Loading…
The efficacy of dexmedetomidine for septic shock: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
INTRODUCTIONThe efficacy of dexmedetomidine was elusive for septic shock. This meta-analysis aimed to explore the efficacy of dexmedetomidine for septic shock. METHODSPubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases have been searched through October 2022 and we included randomi...
Saved in:
Published in: | Medicine (Baltimore) 2023-09, Vol.102 (35), p.e34414-e34414 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | INTRODUCTIONThe efficacy of dexmedetomidine was elusive for septic shock. This meta-analysis aimed to explore the efficacy of dexmedetomidine for septic shock. METHODSPubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases have been searched through October 2022 and we included randomized controlled trials reporting the effect of dexmedetomidine in patients with septic shock. RESULTSFive randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with control group for septic shock, dexmedetomidine treatment was able to substantially decrease Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (mean difference [MD] = -0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -1.14 to -0.84; P < .00001) and duration of mechanical ventilation (MD = -0.90; 95% CI = -1.27 to -0.54; P < .00001), but showed no obvious influence on morality at 28 days (odds ratio = 0.79; 95% CI = 0.38 to 1.66; P = 054), hospital mortality (odds ratio = 0.66; 95% CI = 0.35 to 1.24; P = .20) or intensive care unit length of stay (MD = -1.47; 95% CI = -4.60 to 1.66; P = .36). CONCLUSIONSDexmedetomidine administration may help treat patients with septic shock. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0025-7974 1536-5964 |
DOI: | 10.1097/MD.0000000000034414 |