Passive and active parental food allocation in a songbird

• Published in: Behavioral ecology 2023-09, Vol.34 (5), p.729-740
• Main Authors: Parejo-Pulido, Daniel, Pérez-Rodríguez, Lorenzo, Abril-Colón, Inmaculada, Potti, Jaime, Redondo, Tomás
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Original
• ISSN: 1045-2249; 1465-7279
• DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arad043

Abstract Parent–offspring conflict over food allocation can be modeled using two theoretical frameworks: passive (scramble competition) and active choice (signaling) resolution models. However, differentiating between these models empirically can be challenging. One possibility involves investigating details of decision-making by feeding parents. Different nestling traits, related to competitive prowess or signaling cryptic condition, may interact additively or non-additively as predictors of parental feeding responses. To explore this, we experimentally created even-sized, small broods of pied flycatchers and manipulated nestling cryptic quality, independently of size, by vitamin E supplementation. We explored how interactions between nestling cryptic condition, size, signals, and spatial location predicted food allocation and prey-testing by parents. Parents created the potential for spatial scramble competition between nestlings by feeding from and to a narrow range of nest locations. Heavier supplemented nestlings grew faster and were more likely to access profitable nest locations. However, the most profitable locations were not more contested, and nestling turnover did not vary in relation to spatial predictability or food supply. Postural begging was only predicted by nestling hunger and body mass, but parents did not favor heavier nestlings. This suggests that size-mediated and spatial competition in experimental broods was mild. Pied flycatcher fathers allocated food in response to nestling position and begging order, while mothers seemingly followed an active choice mechanism involving assessment of more complex traits, including postural intensity interacting with order, position, and treatment, and perhaps other stimuli when performing prey-testings. Differences in time constraints may underlie sex differences in food allocation rules. Pied flycatcher moms allocated food to hungry chicks by integrating multiple nestling traits; dads responded swifter and less complexly. Parent birds may distribute food passively (to the most distinct competitor) or actively (by choosing among offspring signals). We manipulated nestling quality, independently of size, by supplementing vitamin E, and studied how parents responded to interacting nestling traits. Males favored closer, first-begging chicks while females assessed more complex traits (begging, prey-testing) to choose hungry nestlings.