Loading…

Our fragile future under the cumulative cultural evolution of two technologies

We derive and analyse a model with unusual features characterizing human activities over the long-run. First, human population dynamics draw heavily on consumer-resource modelling in ecology in that humans must consume biological resources to produce new humans. Second, the model also draws heavily...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences 2024-01, Vol.379 (1893), p.20220257
Main Authors: Efferson, Charles, Richerson, Peter J, Weinberger, Vanessa P
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-f26f93dc47bea2c23d924aaa52dc71e89501c15f811cccff80b5c112a066928b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-f26f93dc47bea2c23d924aaa52dc71e89501c15f811cccff80b5c112a066928b3
container_end_page
container_issue 1893
container_start_page 20220257
container_title Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences
container_volume 379
creator Efferson, Charles
Richerson, Peter J
Weinberger, Vanessa P
description We derive and analyse a model with unusual features characterizing human activities over the long-run. First, human population dynamics draw heavily on consumer-resource modelling in ecology in that humans must consume biological resources to produce new humans. Second, the model also draws heavily from economic growth theory in that humans do not simply consume biological resources; they also produce the resources they consume. Finally, humans use two types of technology. Consumption technology affects the rate at which humans can extract resources. Production technology controls how effectively humans convert labour into new resources. The dynamics of both types of technology are subject to cumulative cultural evolutionary processes that allow both technological progress and regress. The resulting model exhibits a wide range of dynamical regimes. That said, the system is routinely sensitive to initial conditions, with wildly different outcomes given the same parameter values. Moreover, the system exhibits a basic fragility in the sense that human activities often lead to the endogenous extinction of the human species. This can happen gently, or it can follow periods of explosive human activity with super-exponential growth that ends in collapse. This article is part of the theme issue 'Evolution and sustainability: gathering the strands for an Anthropocene synthesis'.
doi_str_mv 10.1098/rstb.2022.0257
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10645086</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2889590389</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-f26f93dc47bea2c23d924aaa52dc71e89501c15f811cccff80b5c112a066928b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkctLxDAQxoMouj6uHiVHL10nadMmJxHxBaIXPYc0TXYr2UbzWPG_t2VX0dMMzDfffMwPoVMCcwKCX4SY2jkFSudAWbODZqRqSEFFA7toBqKmBa_K-gAdxvgGAII11T46KBvBaE3LGXp6zgHboBa9M9jmlIPBeehMwGlpsM6r7FTq11PrxqFy2Ky9y6n3A_YWp0-Pk9HLwTu_6E08RntWuWhOtvUIvd7evFzfF4_Pdw_XV4-FZhWkwtLairLTVdMaRTUtO0ErpRSjnW6I4YIB0YRZTojW2loOLdOEUAV1LShvyyN0ufF9z-3KdNoMacwm30O_UuFLetXL_5OhX8qFX0sCdcWA16PD-dYh-I9sYpKrPmrjnBqMz1FSPqYQUHIxSucbqQ4-xmDs7x0CcqIgJwpyoiAnCuPC2d90v_Kft5ffZ0OGNg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2889590389</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Our fragile future under the cumulative cultural evolution of two technologies</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Efferson, Charles ; Richerson, Peter J ; Weinberger, Vanessa P</creator><creatorcontrib>Efferson, Charles ; Richerson, Peter J ; Weinberger, Vanessa P</creatorcontrib><description>We derive and analyse a model with unusual features characterizing human activities over the long-run. First, human population dynamics draw heavily on consumer-resource modelling in ecology in that humans must consume biological resources to produce new humans. Second, the model also draws heavily from economic growth theory in that humans do not simply consume biological resources; they also produce the resources they consume. Finally, humans use two types of technology. Consumption technology affects the rate at which humans can extract resources. Production technology controls how effectively humans convert labour into new resources. The dynamics of both types of technology are subject to cumulative cultural evolutionary processes that allow both technological progress and regress. The resulting model exhibits a wide range of dynamical regimes. That said, the system is routinely sensitive to initial conditions, with wildly different outcomes given the same parameter values. Moreover, the system exhibits a basic fragility in the sense that human activities often lead to the endogenous extinction of the human species. This can happen gently, or it can follow periods of explosive human activity with super-exponential growth that ends in collapse. This article is part of the theme issue 'Evolution and sustainability: gathering the strands for an Anthropocene synthesis'.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8436</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2970</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2970</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0257</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37952623</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Cultural Evolution ; Ecology ; Economic Development ; Humans ; Part I: Past - How Did the Anthropocene Evolve? ; Population Dynamics ; Technology</subject><ispartof>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences, 2024-01, Vol.379 (1893), p.20220257</ispartof><rights>2023 The Author(s) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-f26f93dc47bea2c23d924aaa52dc71e89501c15f811cccff80b5c112a066928b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-f26f93dc47bea2c23d924aaa52dc71e89501c15f811cccff80b5c112a066928b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8244-4497 ; 0000-0002-9693-7492 ; 0000-0002-7233-358X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10645086/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10645086/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37952623$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Efferson, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richerson, Peter J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinberger, Vanessa P</creatorcontrib><title>Our fragile future under the cumulative cultural evolution of two technologies</title><title>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</title><addtitle>Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci</addtitle><description>We derive and analyse a model with unusual features characterizing human activities over the long-run. First, human population dynamics draw heavily on