Loading…

Quality of life and satisfaction among prostate cancer patients followed in a dedicated survivorship clinic

BACKGROUND Integrating quality‐of‐life (QOL) outcomes into clinics may assist providers in identifying and responding to problems experienced by cancer survivors. To date, however, patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) such as QOL are used infrequently to guide care. We integrated QOL assessments into a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cancer 2015-05, Vol.121 (9), p.1484-1491
Main Authors: Gilbert, Scott M., Dunn, Rodney L., Wittmann, Daniela, Montgomery, Jeffrey S., Hollingsworth, John M., Miller, David C., Hollenbeck, Brent K., Wei, John T., Montie, James E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5155-d48355d0199605e38d313bcbe20d231f44d214869618d35201571008fa078d6c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5155-d48355d0199605e38d313bcbe20d231f44d214869618d35201571008fa078d6c3
container_end_page 1491
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1484
container_title Cancer
container_volume 121
creator Gilbert, Scott M.
Dunn, Rodney L.
Wittmann, Daniela
Montgomery, Jeffrey S.
Hollingsworth, John M.
Miller, David C.
Hollenbeck, Brent K.
Wei, John T.
Montie, James E.
description BACKGROUND Integrating quality‐of‐life (QOL) outcomes into clinics may assist providers in identifying and responding to problems experienced by cancer survivors. To date, however, patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) such as QOL are used infrequently to guide care. We integrated QOL assessments into a prostate cancer survivorship clinic and compared recovery and satisfaction among men managed in the survivorship clinic with those followed with more routine care. METHODS We conducted a before‐after study comparing 235 men treated surgically for prostate cancer who received routine follow‐up care with 102 men managed in a survivorship clinic characterized by point‐of‐care QOL reporting and integration of QOL scores (EPIC) following radical prostatectomy. We then assessed baseline and postprostatectomy QOL at 6 and 12 months, as well as patient satisfaction, and compared outcomes between groups. RESULTS Although baseline QOL was comparable, scores were generally higher among the survivorship group at 6 months and 1 year compared with those followed with routine care. In particular, sexual function scores were significantly higher among patients managed in the survivorship clinic (52.2 vs 33.6 at 1 year, P 
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cncr.29215
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10792765</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2160539061</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5155-d48355d0199605e38d313bcbe20d231f44d214869618d35201571008fa078d6c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU2LFDEQhoMo7rh68QdIwIsIvVYlnU73SWTwCxZFUfAWMkl6N2smaZPuWebfm3HWRT14CkU9PLypl5DHCGcIwF6YaPIZGxiKO2SFMMgGsGV3yQoA-ka0_NsJeVDKVR0lE_w-OWFC8B5Qrsj3T4sOft7TNNLgR0d1tLTo2ZdRm9mnSPU2xQs65VRmPTtqdDQu06kiLs6FjimEdO0s9RWl1llvKlYdS975Xcrl0k_UBB-9eUjujToU9-jmPSVf37z-sn7XnH98-3796rwxAoVobNtzISzgMHQgHO8tR74xG8fAMo5j21qGbd8NHdaVYIBC1jv0owbZ287wU_Ly6J2WzdZZU3NmHdSU_VbnvUraq7830V-qi7RTCHJgshPV8OzGkNOPxZVZbX0xLgQdXVqKwk6KXnYAWNGn_6BXacmx_k8xrPn5AN2Ben6kTL1jyW68TYOgDiWqQ4nqV4kVfvJn_lv0d2sVwCNw7YPb_0el1h_Wn4_Sn8IFp7w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2160539061</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quality of life and satisfaction among prostate cancer patients followed in a dedicated survivorship clinic</title><source>Wiley</source><source>EZB Free E-Journals</source><creator>Gilbert, Scott M. ; Dunn, Rodney L. ; Wittmann, Daniela ; Montgomery, Jeffrey S. ; Hollingsworth, John M. ; Miller, David C. ; Hollenbeck, Brent K. ; Wei, John T. ; Montie, James E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Scott M. ; Dunn, Rodney L. ; Wittmann, Daniela ; Montgomery, Jeffrey S. ; Hollingsworth, John M. ; Miller, David C. ; Hollenbeck, Brent K. ; Wei, John T. ; Montie, James E.</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND Integrating quality‐of‐life (QOL) outcomes into clinics may assist providers in identifying and responding to problems experienced by cancer survivors. To date, however, patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) such as QOL are used infrequently to guide care. We integrated QOL assessments into a prostate cancer survivorship clinic and compared recovery and satisfaction among men managed in the survivorship clinic with those followed with more routine care. METHODS We conducted a before‐after study comparing 235 men treated surgically for prostate cancer who received routine follow‐up care with 102 men managed in a survivorship clinic characterized by point‐of‐care QOL reporting and integration of QOL scores (EPIC) following radical prostatectomy. We then assessed baseline and postprostatectomy QOL at 6 and 12 months, as well as patient satisfaction, and compared outcomes between groups. RESULTS Although baseline QOL was comparable, scores were generally higher among the survivorship group at 6 months and 1 year compared with those followed with routine care. In particular, sexual function scores were significantly higher among patients managed in the survivorship clinic (52.2 vs 33.6 at 1 year, P &lt; .01). Satisfaction scores were consistently higher in the survivorship clinic group compared with the routine‐care group (all P &lt; .05). CONCLUSIONS Patient QOL and satisfaction were higher among men managed in a survivorship program, suggesting that disease‐specific survivorship clinics that integrate QOL reporting into care pathways may yield better outcomes compared with less tailored approaches to patient care following cancer therapy. Cancer 2015;121:1484–1491. © 2014 American Cancer Society. Integrating