Radiation dose considerations in digital radiography with an anti‐scatter grid: A study using adult and pediatric phantoms

• Published in: Journal of applied clinical medical physics 2023-09, Vol.24 (9), p.e14081-n/a
• Main Authors: Kawashima, Hiroki, Ichikawa, Katsuhiro, Kitao, Azusa, Matsubara, Takashi, Sugiura, Takumi, Kobayashi, Tomohiro, Kobayashi, Satoshi
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aluminum; Anthropomorphism; anti‐scatter grid; digital radiography; Pediatrics; phantom study; Polymethyl methacrylate; Radiation; radiation dose; Radiography; Sensors; Signal to noise ratio; Technical Note; Technical Notes
• ISSN: 1526-9914; 1526-9914
• DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14081

Background When using an anti‐scatter grid, a decrease in receptor dose caused by its X‐ray absorption seems to lead to the misperception that radiation dose needs to be increased even in digital radiography (DR). Objective To demonstrate that there is no need to increase radiation dose in DR with a grid, based on a visual evaluation using an adult and a pediatric abdomen phantom (PAD and PPD, respectively). Materials and methods Phantom images with and without a grid were obtained with exposure parameters determined based on a preliminarily measured signal‐to‐noise ratio improvement factor (SIF), an index for potential dose reduction when using a grid. In visual evaluation, four radiologists compared phantom images with a grid applied at different dose reduction rates (0% [no reduction], 18%, 36%, and 59% for PAD and 0% and 11% for PPD) against an image without a grid at the baseline dose (as the reference). They graded the overall image quality of the former relative to that of the latter (reference) on a 3‐point scale (3 = better, 2 = almost equal, 1 = worse). Results The mean scores for dose reduction rates of 0%, 18%, 36%, and 59% were 3.00, 3.00, 2.75, and 1.00, respectively, for PAD; those for 0% and 11% were 2.13 and 1.63, respectively, for PPD. These results support the validity of our view that no dose increase is necessary when using an anti‐scatter grid. Actually, there is even a potential for improvement in image quality with dose reduction rates of ≤36% for PAD. Conclusion It is worth reconsidering the necessity of increasing radiation dose in the DR imaging of the adult and pediatric abdomens with an anti‐scatter grid.