Loading…

Ultrasonographically derived caudal vena cava parameters acquired in a standing position and lateral recumbency in healthy, lightly sedated cats: a pilot study

Objectives The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of ultrasonographically measuring the caudal vena cava (CVC) at the subxiphoid view of healthy, lightly sedated cats in a standing position and lateral recumbency. Methods This was a prospective, observational, experimental single-cen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of feline medicine and surgery 2022-10, Vol.24 (10), p.1039-1045
Main Authors: Hultman, Tove M, Boysen, Søren R, Owen, Rebecca, Yozova, Ivayla D
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-27b2a4d0366e879806b9c37a4a3dbff983b328b25e3d5031c3b1fb89731724d63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-27b2a4d0366e879806b9c37a4a3dbff983b328b25e3d5031c3b1fb89731724d63
container_end_page 1045
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1039
container_title Journal of feline medicine and surgery
container_volume 24
creator Hultman, Tove M
Boysen, Søren R
Owen, Rebecca
Yozova, Ivayla D
description Objectives The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of ultrasonographically measuring the caudal vena cava (CVC) at the subxiphoid view of healthy, lightly sedated cats in a standing position and lateral recumbency. Methods This was a prospective, observational, experimental single-centre study. Twenty healthy research-purposed cats were enrolled. Two trained operators scanned each cat in two positions – standing and lateral recumbency – in a randomised order. CVC diameter was measured at the narrowest diameter during inspiration and at the widest diameter during expiration, at two anatomical locations along the CVC – where the CVC crosses the diaphragm (base) and 2 mm caudal to the diaphragm. The CVC collapsibility index (CVC-CI) was calculated for each site. Normalcy was assessed with a Shapiro–Wilk test. A one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey’s test was used to compare inspiratory with expiratory values within and between groups. A paired t-test compared the CVC-CI between groups (P ⩽0.05 indicated statistical significance). Spearman’s correlation and Bland–Altman analysis assessed inter-operator variability. Results All ultrasonographic data passed normalcy and were reported as mean ± SD. When compared with each other, inspiratory and expiratory values were statistically different for position, location and operator (all P
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1098612X211064697
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10812311</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1098612X211064697</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2610081111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-27b2a4d0366e879806b9c37a4a3dbff983b328b25e3d5031c3b1fb89731724d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQQCMEoqXwAVyQjxzY4rGzScwFVRUFpEpcqMTNmthO4sprp7azUr6GX8XbLRUIiZNHnjdv7Jmqeg30HKBt3wMVXQPsBwOgTd2I9kl1ClvONqzd0qclLvnNATipXqR0SykVXLDn1QmvBa3rDk6rnzcuR0zBhzHiPFmFzq1Em2j3RhOFi0ZH9sZjifdIZoy4M9nERFDdLTYWyHqCJGX02vqRzCHZbEO585o4LGgRRKOWXW-8Wg_0ZNDlaX1HnB2nXNolowt4aJfThyKbrQu5KBe9vqyeDeiSefVwnlU3V5--X37ZXH_7_PXy4nqjuGhy-XDPsNaUN43pWtHRpheKt1gj1_0wiI73nHU92xqut5SD4j0MfSdaDi2rdcPPqo9H77z0O6OV8WUsTs7R7jCuMqCVf2e8neQY9hJoB4wDFMPbB0MMd4tJWe5sUsY59CYsSbIGaGHhHoUjqmJIKZrhsQ9Qedis_GezpebNnw98rPi9ygKcH4GEo5G3YYm-DOw_xl9PMrAT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2610081111</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ultrasonographically derived caudal vena cava parameters acquired in a standing position and lateral recumbency in healthy, lightly sedated cats: a pilot study</title><source>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</source><creator>Hultman, Tove M ; Boysen, Søren R ; Owen, Rebecca ; Yozova, Ivayla D</creator><creatorcontrib>Hultman, Tove M ; Boysen, Søren R ; Owen, Rebecca ; Yozova, Ivayla D</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of ultrasonographically measuring the caudal vena cava (CVC) at the subxiphoid view of healthy, lightly sedated cats in a standing position and lateral recumbency. Methods This was a prospective, observational, experimental single-centre study. Twenty healthy research-purposed cats were enrolled. Two trained operators scanned each cat in two positions – standing and lateral recumbency – in a randomised order. CVC diameter was measured at the narrowest diameter during inspiration and at the widest diameter during expiration, at two anatomical locations along the CVC – where the CVC crosses the diaphragm (base) and 2 mm caudal to the diaphragm. The CVC collapsibility index (CVC-CI) was calculated for each site. Normalcy was assessed with a Shapiro–Wilk test. A one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey’s test was used to compare inspiratory with expiratory values within and between groups. A paired t-test compared the CVC-CI between groups (P ⩽0.05 indicated statistical significance). Spearman’s correlation and Bland–Altman analysis assessed inter-operator variability. Results All ultrasonographic data passed normalcy and were reported as mean ± SD. When compared with each other, inspiratory and expiratory values were statistically different for position, location and operator (all P &lt;0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference between lateral recumbency or standing position for inspiratory, expiratory and CVC-CI values. Inter-operator variability was substantial, with operator 2 consistently obtaining smaller measurements than operator 1. The mean CVC-CI in lateral recumbency at the base was 24% for operator 1 and 37% for operator 2. For the same site in standing position, CVC-CI was 27% and 41% for operators 1 and 2, respectively. Conclusions and relevance This pilot study demonstrates that it is possible to ultrasonographically measure the CVC diameter in both lateral recumbency and a standing position in healthy, lightly sedated cats. However, measurements obtained are operator dependent with variability between individuals. Further studies are needed to determine if ultrasonographic CVC assessment will prove helpful in estimating intravascular volume status in cats.