Loading…

Psychometric properties of the Korean version of the oncofertility barriers scales among nurses: A methodological study

Objective: This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Oncofertility Barrier Scale (K-OBS). Methods: This methodological study investigated the validity and reliability of the K-OBS for measuring barriers to oncofertility care among nurses. A total of 270 nur...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing 2023-09, Vol.10 (9), p.100275
Main Authors: An, Hae Jeong, Kim, Yoonjung
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 9
container_start_page 100275
container_title Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing
container_volume 10
creator An, Hae Jeong
Kim, Yoonjung
description Objective: This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Oncofertility Barrier Scale (K-OBS). Methods: This methodological study investigated the validity and reliability of the K-OBS for measuring barriers to oncofertility care among nurses. A total of 270 nurses who had experience in rendering nursing care to cancer survivors were recruited, and the instrument was translated, assessed for content validity, and tested using a preliminary survey. Construct validity was established through explanatory factor analysis. Convergent validity and discriminant validity were analyzed using a multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) matrix. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega. Results: The K-OBS demonstrated satisfactory validity and reliability, with seven factors, including 27 items explaining 60.42% of the total variance, a Cronbach's alpha of 0.86, and a McDonald's omega of 0.83. The seven factors were labeled, “Lack of information and education” (8 items), “Rigid thinking toward oncofertility care” (5 items), “Cancer patient stereotypes” (4 items), “Insufficient support” (4 items), “Desire for fertility preservation” (2 items), “Interrupted oncofertility care” (2 items), and “Fertility risk” (2 items). Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that the K-OBS may be a suitable instrument with acceptable validity and reliability for evaluating barriers to oncofertility among Korean nurses. This instrument can be used to identify obstacles that make oncofertility care difficult, thereby contributing to new insights for improving the future quality of oncofertility care in Korea.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.apjon.2023.100275
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmedcentral_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10470221</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_8706b3b66adb4b36bf560343ad6d79b4</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10470221</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-2e69548248b10d2361fed9358dca9012592da22874bb2ed29367d6b2ff1dc3033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVj8tOwzAQRSMEElXpF7DxD6TY41fCBlUVj4pKsIB15FdaV2kc2WlR_p5AYdHVjO49c6TJsluC5wQTcbebq24X2jlgoGOCQfKLbAKUlbkQkl7-7jLnAvh1NktphzEmnJeFFJPs6z0NZhv2ro_eoC6GzsXeu4RCjfqtQ68hOtWio4vJh_Y_Da0J9Q_Y-H5AWsXoRwAlo5rxVO1Du0HtISaX7tECjfJtsKEJGz8CKPUHO9xkV7Vqkpv9zWn2-fT4sXzJ12_Pq-VinRvGaZ-DEyVnBbBCE2yBClI7W1JeWKNKTICXYBVAIZnW4CyUVEgrNNQ1sYZiSqfZ6uS1Qe2qLvq9ikMVlK9-gxA3lRr_MI2rComFploIZTXTVOiaC0wZVVZYWWo2uh5Oru6g984a1_ZRNWfS86b122oTjhXBTGIAQr8Beo-G5Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Psychometric properties of the Korean version of the oncofertility barriers scales among nurses: A methodological study</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>ScienceDirect®</source><creator>An, Hae Jeong ; Kim, Yoonjung</creator><creatorcontrib>An, Hae Jeong ; Kim, Yoonjung</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Oncofertility Barrier Scale (K-OBS). Methods: This methodological study investigated the validity and reliability of the K-OBS for measuring barriers to oncofertility care among nurses. A total of 270 nurses who had experience in rendering nursing care to cancer survivors were recruited, and the instrument was translated, assessed for content validity, and tested using a preliminary survey. Construct validity was established through explanatory factor analysis. Convergent validity and discriminant validity were analyzed using a multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) matrix. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega. Results: The K-OBS demonstrated satisfactory validity and reliability, with seven factors, including 27 items explaining 60.42% of the total variance, a Cronbach's alpha of 0.86, and a McDonald's omega of 0.83. The seven factors were labeled, “Lack of information and education” (8 items), “Rigid thinking toward oncofertility care” (5 items), “Cancer patient stereotypes” (4 items), “Insufficient support” (4 items), “Desire for fertility preservation” (2 items), “Interrupted oncofertility care” (2 items), and “Fertility risk” (2 items). Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that the K-OBS may be a suitable instrument with acceptable validity and reliability for evaluating barriers to oncofertility among Korean nurses. This instrument can be used to identify obstacles that make oncofertility care difficult, thereby contributing to new insights for improving the future quality of oncofertility care in Korea.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2347-5625</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2349-6673</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2023.100275</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier</publisher><subject>Cancer survivors ; Factor analysis ; Fertility ; Nursing ; Oncology nursing ; Original</subject><ispartof>Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing, 2023-09, Vol.10 (9), p.100275</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10470221/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10470221/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>An, Hae Jeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yoonjung</creatorcontrib><title>Psychometric properties of the Korean version of the oncofertility barriers scales among nurses: A methodological study</title><title>Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing</title><description>Objective: This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Oncofertility Barrier Scale (K-OBS). Methods: This methodological study investigated the validity and reliability of the K-OBS for measuring barriers to oncofertility care among nurses. A total of 270 nurses who had experience in rendering nursing care to cancer survivors were recruited, and the instrument was translated, assessed for content validity, and tested using a preliminary survey. Construct validity was established through explanatory factor analysis. Convergent validity and discriminant validity were analyzed using a multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) matrix. