Loading…

386 Effects of Different Soy Protein Sources on Gut Microbiome Composition and Relationship with Performance in Pigs in Regular Nursery and F4 Enterotoxigenic Escherichia Coli (ETEC) Challenged Conditions

Abstract Provisoy, produced by hydro, thermal, and mechanical process using soybean meal (SBM) has been shown to improve both post-weaning pig growth and gut health compared with SBM. It was hypothesized that Provisoy could improve the utilization of both protein and fiber fractions along the gastro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of animal science 2023-11, Vol.101 (Supplement_3), p.312-313
Main Authors: Hu, Qiong, Sardi, Maria I, Naqvi, S Ali, Hackenhaar, Leandro, Pluk, Patricia, de Laat, John, Newcomb, Mark D, Khafipour, Ehsan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 313
container_issue Supplement_3
container_start_page 312
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 101
creator Hu, Qiong
Sardi, Maria I
Naqvi, S Ali
Hackenhaar, Leandro
Pluk, Patricia
de Laat, John
Newcomb, Mark D
Khafipour, Ehsan
description Abstract Provisoy, produced by hydro, thermal, and mechanical process using soybean meal (SBM) has been shown to improve both post-weaning pig growth and gut health compared with SBM. It was hypothesized that Provisoy could improve the utilization of both protein and fiber fractions along the gastrointestinal tract of a nursery pig resulting in a more balanced nutrient environment and robust microbiome in the hindgut compared with SBM. A total of 268 weaned pigs (body weight, 6.82 ± 0.85 kg) were allotted to either a regular nursery condition (5 pigs/pen, 10-11 pens/treatment) or subjected to ETEC challenge (3 pigs/pen, 12 pens/treatment, 1 pig per pen was orally gavaged with O149:K91:K88 strain on d 5 post-weaning). Pigs received one of the following diets: SBM, Provisoy or HP300 (soy protein from Hamlet Protein, used as a benchmark). A standard wheat-barley-SBM based diet was used, and test soy products were added to replace SBM in the treatment diets during the first three weeks of nursery program. All diets were isocaloric with the same standardized ileal digestible lysine level in a three-phase (38 days) nursery program. Fecal samples were collected on d 13 or d 14 post-weaning and subjected to DNA extraction and Nanopore shotgun sequencing. Data were center-log-ratio transformed and subjected to statistical analysis. Microbiome composition was affected by dietary treatment (P < 0.01) and challenge (P < 0.05), but their interaction was not significant. In regular nursery condition, both Provisoy and HP300 tended (P < 0.10) to have greater microbiome alpha-diversity compared with SBM, but no difference was observed between these two treatments. Only SBM fed pigs subjected to ETEC challenge had greater (P = 0.02) alpha-diversity compared with their non-challenged counterparts. Compared with the SBM treatment, pigs that received Provisoy in the regular condition had greater abundance of Coprococcus and Dialister, which were positively correlated with greater average daily gain (ADG; r = 0.53, P < 0.01, and r = 0.45, P = 0.01, respectively). Under ETEC challenge, an increase in abundance of Dialister was observed in pigs that received Provisoy treatment with a positive correlation with ADG (r = 0.42, P = 0.01). In conclusion, dietary inclusion of Provisoy or HP300 improved microbiome alpha-diversity compared with SBM. Provisoy helped promote the growth of beneficial bacteria in the hindgut of nursery pigs which were positively correlated with gain.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jas/skad281.372
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10633251</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jas/skad281.372</oup_id><sourcerecordid>3051763148</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2002-64e5312da39618c71680d69ce958fa8d30f5bd20a48393c45fe97580eef01b933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU2P0zAQjRBIlMKZqyUugJStP-rUOSEUsrtIC1TLcrZcZ5y4JHawE6D_kR-17rZC4sRpxp43743ey7KXBF8QXLLVXsVV_K4aKsgF29BH2YJwynNGCvY4W2BMSS4EoU-zZzHuMSaUl3yR_WGiQLUxoKeIvEEfbOoDuAl99Qe0DX4C61I_Bw0J4NDVPKFPVge_s34AVPlh9NFONo2Ua9At9Or4iJ0d0S87dWgLwfgwKKcBJaqtbeOx3kI79yqgz3OIEA4Py5drVLsJkqj_bVtwVqM66g6C1Z1VSau36HV9V1dvUNWpvgfXQpO-XfNwQHyePTGqj_DiXJfZt8v6rrrOb75cfaze3-SaJh_yYg2cEdooVhZE6A0pBG6KUkPJhVGiYdjwXUOxWgtWMr3mBsoNFxjAYLIrGVtm706847wboNHJrqB6OQY7qHCQXln578TZTrb-pyS4YIxykhhenRmC_zFDnOQ-WezS0ZJhTjYFI0l8ma1OqGR3jAHMXwmC5TF0mUKX59BlCj1tvD1t-Hn8L_ge1R-ylA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3051763148</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>386 Effects of Different Soy Protein Sources on Gut Microbiome Composition and Relationship with Performance in Pigs in Regular Nursery and F4 Enterotoxigenic Escherichia Coli (ETEC) Challenged Conditions</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Hu, Qiong ; Sardi, Maria I ; Naqvi, S Ali ; Hackenhaar, Leandro ; Pluk, Patricia ; de Laat, John ; Newcomb, Mark D ; Khafipour, Ehsan</creator><creatorcontrib>Hu, Qiong ; Sardi, Maria I ; Naqvi, S Ali ; Hackenhaar, Leandro ; Pluk, Patricia ; de Laat, John ; Newcomb, Mark D ; Khafipour, Ehsan</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Provisoy, produced by hydro, thermal, and mechanical process using soybean meal (SBM) has been shown to improve both post-weaning pig growth and gut health compared with SBM. It was hypothesized that Provisoy could improve the utilization of both protein and fiber fractions along the gastrointestinal tract of a nursery pig resulting in a more balanced nutrient environment and robust microbiome in the hindgut compared with SBM. A total of 268 weaned pigs (body weight, 6.82 ± 0.85 kg) were allotted to either a regular nursery condition (5 pigs/pen, 10-11 pens/treatment) or subjected to ETEC challenge (3 pigs/pen, 12 pens/treatment, 1 pig per pen was orally gavaged with O149:K91:K88 strain on d 5 post-weaning). Pigs received one of the following diets: SBM, Provisoy or HP300 (soy protein from Hamlet Protein, used as a benchmark). A standard wheat-barley-SBM based diet was used, and test soy products were added to replace SBM in the treatment diets during the first three weeks of nursery program. All diets were isocaloric with the same standardized ileal digestible lysine level in a three-phase (38 days) nursery program. Fecal samples were collected on d 13 or d 14 post-weaning and subjected to DNA extraction and Nanopore shotgun sequencing. Data were center-log-ratio transformed and subjected to statistical analysis. Microbiome composition was affected by dietary treatment (P &lt; 0.01) and challenge (P &lt; 0.05), but their interaction was not significant. In regular nursery condition, both Provisoy and HP300 tended (P &lt; 0.10) to have greater microbiome alpha-diversity compared with SBM, but no difference was observed between these two treatments. Only SBM fed pigs subjected to ETEC challenge had greater (P = 0.02) alpha-diversity compared with their non-challenged counterparts. Compared with the SBM treatment, pigs that received Provisoy in the regular condition had greater abundance of Coprococcus and Dialister, which were positively correlated with greater average daily gain (ADG; r = 0.53, P &lt; 0.01, and r = 0.45, P = 0.01, respectively). Under ETEC challenge, an increase in abundance of Dialister was observed in pigs that received Provisoy treatment with a positive correlation with ADG (r = 0.42, P = 0.01). In conclusion, dietary inclusion of Provisoy or HP300 improved microbiome alpha-diversity compared with SBM. Provisoy helped promote the growth of beneficial bacteria in the hindgut of nursery pigs which were positively correlated with gain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jas/skad281.372</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Body weight ; Composition ; Correlation ; Dialister ; Diet ; Digestive system ; E coli ; Feces ; Gastrointestinal system ; Gastrointestinal tract ; Gene sequencing ; Hindgut ; Hogs ; Intestinal microflora ; Lysine ; Microbiomes ; Nurseries ; Protein sources ; Proteins ; Soybeans ; Statistical analysis ; Swine ; Weaning</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2023-11, Vol.101 (Supplement_3), p.312-313</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10633251/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10633251/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hu, Qiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sardi, Maria I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naqvi, S Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hackenhaar, Leandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pluk, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Laat, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newcomb, Mark D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khafipour, Ehsan</creatorcontrib><title>386 Effects of Different Soy Protein Sources on Gut Microbiome Composition and Relationship with Performance in Pigs in Regular Nursery and F4 Enterotoxigenic Escherichia Coli (ETEC) Challenged Conditions</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>Abstract Provisoy, produced by hydro, thermal, and mechanical process using soybean meal (SBM) has been shown to improve both post-weaning pig growth and gut health compared with SBM. It was hypothesized that Provisoy could improve the utilization of both protein and fiber fractions along the gastrointestinal tract of a nursery pig resulting in a more balanced nutrient environment and robust microbiome in the hindgut compared with SBM. A total of 268 weaned pigs (body weight, 6.82 ± 0.85 kg) were allotted to either a regular nursery condition (5 pigs/pen, 10-11 pens/treatment) or subjected to ETEC challenge (3 pigs/pen, 12 pens/treatment, 1 pig per pen was orally gavaged with O149:K91:K88 strain on d 5 post-weaning). Pigs received one of the following diets: SBM, Provisoy or HP300 (soy protein from