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1098-612X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1532-2750</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2750</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1098612X211064697</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34904481</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cats ; Original ; Pilot Projects ; Prospective Studies ; Standing Position ; Thorax ; Vena Cava, Inferior - diagnostic imaging</subject><ispartof>Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2022-10, Vol.24 (10), p.1039-1045</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021 2021 International Society of Feline Medicine and American Association of Feline Practitioners</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-27b2a4d0366e879806b9c37a4a3dbff983b328b25e3d5031c3b1fb89731724d63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-27b2a4d0366e879806b9c37a4a3dbff983b328b25e3d5031c3b1fb89731724d63</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6629-0221 ; 0000-0002-0936-4834</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10812311/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10812311/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,21966,27853,27924,27925,44945,45333,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1098612X211064697?utm_source=summon&amp;utm_medium=discovery-provider$$EView_record_in_SAGE_Publications$$FView_record_in_$$GSAGE_Publications</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34904481$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hultman, Tove M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boysen, Søren R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owen, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yozova, Ivayla D</creatorcontrib><title>Ultrasonographically derived caudal vena cava parameters acquired in a standing position and lateral recumbency in healthy, lightly sedated cats: a pilot study</title><title>Journal of feline medicine and surgery</title><addtitle>J Feline Med Surg</addtitle><description>Objectives The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of ultrasonographically measuring the caudal vena cava (CVC) at the subxiphoid view of healthy, lightly sedated cats in a standing position and lateral recumbency. Methods This was a prospective, observational, experimental single-centre study. Twenty healthy research-purposed cats were enrolled. Two trained operators scanned each cat in two positions – standing and lateral recumbency – in a randomised order. CVC diameter was measured at the narrowest diameter during inspiration and at the widest diameter during expiration, at two anatomical locations along the CVC – where the CVC crosses the diaphragm (base) and 2 mm caudal to the diaphragm. The CVC collapsibility index (CVC-CI) was calculated for each site. Normalcy was assessed with a Shapiro–Wilk test. A one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey’s test was used to compare inspiratory with expiratory values within and between groups. A paired t-test compared the CVC-CI between groups (P ⩽0.05 indicated statistical significance). Spearman’s correlation and Bland–Altman analysis assessed inter-operator variability. Results All ultrasonographic data passed normalcy and were reported as mean ± SD. When compared with each other, inspiratory and expiratory values were statistically different for position, location and operator (all P &lt;0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference between lateral recumbency or standing position for inspiratory, expiratory and CVC-CI values. Inter-operator variability was substantial, with operator 2 consistently obtaining smaller measurements than operator 1. The mean CVC-CI in lateral recumbency at the base was 24% for operator 1 and 37% for operator 2. For the same site in standing position, CVC-CI was 27% and 41% for operators 1 and 2, respectively. Conclusions and relevance This pilot study demonstrates that it is possible to ultrasonographically measure the CVC diameter in both lateral recumbency and a standing position in healthy, lightly sedated cats. However, measurements obtained are operator dependent with variability between individuals. Further studies are needed to determine if ultrasonographic CVC assessment will prove helpful in estimating intravascular volume status in cats.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cats</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Standing Position</subject><subject>Thorax</subject><subject>Vena Cava, Inferior - diagnostic imaging</subject><issn>1098-612X</issn><issn>1532-2750</issn><issn>1532-2750</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQQCMEoqXwAVyQjxzY4rGzScwFVRUFpEpcqMTNmthO4sprp7azUr6GX8XbLRUIiZNHnjdv7Jmqeg30HKBt3wMVXQPsBwOgTd2I9kl1ClvONqzd0qclLvnNATipXqR0SykVXLDn1QmvBa3rDk6rnzcuR0zBhzHiPFmFzq1Em2j3RhOFi0ZH9sZjifdIZoy4M9nERFDdLTYWyHqCJGX02vqRzCHZbEO585o4LGgRRKOWXW-8Wg_0ZNDlaX1HnB2nXNolowt4aJfThyKbrQu5KBe9vqyeDeiSefVwnlU3V5--X37ZXH_7_PXy4nqjuGhy-XDPsNaUN43pWtHRpheKt1gj1_0wiI73nHU92xqut5SD4j0MfSdaDi2rdcPPqo9H77z0O6OV8WUsTs7R7jCuMqCVf2e8neQY9hJoB4wDFMPbB0MMd4tJWe5sUsY59CYsSbIGaGHhHoUjqmJIKZrhsQ9Qedis_GezpebNnw98rPi9ygKcH4GEo5G3YYm-DOw_xl9PMrAT</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Hultman, Tove M</creator><creator>Boysen, Søren R</creator><creator>Owen, Rebecca</creator><creator>Yozova, Ivayla