Commercially Available Deep-learning-reconstruction of MR Imaging of the Knee at 1.5T Has Higher Image Quality Than Conventionally-reconstructed Imaging at 3T: A Normal Volunteer Study

• Published in: Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences 2023, Vol.22(3), pp.353-360
• Main Authors: Akai, Hiroyuki, Yasaka, Koichiro, Sugawara, Haruto, Tajima, Taku, Akahane, Masaaki, Yoshioka, Naoki, Ohtomo, Kuni, Abe, Osamu, Kiryu, Shigeru
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Acceptability; artificial intelligence; Cartilage; Cartilage, Articular; Deep Learning; Diagnostic systems; Healthy Volunteers; High resolution; Humans; Image acquisition; Image contrast; Image quality; Image reconstruction; Image resolution; Knee; Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods; Major Paper; Medical imaging; Meniscus; Proton density (concentration); Quality control; Statistical analysis; Variance analysis
• ISSN: 1347-3182; 1880-2206
• DOI: 10.2463/mrms.mp.2022-0020

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate whether the image quality of 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the knee is equal to or higher than that of 3T MRI by applying deep learning reconstruction (DLR).Methods: Proton density-weighted images of the right knee of 27 healthy volunteers were obtained by 3T and 1.5T MRI scanners using similar imaging parameters (21 for high resolution image and 6 for normal resolution image). Commercially available DLR was applied to the 1.5T images to obtain 1.5T/DLR images. The 3T and 1.5T/DLR images were compared subjectively for visibility of structures, image noise, artifacts, and overall diagnostic acceptability and objectively. One-way ANOVA and Friedman tests were used for the statistical analyses.Results: For the high resolution images, all of the anatomical structures, except for bone, were depicted significantly better on the 1.5T/DLR compared with 3T images. Image noise scored statistically lower and overall diagnostic acceptability scored higher on the 1.5T/DLR images. The contrast between lateral meniscus and articular cartilage of the 1.5T/DLR images was significantly higher (5.89 ± 1.30 vs. 4.34 ± 0.87, P < 0.001), and also the contrast between medial meniscus and articular cartilage of the 1.5T/DLR images was significantly higher (5.12 ± 0.93 vs. 3.87 ± 0.56, P < 0.001). Similar image quality improvement by DLR was observed for the normal resolution images.Conclusion: The 1.5T/DLR images can achieve less noise, more precise visualization of the meniscus and ligaments, and higher overall image quality compared with the 3T images acquired using a similar protocol.