Effects of two flap palatoplasty versus furlow palatoplasty with buccal myomucosal flap on maxillary arch dimensions in patients with cleft palate at the primary dentition stage: a cohort study

• Published in: Clinical oral investigations 2023-09, Vol.27 (9), p.5605-5613
• Main Authors: Aboulhassan, Mamdouh Ahmed, Refahee, Shaimaa Mohsen, Sabry, Shaimaa, Abd-El-Ghafour, Mohamed
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Birth defects; Cleft lip/palate; Cohort analysis; Dentistry; Dentition; Maxilla; Medicine; Orthodontics; Patients; Statistical analysis; Teeth
• ISSN: 1436-3771; 1432-6981; 1436-3771
• DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-05182-0

Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of two flap palatoplasty (TFP) versus Furlow palatoplasty with buccal myomucosal flap (FPBF) on maxillary arch dimensions in children at the primary dentition stage with cleft palate, in comparison to matching subjects without any craniofacial anomalies. Material and methods This study included 28 subjects with an age range of 5–6 years; 10 non-cleft subjects were included in the control group, 9 patients treated with TFP, and 9 patients treated with FPBF. For the included patients, the maxillary models were scanned using a desktop scanner to produce virtual models, and the maxillary dimension measurements were virtually completed. The produced measurements were compared between the 3 groups. Maxillary models of the 28 participants were evaluated. Results Statistically insignificant differences were detected between the 3 groups for arch symmetry measurements. Differences were detected in the inter-canine width between the 2 surgical groups and non-cleft group. Both arch length and posterior palatal depth significantly differ while comparing the TFP to the control group, with no differences between FPBF and the non-cleft group. Conclusion Furlow palatoplasty with buccal myomucosal flap might be considered a better surgical option than two flap palatoplasty for patients with cleft palate while evaluating maxillary arch dimensions at the primary dentition stage as a surgical outcome. Clinical relevance This study gives insight into the surgical technique that has limited effect on the maxillary growth and dental arch dimension. Therefore, it decreases the need for orthodontic treatment and orthognathic surgery. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT05405738 ).