An in vitro comparative evaluation of intraorifice barriers and bleaching agents on the fracture resistance of the endodontically treated anterior teeth

• Published in: Journal of conservative dentistry 2023-11, Vol.26 (6), p.646-650
• Main Authors: Mehrotra, Arushi, Singh, Shishir, Podar, Rajesh Satyanarain, Shetty, Roshan, Salgar, Avinash, Kumar, Mohan
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid; Original; Peroxides
• ISSN: 2950-4716; 0972-0707; 2950-4708; 2950-4708
• DOI: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_270_23

This study aimed to evaluate and compare the impact of different bleaching agents on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth when using either GC Fuji type 2 glass ionomer cement (GIC) or Shofu Glass Ionomer RX EASE as intraorifice barriers (IOB). A total of 80 single-rooted human maxillary central incisors were prepared and obturated. Three millimeters of gutta-percha was then removed from the orifice. The specimens were divided into two primary groups based on the type of IOB material used: GC Fuji type 2 GIC and Shofu Glass Ionomer RX EASE ( = 40). Each group was further divided into four subgroups based on the bleaching agent used: Carbamide peroxide (CP) 37%, sodium perborate (SP), hydrogen peroxide (HP) 35%, and distilled water used as the control ( = 10). The teeth were subjected to fracture resistance testing. The study found that the order of root fracture resistance was control > CP > SP > HP. There was no statistically significant difference in fracture resistance between GC Fuji type 2 GIC and Shofu Glass Ionomer RX EASE when used as IOB materials. The study concluded that the choice of bleaching agent significantly affects the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. It was observed that fracture resistance is lowest with HP, followed by SP and CP. Both GC Fuji type 2 Glass Ionomer and Shofu Glass Ionomer RX EASE are effective as IOB.