Loading…

Remimazolam Compared to Propofol for Total Intravenous Anesthesia with Remifentanil on the Recovery of Psychomotor Function: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Introduction This study aimed to compare remimazolam to propofol in psychomotor recovery after total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) using the Trieger dot test. Methods Sixty-six patients who were scheduled to undergo endoscopic sinus surgery with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Advances in therapy 2023-10, Vol.40 (10), p.4395-4404
Main Authors: Shimizu, Takahito, Takasusuki, Toshifumi, Yamaguchi, Shigeki
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Introduction This study aimed to compare remimazolam to propofol in psychomotor recovery after total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) using the Trieger dot test. Methods Sixty-six patients who were scheduled to undergo endoscopic sinus surgery with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II were randomly allocated to the remimazolam (group R) or propofol group (group P). In group R, all patients received flumazenil postoperatively. After discontinuation of anesthetic agents, the time to eye opening, response to verbal commands, extubation, and discharge from the operation room were measured. Psychomotor recovery was assessed using the Trieger dot test before induction and at 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 min after anesthesia. Results The time to eye opening, response to verbal commands, extubation, and discharge from the operation room were significantly longer in group P compared to group R (group P: 9.8 ± 3.2 min, 11.5 ± 3.4 min, 12.7 ± 3.4 min, 18.1 ± 4.2 min; group R: 6.5 ± 2 min, 7.3 ± 2.6 min, 8.4 ± 2.9 min, 13.2 ± 3.2 min; respectively, p  
ISSN:0741-238X
1865-8652
1865-8652
DOI:10.1007/s12325-023-02615-w