Loading…

Environmental and nutritional assessment of young children’s diets in Norway: comparing the current diet with national dietary guidelines and the EAT-Lancet reference diet

Purpose Introducing healthy and sustainable diets early in life can promote lifelong healthy dietary patterns with a low environmental impact. Therefore, we aimed to estimate the environmental and nutritional consequences of a dietary change for 2-year-old children in Norway towards healthier dietar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of nutrition 2023-12, Vol.62 (8), p.3383-3396
Main Authors: Wright, Ellen Cecilie, van Oort, Bob, Bjøntegaard, Marie Michaelsen, Carlsen, Monica Hauger, Andersen, Lene Frost
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-17b76ab7f1df32df5459ae131a7120398936b0e10799b11cc5dab8171f5b251c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-17b76ab7f1df32df5459ae131a7120398936b0e10799b11cc5dab8171f5b251c3
container_end_page 3396
container_issue 8
container_start_page 3383
container_title European journal of nutrition
container_volume 62
creator Wright, Ellen Cecilie
van Oort, Bob
Bjøntegaard, Marie Michaelsen
Carlsen, Monica Hauger
Andersen, Lene Frost
description Purpose Introducing healthy and sustainable diets early in life can promote lifelong healthy dietary patterns with a low environmental impact. Therefore, we aimed to estimate the environmental and nutritional consequences of a dietary change for 2-year-old children in Norway towards healthier dietary patterns. Methods Environmental impacts of the current habitual diet among 2-year-olds ( n = 1413) were estimated for six impact categories and compared with scenario diets based on the Norwegian food-based dietary guidelines (FBDG) and the EAT- Lancet Commission reference diet. Last, we evaluated the nutritional adequacy of the diets against the Norwegian nutrition recommendations for children aged 2–5 years. The current diet was assessed by an FFQ. Results Environmental impacts of the current habitual diet were up to two times higher than those of the scenario diets. Compared with the current diet, impacts from the FBDG scenario diet were reduced by 35% for water use and 18% for terrestrial acidification, whereas impacts from the EAT- Lancet scenario diet were reduced by 51% for water use, 57% for terrestrial acidification, 36% for global warming potential and 27% for freshwater eutrophication. Milk and dairy products were the main contributors to environmental impacts in both the current diet and the FBDG scenario diet. The scenario diets were nutritionally adequate and improved the dietary quality among Norwegian 2-year-olds. Conclusion Compared to current diets among young children, more plant-based dietary patterns in line with national FBDG or the EAT- Lancet Commission reference diet can improve the nutritional adequacy of diets and simultaneously reduce environmental impacts.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00394-023-03243-4
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10611869</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2882792172</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-17b76ab7f1df32df5459ae131a7120398936b0e10799b11cc5dab8171f5b251c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ksuOFCEUhonROOPoC7giceOmlAMFVLkxk0l7STq6GdeEoqhuJlXQQtVMeudr-BC-lE8idLdjdOGG2_n-_8DhIPQcyCsgRL5OhLC2rghlFWG0ZlX9AJ1DzUQlKPCH92siz9CTlG4IyaiAx-iMScEZkeQc_Vj5WxeDn6yf9Yi177Ff5uhmF3zZp2RTKkEcBrwPi99gs3VjH63_-e17wr2zc8LO408h3un9G2zCtNPRZW7eWmyWGIu4YPjOzVvs9cm6HOm4x5vF9XZ03qZD9qJaXV5Xa-1N1kQ72Oxg7IF_ih4Nekz22Wm-QF_era6vPlTrz-8_Xl2uK1NLOVcgOyl0JwfoB0b7gde81RYYaAk016xpmeiIBSLbtgMwhve6a0DCwDvKwbAL9Pbou1u6yfYmPyHqUe2im_KVVdBO_R3xbqs24VYBEQCNaLMDPjqY6NLsvPIh6hxuOM0jp1Jk5OUpSQxfF5tmNblk7Dhqb8OSFG0EqQlQyTP64h_0JiwxV7FQDZUtBUkzRX_nDCnlyt1fGIgqHaOOHaNyG6hDx6g6i9hRlHbl12z8Y_0f1S-m0MVT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2882792172</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Environmental and nutritional assessment of young children’s diets in Norway: comparing the current diet with national dietary guidelines and the EAT-Lancet reference diet</title><source>EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus with Full Text</source><source>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</source><source>Springer Nature:Jisc Collections:Springer Nature Read and Publish 2023-2025: Springer Reading List</source><creator>Wright, Ellen Cecilie ; van Oort, Bob ; Bjøntegaard, Marie Michaelsen ; Carlsen, Monica Hauger ; Andersen, Lene Frost</creator><creatorcontrib>Wright, Ellen Cecilie ; van Oort, Bob ; Bjøntegaard, Marie Michaelsen ; Carlsen, Monica Hauger ; Andersen, Lene Frost</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Introducing healthy and sustainable diets early in life can promote lifelong healthy dietary patterns with a low environmental impact. Therefore, we aimed to estimate the environmental and nutritional consequences of a dietary change for 2-year-old children in Norway towards healthier dietary patterns. Methods Environmental impacts of the current habitual diet among 2-year-olds ( n = 1413) were estimated for six impact categories and compared with scenario diets based on the Norwegian food-based dietary guidelines (FBDG) and the EAT- Lancet Commission reference diet. Last, we evaluated the nutritional adequacy of the diets against the Norwegian nutrition recommendations for children aged 2–5 years. The current diet was assessed by an FFQ. Results Environmental impacts of the current habitual diet were up to two times higher than those of the scenario diets. Compared with the current diet, impacts from the FBDG scenario diet