Hamlet Protein, used as a benchmark). A standard wheat-barley-SBM based diet was used, and test soy products were added to replace SBM in the treatment diets during the first three weeks of nursery program. All diets were isocaloric with the same standardized ileal digestible lysine level in a three-phase (38 days) nursery program. Fecal samples were collected on d 13 or d 14 post-weaning and subjected to DNA extraction and Nanopore shotgun sequencing. Data were center-log-ratio transformed and subjected to statistical analysis. Microbiome composition was affected by dietary treatment (P &lt; 0.01) and challenge (P &lt; 0.05), but their interaction was not significant. In regular nursery condition, both Provisoy and HP300 tended (P &lt; 0.10) to have greater microbiome alpha-diversity compared with SBM, but no difference was observed between these two treatments. Only SBM fed pigs subjected to ETEC challenge had greater (P = 0.02) alpha-diversity compared with their non-challenged counterparts. Compared with the SBM treatment, pigs that received Provisoy in the regular condition had greater abundance of Coprococcus and Dialister, which were positively correlated with greater average daily gain (ADG; r = 0.53, P &lt; 0.01, and r = 0.45, P = 0.01, respectively). Under ETEC challenge, an increase in abundance of Dialister was observed in pigs that received Provisoy treatment with a positive correlation with ADG (r = 0.42, P = 0.01). In conclusion, dietary inclusion of Provisoy or HP300 improved microbiome alpha-diversity compared with SBM. Provisoy helped promote the growth of beneficial bacteria in the hindgut of nursery pigs which were positively correlated with gain.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Body weight</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Dialister</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Digestive system</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Feces</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal system</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal tract</subject><subject>Gene sequencing</subject><subject>Hindgut</subject><subject>Hogs</subject><subject>Intestinal microflora</subject><subject>Lysine</subject><subject>Microbiomes</subject><subject>Nurseries</subject><subject>Protein sources</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Weaning</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUU2P0zAQjRBIlMKZqyUugJStP-rUOSEUsrtIC1TLcrZcZ5y4JHawE6D_kR-17rZC4sRpxp43743ey7KXBF8QXLLVXsVV_K4aKsgF29BH2YJwynNGCvY4W2BMSS4EoU-zZzHuMSaUl3yR_WGiQLUxoKeIvEEfbOoDuAl99Qe0DX4C61I_Bw0J4NDVPKFPVge_s34AVPlh9NFONo2Ua9At9Or4iJ0d0S87dWgLwfgwKKcBJaqtbeOx3kI79yqgz3OIEA4Py5drVLsJkqj_bVtwVqM66g6C1Z1VSau36HV9V1dvUNWpvgfXQpO-XfNwQHyePTGqj_DiXJfZt8v6rrrOb75cfaze3-SaJh_yYg2cEdooVhZE6A0pBG6KUkPJhVGiYdjwXUOxWgtWMr3mBsoNFxjAYLIrGVtm706847wboNHJrqB6OQY7qHCQXln578TZTrb-pyS4YIxykhhenRmC_zFDnOQ-WezS0ZJhTjYFI0l8ma1OqGR3jAHMXwmC5TF0mUKX59BlCj1tvD1t-Hn8L_ge1R-ylA</recordid><startdate>20231106</startdate><enddate>20231106</enddate><creator>Hu, Qiong</creator><creator>Sardi, Maria I</creator><creator>Naqvi, S Ali</creator><creator>Hackenhaar, Leandro</creator><creator>Pluk, Patricia</creator><creator>de Laat, John</creator><creator>Newcomb, Mark D</creator><creator>Khafipour, Ehsan</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231106</creationdate><title>386 Effects of Different Soy Protein Sources on Gut Microbiome Composition and Relationship with Performance in Pigs in Regular Nursery and F4 Enterotoxigenic Escherichia Coli (ETEC) Challenged Conditions</title><author>Hu, Qiong ; Sardi, Maria I ; Naqvi, S Ali ; Hackenhaar, Leandro ; Pluk, Patricia ; de Laat, John ; Newcomb, Mark D ; Khafipour, Ehsan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2002-64e5312da39618c71680d69ce958fa8d30f5bd20a48393c45fe97580eef01b933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Body weight</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Dialister</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Digestive system</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Feces</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal system</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal tract</topic><topic>Gene sequencing</topic><topic>Hindgut</topic><topic>Hogs</topic><topic>Intestinal microflora</topic><topic>Lysine</topic><topic>Microbiomes</topic><topic>Nurseries</topic><topic>Protein sources</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Weaning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hu, Qiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sardi, Maria I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naqvi, S Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hackenhaar, Leandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pluk, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Laat, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newcomb, Mark