Loading…

Access to food and physical activity environment resources in rural communities: Impact of using driving time versus physical distance indicators

The one-mile buffer is commonly used in examining associations between the built environment and weight-related outcomes; however, this buffer may not adequately capture access to built environment resources among individuals residing in geographically dispersed rural communities. Thus, there is nee...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of transport & health 2022-12, Vol.27, p.101521, Article 101521
Main Authors: Dixon, Brittney N., Hong, Young-Rock, Perri, Michael G., Allen, Acquel, Aufmuth, Joe, Ross, Kathryn M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-b281e05856bdd9ccf72c9ee8ea543e61f5ac9b3828ac52fe1114857b255958093
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-b281e05856bdd9ccf72c9ee8ea543e61f5ac9b3828ac52fe1114857b255958093
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 101521
container_title Journal of transport & health
container_volume 27
creator Dixon, Brittney N.
Hong, Young-Rock
Perri, Michael G.
Allen, Acquel
Aufmuth, Joe
Ross, Kathryn M.
description The one-mile buffer is commonly used in examining associations between the built environment and weight-related outcomes; however, this buffer may not adequately capture access to built environment resources among individuals residing in geographically dispersed rural communities. Thus, there is need to explore how different buffer sizes and types capture access to built environment resources in rural communities. This study compared two physical distance buffers (i.e., one-mile and two-mile) against two driving distances (i.e., 15-min and 30-min) to determine ability to capture access to built environment resources related to dietary intake and physical activity for participants in a weight management trial across rural counties. Data from the Rural Lifestyle Eating and Activity (Rural LEAP) trial were combined with publicly available geospatial datasets to identify and examine built environment resources for individuals residing in 13 rural counties in Florida. Descriptive statistics were calculated to determine access to built environment resources, and paired samples t-tests were used to compare access across various buffers and by level of rurality. Results demonstrated limited resources available within the one- and two-mile buffers; however, participants had greater access to resources in the 15- and 30-min driving distances. Using supermarkets and grocery stores as an example, findings also demonstrated that participants residing in less rural counties compared to more rural counties had greater access to supermarkets and grocery stores within the 15-min (mean [SD] 9.16 [6.03], p 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jth.2022.101521
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10655550</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2214140522001931</els_id><sourcerecordid>2892011055</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-b281e05856bdd9ccf72c9ee8ea543e61f5ac9b3828ac52fe1114857b255958093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU2PEzEMHSGQWC37A7jlyKUlzjTTDBzQasXHSitxgXOUSTxbV52kxJmR-jP4x6TqahEXfLGdvPcs-zXNW5BrkNC936_3ZbdWUqlzrxW8aK6Ugs0KNtC-fK6lft3cMO-llKD0dtuaq-b3rffILEoSY0pBuBjEcXdi8u4gnC-0UDkJjAvlFCeMRWTkNOdKEhRFnnPF-TRNc6RCyB_E_XSsPJFGMTPFRxFy1ai50IRiwcwz_50QiIuLHqtWqA8lZX7TvBrdgfHmKV83P798_nH3bfXw_ev93e3DyremK6tBGUCpje6GEHrvx63yPaJBpzctdjBq5_uhNco4r9WIALAxejsorXttZN9eN58uusd5mDD4ulvdxR4zTS6fbHJk__2JtLOPabEgO11DVoV3Two5_ZqRi52IPR4OLmKa2SrTKwkgta5QuEB9TswZx-c5IO3ZQ7u31UN79tBePKycjxcO1isshNmyJ6zHCpTRFxsS_Yf9ByhoqOk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2892011055</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Access to food and physical activity environment resources in rural communities: Impact of using driving time versus physical distance indicators</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Dixon, Brittney N. ; Hong, Young-Rock ; Perri, Michael G. ; Allen, Acquel ; Aufmuth, Joe ; Ross, Kathryn M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dixon, Brittney N. ; Hong, Young-Rock ; Perri, Michael G. ; Allen, Acquel ; Aufmuth, Joe ; Ross, Kathryn M.</creatorcontrib><description>The one-mile buffer is commonly used in examining associations between the built environment and weight-related outcomes; however, this buffer may not adequately capture access to built environment resources among individuals residing in geographically dispersed rural communities. Thus, there is need to explore how different buffer sizes and types capture access to built environment resources in rural communities. This study compared two physical distance buffers (i.e., one-mile and two-mile) against two driving distances (i.e., 15-min and 30-min) to determine ability to capture access to built environment resources related to dietary intake and physical activity for participants in a weight management trial across rural counties. Data from the Rural Lifestyle Eating and Activity (Rural LEAP) trial were combined with publicly available geospatial datasets to identify and examine built environment resources for individuals residing in 13 rural counties in Florida. Descriptive statistics were calculated to determine access to built environment resources, and paired samples t-tests were used to compare access across various buffers and by level of rurality. Results demonstrated limited resources available within the one- and two-mile buffers; however, participants had greater access to resources in the 15- and 30-min driving distances. Using supermarkets and grocery stores as an example, findings also demonstrated that participants residing in less rural counties compared to more rural counties had greater access to supermarkets and grocery stores within the 15-min (mean [SD] 9.16 [6.03], p &lt; .0001) and 30-min (mean [SD] 24.82 [9.19], p = .007) driving distance buffers. There were no significant differences in the number of supermarkets between more or less rural counties for the one- and two-mile buffers. Driving distances may be useful measures to capture access to built environment resources in rural communities. Future studies should examine alternative buffers that adequately capture built environment resources accessed by rural residents. •Differences may exist in access to resources by level of rurality.