Loading…
DNA extraction leads to bias in bacterial quantification by qPCR
Quantitative PCR (qPCR) has become a widely used technique for bacterial quantification. The affordability, ease of experimental design, reproducibility, and robustness of qPCR experiments contribute to its success. The establishment of guidelines for minimum information for publication of qPCR expe...
Saved in:
Published in: | Applied microbiology and biotechnology 2022-12, Vol.106 (24), p.7993-8006 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c533t-2ba36c65d38041d570d6bc908222f6dddc9ad5724732d025760cf816e2b128463 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c533t-2ba36c65d38041d570d6bc908222f6dddc9ad5724732d025760cf816e2b128463 |
container_end_page | 8006 |
container_issue | 24 |
container_start_page | 7993 |
container_title | Applied microbiology and biotechnology |
container_volume | 106 |
creator | Lima, Angela França, Angela Muzny, Christina A. Taylor, Christopher M. Cerca, Nuno |
description | Quantitative PCR (qPCR) has become a widely used technique for bacterial quantification. The affordability, ease of experimental design, reproducibility, and robustness of qPCR experiments contribute to its success. The establishment of guidelines for minimum information for publication of qPCR experiments, now more than 10 years ago, aimed to mitigate the publication of contradictory data. Unfortunately, there are still a significant number of recent research articles that do not consider the main pitfalls of qPCR for quantification of biological samples, which undoubtedly leads to biased experimental conclusions. qPCR experiments have two main issues that need to be properly tackled: those related to the extraction and purification of genomic DNA and those related to the thermal amplification process. This mini-review provides an updated literature survey that critically analyzes the following key aspects of bacterial quantification by qPCR: (i) the normalization of qPCR results by using exogenous controls, (ii) the construction of adequate calibration curves, and (iii) the determination of qPCR reaction efficiency. It is primarily focused on original papers published last year, where qPCR was applied to quantify bacterial species in different types of biological samples, including multi-species biofilms, human fluids, and water and soil samples.
Key points
•
qPCR is a widely used technique used for absolute bacterial quantification.
•
Recently published papers lack proper qPCR methodologies.
•
Not including proper qPCR controls significantly affect experimental conclusions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00253-022-12276-4 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10493044</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2834277297</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c533t-2ba36c65d38041d570d6bc908222f6dddc9ad5724732d025760cf816e2b128463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1O3DAUhS1EBcO0L8ACReqGTeD62rGTVTsafoqEaFW1a8uxHTDKJIydIHh7PAyd0i5gZcnn8_G59xCyT-GIAsjjCIAFywExp4hS5HyLTChnmIOgfJtMgMoil0VV7pK9GG8BKJZC7JBdJpjkjOGEfD25mmXuYQjaDL7vstZpG7Ohz2qvY-a7rE6CC1632XLU3eAbb_QzWT9myx_znx_Jh0a30X16Oafk99npr_m3_PL7-cV8dpmbgrEhx1ozYURhWQmc2kKCFbWpoETERlhrTaXTLXLJ0KaxpADTlFQ4rFNoLtiUfFn73o31wlnjupS5VXfBL3R4VL326l-l8zfqur9XFHjFgPPkcPjiEPrl6OKgFj4a17a6c_0YFZaMo5RYyfdRmTYITJYr18__obf9GLq0ikRxSWlVYpUoXFMm9DEG12yCU1CrMtW6TJXKVM9lqpX1weuRN0_-tJcAtgZikrprF_7-_YbtE5mip80</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2747119829</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>DNA extraction leads to bias in bacterial quantification by qPCR</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Lima, Angela ; França, Angela ; Muzny, Christina A. ; Taylor, Christopher M. ; Cerca, Nuno</creator><creatorcontrib>Lima, Angela ; França, Angela ; Muzny, Christina A. ; Taylor, Christopher M. ; Cerca, Nuno</creatorcontrib><description>Quantitative PCR (qPCR) has become a widely used technique for bacterial quantification. The affordability, ease of experimental design, reproducibility, and robustness of qPCR experiments contribute to its success. The establishment of guidelines for minimum information for publication of qPCR experiments, now more than 10 years ago, aimed to mitigate the publication of contradictory data. Unfortunately, there are still a significant number of recent research articles that do not consider the main pitfalls of qPCR for quantification of biological samples, which undoubtedly leads to biased experimental conclusions. qPCR experiments have two main issues that need to be properly tackled: those related to the extraction and purification of genomic DNA and those related to the thermal amplification process. This mini-review provides an updated literature survey that critically analyzes the following key aspects of bacterial quantification by qPCR: (i) the normalization of qPCR results by using exogenous controls, (ii) the construction of adequate calibration curves, and (iii) the determination of qPCR reaction efficiency. It is primarily focused on original papers published last year, where qPCR was applied to quantify bacterial species in different types of biological samples, including multi-species biofilms, human fluids, and water and soil samples.