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega. Results: The K-OBS demonstrated satisfactory validity and reliability, with seven factors, including 27 items explaining 60.42% of the total variance, a Cronbach's alpha of 0.86, and a McDonald's omega of 0.83. The seven factors were labeled, “Lack of information and education” (8 items), “Rigid thinking toward oncofertility care” (5 items), “Cancer patient stereotypes” (4 items), “Insufficient support” (4 items), “Desire for fertility preservation” (2 items), “Interrupted oncofertility care” (2 items), and “Fertility risk” (2 items). Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that the K-OBS may be a suitable instrument with acceptable validity and reliability for evaluating barriers to oncofertility among Korean nurses. This instrument can be used to identify obstacles that make oncofertility care difficult, thereby contributing to new insights for improving the future quality of oncofertility care in Korea.</description><subject>Cancer survivors</subject><subject>Factor analysis</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Oncology nursing</subject><subject>Original</subject><issn>2347-5625</issn><issn>2349-6673</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVj8tOwzAQRSMEElXpF7DxD6TY41fCBlUVj4pKsIB15FdaV2kc2WlR_p5AYdHVjO49c6TJsluC5wQTcbebq24X2jlgoGOCQfKLbAKUlbkQkl7-7jLnAvh1NktphzEmnJeFFJPs6z0NZhv2ro_eoC6GzsXeu4RCjfqtQ68hOtWio4vJh_Y_Da0J9Q_Y-H5AWsXoRwAlo5rxVO1Du0HtISaX7tECjfJtsKEJGz8CKPUHO9xkV7Vqkpv9zWn2-fT4sXzJ12_Pq-VinRvGaZ-DEyVnBbBCE2yBClI7W1JeWKNKTICXYBVAIZnW4CyUVEgrNNQ1sYZiSqfZ6uS1Qe2qLvq9ikMVlK9-gxA3lRr_MI2rComFploIZTXTVOiaC0wZVVZYWWo2uh5Oru6g984a1_ZRNWfS86b122oTjhXBTGIAQr8Beo-G5Q</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>An, Hae Jeong</creator><creator>Kim, Yoonjung</creator><general>Elsevier</general><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>Psychometric properties of the Korean version of the oncofertility barriers scales among nurses: A methodological study</title><author>An, Hae Jeong ; Kim, Yoonjung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-2e69548248b10d2361fed9358dca9012592da22874bb2ed29367d6b2ff1dc3033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Cancer survivors</topic><topic>Factor analysis</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Oncology nursing</topic><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>An, Hae Jeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yoonjung</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>An, Hae Jeong</au><au>Kim, Yoonjung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Psychometric properties of the Korean version of the oncofertility barriers scales among nurses: A methodological study</atitle><jtitle>Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing</jtitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>100275</spage><pages>100275-</pages><issn>2347-5625</issn><eissn>2349-6673</eissn><abstract>Objective: This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Oncofertility Barrier Scale (K-OBS). Methods: This methodological study investigated the validity and reliability of the K-OBS for measuring barriers to oncofertility care among nurses. A total of 270 nurses who had experience in rendering nursing care to cancer survivors were recruited, and the instrument was translated, assessed for content validity, and tested using a preliminary survey. Construct validity was established through explanatory factor analysis. Convergent validity and discriminant validity were analyzed using a multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) matrix. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega. Results: The K-OBS demonstrated satisfactory validity and reliability, with seven factors, including 27 items explaining 60.42% of the total variance, a Cronbach's alpha of 0.86, and a McDonald's omega of 0.83. The seven factors were labeled, “Lack of information and education” (8 items), “Rigid thinking toward oncofertility care” (5 items), “Cancer patient stereotypes” (4 items), “Insufficient support” (4 items), “Desire for fertility preservation” (2 items), “Interrupted oncofertility care” (2 items), and “Fertility risk” (2 items). Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that the K-OBS may be a suitable instrument with acceptable validity and reliability for evaluating barriers to oncofertility among Korean nurses. This instrument can be used to identify obstacles that make oncofertility care difficult, thereby contributing to new insights for improving the future quality of oncofertility care in Korea.</abstract><pub>Elsevier</pub><doi>10.1016/j.apjon.2023.100275</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2347-5625
ispartof Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing, 2023-09, Vol.10 (9), p.100275
issn 2347-5625
2349-6673
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10470221
source Open Access: PubMed Central; ScienceDirect®
subjects Cancer survivors
Factor analysis
Fertility
Nursing
Oncology nursing
Original
title Psychometric properties of the Korean version of the oncofertility barriers scales among nurses: A methodological study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T02%3A03%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmedcentral_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Psychometric%20properties%20of%20the%20Korean%20version%20of%20the%20oncofertility%20barriers%20scales%20among%20nurses:%20A%20methodological%20study&rft.jtitle=Asia-Pacific%20Journal%20of%20Oncology%20Nursing&rft.au=An,%20Hae%20Jeong&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=100275&rft.pages=100275-&rft.issn=2347-5625&rft.eissn=2349-6673&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.apjon.2023.100275&rft_dat=%3Cpubmedcentral_doaj_%3Epubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10470221%3C/pubmedcentral_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-2e69548248b10d2361fed9358dca9012592da22874bb2ed29367d6b2ff1dc3033%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true