D</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6629-0221</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0936-4834</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Ultrasonographically derived caudal vena cava parameters acquired in a standing position and lateral recumbency in healthy, lightly sedated cats: a pilot study</title><author>Hultman, Tove M ; Boysen, Søren R ; Owen, Rebecca ; Yozova, Ivayla D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-27b2a4d0366e879806b9c37a4a3dbff983b328b25e3d5031c3b1fb89731724d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cats</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Standing Position</topic><topic>Thorax</topic><topic>Vena Cava, Inferior - diagnostic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hultman, Tove M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boysen, Søren R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owen, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yozova, Ivayla D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of feline medicine and surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hultman, Tove M</au><au>Boysen, Søren R</au><au>Owen, Rebecca</au><au>Yozova, Ivayla D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ultrasonographically derived caudal vena cava parameters acquired in a standing position and lateral recumbency in healthy, lightly sedated cats: a pilot study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of feline medicine and surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Feline Med Surg</addtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1039</spage><epage>1045</epage><pages>1039-1045</pages><issn>1098-612X</issn><issn>1532-2750</issn><eissn>1532-2750</eissn><abstract>Objectives The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of ultrasonographically measuring the caudal vena cava (CVC) at the subxiphoid view of healthy, lightly sedated cats in a standing position and lateral recumbency. Methods This was a prospective, observational, experimental single-centre study. Twenty healthy research-purposed cats were enrolled. Two trained operators scanned each cat in two positions – standing and lateral recumbency – in a randomised order. CVC diameter was measured at the narrowest diameter during inspiration and at the widest diameter during expiration, at two anatomical locations along the CVC – where the CVC crosses the diaphragm (base) and 2 mm caudal to the diaphragm. The CVC collapsibility index (CVC-CI) was calculated for each site. Normalcy was assessed with a Shapiro–Wilk test. A one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey’s test was used to compare inspiratory with expiratory values within and between groups. A paired t-test compared the CVC-CI between groups (P ⩽0.05 indicated statistical significance). Spearman’s correlation and Bland–Altman analysis assessed inter-operator variability. Results All ultrasonographic data passed normalcy and were reported as mean ± SD. When compared with each other, inspiratory and expiratory values were statistically different for position, location and operator (all P &lt;0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference between lateral recumbency or standing position for inspiratory, expiratory and CVC-CI values. Inter-operator variability was substantial, with operator 2 consistently obtaining smaller measurements than operator 1. The mean CVC-CI in lateral recumbency at the base was 24% for operator 1 and 37% for operator 2. For the same site in standing position, CVC-CI was 27% and 41% for operators 1 and 2, respectively. Conclusions and relevance This pilot study demonstrates that it is possible to ultrasonographically measure the CVC diameter in both lateral recumbency and a standing position in healthy, lightly sedated cats. However, measurements obtained are operator dependent with variability between individuals. Further studies are needed to determine if ultrasonographic CVC assessment will prove helpful in estimating intravascular volume status in cats.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>34904481</pmid><doi>10.1177/1098612X211064697</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6629-0221</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0936-4834</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1098-612X
ispartof Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2022-10, Vol.24 (10), p.1039-1045
issn 1098-612X
1532-2750
1532-2750
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10812311
source Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024
subjects Animals
Cats
Original
Pilot Projects
Prospective Studies
Standing Position
Thorax
Vena Cava, Inferior - diagnostic imaging
title Ultrasonographically derived caudal vena cava parameters acquired in a standing position and lateral recumbency in healthy, lightly sedated cats: a pilot study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T21%3A57%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_AFRWT&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ultrasonographically%20derived%20caudal%20vena%20cava%20parameters%20acquired%20in%20a%20standing%20position%20and%20lateral%20recumbency%20in%20healthy,%20lightly%20sedated%20cats:%20a%20pilot%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20feline%20medicine%20and%20surgery&rft.au=Hultman,%20Tove%20M&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1039&rft.epage=1045&rft.pages=1039-1045&rft.issn=1098-612X&rft.eissn=1532-2750&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1098612X211064697&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_AFRWT%3E2610081111%3C/proquest_AFRWT%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-27b2a4d0366e879806b9c37a4a3dbff983b328b25e3d5031c3b1fb89731724d63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2610081111&rft_id=info:pmid/34904481&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1098612X211064697&rfr_iscdi=true