Key points
•
qPCR is a widely used technique used for absolute bacterial quantification.
•
Recently published papers lack proper qPCR methodologies.
•
Not including proper qPCR controls significantly affect experimental conclusions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0175-7598</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1432-0614</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0614</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00253-022-12276-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36374332</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>affordability ; Bacteria ; biofilm ; Biofilms ; Biological properties ; Biological samples ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biotechnology ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; Design of experiments ; DNA ; Experimental design ; Experiments ; Humans ; Life Sciences ; Literature reviews ; Microbial Genetics and Genomics ; Microbiology ; Mini-Review ; quantitative polymerase chain reaction ; Reproducibility of Results ; soil ; Soil water ; species ; surveys</subject><ispartof>Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2022-12, Vol.106 (24), p.7993-8006</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c533t-2ba36c65d38041d570d6bc908222f6dddc9ad5724732d025760cf816e2b128463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c533t-2ba36c65d38041d570d6bc908222f6dddc9ad5724732d025760cf816e2b128463</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3365-3537</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2747119829/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2747119829?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,11666,27900,27901,36036,36037,44338,74864</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36374332$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lima, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>França, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muzny, Christina A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Christopher M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerca, Nuno</creatorcontrib><title>DNA extraction leads to bias in bacterial quantification by qPCR</title><title>Applied microbiology and biotechnology</title><addtitle>Appl Microbiol Biotechnol</addtitle><addtitle>Appl Microbiol Biotechnol</addtitle><description>Quantitative PCR (qPCR) has become a widely used technique for bacterial quantification. The affordability, ease of experimental design, reproducibility, and robustness of qPCR experiments contribute to its success. The establishment of guidelines for minimum information for publication of qPCR experiments, now more than 10 years ago, aimed to mitigate the publication of contradictory data. Unfortunately, there are still a significant number of recent research articles that do not consider the main pitfalls of qPCR for quantification of biological samples, which undoubtedly leads to biased experimental conclusions. qPCR experiments have two main issues that need to be properly tackled: those related to the extraction and purification of genomic DNA and those related to the thermal amplification process. This mini-review provides an updated literature survey that critically analyzes the following key aspects of bacterial quantification by qPCR: (i) the normalization of qPCR results by using exogenous controls, (ii) the construction of adequate calibration curves, and (iii) the determination of qPCR reaction efficiency. It is primarily focused on original papers published last year, where qPCR was applied to quantify bacterial species in different types of biological samples, including multi-species biofilms, human fluids, and water and soil samples.
Key points
•
qPCR is a widely used technique used for absolute bacterial quantification.
•
Recently published papers lack proper qPCR methodologies.
