Loading…

Minimally invasive approach associated with lower resource utilization after aortic and mitral valve surgery

To investigate the effect of minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) on resource utilization, cost, and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing left-heart valve operations. Data were retrospectively reviewed for patients undergoing single-valve surgery (eg, aortic valve replacement, mitral v...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:JTCVS open 2023-09, Vol.15, p.72-80
Main Authors: Yang, NaYoung K., Soliman, Fady K., Pepe, Russell J., Palte, Nadia K., Yoo, Jin, Nithikasem, Sorasicha, Laraia, Kayla N., Chakraborty, Abhishek, Chao, Joshua C., Sunagawa, Gengo, Takebe, Manabu, Lemaire, Anthony, Ikegami, Hirohisa, Russo, Mark J., Lee, Leonard Y.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To investigate the effect of minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) on resource utilization, cost, and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing left-heart valve operations. Data were retrospectively reviewed for patients undergoing single-valve surgery (eg, aortic valve replacement, mitral valve replacement, or mitral valve repair) at a single center from 2018 to 2021, stratified by surgical approach: MICS vs full sternotomy (FS). Baseline characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared. Primary outcome was high resource utilization, defined as direct procedure cost higher than the third quartile or either postoperative LOS ≥7 days or 30-day readmission. Secondary outcomes were direct cost, length of stay, 30-day readmission, in-hospital and 30-day mortality, and major morbidity. Multiple regression analysis was conducted, controlling for baseline characteristics, operative approach, valve operation, and lead surgeon to assess high resource utilization. MICS was correlated with a significantly lower rate of high resource utilization (MICS, 31.25% [n = 115] vs FS 61.29% [n = 76]; P 
ISSN:2666-2736
2666-2736
DOI:10.1016/j.xjon.2023.06.007