Loading…
Point of Care Ultrasound Track at One Year in an Academic Family Medicine Department
Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) is the bedside acquisition and interpretation of sonograms and is rapidly expanding in ambulatory primary care. Our department built a POCUS curriculum through obtaining an ultrasound fellowship-trained physician, purchasing Mindray TE7 machines for resident clinics,...
Saved in:
Published in: | Annals of family medicine 2023-01, Vol.21 (S1) |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | S1 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Annals of family medicine |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Schoneich, Sebastian Capizzano, Juana Nicoll Kelley, Scott Beduhn, Ben Saunders, William |
description | Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) is the bedside acquisition and interpretation of sonograms and is rapidly expanding in ambulatory primary care. Our department built a POCUS curriculum through obtaining an ultrasound fellowship-trained physician, purchasing Mindray TE7 machines for resident clinics, and establishing image storage. All family medicine residents received POCUS didactics, and three PGY-3 residents underwent an intensive year-long POCUS track. While prior studies describe attitudes to POCUS and the development of POCUS residency curricula, there is a dearth of evidence detailing training outcomes. To address this gap, we conducted a retrospective chart review of all outpatient POCUS scans performed during the first year of our POCUS residency track in a single academic family medicine department. A total of 534 POCUS scans were performed on patients in three outpatient family medicine clinics over 12 months. The most common scans were soft tissue (27.5%), musculoskeletal (25.3%), obstetric (10.1%), cardiac (7.9%), and abdominal aortic aneurysm screen (6.5%). An average of 45.1 (SD 11.7) scans were completed monthly. The three POCUS track residents performed 225 patient scans (42.1% of all scans). Non-track residents (36 residents) performed 64 scans (11.9%). To our knowledge, this is the first study describing a POCUS track in a family medicine residency. We detail the volume and range of POCUS applications in ambulatory family medicine clinics. As anticipated, most scans were for soft tissue and musculoskeletal concerns, consistent with common outpatient chief complaints amenable to POCUS. The POCUS track residents performed more scans than their non-track peers. All three track residents went on to match into ultrasound-focused fellowships (two POCUS and one sports medicine fellowship). Offering a POCUS track provides more scan volume and may be an important strategy to growing POCUS expertise within family medicine residencies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1370/afm.21.s1.4219 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10549367</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A737170805</galeid><sourcerecordid>A737170805</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g2329-a7d80b860b6418540448dc32ae86c538689d4811c223fe7b36b4f3bc6de036a93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM1Lw0AQxYMoWD-unhcEb4m72U2yOUmpVoVKPbQHT2GymaSryW7JpkL_exdapIWeZpj5vffgBcEdoxHjGX2EuotiFjkWiZjlZ8GIJUKELGPZ-f9O88vgyrlvSmMW83gULD6tNgOxNZlAj2TZDj04uzEVWfSgfggMZG6QfCH0RBsChowVVNhpRabQ6XZLPrDSSnvmGdfQDx2a4Sa4qKF1eLuf18Fy-rKYvIWz-ev7ZDwLG5-dh5BVkpYypWUqmEwEFUJWiseAMlUJl6nMKyEZU3HMa8xKnpai5qVKK6Q8hZxfB0873_Wm7LBSPrqHtlj3uoN-W1jQxfHH6FXR2N-C0UTkPM28w_3OoYEWC21q6znVaaeKccZ9dVTSxFPhCapBg97UGqy1Px_x0Qke9sWdFDwcCFYI7bBytt0M2hp3CP4BPXST4g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Point of Care Ultrasound Track at One Year in an Academic Family Medicine Department</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Schoneich, Sebastian ; Capizzano, Juana Nicoll ; Kelley, Scott ; Beduhn, Ben ; Saunders, William</creator><creatorcontrib>Schoneich, Sebastian ; Capizzano, Juana Nicoll ; Kelley, Scott ; Beduhn, Ben ; Saunders, William</creatorcontrib><description>Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) is the bedside acquisition and interpretation of sonograms and is rapidly expanding in ambulatory primary care. Our department built a POCUS curriculum through obtaining an ultrasound fellowship-trained physician, purchasing Mindray TE7 machines for resident clinics, and establishing image storage. All family medicine residents received POCUS didactics, and three PGY-3 residents underwent an intensive year-long POCUS track. While prior studies describe attitudes to POCUS and the development of POCUS residency curricula, there is a dearth of evidence detailing training outcomes. To address this gap, we conducted a retrospective chart review of all outpatient POCUS scans performed during the first year of our POCUS residency track in a single academic family medicine department. A total of 534 POCUS scans were performed on patients in three outpatient family medicine clinics over 12 months. The most common scans were soft