were reduced by 35% for water use and 18% for terrestrial acidification, whereas impacts from the EAT- Lancet scenario diet were reduced by 51% for water use, 57% for terrestrial acidification, 36% for global warming potential and 27% for freshwater eutrophication. Milk and dairy products were the main contributors to environmental impacts in both the current diet and the FBDG scenario diet. The scenario diets were nutritionally adequate and improved the dietary quality among Norwegian 2-year-olds. Conclusion Compared to current diets among young children, more plant-based dietary patterns in line with national FBDG or the EAT- Lancet Commission reference diet can improve the nutritional adequacy of diets and simultaneously reduce environmental impacts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1436-6207</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1436-6215</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00394-023-03243-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37653070</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Acidification ; Chemistry ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Children ; Dairy products ; Diet ; Dietary guidelines ; Environmental impact ; Eutrophication ; Global warming ; Nutrition ; Original Contribution ; Water use</subject><ispartof>European journal of nutrition, 2023-12, Vol.62 (8), p.3383-3396</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-17b76ab7f1df32df5459ae131a7120398936b0e10799b11cc5dab8171f5b251c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-17b76ab7f1df32df5459ae131a7120398936b0e10799b11cc5dab8171f5b251c3</cites><orcidid>0009-0000-6779-1909</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,26566,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wright, Ellen Cecilie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Oort, Bob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bjøntegaard, Marie Michaelsen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlsen, Monica Hauger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Lene Frost</creatorcontrib><title>Environmental and nutritional assessment of young children’s diets in Norway: comparing the current diet with national dietary guidelines and the EAT-Lancet reference diet</title><title>European journal of nutrition</title><addtitle>Eur J Nutr</addtitle><description>Purpose Introducing healthy and sustainable diets early in life can promote lifelong healthy dietary patterns with a low environmental impact. Therefore, we aimed to estimate the environmental and nutritional consequences of a dietary change for 2-year-old children in Norway towards healthier dietary patterns. Methods Environmental impacts of the current habitual diet among 2-year-olds ( n = 1413) were estimated for six impact categories and compared with scenario diets based on the Norwegian food-based dietary guidelines (FBDG) and the EAT- Lancet Commission reference diet. Last, we evaluated the nutritional adequacy of the diets against the Norwegian nutrition recommendations for children aged 2–5 years. The current diet was assessed by an FFQ. Results Environmental impacts of the current habitual diet were up to two times higher than those of the scenario diets. Compared with the current diet, impacts from the FBDG scenario diet were reduced by 35% for water use and 18% for terrestrial acidification, whereas impacts from the EAT- Lancet scenario diet were reduced by 51% for water use, 57% for terrestrial acidification, 36% for global warming potential and 27% for freshwater eutrophication. Milk and dairy products were the main contributors to environmental impacts in both the current diet and the FBDG scenario diet. The scenario diets were nutritionally adequate and improved the dietary quality among Norwegian 2-year-olds. Conclusion Compared to current diets among young children, more plant-based dietary patterns in line with national FBDG or the EAT- Lancet Commission reference diet can improve the nutritional adequacy of diets and simultaneously reduce environmental impacts.</description><subject>Acidification</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Dairy products</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Dietary guidelines</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Eutrophication</subject><subject>Global warming</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Original Contribution</subject><subject>Water use</subject><issn>1436-6207</issn><issn>1436-6215</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>3HK</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ksuOFCEUhonROOPoC7giceOmlAMFVLkxk0l7STq6GdeEoqhuJlXQQtVMeudr-BC-lE8idLdjdOGG2_n-_8DhIPQcyCsgRL5OhLC2rghlFWG0ZlX9AJ1DzUQlKPCH92siz9CTlG4IyaiAx-iMScEZkeQc_Vj5WxeDn6yf9Yi177Ff5uhmF3zZp2RTKkEcBrwPi99gs3VjH63_-e17wr2zc8LO408h3un9G2zCtNPRZW7eWmyWGIu4YPjOzVvs9cm6HOm4x5vF9XZ03qZD9qJaXV5Xa-1N1kQ72Oxg7IF_ih4Nekz22Wm-QF_era6vPlTrz-8_Xl2uK1NLOVcgOyl0JwfoB0b7gde81RYYaAk016xpmeiIBSLbtgMwhve6a0DCwDvKwbAL9Pbou1u6yfYmPyHqUe2im_KVVdBO_R3xbqs24VYBEQCNaLMDPjqY6NLsvPIh6hxuOM0jp1Jk5OUpSQxfF5tmNblk7Dhqb8OSFG0EqQlQyTP64h_0JiwxV7FQDZUtBUkzRX_nDCnlyt1fGIgqHaOOHaNyG6hDx6g6i9hRlHbl12z8Y_0f1S-m0MVT</recordid><startdate>20231201</startdate><enddate>20231201</enddate><creator>Wright, Ellen Cecilie</creator><creator>van Oort, Bob</creator><creator>Bjøntegaard, Marie Michaelsen</creator><creator>Carlsen, Monica Hauger</creator><creator>Andersen, Lene Frost</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Steinkopff-Verlag</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>3HK</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6779-1909</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231201</creationdate><title>Environmental