Loading…
Remimazolam Compared to Propofol for Total Intravenous Anesthesia with Remifentanil on the Recovery of Psychomotor Function: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Introduction This study aimed to compare remimazolam to propofol in psychomotor recovery after total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) using the Trieger dot test. Methods Sixty-six patients who were scheduled to undergo endoscopic sinus surgery with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical s...
Saved in:
Published in: | Advances in therapy 2023-10, Vol.40 (10), p.4395-4404 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Introduction
This study aimed to compare remimazolam to propofol in psychomotor recovery after total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) using the Trieger dot test.
Methods
Sixty-six patients who were scheduled to undergo endoscopic sinus surgery with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II were randomly allocated to the remimazolam (group R) or propofol group (group P). In group R, all patients received flumazenil postoperatively. After discontinuation of anesthetic agents, the time to eye opening, response to verbal commands, extubation, and discharge from the operation room were measured. Psychomotor recovery was assessed using the Trieger dot test before induction and at 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 min after anesthesia.
Results
The time to eye opening, response to verbal commands, extubation, and discharge from the operation room were significantly longer in group P compared to group R (group P: 9.8 ± 3.2 min, 11.5 ± 3.4 min, 12.7 ± 3.4 min, 18.1 ± 4.2 min; group R: 6.5 ± 2 min, 7.3 ± 2.6 min, 8.4 ± 2.9 min, 13.2 ± 3.2 min; respectively,
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0741-238X 1865-8652 1865-8652 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s12325-023-02615-w |