tissue (27.5%), musculoskeletal (25.3%), obstetric (10.1%), cardiac (7.9%), and abdominal aortic aneurysm screen (6.5%). An average of 45.1 (SD 11.7) scans were completed monthly. The three POCUS track residents performed 225 patient scans (42.1% of all scans). Non-track residents (36 residents) performed 64 scans (11.9%). To our knowledge, this is the first study describing a POCUS track in a family medicine residency. We detail the volume and range of POCUS applications in ambulatory family medicine clinics. As anticipated, most scans were for soft tissue and musculoskeletal concerns, consistent with common outpatient chief complaints amenable to POCUS. The POCUS track residents performed more scans than their non-track peers. All three track residents went on to match into ultrasound-focused fellowships (two POCUS and one sports medicine fellowship). Offering a POCUS track provides more scan volume and may be an important strategy to growing POCUS expertise within family medicine residencies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1544-1709</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1544-1717</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1370/afm.21.s1.4219</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Annals of Family Medicine</publisher><subject>Curricula ; Education and Training ; Family medicine ; Medical education ; Residents (Medicine) ; Training ; Ultrasound imaging</subject><ispartof>Annals of family medicine, 2023-01, Vol.21 (S1)</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Annals of Family Medicine</rights><rights>2023 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10549367/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10549367/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schoneich, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capizzano, Juana Nicoll</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelley, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beduhn, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saunders, William</creatorcontrib><title>Point of Care Ultrasound Track at One Year in an Academic Family Medicine Department</title><title>Annals of family medicine</title><description>Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) is the bedside acquisition and interpretation of sonograms and is rapidly expanding in ambulatory primary care. Our department built a POCUS curriculum through obtaining an ultrasound fellowship-trained physician, purchasing Mindray TE7 machines for resident clinics, and establishing image storage. All family medicine residents received POCUS didactics, and three PGY-3 residents underwent an intensive year-long POCUS track. While prior studies describe attitudes to POCUS and the development of POCUS residency curricula, there is a dearth of evidence detailing training outcomes. To address this gap, we conducted a retrospective chart review of all outpatient POCUS scans performed during the first year of our POCUS residency track in a single academic family medicine department. A total of 534 POCUS scans were performed on patients in three outpatient family medicine clinics over 12 months. The most common scans were soft tissue (27.5%), musculoskeletal (25.3%), obstetric (10.1%), cardiac (7.9%), and abdominal aortic aneurysm screen (6.5%). An average of 45.1 (SD 11.7) scans were completed monthly. The three POCUS track residents performed 225 patient scans (42.1% of all scans). Non-track residents (36 residents) performed 64 scans (11.9%). To our knowledge, this is the first study describing a POCUS track in a family medicine residency. We detail the volume and range of POCUS applications in ambulatory family medicine clinics. As anticipated, most scans were for soft tissue and musculoskeletal concerns, consistent with common outpatient chief complaints amenable to POCUS. The POCUS track residents performed more scans than their non-track peers. All three track residents went on to match into ultrasound-focused fellowships (two POCUS and one sports medicine fellowship). Offering a POCUS track provides more scan volume and may be an important strategy to growing POCUS expertise within family medicine residencies.</description><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Education and Training</subject><subject>Family medicine</subject><subject>Medical education</subject><subject>Residents (Medicine)</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Ultrasound imaging</subject><issn>1544-1709</issn><issn>1544-1717</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkM1Lw0AQxYMoWD-unhcEb4m72U2yOUmpVoVKPbQHT2GymaSryW7JpkL_exdapIWeZpj5vffgBcEdoxHjGX2EuotiFjkWiZjlZ8GIJUKELGPZ-f9O88vgyrlvSmMW83gULD6tNgOxNZlAj2TZDj04uzEVWfSgfggMZG6QfCH0RBsChowVVNhpRabQ6XZLPrDSSnvmGdfQDx2a4Sa4qKF1eLuf18Fy-rKYvIWz-ev7ZDwLG5-dh5BVkpYypWUqmEwEFUJWiseAMlUJl6nMKyEZU3HMa8xKnpai5qVKK6Q8hZxfB0873_Wm7LBSPrqHtlj3uoN-W1jQxfHH6FXR2N-C0UTkPM28w_3OoYEWC21q6znVaaeKccZ9dVTSxFPhCapBg97UGqy1Px_x0Qke9sWdFDwcCFYI7bBytt0M2hp3CP4BPXST4g</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Schoneich, Sebastian</creator><creator>Capizzano, Juana