Loading…
Feasibility and Challenges of Transradial Approach in Neuroendovascular Therapy: A Retrospective Observational Study
Objective: Transradial approach (TRA) is increasingly used as a viable alternative to the traditional transfemoral approach (TFA) in neuroendovascular therapy (NET) owing to its potential anatomical benefits and lower puncture-site complication rates. However, the real-world challenges of implementi...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of Neuroendovascular Therapy 2024, Vol.18(1), pp.10-17 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c608t-8a2e1c8dd0b01a91e7231a8be6ed34ddf4d97fdc73911af6fe7eaecc81a32d683 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c608t-8a2e1c8dd0b01a91e7231a8be6ed34ddf4d97fdc73911af6fe7eaecc81a32d683 |
container_end_page | 17 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 10 |
container_title | Journal of Neuroendovascular Therapy |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Tanoue, Shunsuke Ono, Kenichiro Toyooka, Terushige Nakagawa, Masaya Wada, Kojiro |
description | Objective: Transradial approach (TRA) is increasingly used as a viable alternative to the traditional transfemoral approach (TFA) in neuroendovascular therapy (NET) owing to its potential anatomical benefits and lower puncture-site complication rates. However, the real-world challenges of implementing TRA-NET have not been thoroughly studied, particularly those related to guide catheter (GC) placement. In this study, we aimed to explore the feasibility and challenges of TRA-NET, with a specific focus on GC placement.Methods: This retrospective observational study included patients who underwent NET at our institution between December 2019 and May 2022. Procedural success was defined as the successful placement of a GC in the target vessel. Cases in which a Simmons-shaped GC was used or the approach was changed to TFA were classified as difficult. Safety was assessed based on the rate of severe puncture-site complications requiring either blood transfusion or surgical intervention.Results: Among the 310 patients who underwent NET during the study period, 222 (71.6%) with a median age of 74 years were selected for TRA-NET. The target vessel was in the left anterior circulation (LtAC) in 101 (45.5%) patients, and 8-F GCs were the most frequently used (40.1%). TRA-NET achieved a 95.0% success rate, with a switch to TFA required in 5.0% of the cases. Procedural challenges occurred in 42 (18.9%) patients, primarily in those with LtAC lesions. Specifically, a type III aortic arch (p |
doi_str_mv | 10.5797/jnet.oa.2023-0048 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmedcentral_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10800168</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10800168</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c608t-8a2e1c8dd0b01a91e7231a8be6ed34ddf4d97fdc73911af6fe7eaecc81a32d683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkMGO0zAQhiMEEtWyD8DNL5DicdLE4YKqil2QVqwE5WxN7EnjymtHtlupb09CUQEfZizZ3zf2XxTvga83bdd-OHrK64BrwUVVcl7LV8VKgGxKUXf162IFUoqy5q14W9yndOTzajhIqFdFfiBMtrfO5gtDb9huROfIHyixMLB9RJ8iGouObacpBtQjs559o1MM5E04Y9Inh5HtR4o4XT6yLftOOYY0kc72TOy5TxTPmG3ws-RHPpnLu-LNgC7R_Z9-V_x8-LzffSmfnh-_7rZPpW64zKVEQaClMbzngB1QKypA2VNDpqqNGWrTtYPRbdUB4NAM1BKS1hKwEqaR1V3x6eqdTv0LGU0-R3RqivYF40UFtOr_E29HdQhnBVxyDr8NcDXo-Ucp0nCDgasle7VkP5vUkr1asp-Zxyszi61GF7yzntQxnOKcQFJ62CzQuCD1jIDkMDexbPlS2rraQNd0f03HlPFAt9kYs9WOrrNBKljKv2-43dAjRkW--gVsHK3a</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feasibility and Challenges of Transradial Approach in Neuroendovascular Therapy: A Retrospective Observational Study</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>J-STAGE</source><creator>Tanoue, Shunsuke ; Ono, Kenichiro ; Toyooka, Terushige ; Nakagawa, Masaya ; Wada, Kojiro</creator><creatorcontrib>Tanoue, Shunsuke ; Ono, Kenichiro ; Toyooka, Terushige ; Nakagawa, Masaya ; Wada, Kojiro ; Department of Neurosurgery ; Mishuku Hospital ; National Defense Medical College Hospital</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: Transradial approach (TRA) is increasingly used as a viable alternative to the traditional transfemoral approach (TFA) in neuroendovascular therapy (NET) owing to its potential anatomical benefits and lower puncture-site complication rates. However, the real-world challenges of implementing TRA-NET have not been thoroughly studied, particularly those related to guide catheter (GC) placement. In this study, we aimed to explore the feasibility and challenges of TRA-NET, with a specific focus on GC placement.Methods: This retrospective observational study included patients who underwent NET at our institution between December 2019 and May 2022. Procedural success was defined as the successful placement of a GC in the target vessel. Cases in which a Simmons-shaped GC was used or the approach was changed to TFA were classified as difficult. Safety was assessed based on the rate of severe puncture-site complications requiring either blood transfusion or surgical intervention.Results: Among the 310 patients who underwent NET during the study period, 222 (71.6%) with a median age of 74 years were selected for TRA-NET. The target vessel was in the left anterior circulation (LtAC) in 101 (45.5%) patients, and 8-F GCs were the most frequently used (40.1%). TRA-NET achieved a 95.0% success rate, with a switch to TFA required in 5.0% of the cases. Procedural challenges occurred in 42 (18.9%) patients, primarily in those with LtAC lesions. Specifically, a type III aortic arch (p <0.0001) and age ≥80 years (p = 0.01) were significantly associated with procedural difficulties. Radial artery evaluation was confirmed in 66 cases (29.7%), revealing one instance (1.5%) of radial artery occlusion. No severe puncture-site complications were observed.Conclusion: TRA-NET may provide substantial therapeutic benefits without significant limitations in device use. However, it may be challenging, particularly in older patients and those with a type III aortic arch with LtAC lesions. Consequently, careful selection of the approach route is imperative.