Loading…

The efficacy of dexmedetomidine for septic shock: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTIONThe efficacy of dexmedetomidine was elusive for septic shock. This meta-analysis aimed to explore the efficacy of dexmedetomidine for septic shock. METHODSPubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases have been searched through October 2022 and we included randomi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medicine (Baltimore) 2023-09, Vol.102 (35), p.e34414-e34414
Main Authors: Huang, Xue, He, Chunyan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:INTRODUCTIONThe efficacy of dexmedetomidine was elusive for septic shock. This meta-analysis aimed to explore the efficacy of dexmedetomidine for septic shock. METHODSPubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases have been searched through October 2022 and we included randomized controlled trials reporting the effect of dexmedetomidine in patients with septic shock. RESULTSFive randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with control group for septic shock, dexmedetomidine treatment was able to substantially decrease Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (mean difference [MD] = -0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -1.14 to -0.84; P < .00001) and duration of mechanical ventilation (MD = -0.90; 95% CI = -1.27 to -0.54; P < .00001), but showed no obvious influence on morality at 28 days (odds ratio = 0.79; 95% CI = 0.38 to 1.66; P = 054), hospital mortality (odds ratio = 0.66; 95% CI = 0.35 to 1.24; P = .20) or intensive care unit length of stay (MD = -1.47; 95% CI = -4.60 to 1.66; P = .36). CONCLUSIONSDexmedetomidine administration may help treat patients with septic shock.
ISSN:0025-7974
1536-5964
DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000034414