Nicoll</creator><creator>Kelley, Scott</creator><creator>Beduhn, Ben</creator><creator>Saunders, William</creator><general>Annals of Family Medicine</general><general>American Academy of Family Physicians</general><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>Point of Care Ultrasound Track at One Year in an Academic Family Medicine Department</title><author>Schoneich, Sebastian ; Capizzano, Juana Nicoll ; Kelley, Scott ; Beduhn, Ben ; Saunders, William</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g2329-a7d80b860b6418540448dc32ae86c538689d4811c223fe7b36b4f3bc6de036a93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Education and Training</topic><topic>Family medicine</topic><topic>Medical education</topic><topic>Residents (Medicine)</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Ultrasound imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schoneich, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capizzano, Juana Nicoll</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelley, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beduhn, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saunders, William</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of family medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schoneich, Sebastian</au><au>Capizzano, Juana Nicoll</au><au>Kelley, Scott</au><au>Beduhn, Ben</au><au>Saunders, William</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Point of Care Ultrasound Track at One Year in an Academic Family Medicine Department</atitle><jtitle>Annals of family medicine</jtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>S1</issue><issn>1544-1709</issn><eissn>1544-1717</eissn><abstract>Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) is the bedside acquisition and interpretation of sonograms and is rapidly expanding in ambulatory primary care. Our department built a POCUS curriculum through obtaining an ultrasound fellowship-trained physician, purchasing Mindray TE7 machines for resident clinics, and establishing image storage. All family medicine residents received POCUS didactics, and three PGY-3 residents underwent an intensive year-long POCUS track. While prior studies describe attitudes to POCUS and the development of POCUS residency curricula, there is a dearth of evidence detailing training outcomes. To address this gap, we conducted a retrospective chart review of all outpatient POCUS scans performed during the first year of our POCUS residency track in a single academic family medicine department. A total of 534 POCUS scans were performed on patients in three outpatient family medicine clinics over 12 months. The most common scans were soft tissue (27.5%), musculoskeletal (25.3%), obstetric (10.1%), cardiac (7.9%), and abdominal aortic aneurysm screen (6.5%). An average of 45.1 (SD 11.7) scans were completed monthly. The three POCUS track residents performed 225 patient scans (42.1% of all scans). Non-track residents (36 residents) performed 64 scans (11.9%). To our knowledge, this is the first study describing a POCUS track in a family medicine residency. We detail the volume and range of POCUS applications in ambulatory family medicine clinics. As anticipated, most scans were for soft tissue and musculoskeletal concerns, consistent with common outpatient chief complaints amenable to POCUS. The POCUS track residents performed more scans than their non-track peers. All three track residents went on to match into ultrasound-focused fellowships (two POCUS and one sports medicine fellowship). Offering a POCUS track provides more scan volume and may be an important strategy to growing POCUS expertise within family medicine residencies.</abstract><pub>Annals of Family Medicine</pub><doi>10.1370/afm.21.s1.4219</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1544-1709 |
ispartof | Annals of family medicine, 2023-01, Vol.21 (S1) |
issn | 1544-1709 1544-1717 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10549367 |
source | PubMed Central |
subjects | Curricula Education and Training Family medicine Medical education Residents (Medicine) Training Ultrasound imaging |
title | Point of Care Ultrasound Track at One Year in an Academic Family Medicine Department |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T15%3A11%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Point%20of%20Care%20Ultrasound%20Track%20at%20One%20Year%20in%20an%20Academic%20Family%20Medicine%20Department&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20family%20medicine&rft.au=Schoneich,%20Sebastian&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=S1&rft.issn=1544-1709&rft.eissn=1544-1717&rft_id=info:doi/10.1370/afm.21.s1.4219&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA737170805%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g2329-a7d80b860b6418540448dc32ae86c538689d4811c223fe7b36b4f3bc6de036a93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A737170805&rfr_iscdi=true |