Loading…

The Appropriateness of Sum Scores as Estimates of Factor Scores in the Multiple Factor Analysis of Ordered-Categorical Responses

Unit-weight sum scores (UWSSs) are routinely used as estimates of factor scores on the basis of solutions obtained with the nonlinear exploratory factor analysis (EFA) model for ordered-categorical responses. Theoretically, this practice results in a loss of information and accuracy, and is expected...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Educational and psychological measurement 2021-04, Vol.81 (2), p.205-228
Main Authors: Ferrando, Pere J., Lorenzo-Seva, Urbano
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-d55fa47f7e231dbedf290cd68af414d590c22bdd195e86494632627b2985c36b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-d55fa47f7e231dbedf290cd68af414d590c22bdd195e86494632627b2985c36b3
container_end_page 228
container_issue 2
container_start_page 205
container_title Educational and psychological measurement
container_volume 81
creator Ferrando, Pere J.
Lorenzo-Seva, Urbano
description Unit-weight sum scores (UWSSs) are routinely used as estimates of factor scores on the basis of solutions obtained with the nonlinear exploratory factor analysis (EFA) model for ordered-categorical responses. Theoretically, this practice results in a loss of information and accuracy, and is expected to lead to biased estimates. However, the practical relevance of these limitations is far from clear. In this article, we adopt an empirical view and propose indices and procedures (some of them new) for assessing the appropriateness of UWSSs in nonlinear EFA applications. A new automated approach for obtaining UWSSs that maximize fidelity and correlational accuracy is proposed. The appropriateness of UWSSs under different conditions and the behavior of the present proposal in comparison with other more common approaches are assessed with a simulation study. A tutorial for interested practitioners is presented using an illustrative example based on a well-known personality questionnaire. All the procedures proposed in the article have been implemented in a well-known noncommercial EFA program.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0013164420938108
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10621685</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1286921</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_0013164420938108</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2886599819</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-d55fa47f7e231dbedf290cd68af414d590c22bdd195e86494632627b2985c36b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFrFDEUh4MouFbvXoQBL15G8zJJJjnJsmyrUim09TxkkjfblJnJmMwIvfmnN9ttKxaaSwjf935J3iPkPdDPAHX9hVKoQHLOqK4UUPWCrEAIVlZKqZdktcflnr8mb1K6pnlxgBX5e3mFxXqaYpiiNzOOmFIRuuJiGYoLGyKmwqRim2Y_ZHqHjo2dQ3ygfizmHPFz6Wc_9fhA16Ppb5K_KziLDiO6cpMTdiF6a_riHNMUxoTpLXnVmT7hu_v9iPw63l5uvpWnZyffN-vT0nLJ5tIJ0RledzWyClyLrmOaWieV6ThwJ_KBsdY50AKV5JrLiklWt0wrYSvZVkfk6yF3WtoBncVxjqZv8q8HE2-aYHzzPxn9VbMLfxqgkoFUIid8uk-I4feCaW4Gnyz2vRkxLKlhSkmhtQKd1Y9P1OuwxNySbHFNucqWzBY9WDaGlCJ2j68B2uyH2jwdai75cCjB3MZHffsDmJKaQeblgSezw3-XPpt3CwOIrAI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2490489816</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Appropriateness of Sum Scores as Estimates of Factor Scores in the Multiple Factor Analysis of Ordered-Categorical Responses</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>ERIC</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Ferrando, Pere J. ; Lorenzo-Seva, Urbano</creator><creatorcontrib>Ferrando, Pere J. ; Lorenzo-Seva, Urbano</creatorcontrib><description>Unit-weight sum scores (UWSSs) are routinely used as estimates of factor scores on the basis of solutions obtained with the nonlinear exploratory factor analysis (EFA) model for ordered-categorical responses. Theoretically, this practice results in a loss of information and accuracy, and is expected to lead to biased estimates. However, the practical relevance of these limitations is far from clear. In this article, we adopt an empirical view and propose indices and procedures (some of them new) for assessing the appropriateness of UWSSs in nonlinear EFA applications. A new automated approach for obtaining UWSSs that maximize fidelity and correlational accuracy is proposed. The appropriateness of UWSSs under different conditions and the behavior of the present proposal in comparison with other more common approaches are assessed with a simulation study. A tutorial for interested practitioners is presented using an illustrative example based on a well-known personality questionnaire. All the procedures proposed in the article have been implemented in a well-known noncommercial EFA program.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-1644</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3888</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0013164420938108</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Automation ; Correlation ; Discriminant analysis ; Factor Analysis ; Fidelity ; Personality Measures ; Quantitative psychology ; Scores ; Simulation</subject><ispartof>Educational and psychological measurement, 2021-04, Vol.81 (2), p.205-228</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020 2020 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-d55fa47f7e231dbedf290cd68af414d590c22bdd195e86494632627b2985c36b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-d55fa47f7e231dbedf290cd68af414d590c22bdd195e86494632627b2985c36b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3133-5466</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10621685/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10621685/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53769,53771,79110</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1286921$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ferrando, Pere J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lorenzo-Seva, Urbano</creatorcontrib><title>The Appropriateness of Sum Scores as Estimates of Factor Scores in the Multiple Factor Analysis of Ordered-Categorical Responses</title><title>Educational and psychological measurement</title><description>Unit-weight sum scores (UWSSs) are routinely used as