•Limited access to built environment resources in 1-mile and 2-mile buffers.•Driving distance may better capture access to built environment resources.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2214-1405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2214-1413</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jth.2022.101521</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Built environment ; Rural ; Weight</subject><ispartof>Journal of transport &amp; health, 2022-12, Vol.27, p.101521, Article 101521</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-b281e05856bdd9ccf72c9ee8ea543e61f5ac9b3828ac52fe1114857b255958093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-b281e05856bdd9ccf72c9ee8ea543e61f5ac9b3828ac52fe1114857b255958093</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3628-766X ; 0000-0003-3651-1542 ; 0000-0002-0366-5687 ; 0000-0001-5006-0448 ; 0000-0002-2750-7237 ; 0000-0003-3408-4524</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dixon, Brittney N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Young-Rock</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perri, Michael G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Acquel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aufmuth, Joe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, Kathryn M.</creatorcontrib><title>Access to food and physical activity environment resources in rural communities: Impact of using driving time versus physical distance indicators</title><title>Journal of transport &amp; health</title><description>The one-mile buffer is commonly used in examining associations between the built environment and weight-related outcomes; however, this buffer may not adequately capture access to built environment resources among individuals residing in geographically dispersed rural communities. Thus, there is need to explore how different buffer sizes and types capture access to built environment resources in rural communities. This study compared two physical distance buffers (i.e., one-mile and two-mile) against two driving distances (i.e., 15-min and 30-min) to determine ability to capture access to built environment resources related to dietary intake and physical activity for participants in a weight management trial across rural counties. Data from the Rural Lifestyle Eating and Activity (Rural LEAP) trial were combined with publicly available geospatial datasets to identify and examine built environment resources for individuals residing in 13 rural counties in Florida. Descriptive statistics were calculated to determine access to built environment resources, and paired samples t-tests were used to compare access across various buffers and by level of rurality. Results demonstrated limited resources available within the one- and two-mile buffers; however, participants had greater access to resources in the 15- and 30-min driving distances. Using supermarkets and grocery stores as an example, findings also demonstrated that participants residing in less rural counties compared to more rural counties had greater access to supermarkets and grocery stores within the 15-min (mean [SD] 9.16 [6.03], p &lt; .0001) and 30-min (mean [SD] 24.82 [9.19], p = .007) driving distance buffers. There were no significant differences in the number of supermarkets between more or less rural counties for the one- and two-mile buffers. Driving distances may be useful measures to capture access to built environment resources in rural communities. Future studies should examine alternative buffers that adequately capture built environment resources accessed by rural residents. •Differences may exist in access to resources by level of rurality.•Limited access to built environment resources in 1-mile and 2-mile buffers.•Driving distance may better capture access to built environment resources.</description><subject>Built environment</subject><subject>Rural</subject><subject>Weight</subject><issn>2214-1405</issn><issn>2214-1413</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UU2PEzEMHSGQWC37A7jlyKUlzjTTDBzQasXHSitxgXOUSTxbV52kxJmR-jP4x6TqahEXfLGdvPcs-zXNW5BrkNC936_3ZbdWUqlzrxW8aK6Ugs0KNtC-fK6lft3cMO-llKD0dtuaq-b3rffILEoSY0pBuBjEcXdi8u4gnC-0UDkJjAvlFCeMRWTkNOdKEhRFnnPF-TRNc6RCyB_E_XSsPJFGMTPFRxFy1ai50IRiwcwz_50QiIuLHqtWqA8lZX7TvBrdgfHmKV83P798_nH3bfXw_ev93e3DyremK6tBGUCpje6GEHrvx63yPaJBpzctdjBq5_uhNco4r9WIALAxejsorXttZN9eN58uusd5mDD4ulvdxR4zTS6fbHJk__2JtLOPabEgO11DVoV3Two5_ZqRi52IPR4OLmKa2SrTKwkgta5QuEB9TswZx-c5IO3ZQ7u31UN79tBePKycjxcO1isshNmyJ6zHCpTRFxsS_Yf9ByhoqOk</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Dixon, Brittney N.</creator><creator>Hong, Young-Rock</creator><creator>Perri, Michael G.