patient‐reported outcomes such as quality of life into the recovery care of men with prostate cancer is associated with better outcomes. These results indicate that more tailored approaches to evaluating and addressing patient‐reported problems improve care and support survivorship models of care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29215</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25538017</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Cancer ; Cancer surgery ; Clinics ; Disease control ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Men ; Middle Aged ; Oncology ; Oncology Service, Hospital ; Patient satisfaction ; Patients ; Personal Satisfaction ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatectomy ; Prostatic Neoplasms - psychology ; Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery ; Quality of Life ; quality of life assessment ; Survival ; Survivors ; survivorship care ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 2015-05, Vol.121 (9), p.1484-1491</ispartof><rights>2014 American Cancer Society</rights><rights>2014 American Cancer Society.</rights><rights>2015 American Cancer Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5155-d48355d0199605e38d313bcbe20d231f44d214869618d35201571008fa078d6c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5155-d48355d0199605e38d313bcbe20d231f44d214869618d35201571008fa078d6c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25538017$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Scott M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunn, Rodney L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wittmann, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montgomery, Jeffrey S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollingsworth, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, David C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollenbeck, Brent K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, John T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montie, James E.</creatorcontrib><title>Quality of life and satisfaction among prostate cancer patients followed in a dedicated survivorship clinic</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND Integrating quality‐of‐life (QOL) outcomes into clinics may assist providers in identifying and responding to problems experienced by cancer survivors. To date, however, patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) such as QOL are used infrequently to guide care. We integrated QOL assessments into a prostate cancer survivorship clinic and compared recovery and satisfaction among men managed in the survivorship clinic with those followed with more routine care. METHODS We conducted a before‐after study comparing 235 men treated surgically for prostate cancer who received routine follow‐up care with 102 men managed in a survivorship clinic characterized by point‐of‐care QOL reporting and integration of QOL scores (EPIC) following radical prostatectomy. We then assessed baseline and postprostatectomy QOL at 6 and 12 months, as well as patient satisfaction, and compared outcomes between groups. RESULTS Although baseline QOL was comparable, scores were generally higher among the survivorship group at 6 months and 1 year compared with those followed with routine care. In particular, sexual function scores were significantly higher among patients managed in the survivorship clinic (52.2 vs 33.6 at 1 year, P &lt; .01). Satisfaction scores were consistently higher in the survivorship clinic group compared with the routine‐care group (all P &lt; .05). CONCLUSIONS Patient QOL and satisfaction were higher among men managed in a survivorship program, suggesting that disease‐specific survivorship clinics that integrate QOL reporting into care pathways may yield better outcomes compared with less tailored approaches to patient care following cancer therapy. Cancer 2015;121:1484–1491. © 2014 American Cancer Society. Integrating patient‐reported outcomes such as quality of life into the recovery care of men with prostate cancer is associated with better outcomes. These results indicate that more tailored approaches to evaluating and addressing patient‐reported problems improve care and support survivorship models of care.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer surgery</subject><subject>Clinics</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Oncology Service, Hospital</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Personal Satisfaction</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatectomy</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>quality of life assessment</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Survivors</subject><subject>survivorship care</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU2LFDEQhoMo7rh68QdIwIsIvVYlnU73SWTwCxZFUfAWMkl6N2smaZPuWebfm3HWRT14CkU9PLypl5DHCGcIwF6YaPIZGxiKO2SFMMgGsGV3yQoA-ka0_NsJeVDKVR0lE_w-OWFC8B5Qrsj3T4sOft7TNNLgR0d1tLTo2ZdRm9mnSPU2xQs65VRmPTtqdDQu06kiLs6FjimEdO0s9RWl1llvKlYdS975Xcrl0k_UBB-9eUjujToU9-jmPSVf37z-sn7XnH98-3796rwxAoVobNtzISzgMHQgHO8tR74xG8fAMo5j21qGbd8NHdaVYIBC1jv0owbZ287wU_Ly6J2WzdZZU3NmHdSU_VbnvUraq7830V-qi7RTCHJgshPV8OzGkNOPxZVZbX0xLgQdXVqKwk6KXnYAWNGn_6BXacmx_k8xrPn5AN2Ben6kTL1jyW68TYOgDiWqQ4nqV4kVfvJn_lv0d2sVwCNw7YPb_0el1h_Wn4_Sn8IFp7w</recordid><startdate>20150501</startdate><enddate>20150501</enddate><creator>Gilbert, Scott M.</creator><creator>Dunn, Rodney L.</creator><creator>Wittmann, Daniela</creator><creator>Montgomery, Jeffrey S.</creator><creator>Hollingsworth, John M.</creator><creator>Miller, David C.</creator><creator>Hollenbeck, Brent K.</creator><creator>Wei, John T.</creator><creator>Montie, James E.