Loading…

Stabilization and Gap Formation of Adjustable Versus Fixed Primary ACL Repair With Internal Brace: An in Vitro Full-Construct Biomechanical Cadaveric Study

Background: A knotless, tensionable primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair system preloaded with an internal brace has been released. Currently, there is no biomechanical data on the stabilization and gap formation behavior of the adjustable system when compared with fixed repairs in human...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine 2023-09, Vol.11 (9), p.23259671231201462-23259671231201462
Main Authors: Bachmaier, Samuel, Smith, Patrick A., Hammoud, Sommer, Ritter, Daniel, Hauck, Oliver, Wijdicks, Coen A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-ee556f23604b97d60808c81029b5e3124b06794715e34928b160a5aa403fc8283
container_end_page 23259671231201462
container_issue 9
container_start_page 23259671231201462
container_title Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine
container_volume 11
creator Bachmaier, Samuel
Smith, Patrick A.
Hammoud, Sommer
Ritter, Daniel
Hauck, Oliver
Wijdicks, Coen A.
description Background: A knotless, tensionable primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair system preloaded with an internal brace has been released. Currently, there is no biomechanical data on the stabilization and gap formation behavior of the adjustable system when compared with fixed repairs in human ACL tissue. Hypothesis: That knotless adjustable suture repair with an internal brace would provide overall higher construct stability and greater load share on the ACL with less gap formation compared with fixed repair. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Human cadaveric knees were utilized for internal braced ACL repair constructs (each group n = 16). Two fixed groups consisting of a single-cinch loop (SCL), cortical button (SCL group), and knotless suture-anchor (anchor group) were compared with an SCL-adjustable loop device (SCL-ALD) group. Testing was performed at 4 different peak loads (50, 150, 250, 350 N) over 4000 cycles at 0.75 Hz including suture repair preconditioning (10 cycles at 0.5 Hz) for SCL-ALD. Specimens were ultimately pulled to failure with a cut internal brace. The final loading situation of the construct and ACL repair with gap formation and ultimate strength were evaluated. Results: Peak elongation at various peak loads showed a significantly higher (P 
doi_str_mv 10.1177/23259671231201462
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10541754</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_23259671231201462</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2871589693</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-ee556f23604b97d60808c81029b5e3124b06794715e34928b160a5aa403fc8283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1DAUhSNEJarSB2BniQ2bFNuJE4cNmkZMW2kkKgplad04Nx2PEnuwnYryKn1ZElK1_Ahv7Hv8nSP73iR5xegJY2X5lmdcVEXJeMY4ZXnBnyWHs5bO4vPfzi-S4xB2dFpSsCorD5P7qwiN6c0PiMZZArYlZ7Ana-eHRXEdWbW7MUxYj-QafRgDWZvv2JJLbwbwd2RVb8gn3IPx5KuJW3JhI3oLPTn1oPEdWVliLLk20TuyHvs-rZ0N0Y86klPjBtRbsEZPfA0t3KI3mlzFsb17mRx00Ac8ftiPki_rD5_r83Tz8eyiXm1SnVVFTBGFKDqeFTRvqrItqKRSS0Z51QicOpI3tCirvGRTlVdcNqygIABymnVacpkdJe-X3P3YDNhqtNFDr_bL95QDo_68sWarbtytYlTkrBT5lPDmIcG7byOGqAYTNPY9WHRjUFyWnElO6Yy-_gvduXHu1i-KCVkVVTZRbKG0dyF47B5fw6iaZ67-mfnkOVk8AW7wKfX_hp-0yKun</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2871589693</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stabilization and Gap Formation of Adjustable Versus Fixed Primary ACL Repair With Internal Brace: An in Vitro Full-Construct Biomechanical Cadaveric Study</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Bachmaier, Samuel ; Smith, Patrick A. ; Hammoud, Sommer ; Ritter, Daniel ; Hauck, Oliver ; Wijdicks, Coen A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bachmaier, Samuel ; Smith, Patrick A. ; Hammoud, Sommer ; Ritter, Daniel ; Hauck, Oliver ; Wijdicks, Coen A.</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Background: A knotless, tensionable primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair system preloaded with an internal brace has been released. Currently, there is no biomechanical data on the stabilization and gap formation behavior of the adjustable system when compared with fixed repairs in human ACL tissue. Hypothesis: That knotless adjustable suture repair with an internal brace would provide overall higher construct stability and greater load share on the ACL with less gap formation compared with fixed repair. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Human cadaveric knees were utilized for internal braced ACL repair constructs (each group n = 16). Two fixed groups consisting of a single-cinch loop (SCL), cortical button (SCL group), and knotless suture-anchor (anchor group) were compared with an SCL-adjustable loop device (SCL-ALD) group. Testing was performed at 4 different peak loads (50, 150, 250, 350 N) over 4000 cycles at 0.75 Hz including suture repair preconditioning (10 cycles at 0.5 Hz) for SCL-ALD. Specimens were ultimately pulled to failure with a cut internal brace. The final loading situation of the construct and ACL repair with gap formation and ultimate strength were evaluated. Results: Peak elongation at various peak loads showed a significantly higher (P < .001) stabilization of SCL-ALD when compared with both fixed groups. There was a significantly higher (P < .001) load share of SCL-ALD, especially at lower loads (48% of 50 N), and the gap formation remained restricted up to 250 N. With only a little load share on the fixed constructs (<6%) at lower loads (50, 150 N), gap formation in these groups started at a load of 150 N, leading to significantly higher gaps (P < .001). The ultimate failure load for SCL-ALD and anchor groups was significantly increased (P < .001) as compared with SCL. The stiffness of SCL-ALD (62.9 ± 10.6 N/mm) was significantly increased (P < .001). Conclusion: Internal braced knotless adjustable fixation for ACL repair with preconditioning of the suture repaired ligament increased the overall stabilization with higher load share on the ACL and restricted gap formation (<0.5 mm up to 350 N) compared with fixed suture repair. All internal braced repairs restored stability according to native ACL function. Clinical Relevance: Adjustable ACL repair improved the mechanical characteristics and reduced gap formation, but the overall clinical significance on healing remains unclear.