Astigmatism Influences Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis in Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Imaging

• Published in: Translational vision science & technology 2024-01, Vol.13 (1), p.10-10
• Main Authors: Vidal-Oliver, Lourdes, Gallego-Pinazo, Roberto, Dolz-Marco, Rosa
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Angiography; Astigmatism - diagnostic imaging; Cross-Sectional Studies; Humans; Macula Lutea; Prospective Studies; Retina; Tomography, Optical Coherence
• ISSN: 2164-2591; 2164-2591
• DOI: 10.1167/tvst.13.1.10

The purpose of this paper was to study the influence of astigmatism in optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) images in a quantitative and qualitative analysis. This was a prospective, cross-sectional study. We included 110 eyes of 110 patients: 20 eyes without astigmatism and 90 eyes with astigmatism ≥0.5 diopters (D). We performed a macula centered OCTA as a reference image. In patients without astigmatism, registered follow-up scans were performed after induction of -1 and -2 D astigmatism. In patients with astigmatism, we performed the follow-up scan after astigmatism correction. We used a set of cylindrical lenses attached to the camera head of the SPECTRALIS (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). A quantitative and qualitative analysis of the superficial vascular complex (SVC) and deep vascular complex (DVC) was performed. The main outcome measures were vessel density (VD), image quality, and the presence of artifacts. Mean VD of the SVC was significantly higher in the reference images compared with the images after induction of -2 D. Differences with -1 D were nonsignificant. Higher degrees of astigmatisms had higher VD dropout (0.012-0.02 per diopter in SVC). Astigmatism axis showed no relevance in our cohort. Image quality assessed by two independent observers was graded as higher in images without astigmatism. Defocus and attenuation were more prevalent in images with astigmatism. Astigmatism of -2 D affects quantification of VD in OCTA images, mainly affecting the SVC, as well as the subjective quality assessment. Correction of this refractive error might be necessary for an accurate quantitative assessment of OCTA images. Correcting astigmatism of 2 D or greater appears to be necessary when analyzing OCTA images.