Loading…
Ultrasonographically derived caudal vena cava parameters acquired in a standing position and lateral recumbency in healthy, lightly sedated cats: a pilot study
Objectives The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of ultrasonographically measuring the caudal vena cava (CVC) at the subxiphoid view of healthy, lightly sedated cats in a standing position and lateral recumbency. Methods This was a prospective, observational, experimental single-cen...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of feline medicine and surgery 2022-10, Vol.24 (10), p.1039-1045 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Request full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-27b2a4d0366e879806b9c37a4a3dbff983b328b25e3d5031c3b1fb89731724d63 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-27b2a4d0366e879806b9c37a4a3dbff983b328b25e3d5031c3b1fb89731724d63 |
container_end_page | 1045 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1039 |
container_title | Journal of feline medicine and surgery |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Hultman, Tove M Boysen, Søren R Owen, Rebecca Yozova, Ivayla D |
description | Objectives
The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of ultrasonographically measuring the caudal vena cava (CVC) at the subxiphoid view of healthy, lightly sedated cats in a standing position and lateral recumbency.
Methods
This was a prospective, observational, experimental single-centre study. Twenty healthy research-purposed cats were enrolled. Two trained operators scanned each cat in two positions – standing and lateral recumbency – in a randomised order. CVC diameter was measured at the narrowest diameter during inspiration and at the widest diameter during expiration, at two anatomical locations along the CVC – where the CVC crosses the diaphragm (base) and 2 mm caudal to the diaphragm. The CVC collapsibility index (CVC-CI) was calculated for each site. Normalcy was assessed with a Shapiro–Wilk test. A one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey’s test was used to compare inspiratory with expiratory values within and between groups. A paired t-test compared the CVC-CI between groups (P ⩽0.05 indicated statistical significance). Spearman’s correlation and Bland–Altman analysis assessed inter-operator variability.
Results
All ultrasonographic data passed normalcy and were reported as mean ± SD. When compared with each other, inspiratory and expiratory values were statistically different for position, location and operator (all P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1098612X211064697 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10812311</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1098612X211064697</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2610081111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-27b2a4d0366e879806b9c37a4a3dbff983b328b25e3d5031c3b1fb89731724d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQQCMEoqXwAVyQjxzY4rGzScwFVRUFpEpcqMTNmthO4sprp7azUr6GX8XbLRUIiZNHnjdv7Jmqeg30HKBt3wMVXQPsBwOgTd2I9kl1ClvONqzd0qclLvnNATipXqR0SykVXLDn1QmvBa3rDk6rnzcuR0zBhzHiPFmFzq1Em2j3RhOFi0ZH9sZjifdIZoy4M9nERFDdLTYWyHqCJGX02vqRzCHZbEO585o4LGgRRKOWXW-8Wg_0ZNDlaX1HnB2nXNolowt4aJfThyKbrQu5KBe9vqyeDeiSefVwnlU3V5--X37ZXH_7_PXy4nqjuGhy-XDPsNaUN43pWtHRpheKt1gj1_0wiI73nHU92xqut5SD4j0MfSdaDi2rdcPPqo9H77z0O6OV8WUsTs7R7jCuMqCVf2e8neQY9hJoB4wDFMPbB0MMd4tJWe5sUsY59CYsSbIGaGHhHoUjqmJIKZrhsQ9Qedis_GezpebNnw98rPi9ygKcH4GEo5G3YYm-DOw_xl9PMrAT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2610081111</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ultrasonographically derived caudal vena cava parameters acquired in a standing position and lateral recumbency in healthy, lightly sedated cats: a pilot study</title><source>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</source><creator>Hultman, Tove M ; Boysen, Søren R ; Owen, Rebecca ; Yozova, Ivayla D</creator><creatorcontrib>Hultman, Tove M ; Boysen, Søren R ; Owen, Rebecca ; Yozova, Ivayla D</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of ultrasonographically measuring the caudal vena cava (CVC) at the subxiphoid view of healthy, lightly sedated cats in a standing position and lateral recumbency.
Methods
This was a prospective, observational, experimental single-centre study. Twenty healthy research-purposed cats were enrolled. Two trained operators scanned each cat in two positions – standing and lateral recumbency – in a randomised order. CVC diameter was measured at the narrowest diameter during inspiration and at the widest diameter during expiration, at two anatomical locations along the CVC – where the CVC crosses the diaphragm (base) and 2 mm caudal to the diaphragm. The CVC collapsibility index (CVC-CI) was calculated for each site. Normalcy was assessed with a Shapiro–Wilk test. A one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey’s test was used to compare inspiratory with expiratory values within and between groups. A paired t-test compared the CVC-CI between groups (P ⩽0.05 indicated statistical significance). Spearman’s correlation and Bland–Altman analysis assessed inter-operator variability.