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 2325-9671</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2325-9671</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/23259671231201462</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Biomechanics ; Original Research ; Orthopedics ; Sports medicine</subject><ispartof>Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2023-09, Vol.11 (9), p.23259671231201462-23259671231201462</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – No Derivatives License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023 2023 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-ee556f23604b97d60808c81029b5e3124b06794715e34928b160a5aa403fc8283</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10541754/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2871589693?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,21966,25753,27853,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,44945,45333,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bachmaier, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Patrick A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammoud, Sommer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ritter, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hauck, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wijdicks, Coen A.</creatorcontrib><title>Stabilization and Gap Formation of Adjustable Versus Fixed Primary ACL Repair With Internal Brace: An in Vitro Full-Construct Biomechanical Cadaveric Study</title><title>Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine</title><description><![CDATA[Background: A knotless, tensionable primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair system preloaded with an internal brace has been released. Currently, there is no biomechanical data on the stabilization and gap formation behavior of the adjustable system when compared with fixed repairs in human ACL tissue. Hypothesis: That knotless adjustable suture repair with an internal brace would provide overall higher construct stability and greater load share on the ACL with less gap formation compared with fixed repair. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Human cadaveric knees were utilized for internal braced ACL repair constructs (each group n = 16). Two fixed groups consisting of a single-cinch loop (SCL), cortical button (SCL group), and knotless suture-anchor (anchor group) were compared with an SCL-adjustable loop device (SCL-ALD) group. Testing was performed at 4 different peak loads (50, 150, 250, 350 N) over 4000 cycles at 0.75 Hz including suture repair preconditioning (10 cycles at 0.5 Hz) for SCL-ALD. Specimens were ultimately pulled to failure with a cut internal brace. The final loading situation of the construct and ACL repair with gap formation and ultimate strength were evaluated. Results: Peak elongation at various peak loads showed a significantly higher (P < .001) stabilization of SCL-ALD when compared with both fixed groups. There was a significantly higher (P < .001) load share of SCL-ALD, especially at lower loads (48% of 50 N), and the gap formation remained restricted up to 250 N. With only a little load share on the fixed constructs (<6%) at lower loads (50, 150 N), gap formation in these groups started at a load of 150 N, leading to significantly higher gaps (P < .001). The ultimate failure load for SCL-ALD and anchor groups was significantly increased (P < .001) as compared with SCL. The stiffness of SCL-ALD (62.9 ± 10.6 N/mm) was significantly increased (P < .001). Conclusion: Internal braced knotless adjustable fixation for ACL repair with preconditioning of the suture repaired ligament increased the overall stabilization with higher load share on the ACL and restricted gap formation (<0.5 mm up to 350 N) compared with fixed suture repair. All internal braced repairs restored stability according to native ACL function. Clinical Relevance: Adjustable ACL repair improved the mechanical characteristics and reduced gap formation, but the overall clinical significance on healing remains unclear.]]></description><subject>Biomechanics</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Sports medicine</subject><issn>2325-9671</issn><issn>2325-9671</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1u1DAUhSNEJarSB2BniQ2bFNuJE4cNmkZMW2kkKgplad04Nx2PEnuwnYryKn1ZElK1_Ahv7Hv8nSP73iR5xegJY2X5lmdcVEXJeMY4ZXnBnyWHs5bO4vPfzi-S4xB2dFpSsCorD5P7qwiN6c0PiMZZArYlZ7Ana-eHRXEdWbW7MUxYj-QafRgDWZvv2JJLbwbwd2RVb8gn3IPx5KuJW3JhI3oLPTn1oPEdWVliLLk20TuyHvs-rZ0N0Y86klPjBtRbsEZPfA0t3KI3mlzFsb17mRx00Ac8ftiPki_rD5_r83Tz8eyiXm1SnVVFTBGFKDqeFTRvqrItqKRSS0Z51QicOpI3tCirvGRTlVdcNqygIABymnVacpkdJe-X3P3YDNhqtNFDr_bL95QDo_68sWarbtytYlTkrBT5lPDmIcG7byOGqAYTNPY9WHRjUFyWnElO6Yy-_gvduXHu1i-KCVkVVTZRbKG0dyF47B5fw6iaZ67-mfnkOVk8AW7wKfX_hp-0yKun</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Bachmaier, Samuel</creator><creator>Smith, Patrick A.</creator><creator>Hammoud, Sommer</creator><creator>Ritter, Daniel</creator><creator>Hauck, Oliver</creator><creator>Wijdicks, Coen A.