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1882-4072</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2186-2494</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5797/jnet.oa.2023-0048</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy</publisher><subject>case series ; neuroendovascular therapy ; Original ; radial access</subject><ispartof>Journal of Neuroendovascular Therapy, 2024, Vol.18(1), pp.10-17</ispartof><rights>2024 The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy</rights><rights>2024 The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c608t-8a2e1c8dd0b01a91e7231a8be6ed34ddf4d97fdc73911af6fe7eaecc81a32d683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c608t-8a2e1c8dd0b01a91e7231a8be6ed34ddf4d97fdc73911af6fe7eaecc81a32d683</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10800168/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10800168/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,1882,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tanoue, Shunsuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ono, Kenichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toyooka, Terushige</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakagawa, Masaya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wada, Kojiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Neurosurgery</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mishuku Hospital</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Defense Medical College Hospital</creatorcontrib><title>Feasibility and Challenges of Transradial Approach in Neuroendovascular Therapy: A Retrospective Observational Study</title><title>Journal of Neuroendovascular Therapy</title><addtitle>JNET</addtitle><description>Objective: Transradial approach (TRA) is increasingly used as a viable alternative to the traditional transfemoral approach (TFA) in neuroendovascular therapy (NET) owing to its potential anatomical benefits and lower puncture-site complication rates. However, the real-world challenges of implementing TRA-NET have not been thoroughly studied, particularly those related to guide catheter (GC) placement. In this study, we aimed to explore the feasibility and challenges of TRA-NET, with a specific focus on GC placement.Methods: This retrospective observational study included patients who underwent NET at our institution between December 2019 and May 2022. Procedural success was defined as the successful placement of a GC in the target vessel. Cases in which a Simmons-shaped GC was used or the approach was changed to TFA were classified as difficult. Safety was assessed based on the rate of severe puncture-site complications requiring either blood transfusion or surgical intervention.Results: Among the 310 patients who underwent NET during the study period, 222 (71.6%) with a median age of 74 years were selected for TRA-NET. The target vessel was in the left anterior circulation (LtAC) in 101 (45.5%) patients, and 8-F GCs were the most frequently used (40.1%). TRA-NET achieved a 95.0% success rate, with a switch to TFA required in 5.0% of the cases. Procedural challenges occurred in 42 (18.9%) patients, primarily in those with LtAC lesions. Specifically, a type III aortic arch (p <0.0001) and age ≥80 years (p = 0.01) were significantly associated with procedural difficulties. Radial artery evaluation was confirmed in 66 cases (29.7%), revealing one instance (1.5%) of radial artery occlusion. No severe puncture-site complications were observed.Conclusion: TRA-NET may provide substantial therapeutic benefits without significant limitations in device use. However, it may be challenging, particularly in older patients and those with a type III aortic arch with LtAC lesions. Consequently, careful selection of the approach route is imperative.</description><subject>case series</subject><subject>neuroendovascular therapy</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>radial access</subject><issn>1882-4072</issn><issn>2186-2494</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkMGO0zAQhiMEEtWyD8DNL5DicdLE4YKqil2QVqwE5WxN7EnjymtHtlupb09CUQEfZizZ3zf2XxTvga83bdd-OHrK64BrwUVVcl7LV8VKgGxKUXf162IFUoqy5q14W9yndOTzajhIqFdFfiBMtrfO5gtDb9huROfIHyixMLB9RJ8iGouObacpBtQjs559o1MM5E04Y9Inh5HtR4o4XT6yLftOOYY0kc72TOy5TxTPmG3ws-RHPpnLu-LNgC7R_Z9-V_x8-LzffSmfnh-_7rZPpW64zKVEQaClMbzngB1QKypA2VNDpqqNGWrTtYPRbdUB4NAM1BKS1hKwEqaR1V3x6eqdTv0LGU0-R3RqivYF40UFtOr_E29HdQhnBVxyDr8NcDXo-Ucp0nCDgasle7VkP5vUkr1asp-Zxyszi61GF7yzntQxnOKcQFJ62CzQuCD1jIDkMDexbPlS2rraQNd0f03HlPFAt9kYs9WOrrNBKljKv2-43dAjRkW--gVsHK3a</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Tanoue, Shunsuke</creator><creator>Ono, Kenichiro</creator><creator>Toyooka, Terushige</creator><creator>Nakagawa, Masaya</creator><creator>Wada, Kojiro</creator><general>The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>Feasibility