</creator><creator>Allen, Acquel</creator><creator>Aufmuth, Joe</creator><creator>Ross, Kathryn M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3628-766X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3651-1542</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0366-5687</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5006-0448</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2750-7237</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3408-4524</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>Access to food and physical activity environment resources in rural communities: Impact of using driving time versus physical distance indicators</title><author>Dixon, Brittney N. ; Hong, Young-Rock ; Perri, Michael G. ; Allen, Acquel ; Aufmuth, Joe ; Ross, Kathryn M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-b281e05856bdd9ccf72c9ee8ea543e61f5ac9b3828ac52fe1114857b255958093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Built environment</topic><topic>Rural</topic><topic>Weight</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dixon, Brittney N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Young-Rock</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perri, Michael G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Acquel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aufmuth, Joe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, Kathryn M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of transport &amp; health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dixon, Brittney N.</au><au>Hong, Young-Rock</au><au>Perri, Michael G.</au><au>Allen, Acquel</au><au>Aufmuth, Joe</au><au>Ross, Kathryn M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Access to food and physical activity environment resources in rural communities: Impact of using driving time versus physical distance indicators</atitle><jtitle>Journal of transport &amp; health</jtitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>27</volume><spage>101521</spage><pages>101521-</pages><artnum>101521</artnum><issn>2214-1405</issn><eissn>2214-1413</eissn><abstract>The one-mile buffer is commonly used in examining associations between the built environment and weight-related outcomes; however, this buffer may not adequately capture access to built environment resources among individuals residing in geographically dispersed rural communities. Thus, there is need to explore how different buffer sizes and types capture access to built environment resources in rural communities. This study compared two physical distance buffers (i.e., one-mile and two-mile) against two driving distances (i.e., 15-min and 30-min) to determine ability to capture access to built environment resources related to dietary intake and physical activity for participants in a weight management trial across rural counties. Data from the Rural Lifestyle Eating and Activity (Rural LEAP) trial were combined with publicly available geospatial datasets to identify and examine built environment resources for individuals residing in 13 rural counties in Florida. Descriptive statistics were calculated to determine access to built environment resources, and paired samples t-tests were used to compare access across various buffers and by level of rurality. Results demonstrated limited resources available within the one- and two-mile buffers; however, participants had greater access to resources in the 15- and 30-min driving distances. Using supermarkets and grocery stores as an example, findings also demonstrated that participants residing in less rural counties compared to more rural counties had greater access to supermarkets and grocery stores within the 15-min (mean [SD] 9.16 [6.03], p &lt; .0001) and 30-min (mean [SD] 24.82 [9.19], p = .007) driving distance buffers. There were no significant differences in the number of supermarkets between more or less rural counties for the one- and two-mile buffers. Driving distances may be useful measures to capture access to built environment resources in rural communities. Future studies should examine alternative buffers that adequately capture built environment resources accessed by rural residents. •Differences may exist in access to resources by level of rurality.•Limited access to built environment resources in 1-mile and 2-mile buffers.•Driving distance may better capture access to built environment resources.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jth.2022.101521</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3628-766X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3651-1542</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0366-5687</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5006-0448</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2750-7237</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3408-4524</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2214-1405
ispartof Journal of transport & health, 2022-12, Vol.27, p.101521, Article 101521
issn 2214-1405
2214-1413
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10655550
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Built environment
Rural
Weight
title Access to food and physical activity environment resources in rural communities: Impact of using driving time versus physical distance indicators
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T12%3A42%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Access%20to%20food%20and%20physical%20activity%20environment%20resources%20in%20rural%20communities:%20Impact%20of%20using%20driving%20time%20versus%20physical%20distance%20indicators&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20transport%20&%20health&rft.au=Dixon,%20Brittney%20N.&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=27&rft.spage=101521&rft.pages=101521-&rft.artnum=101521&rft.issn=2214-1405&rft.eissn=2214-1413&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jth.2022.101521&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2892011055%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-b281e05856bdd9ccf72c9ee8ea543e61f5ac9b3828ac52fe1114857b255958093%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2892011055&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true