consumer-resource modelling in ecology in that humans must consume biological resources to produce new humans. Second, the model also draws heavily from economic growth theory in that humans do not simply consume biological resources; they also produce the resources they consume. Finally, humans use two types of technology. Consumption technology affects the rate at which humans can extract resources. Production technology controls how effectively humans convert labour into new resources. The dynamics of both types of technology are subject to cumulative cultural evolutionary processes that allow both technological progress and regress. The resulting model exhibits a wide range of dynamical regimes. That said, the system is routinely sensitive to initial conditions, with wildly different outcomes given the same parameter values. Moreover, the system exhibits a basic fragility in the sense that human activities often lead to the endogenous extinction of the human species. This can happen gently, or it can follow periods of explosive human activity with super-exponential growth that ends in collapse. This article is part of the theme issue 'Evolution and sustainability: gathering the strands for an Anthropocene synthesis'.</description><subject>Cultural Evolution</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Economic Development</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Part I: Past - How Did the Anthropocene Evolve?</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>Technology</subject><issn>0962-8436</issn><issn>1471-2970</issn><issn>1471-2970</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkctLxDAQxoMouj6uHiVHL10nadMmJxHxBaIXPYc0TXYr2UbzWPG_t2VX0dMMzDfffMwPoVMCcwKCX4SY2jkFSudAWbODZqRqSEFFA7toBqKmBa_K-gAdxvgGAII11T46KBvBaE3LGXp6zgHboBa9M9jmlIPBeehMwGlpsM6r7FTq11PrxqFy2Ky9y6n3A_YWp0-Pk9HLwTu_6E08RntWuWhOtvUIvd7evFzfF4_Pdw_XV4-FZhWkwtLairLTVdMaRTUtO0ErpRSjnW6I4YIB0YRZTojW2loOLdOEUAV1LShvyyN0ufF9z-3KdNoMacwm30O_UuFLetXL_5OhX8qFX0sCdcWA16PD-dYh-I9sYpKrPmrjnBqMz1FSPqYQUHIxSucbqQ4-xmDs7x0CcqIgJwpyoiAnCuPC2d90v_Kft5ffZ0OGNg</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Efferson, Charles</creator><creator>Richerson, Peter J</creator><creator>Weinberger, Vanessa P</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8244-4497</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9693-7492</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7233-358X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>Our fragile future under the cumulative cultural evolution of two technologies</title><author>Efferson, Charles ; Richerson, Peter J ; Weinberger, Vanessa P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-f26f93dc47bea2c23d924aaa52dc71e89501c15f811cccff80b5c112a066928b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Cultural Evolution</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Economic Development</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Part I: Past - How Did the Anthropocene Evolve?</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Efferson, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richerson, Peter J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinberger, Vanessa P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Efferson, Charles</au><au>Richerson, Peter J</au><au>Weinberger, Vanessa P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Our fragile future under the cumulative cultural evolution of two technologies</atitle><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci</addtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>379</volume><issue>1893</issue><spage>20220257</spage><pages>20220257-</pages><issn>0962-8436</issn><issn>1471-2970</issn><eissn>1471-2970</eissn><abstract>We derive and analyse a model with unusual features characterizing human activities over the long-run. First, human population dynamics draw heavily on consumer-resource modelling in ecology in that humans must consume biological resources to produce new humans. Second, the model also draws heavily from economic growth theory in that humans do not simply consume biological resources; they also produce the resources they consume. Finally, humans use two types of technology. Consumption technology affects the rate at which humans can extract resources. Production technology controls how effectively humans convert labour into new resources. The dynamics of both types of technology are subject to cumulative cultural evolutionary processes that allow both technological progress and regress. The resulting model exhibits a wide range of dynamical regimes. That said, the system is routinely sensitive to initial conditions, with wildly different outcomes given the same parameter values. Moreover, the system exhibits a basic fragility in the sense that human activities often lead to the endogenous extinction of the human species. This can happen gently, or it can follow periods of explosive human activity with super-exponential growth that ends in collapse. This article is part of the theme issue 'Evolution and sustainability: gathering the strands for an Anthropocene synthesis'.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><pmid>37952623</pmid><doi>10.1098/rstb.2022.0257</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8244-4497</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9693-7492</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7233-358X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0962-8436
ispartof Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences, 2024-01, Vol.379 (1893), p.20220257
issn 0962-8436
1471-2970
1471-2970
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10645086
source PubMed Central
subjects Cultural Evolution
Ecology
Economic Development
Humans
Part I: Past - How Did the Anthropocene Evolve?
Population Dynamics
Technology
title Our fragile future under the cumulative cultural evolution of two technologies
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T02%3A28%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Our%20fragile%20future%20under%20the%20cumulative%20cultural%20evolution%20of%20two%20technologies&rft.jtitle=Philosophical%20transactions%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society%20of%20London.%20Series%20B.%20Biological%20sciences&rft.au=Efferson,%20Charles&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=379&rft.issue=1893&rft.spage=20220257&rft.pages=20220257-&rft.issn=0962-8436&rft.eissn=1471-2970&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rstb.2022.0257&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2889590389%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-f26f93dc47bea2c23d924aaa52dc71e89501c15f811cccff80b5c112a066928b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2889590389&rft_id=info:pmid/37952623&rfr_iscdi=true