estimates of factor scores on the basis of solutions obtained with the nonlinear exploratory factor analysis (EFA) model for ordered-categorical responses. Theoretically, this practice results in a loss of information and accuracy, and is expected to lead to biased estimates. However, the practical relevance of these limitations is far from clear. In this article, we adopt an empirical view and propose indices and procedures (some of them new) for assessing the appropriateness of UWSSs in nonlinear EFA applications. A new automated approach for obtaining UWSSs that maximize fidelity and correlational accuracy is proposed. The appropriateness of UWSSs under different conditions and the behavior of the present proposal in comparison with other more common approaches are assessed with a simulation study. A tutorial for interested practitioners is presented using an illustrative example based on a well-known personality questionnaire. All the procedures proposed in the article have been implemented in a well-known noncommercial EFA program.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Discriminant analysis</subject><subject>Factor Analysis</subject><subject>Fidelity</subject><subject>Personality Measures</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Scores</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><issn>0013-1644</issn><issn>1552-3888</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFrFDEUh4MouFbvXoQBL15G8zJJJjnJsmyrUim09TxkkjfblJnJmMwIvfmnN9ttKxaaSwjf935J3iPkPdDPAHX9hVKoQHLOqK4UUPWCrEAIVlZKqZdktcflnr8mb1K6pnlxgBX5e3mFxXqaYpiiNzOOmFIRuuJiGYoLGyKmwqRim2Y_ZHqHjo2dQ3ygfizmHPFz6Wc_9fhA16Ppb5K_KziLDiO6cpMTdiF6a_riHNMUxoTpLXnVmT7hu_v9iPw63l5uvpWnZyffN-vT0nLJ5tIJ0RledzWyClyLrmOaWieV6ThwJ_KBsdY50AKV5JrLiklWt0wrYSvZVkfk6yF3WtoBncVxjqZv8q8HE2-aYHzzPxn9VbMLfxqgkoFUIid8uk-I4feCaW4Gnyz2vRkxLKlhSkmhtQKd1Y9P1OuwxNySbHFNucqWzBY9WDaGlCJ2j68B2uyH2jwdai75cCjB3MZHffsDmJKaQeblgSezw3-XPpt3CwOIrAI</recordid><startdate>20210401</startdate><enddate>20210401</enddate><creator>Ferrando, Pere J.</creator><creator>Lorenzo-Seva, Urbano</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3133-5466</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210401</creationdate><title>The Appropriateness of Sum Scores as Estimates of Factor Scores in the Multiple Factor Analysis of Ordered-Categorical Responses</title><author>Ferrando, Pere J. ; Lorenzo-Seva, Urbano</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-d55fa47f7e231dbedf290cd68af414d590c22bdd195e86494632627b2985c36b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Discriminant analysis</topic><topic>Factor Analysis</topic><topic>Fidelity</topic><topic>Personality Measures</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Scores</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ferrando, Pere J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lorenzo-Seva, Urbano</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Educational and psychological measurement</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ferrando, Pere J.</au><au>Lorenzo-Seva, Urbano</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1286921</ericid><atitle>The Appropriateness of Sum Scores as Estimates of Factor Scores in the Multiple Factor Analysis of Ordered-Categorical Responses</atitle><jtitle>Educational and psychological measurement</jtitle><date>2021-04-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>205</spage><epage>228</epage><pages>205-228</pages><issn>0013-1644</issn><eissn>1552-3888</eissn><abstract>Unit-weight sum scores (UWSSs) are routinely used as estimates of factor scores on the basis of solutions obtained with the nonlinear exploratory factor analysis (EFA) model for ordered-categorical responses. Theoretically, this practice results in a loss of information and accuracy, and is expected to lead to biased estimates. However, the practical relevance of these limitations is far from clear. In this article, we adopt an empirical view and propose indices and procedures (some of them new) for assessing the appropriateness of UWSSs in nonlinear EFA applications. A new automated approach for obtaining UWSSs that maximize fidelity and correlational accuracy is proposed. The appropriateness of UWSSs under different conditions and the behavior of the present proposal in comparison with other more common approaches are assessed with a simulation study. A tutorial for interested practitioners is presented using an illustrative example based on a well-known personality questionnaire. All the procedures proposed in the article have been implemented in a well-known noncommercial EFA program.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0013164420938108</doi><tpages>24</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3133-5466</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-1644
ispartof Educational and psychological measurement, 2021-04, Vol.81 (2), p.205-228
issn 0013-1644
1552-3888
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10621685
source Open Access: PubMed Central; ERIC; SAGE
subjects Accuracy
Automation
Correlation
Discriminant analysis
Factor Analysis
Fidelity
Personality Measures
Quantitative psychology
Scores
Simulation
title The Appropriateness of Sum Scores as Estimates of Factor Scores in the Multiple Factor Analysis of Ordered-Categorical Responses
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T19%3A56%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Appropriateness%20of%20Sum%20Scores%20as%20Estimates%20of%20Factor%20Scores%20in%20the%20Multiple%20Factor%20Analysis%20of%20Ordered-Categorical%20Responses&rft.jtitle=Educational%20and%20psychological%20measurement&rft.au=Ferrando,%20Pere%20J.&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=205&rft.epage=228&rft.pages=205-228&rft.issn=0013-1644&rft.eissn=1552-3888&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0013164420938108&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2886599819%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-d55fa47f7e231dbedf290cd68af414d590c22bdd195e86494632627b2985c36b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2490489816&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1286921&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0013164420938108&rfr_iscdi=true