Results
All ultrasonographic data passed normalcy and were reported as mean ± SD. When compared with each other, inspiratory and expiratory values were statistically different for position, location and operator (all P <0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference between lateral recumbency or standing position for inspiratory, expiratory and CVC-CI values. Inter-operator variability was substantial, with operator 2 consistently obtaining smaller measurements than operator 1. The mean CVC-CI in lateral recumbency at the base was 24% for operator 1 and 37% for operator 2. For the same site in standing position, CVC-CI was 27% and 41% for operators 1 and 2, respectively.
Conclusions and relevance
This pilot study demonstrates that it is possible to ultrasonographically measure the CVC diameter in both lateral recumbency and a standing position in healthy, lightly sedated cats. However, measurements obtained are operator dependent with variability between individuals. Further studies are needed to determine if ultrasonographic CVC assessment will prove helpful in estimating intravascular volume status in cats.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1098-612X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1532-2750</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2750</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1098612X211064697</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34904481</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cats ; Original ; Pilot Projects ; Prospective Studies ; Standing Position ; Thorax ; Vena Cava, Inferior - diagnostic imaging</subject><ispartof>Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2022-10, Vol.24 (10), p.1039-1045</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021 2021 International Society of Feline Medicine and American Association of Feline Practitioners</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-27b2a4d0366e879806b9c37a4a3dbff983b328b25e3d5031c3b1fb89731724d63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-27b2a4d0366e879806b9c37a4a3dbff983b328b25e3d5031c3b1fb89731724d63</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6629-0221 ; 0000-0002-0936-4834</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10812311/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10812311/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,21966,27853,27924,27925,44945,45333,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1098612X211064697?utm_source=summon&utm_medium=discovery-provider$$EView_record_in_SAGE_Publications$$FView_record_in_$$GSAGE_Publications</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34904481$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hultman, Tove M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boysen, Søren R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owen, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yozova, Ivayla D</creatorcontrib><title>Ultrasonographically derived caudal vena cava parameters acquired in a standing position and lateral recumbency in healthy, lightly sedated cats: a pilot study</title><title>Journal of feline medicine and surgery</title><addtitle>J Feline Med Surg</addtitle><description>Objectives
The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of ultrasonographically measuring the caudal vena cava (CVC) at the subxiphoid view of healthy, lightly sedated cats in a standing position and lateral recumbency.
Methods
This was a prospective, observational, experimental single-centre study. Twenty healthy research-purposed cats were enrolled. Two trained operators scanned each cat in two positions – standing and lateral recumbency – in a randomised order. CVC diameter was measured at the narrowest diameter during inspiration and at the widest diameter during expiration, at two anatomical locations along the CVC – where the CVC crosses the diaphragm (base) and 2 mm caudal to the diaphragm. The CVC collapsibility index (CVC-CI) was calculated for each site. Normalcy was assessed with a Shapiro–Wilk test. A one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey’s test was used to compare inspiratory with expiratory values within and between groups. A paired t-test compared the CVC-CI between groups (P ⩽0.05 indicated statistical significance). Spearman’s correlation and Bland–Altman analysis assessed inter-operator variability.
Results
All ultrasonographic data passed normalcy and were reported as mean ± SD. When compared with each other, inspiratory and expiratory values were statistically different for position, location and operator (all P <0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference between lateral recumbency or standing position for inspiratory, expiratory and CVC-CI values. Inter-operator variability was substantial, with operator 2 consistently obtaining smaller measurements than operator 1. The mean CVC-CI in lateral recumbency at the base was 24% for operator 1 and 37% for operator 2. For the same site in standing position, CVC-CI was 27% and 41% for operators 1 and 2, respectively.
