Exploring the role of retinal fluid as a biomarker for the management of diabetic macular oedema

• Published in: Eye (London) 2024-01, Vol.38 (1), p.54-60
• Main Authors: Khoramnia, Ramin, Nguyen, Quan Dong, Kertes, Peter J., Sararols Ramsay, Laura, Vujosevic, Stela, Anderesi, Majid, Igwe, Franklin, Eter, Nicole
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: 692/53/2422; 692/699/3161/3175; Acuity; Angiogenesis Inhibitors - therapeutic use; Biomarkers; Clinical trials; Diabetes; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetic Retinopathy - complications; Diabetic Retinopathy - diagnosis; Diabetic Retinopathy - therapy; Edema; Humans; Intravitreal Injections; Laboratory Medicine; Macular Edema - diagnosis; Macular Edema - drug therapy; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Ophthalmology; Patients; Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology; Retina; Review; Review Article; Surgery; Surgical Oncology; Tomography, Optical Coherence - methods; Treatment Outcome; Vascular endothelial growth factor; Visual acuity
• ISSN: 0950-222X; 1476-5454
• DOI: 10.1038/s41433-023-02637-2

Anti-VEGF therapies are associated with significant gains in visual acuity and fluid resolution in the treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DMO) and have become the standard of care. However, despite their efficacy, outcomes can be unpredictable, vary widely between individual eyes, and a large proportion of patients have persistent fluid following initial treatment, with a negative impact on visual outcomes. Anatomical parameters measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT), in addition to visual acuity, are key to monitoring treatment effectiveness and guiding retreatment decisions; however, existing guidelines on the management of DMO lack clear recommendations for interpretation of OCT parameters, or proposed thresholds of various markers to guide retreatment decisions. Although central subfield thickness (CSFT) has been widely used as a marker for retreatment decisions in clinical trials in DMO, and a reduction in CSFT has generally been shown to accompany improvements in best-corrected visual acuity with treatment, analyses of the relationship between these parameters show that the correlation is small to moderate. A more direct relationship can be seen between an increased magnitude of CSFT fluctuations over time and poorer visual acuity, suggesting that control of CSFT could be important in maximising visual outcomes. The relationship between visual outcomes and qualitatively assessed intraretinal fluid and subretinal fluid is also unclear, although quantitative assessments of fluid parameters suggest that untreated intraretinal fluid and subretinal fluid negatively impact visual outcomes. These findings highlight a need for clearer guidelines on the management of retinal fluid to improve visual outcomes for patients with DMO.