and nutritional assessment of young children’s diets in Norway: comparing the current diet with national dietary guidelines and the EAT-Lancet reference diet</title><author>Wright, Ellen Cecilie ; van Oort, Bob ; Bjøntegaard, Marie Michaelsen ; Carlsen, Monica Hauger ; Andersen, Lene Frost</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-17b76ab7f1df32df5459ae131a7120398936b0e10799b11cc5dab8171f5b251c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Acidification</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Dairy products</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Dietary guidelines</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Eutrophication</topic><topic>Global warming</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Original Contribution</topic><topic>Water use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wright, Ellen Cecilie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Oort, Bob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bjøntegaard, Marie Michaelsen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlsen, Monica Hauger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Lene Frost</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>European journal of nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wright, Ellen Cecilie</au><au>van Oort, Bob</au><au>Bjøntegaard, Marie Michaelsen</au><au>Carlsen, Monica Hauger</au><au>Andersen, Lene Frost</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Environmental and nutritional assessment of young children’s diets in Norway: comparing the current diet with national dietary guidelines and the EAT-Lancet reference diet</atitle><jtitle>European journal of nutrition</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Nutr</stitle><date>2023-12-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>3383</spage><epage>3396</epage><pages>3383-3396</pages><issn>1436-6207</issn><eissn>1436-6215</eissn><abstract>Purpose Introducing healthy and sustainable diets early in life can promote lifelong healthy dietary patterns with a low environmental impact. Therefore, we aimed to estimate the environmental and nutritional consequences of a dietary change for 2-year-old children in Norway towards healthier dietary patterns. Methods Environmental impacts of the current habitual diet among 2-year-olds ( n = 1413) were estimated for six impact categories and compared with scenario diets based on the Norwegian food-based dietary guidelines (FBDG) and the EAT- Lancet Commission reference diet. Last, we evaluated the nutritional adequacy of the diets against the Norwegian nutrition recommendations for children aged 2–5 years. The current diet was assessed by an FFQ. Results Environmental impacts of the current habitual diet were up to two times higher than those of the scenario diets. Compared with the current diet, impacts from the FBDG scenario diet were reduced by 35% for water use and 18% for terrestrial acidification, whereas impacts from the EAT- Lancet scenario diet were reduced by 51% for water use, 57% for terrestrial acidification, 36% for global warming potential and 27% for freshwater eutrophication. Milk and dairy products were the main contributors to environmental impacts in both the current diet and the FBDG scenario diet. The scenario diets were nutritionally adequate and improved the dietary quality among Norwegian 2-year-olds. Conclusion Compared to current diets among young children, more plant-based dietary patterns in line with national FBDG or the EAT- Lancet Commission reference diet can improve the nutritional adequacy of diets and simultaneously reduce environmental impacts.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>37653070</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00394-023-03243-4</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6779-1909</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1436-6207
ispartof European journal of nutrition, 2023-12, Vol.62 (8), p.3383-3396
issn 1436-6207
1436-6215
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10611869
source EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus with Full Text; NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives; Springer Nature:Jisc Collections:Springer Nature Read and Publish 2023-2025: Springer Reading List
subjects Acidification
Chemistry
Chemistry and Materials Science
Children
Dairy products
Diet
Dietary guidelines
Environmental impact
Eutrophication
Global warming
Nutrition
Original Contribution
Water use
title Environmental and nutritional assessment of young children’s diets in Norway: comparing the current diet with national dietary guidelines and the EAT-Lancet reference diet
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T12%3A15%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Environmental%20and%20nutritional%20assessment%20of%20young%20children%E2%80%99s%20diets%20in%20Norway:%20comparing%20the%20current%20diet%20with%20national%20dietary%20guidelines%20and%20the%20EAT-Lancet%20reference%20diet&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20nutrition&rft.au=Wright,%20Ellen%20Cecilie&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=3383&rft.epage=3396&rft.pages=3383-3396&rft.issn=1436-6207&rft.eissn=1436-6215&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00394-023-03243-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2882792172%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-17b76ab7f1df32df5459ae131a7120398936b0e10799b11cc5dab8171f5b251c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2882792172&rft_id=info:pmid/37653070&rfr_iscdi=true