and Challenges of Transradial Approach in Neuroendovascular Therapy: A Retrospective Observational Study</title><author>Tanoue, Shunsuke ; Ono, Kenichiro ; Toyooka, Terushige ; Nakagawa, Masaya ; Wada, Kojiro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c608t-8a2e1c8dd0b01a91e7231a8be6ed34ddf4d97fdc73911af6fe7eaecc81a32d683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>case series</topic><topic>neuroendovascular therapy</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>radial access</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tanoue, Shunsuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ono, Kenichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toyooka, Terushige</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakagawa, Masaya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wada, Kojiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Neurosurgery</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mishuku Hospital</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Defense Medical College Hospital</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of Neuroendovascular Therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tanoue, Shunsuke</au><au>Ono, Kenichiro</au><au>Toyooka, Terushige</au><au>Nakagawa, Masaya</au><au>Wada, Kojiro</au><aucorp>Department of Neurosurgery</aucorp><aucorp>Mishuku Hospital</aucorp><aucorp>National Defense Medical College Hospital</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Feasibility and Challenges of Transradial Approach in Neuroendovascular Therapy: A Retrospective Observational Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Neuroendovascular Therapy</jtitle><addtitle>JNET</addtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>10</spage><epage>17</epage><pages>10-17</pages><artnum>oa.2023-0048</artnum><issn>1882-4072</issn><eissn>2186-2494</eissn><abstract>Objective: Transradial approach (TRA) is increasingly used as a viable alternative to the traditional transfemoral approach (TFA) in neuroendovascular therapy (NET) owing to its potential anatomical benefits and lower puncture-site complication rates. However, the real-world challenges of implementing TRA-NET have not been thoroughly studied, particularly those related to guide catheter (GC) placement. In this study, we aimed to explore the feasibility and challenges of TRA-NET, with a specific focus on GC placement.Methods: This retrospective observational study included patients who underwent NET at our institution between December 2019 and May 2022. Procedural success was defined as the successful placement of a GC in the target vessel. Cases in which a Simmons-shaped GC was used or the approach was changed to TFA were classified as difficult. Safety was assessed based on the rate of severe puncture-site complications requiring either blood transfusion or surgical intervention.Results: Among the 310 patients who underwent NET during the study period, 222 (71.6%) with a median age of 74 years were selected for TRA-NET. The target vessel was in the left anterior circulation (LtAC) in 101 (45.5%) patients, and 8-F GCs were the most frequently used (40.1%). TRA-NET achieved a 95.0% success rate, with a switch to TFA required in 5.0% of the cases. Procedural challenges occurred in 42 (18.9%) patients, primarily in those with LtAC lesions. Specifically, a type III aortic arch (p <0.0001) and age ≥80 years (p = 0.01) were significantly associated with procedural difficulties. Radial artery evaluation was confirmed in 66 cases (29.7%), revealing one instance (1.5%) of radial artery occlusion. No severe puncture-site complications were observed.Conclusion: TRA-NET may provide substantial therapeutic benefits without significant limitations in device use. However, it may be challenging, particularly in older patients and those with a type III aortic arch with LtAC lesions. Consequently, careful selection of the approach route is imperative.</abstract><pub>The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy</pub><doi>10.5797/jnet.oa.2023-0048</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1882-4072 |
ispartof | Journal of Neuroendovascular Therapy, 2024, Vol.18(1), pp.10-17 |
issn | 1882-4072 2186-2494 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10800168 |
source | Open Access: PubMed Central; J-STAGE |
subjects | case series neuroendovascular therapy Original radial access |
title | Feasibility and Challenges of Transradial Approach in Neuroendovascular Therapy: A Retrospective Observational Study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T21%3A56%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmedcentral_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Feasibility%20and%20Challenges%20of%20Transradial%20Approach%20in%20Neuroendovascular%20Therapy:%20A%20Retrospective%20Observational%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Neuroendovascular%20Therapy&rft.au=Tanoue,%20Shunsuke&rft.aucorp=Department%20of%20Neurosurgery&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=10&rft.epage=17&rft.pages=10-17&rft.artnum=oa.2023-0048&rft.issn=1882-4072&rft.eissn=2186-2494&rft_id=info:doi/10.5797/jnet.oa.2023-0048&rft_dat=%3Cpubmedcentral_cross%3Epubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10800168%3C/pubmedcentral_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c608t-8a2e1c8dd0b01a91e7231a8be6ed34ddf4d97fdc73911af6fe7eaecc81a32d683%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |