Quantitative myocardial perfusion with a hybrid 2D simultaneous multi-slice sequence

• Published in: Magnetic resonance imaging 2023-05, Vol.98, p.7-16
• Main Authors: Huang, Qi, Tian, Ye, Mendes, Jason, Ranjan, Ravi, Adluru, Ganesh, DiBella, Edward
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: 2D SMS; 3D stack-of-stars; Algorithms; Animals; Coronary Circulation; Coronary Vessels; Dogs; Every other beat; Humans; Hybrid; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods; Myocardial blood flow; Myocardial perfusion; Myocardial Perfusion Imaging - methods; Perfusion
• ISSN: 0730-725X; 1873-5894; 1873-5894
• DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2022.12.010

To evaluate a novel 2D simultaneous multi-slice (SMS) myocardial perfusion acquisition and compare directly to a published quantitative 3D stack-of-stars (SoS) acquisition. A hybrid saturation recovery radial 2D SMS sequence following a single saturation was created for the quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF). This sequence acquired three slices simultaneously and generated an arterial input function (AIF) using the first 24 rays. Validation was done in a novel way by alternating heartbeats between the hybrid 2D SMS and the 3D SoS acquisitions. Initial studies were done to study the effects of using only every other beat for the 2D SMS in two subjects, and for the 3D SoS in four subjects. The proposed alternating acquisitions were then performed in ten dog studies at rest, four dog studies at adenosine stress, and two human resting studies. Quantitative MBF analysis was performed for 2D SMS and 3D SoS separately, using a compartment model. Acquiring every-other-beat data resulted in 6 ± 5% (“ideal”) and 11 ± 8% (“practical”) perfusion changes for both 2D SMS and 3D SoS methods. For alternating acquisitions, 2D SMS and 3D SoS quantitative perfusion values were comparable for both the twelve rest studies (2D SMS: 0.69 ± 0.16 vs 3D: 0.69 ± 0.15 ml/g/min, p = 0.55) and the four stress studies (2D SMS: 1.28 ± 0.22 vs 3D: 1.30 ± 0.24 ml/g/min, p = 0.61). Every-other-beat acquisition changed estimated perfusion values relatively little for both sequences. The quantitative hybrid radial 2D SMS myocardial first-pass perfusion imaging sequence gave results similar to 3D perfusion when compared directly with an alternating beat acquisition.