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150501</creationdate><title>Quality of life and satisfaction among prostate cancer patients followed in a dedicated survivorship clinic</title><author>Gilbert, Scott M. ; Dunn, Rodney L. ; Wittmann, Daniela ; Montgomery, Jeffrey S. ; Hollingsworth, John M. ; Miller, David C. ; Hollenbeck, Brent K. ; Wei, John T. ; Montie, James E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5155-d48355d0199605e38d313bcbe20d231f44d214869618d35201571008fa078d6c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer surgery</topic><topic>Clinics</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Oncology Service, Hospital</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Personal Satisfaction</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatectomy</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>quality of life assessment</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Survivors</topic><topic>survivorship care</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Scott M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunn, Rodney L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wittmann, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montgomery, Jeffrey S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollingsworth, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, David C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollenbeck, Brent K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, John T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montie, James E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gilbert, Scott M.</au><au>Dunn, Rodney L.</au><au>Wittmann, Daniela</au><au>Montgomery, Jeffrey S.</au><au>Hollingsworth, John M.</au><au>Miller, David C.</au><au>Hollenbeck, Brent K.</au><au>Wei, John T.</au><au>Montie, James E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quality of life and satisfaction among prostate cancer patients followed in a dedicated survivorship clinic</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>2015-05-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>121</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1484</spage><epage>1491</epage><pages>1484-1491</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND Integrating quality‐of‐life (QOL) outcomes into clinics may assist providers in identifying and responding to problems experienced by cancer survivors. To date, however, patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) such as QOL are used infrequently to guide care. We integrated QOL assessments into a prostate cancer survivorship clinic and compared recovery and satisfaction among men managed in the survivorship clinic with those followed with more routine care. METHODS We conducted a before‐after study comparing 235 men treated surgically for prostate cancer who received routine follow‐up care with 102 men managed in a survivorship clinic characterized by point‐of‐care QOL reporting and integration of QOL scores (EPIC) following radical prostatectomy. We then assessed baseline and postprostatectomy QOL at 6 and 12 months, as well as patient satisfaction, and compared outcomes between groups. RESULTS Although baseline QOL was comparable, scores were generally higher among the survivorship group at 6 months and 1 year compared with those followed with routine care. In particular, sexual function scores were significantly higher among patients managed in the survivorship clinic (52.2 vs 33.6 at 1 year, P &lt; .01). Satisfaction scores were consistently higher in the survivorship clinic group compared with the routine‐care group (all P &lt; .05). CONCLUSIONS Patient QOL and satisfaction were higher among men managed in a survivorship program, suggesting that disease‐specific survivorship clinics that integrate QOL reporting into care pathways may yield better outcomes compared with less tailored approaches to patient care following cancer therapy. Cancer 2015;121:1484–1491. © 2014 American Cancer Society. Integrating patient‐reported outcomes such as quality of life into the recovery care of men with prostate cancer is associated with better outcomes. These results indicate that more tailored approaches to evaluating and addressing patient‐reported problems improve care and support survivorship models of care.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>25538017</pmid><doi>10.1002/cncr.29215</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-543X
ispartof Cancer, 2015-05, Vol.121 (9), p.1484-1491
issn 0008-543X
1097-0142
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10792765
source Wiley; EZB Free E-Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Cancer
Cancer surgery
Clinics
Disease control
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Men
Middle Aged
Oncology
Oncology Service, Hospital
Patient satisfaction
Patients
Personal Satisfaction
Prostate cancer
Prostatectomy
Prostatic Neoplasms - psychology
Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery
Quality of Life
quality of life assessment
Survival
Survivors
survivorship care
Treatment Outcome
title Quality of life and satisfaction among prostate cancer patients followed in a dedicated survivorship clinic
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T04%3A26%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quality%20of%20life%20and%20satisfaction%20among%20prostate%20cancer%20patients%20followed%20in%20a%20dedicated%20survivorship%20clinic&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=Gilbert,%20Scott%20M.&rft.date=2015-05-01&rft.volume=121&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1484&rft.epage=1491&rft.pages=1484-1491&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cncr.29215&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2160539061%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5155-d48355d0199605e38d313bcbe20d231f44d214869618d35201571008fa078d6c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2160539061&rft_id=info:pmid/25538017&rfr_iscdi=true