Conclusions and relevance
This pilot study demonstrates that it is possible to ultrasonographically measure the CVC diameter in both lateral recumbency and a standing position in healthy, lightly sedated cats. However, measurements obtained are operator dependent with variability between individuals. Further studies are needed to determine if ultrasonographic CVC assessment will prove helpful in estimating intravascular volume status in cats.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cats</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Standing Position</subject><subject>Thorax</subject><subject>Vena Cava, Inferior - diagnostic imaging</subject><issn>1098-612X</issn><issn>1532-2750</issn><issn>1532-2750</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQQCMEoqXwAVyQjxzY4rGzScwFVRUFpEpcqMTNmthO4sprp7azUr6GX8XbLRUIiZNHnjdv7Jmqeg30HKBt3wMVXQPsBwOgTd2I9kl1ClvONqzd0qclLvnNATipXqR0SykVXLDn1QmvBa3rDk6rnzcuR0zBhzHiPFmFzq1Em2j3RhOFi0ZH9sZjifdIZoy4M9nERFDdLTYWyHqCJGX02vqRzCHZbEO585o4LGgRRKOWXW-8Wg_0ZNDlaX1HnB2nXNolowt4aJfThyKbrQu5KBe9vqyeDeiSefVwnlU3V5--X37ZXH_7_PXy4nqjuGhy-XDPsNaUN43pWtHRpheKt1gj1_0wiI73nHU92xqut5SD4j0MfSdaDi2rdcPPqo9H77z0O6OV8WUsTs7R7jCuMqCVf2e8neQY9hJoB4wDFMPbB0MMd4tJWe5sUsY59CYsSbIGaGHhHoUjqmJIKZrhsQ9Qedis_GezpebNnw98rPi9ygKcH4GEo5G3YYm-DOw_xl9PMrAT</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Hultman, Tove M</creator><creator>Boysen, Søren R</creator><creator>Owen, Rebecca</creator><creator>Yozova, Ivayla D</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6629-0221</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0936-4834</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Ultrasonographically derived caudal vena cava parameters acquired in a standing position and lateral recumbency in healthy, lightly sedated cats: a pilot study</title><author>Hultman, Tove M ; Boysen, Søren R ; Owen, Rebecca ; Yozova, Ivayla D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-27b2a4d0366e879806b9c37a4a3dbff983b328b25e3d5031c3b1fb89731724d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cats</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Standing Position</topic><topic>Thorax</topic><topic>Vena Cava, Inferior - diagnostic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hultman, Tove M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boysen, Søren R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owen, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yozova, Ivayla D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of feline medicine and surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hultman, Tove M</au><au>Boysen, Søren R</au><au>Owen, Rebecca</au><au>Yozova, Ivayla D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ultrasonographically derived caudal vena cava parameters acquired in a standing position and lateral recumbency in healthy, lightly sedated cats: a pilot study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of feline medicine and surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Feline Med Surg</addtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1039</spage><epage>1045</epage><pages>1039-1045</pages><issn>1098-612X</issn><issn>1532-2750</issn><eissn>1532-2750</eissn><abstract>Objectives
The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of ultrasonographically measuring the caudal vena cava (CVC) at the subxiphoid view of healthy, lightly sedated cats in a standing position and lateral recumbency.
Methods
This was a prospective, observational, experimental single-centre study. Twenty healthy research-purposed cats were enrolled. Two trained operators scanned each cat in two positions – standing and lateral recumbency – in a randomised order. CVC diameter was measured at the narrowest diameter during inspiration and at the widest diameter during expiration, at two anatomical locations along the CVC – where the CVC crosses the diaphragm (base) and 2 mm caudal to the diaphragm. The CVC collapsibility index (CVC-CI) was calculated for each site. Normalcy was assessed with a Shapiro–Wilk test. A one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey’s test was used to compare inspiratory with expiratory values within and between groups. A paired t-test compared the CVC-CI between groups (P ⩽0.05 indicated statistical significance). Spearman’s correlation and Bland–Altman analysis assessed inter-operator variability.
Results
All ultrasonographic data passed normalcy and were reported as mean ± SD. When compared with each other, inspiratory and expiratory values were statistically different for position, location and operator (all P <0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference between lateral recumbency or standing position for inspiratory, expiratory and CVC-CI values. Inter-operator variability was substantial, with operator 2 consistently obtaining smaller measurements than operator 1. The mean CVC-CI in lateral recumbency at the base was 24% for operator 1 and 37% for operator 2. For the same site in standing position, CVC-CI was 27% and 41% for operators 1 and 2, respectively.
Conclusions and relevance
This pilot study demonstrates that it is possible to ultrasonographically measure the CVC diameter in both lateral recumbency and a standing position in healthy, lightly sedated cats. However, measurements obtained are operator dependent with variability between individuals. Further studies are needed to determine if ultrasonographic CVC assessment will prove helpful in estimating intravascular volume status in cats.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>34904481</pmid><doi>10.1177/1098612X211064697</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6629-0221</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0936-4834</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1098-612X |
ispartof | Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2022-10, Vol.24 (10), p.1039-1045 |
issn | 1098-612X 1532-2750 1532-2750 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10812311 |
source | Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024 |
subjects | Animals Cats Original Pilot Projects Prospective Studies Standing Position Thorax Vena Cava, Inferior - diagnostic imaging |
title | Ultrasonographically derived caudal vena cava parameters acquired in a standing position and lateral recumbency in healthy, lightly sedated cats: a pilot study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T21%3A57%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_AFRWT&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ultrasonographically%20derived%20caudal%20vena%20cava%20parameters%20acquired%20in%20a%20standing%20position%20and%20lateral%20recumbency%20in%20healthy,%20lightly%20sedated%20cats:%20a%20pilot%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20feline%20medicine%20and%20surgery&rft.au=Hultman,%20Tove%20M&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1039&rft.epage=1045&rft.pages=1039-1045&rft.issn=1098-612X&rft.eissn=1532-2750&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1098612X211064697&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_AFRWT%3E2610081111%3C/proquest_AFRWT%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-27b2a4d0366e879806b9c37a4a3dbff983b328b25e3d5031c3b1fb89731724d63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2610081111&rft_id=info:pmid/34904481&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1098612X211064697&rfr_iscdi=true |