•
Not including proper qPCR controls significantly affect experimental conclusions.</description><subject>affordability</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>biofilm</subject><subject>Biofilms</subject><subject>Biological properties</subject><subject>Biological samples</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>Design of experiments</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Experimental design</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Microbial Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Mini-Review</subject><subject>quantitative polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>soil</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>species</subject><subject>surveys</subject><issn>0175-7598</issn><issn>1432-0614</issn><issn>1432-0614</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1O3DAUhS1EBcO0L8ACReqGTeD62rGTVTsafoqEaFW1a8uxHTDKJIydIHh7PAyd0i5gZcnn8_G59xCyT-GIAsjjCIAFywExp4hS5HyLTChnmIOgfJtMgMoil0VV7pK9GG8BKJZC7JBdJpjkjOGEfD25mmXuYQjaDL7vstZpG7Ohz2qvY-a7rE6CC1632XLU3eAbb_QzWT9myx_znx_Jh0a30X16Oafk99npr_m3_PL7-cV8dpmbgrEhx1ozYURhWQmc2kKCFbWpoETERlhrTaXTLXLJ0KaxpADTlFQ4rFNoLtiUfFn73o31wlnjupS5VXfBL3R4VL326l-l8zfqur9XFHjFgPPkcPjiEPrl6OKgFj4a17a6c_0YFZaMo5RYyfdRmTYITJYr18__obf9GLq0ikRxSWlVYpUoXFMm9DEG12yCU1CrMtW6TJXKVM9lqpX1weuRN0_-tJcAtgZikrprF_7-_YbtE5mip80</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Lima, Angela</creator><creator>França, Angela</creator><creator>Muzny, Christina A.</creator><creator>Taylor, Christopher M.</creator><creator>Cerca, Nuno</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3365-3537</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>DNA extraction leads to bias in bacterial quantification by qPCR</title><author>Lima, Angela ; França, Angela ; Muzny, Christina A. ; Taylor, Christopher M. ; Cerca, Nuno</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c533t-2ba36c65d38041d570d6bc908222f6dddc9ad5724732d025760cf816e2b128463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>affordability</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>biofilm</topic><topic>Biofilms</topic><topic>Biological properties</topic><topic>Biological samples</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>Design of experiments</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Experimental design</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Microbial Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Mini-Review</topic><topic>quantitative polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>soil</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>species</topic><topic>surveys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lima, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>França, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muzny, Christina A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Christopher M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerca, Nuno</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Applied microbiology and biotechnology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lima, Angela</au><au>França, Angela</au><au>Muzny, Christina A.</au><au>Taylor, Christopher M.</au><au>Cerca, Nuno</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>DNA extraction leads to bias in bacterial quantification by qPCR</atitle><jtitle>Applied microbiology and biotechnology</jtitle><stitle>Appl Microbiol Biotechnol</stitle><addtitle>Appl Microbiol Biotechnol</addtitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>106</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>7993</spage><epage>8006</epage><pages>7993-8006</pages><issn>0175-7598</issn><issn>1432-0614</issn><eissn>1432-0614</eissn><abstract>Quantitative PCR (qPCR) has become a widely used technique for bacterial quantification. The affordability, ease of experimental design, reproducibility, and robustness of qPCR experiments contribute to its success. The establishment of guidelines for minimum information for publication of qPCR experiments, now more than 10 years ago, aimed to mitigate the publication of contradictory data. Unfortunately, there are still a significant number of recent research articles that do not consider the main pitfalls of qPCR for quantification of biological samples, which undoubtedly leads to biased experimental conclusions. qPCR experiments have two main issues that need to be properly tackled: those related to the extraction and purification of genomic DNA and those related to the thermal amplification process. This mini-review provides an updated literature survey that critically analyzes the following key aspects of bacterial quantification by qPCR: (i) the normalization of qPCR results by using exogenous controls, (ii) the construction of adequate calibration curves, and (iii) the determination of qPCR reaction efficiency. It is primarily focused on original papers published last year, where qPCR was applied to quantify bacterial species in different types of biological samples, including multi-species biofilms, human fluids, and water and soil samples.
Key points
•
qPCR is a widely used technique used for absolute bacterial quantification.
•
Recently published papers lack proper qPCR methodologies.
•
Not including proper qPCR controls significantly affect experimental conclusions.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>36374332</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00253-022-12276-4</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3365-3537</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0175-7598 |
ispartof | Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2022-12, Vol.106 (24), p.7993-8006 |
issn | 0175-7598 1432-0614 1432-0614 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10493044 |
source | ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Link |
subjects | affordability Bacteria biofilm Biofilms Biological properties Biological samples Biomedical and Life Sciences Biotechnology Deoxyribonucleic acid Design of experiments DNA Experimental design Experiments Humans Life Sciences Literature reviews Microbial Genetics and Genomics Microbiology Mini-Review quantitative polymerase chain reaction Reproducibility of Results soil Soil water species surveys |
title | DNA extraction leads to bias in bacterial quantification by qPCR |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-25T12%3A43%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=DNA%20extraction%20leads%20to%20bias%20in%20bacterial%20quantification%20by%20qPCR&rft.jtitle=Applied%20microbiology%20and%20biotechnology&rft.au=Lima,%20Angela&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=7993&rft.epage=8006&rft.pages=7993-8006&rft.issn=0175-7598&rft.eissn=1432-0614&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00253-022-12276-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2834277297%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c533t-2ba36c65d38041d570d6bc908222f6dddc9ad5724732d025760cf816e2b128463%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2747119829&rft_id=info:pmid/36374332&rfr_iscdi=true |