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>Stabilization and Gap Formation of Adjustable Versus Fixed Primary ACL Repair With Internal Brace: An in Vitro Full-Construct Biomechanical Cadaveric Study</title><author>Bachmaier, Samuel ; Smith, Patrick A. ; Hammoud, Sommer ; Ritter, Daniel ; Hauck, Oliver ; Wijdicks, Coen A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-ee556f23604b97d60808c81029b5e3124b06794715e34928b160a5aa403fc8283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Biomechanics</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Sports medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bachmaier, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Patrick A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammoud, Sommer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ritter, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hauck, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wijdicks, Coen A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bachmaier, Samuel</au><au>Smith, Patrick A.</au><au>Hammoud, Sommer</au><au>Ritter, Daniel</au><au>Hauck, Oliver</au><au>Wijdicks, Coen A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stabilization and Gap Formation of Adjustable Versus Fixed Primary ACL Repair With Internal Brace: An in Vitro Full-Construct Biomechanical Cadaveric Study</atitle><jtitle>Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine</jtitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>23259671231201462</spage><epage>23259671231201462</epage><pages>23259671231201462-23259671231201462</pages><issn>2325-9671</issn><eissn>2325-9671</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Background: A knotless, tensionable primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair system preloaded with an internal brace has been released. Currently, there is no biomechanical data on the stabilization and gap formation behavior of the adjustable system when compared with fixed repairs in human ACL tissue. Hypothesis: That knotless adjustable suture repair with an internal brace would provide overall higher construct stability and greater load share on the ACL with less gap formation compared with fixed repair. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Human cadaveric knees were utilized for internal braced ACL repair constructs (each group n = 16). Two fixed groups consisting of a single-cinch loop (SCL), cortical button (SCL group), and knotless suture-anchor (anchor group) were compared with an SCL-adjustable loop device (SCL-ALD) group. Testing was performed at 4 different peak loads (50, 150, 250, 350 N) over 4000 cycles at 0.75 Hz including suture repair preconditioning (10 cycles at 0.5 Hz) for SCL-ALD. Specimens were ultimately pulled to failure with a cut internal brace. The final loading situation of the construct and ACL repair with gap formation and ultimate strength were evaluated. Results: Peak elongation at various peak loads showed a significantly higher (P < .001) stabilization of SCL-ALD when compared with both fixed groups. There was a significantly higher (P < .001) load share of SCL-ALD, especially at lower loads (48% of 50 N), and the gap formation remained restricted up to 250 N. With only a little load share on the fixed constructs (<6%) at lower loads (50, 150 N), gap formation in these groups started at a load of 150 N, leading to significantly higher gaps (P < .001). The ultimate failure load for SCL-ALD and anchor groups was significantly increased (P < .001) as compared with SCL. The stiffness of SCL-ALD (62.9 ± 10.6 N/mm) was significantly increased (P < .001). Conclusion: Internal braced knotless adjustable fixation for ACL repair with preconditioning of the suture repaired ligament increased the overall stabilization with higher load share on the ACL and restricted gap formation (<0.5 mm up to 350 N) compared with fixed suture repair. All internal braced repairs restored stability according to native ACL function. Clinical Relevance: Adjustable ACL repair improved the mechanical characteristics and reduced gap formation, but the overall clinical significance on healing remains unclear.]]></abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/23259671231201462</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2325-9671
ispartof Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2023-09, Vol.11 (9), p.23259671231201462-23259671231201462
issn 2325-9671
2325-9671
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10541754
source Publicly Available Content Database; Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024; PubMed Central
subjects Biomechanics
Original Research
Orthopedics
Sports medicine
title Stabilization and Gap Formation of Adjustable Versus Fixed Primary ACL Repair With Internal Brace: An in Vitro Full-Construct Biomechanical Cadaveric Study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T08%3A12%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stabilization%20and%20Gap%20Formation%20of%20Adjustable%20Versus%20Fixed%20Primary%20ACL%20Repair%20With%20Internal%20Brace:%20An%20in%20Vitro%20Full-Construct%20Biomechanical%20Cadaveric%20Study&rft.jtitle=Orthopaedic%20journal%20of%20sports%20medicine&rft.au=Bachmaier,%20Samuel&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=23259671231201462&rft.epage=23259671231201462&rft.pages=23259671231201462-23259671231201462&rft.issn=2325-9671&rft.eissn=2325-9671&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/23259671231201462&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2871589693%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-ee556f23604b97d60808c81029b5e3124b06794715e34928b160a5aa403fc8283%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2871589693&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_23259671231201462&rfr_iscdi=true