D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khafipour, Ehsan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hu, Qiong</au><au>Sardi, Maria I</au><au>Naqvi, S Ali</au><au>Hackenhaar, Leandro</au><au>Pluk, Patricia</au><au>de Laat, John</au><au>Newcomb, Mark D</au><au>Khafipour, Ehsan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>386 Effects of Different Soy Protein Sources on Gut Microbiome Composition and Relationship with Performance in Pigs in Regular Nursery and F4 Enterotoxigenic Escherichia Coli (ETEC) Challenged Conditions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2023-11-06</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>Supplement_3</issue><spage>312</spage><epage>313</epage><pages>312-313</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Abstract Provisoy, produced by hydro, thermal, and mechanical process using soybean meal (SBM) has been shown to improve both post-weaning pig growth and gut health compared with SBM. It was hypothesized that Provisoy could improve the utilization of both protein and fiber fractions along the gastrointestinal tract of a nursery pig resulting in a more balanced nutrient environment and robust microbiome in the hindgut compared with SBM. A total of 268 weaned pigs (body weight, 6.82 ± 0.85 kg) were allotted to either a regular nursery condition (5 pigs/pen, 10-11 pens/treatment) or subjected to ETEC challenge (3 pigs/pen, 12 pens/treatment, 1 pig per pen was orally gavaged with O149:K91:K88 strain on d 5 post-weaning). Pigs received one of the following diets: SBM, Provisoy or HP300 (soy protein from Hamlet Protein, used as a benchmark). A standard wheat-barley-SBM based diet was used, and test soy products were added to replace SBM in the treatment diets during the first three weeks of nursery program. All diets were isocaloric with the same standardized ileal digestible lysine level in a three-phase (38 days) nursery program. Fecal samples were collected on d 13 or d 14 post-weaning and subjected to DNA extraction and Nanopore shotgun sequencing. Data were center-log-ratio transformed and subjected to statistical analysis. Microbiome composition was affected by dietary treatment (P &lt; 0.01) and challenge (P &lt; 0.05), but their interaction was not significant. In regular nursery condition, both Provisoy and HP300 tended (P &lt; 0.10) to have greater microbiome alpha-diversity compared with SBM, but no difference was observed between these two treatments. Only SBM fed pigs subjected to ETEC challenge had greater (P = 0.02) alpha-diversity compared with their non-challenged counterparts. Compared with the SBM treatment, pigs that received Provisoy in the regular condition had greater abundance of Coprococcus and Dialister, which were positively correlated with greater average daily gain (ADG; r = 0.53, P &lt; 0.01, and r = 0.45, P = 0.01, respectively). Under ETEC challenge, an increase in abundance of Dialister was observed in pigs that received Provisoy treatment with a positive correlation with ADG (r = 0.42, P = 0.01). In conclusion, dietary inclusion of Provisoy or HP300 improved microbiome alpha-diversity compared with SBM. Provisoy helped promote the growth of beneficial bacteria in the hindgut of nursery pigs which were positively correlated with gain.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jas/skad281.372</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2023-11, Vol.101 (Supplement_3), p.312-313
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10633251
source Oxford Journals Online; PubMed Central
subjects Abundance
Body weight
Composition
Correlation
Dialister
Diet
Digestive system
E coli
Feces
Gastrointestinal system
Gastrointestinal tract
Gene sequencing
Hindgut
Hogs
Intestinal microflora
Lysine
Microbiomes
Nurseries
Protein sources
Proteins
Soybeans
Statistical analysis
Swine
Weaning
title 386 Effects of Different Soy Protein Sources on Gut Microbiome Composition and Relationship with Performance in Pigs in Regular Nursery and F4 Enterotoxigenic Escherichia Coli (ETEC) Challenged Conditions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T16%3A24%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=386%20Effects%20of%20Different%20Soy%20Protein%20Sources%20on%20Gut%20Microbiome%20Composition%20and%20Relationship%20with%20Performance%20in%20Pigs%20in%20Regular%20Nursery%20and%20F4%20Enterotoxigenic%20Escherichia%20Coli%20(ETEC)%20Challenged%20Conditions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Hu,%20Qiong&rft.date=2023-11-06&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=Supplement_3&rft.spage=312&rft.epage=313&rft.pages=312-313&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jas/skad281.372&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3051763148%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2002-64e5312da39618c71680d69ce958fa8d30f5bd20a48393c45fe97580eef01b933%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3051763148&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jas/skad281.372&rfr_iscdi=true