Loading…
Prevalence of selected infectious disease agents in cats from Arizona
The objective of this study was to use polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays to determine the prevalence of Ehrlichia species, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Mycoplasma haemofelis, ‘ Candidatus Mycoplasma haemominutum’ and Bartonella species from feral and relinquished cats in Phoenix and Nogales, Ariz...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Journal of feline medicine and surgery 2006-06, Vol.8 (3), p.164-168 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Request full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-9e862af5109534333fa18ae64ad8e41872409ef059b1ca62e52793a6e82813a13 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-9e862af5109534333fa18ae64ad8e41872409ef059b1ca62e52793a6e82813a13 |
| container_end_page | 168 |
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 164 |
| container_title | Journal of feline medicine and surgery |
| container_volume | 8 |
| creator | Eberhardt, Jason M. Neal, Karter Shackelford, Tom Lappin, Michael R. |
| description | The objective of this study was to use polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays to determine the prevalence of
Ehrlichia species,
Anaplasma phagocytophilum,
Mycoplasma haemofelis, ‘
Candidatus Mycoplasma haemominutum’ and
Bartonella species from feral and relinquished cats in Phoenix and Nogales, Arizona. DNA from one or more of the organisms was amplified from 31 of 112 blood samples (27.7%). DNA consistent with
Bartonella clarridgeiae 15 (13.4%),
Bartonella henselae 14 (12.5%), ‘
Candidatus M haemominutum’ 9 (8.0%), and
M haemofelis 5 (4.5%) were detected. DNA of
Ehrlichia species,
Neorickettsia risticii, or
A phagocytophilum was not amplified. Failure to amplify DNA of
A phagocytophilum may relate to the absence of appropriate tick vectors. Failure to amplify
Ehrlichia species DNA suggests that cats were not exposed, exposed but not infected, or infected but the DNA was not detected by the PCR assay used in this study. The
Bartonella species and hemoplasma results suggest flea control should be maintained. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jfms.2005.12.002 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10832851</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1016_j.jfms.2005.12.002</sage_id><els_id>S1098612X05001828</els_id><sourcerecordid>67953550</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-9e862af5109534333fa18ae64ad8e41872409ef059b1ca62e52793a6e82813a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kVFrFTEQhYMotlb_gA-6T33b7STZ7GZBkFKqFgotaMG3MM1Orll2NzW594L-erPsRetLn2YgZ86cfMPYWw4VB96cDdXgplQJAFVxUQGIZ-yYKylK0Sp4nnvodNlw8f2IvUppAIBOduIlO-JNXUup5TG7vI20x5FmS0VwRaKR7Jb6ws8uNz7sUtH7RJiowA3N25RfCou5uhim4jz632HG1-yFwzHRm0M9YXefLr9dfCmvbz5fXZxfl1ZxvS070o1Ap3IuJXMA6ZBrpKbGXlPNdStq6MiB6u65xUaQEm0nsSEtNJfI5Qn7uPo-7O4n6m0OFHE0D9FPGH-ZgN78_zL7H2YT9oaDlkKrxeH04BDDzx2lrZl8sjSOOFP-rGnaHE0pyEKxCm0MKUVyf7dwMAt-M5gFv1nwGy5Mxp-H3j3O92_kwDsLzlZByjTNEHZxzryetny_TjgMBjfRJ3P3VQCXwKFtheyy4sOqoEx-7ymaZP1y0N7HfEPTB__Ugj9DzK7p</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67953550</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prevalence of selected infectious disease agents in cats from Arizona</title><source>SAGE Open Access</source><creator>Eberhardt, Jason M. ; Neal, Karter ; Shackelford, Tom ; Lappin, Michael R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Eberhardt, Jason M. ; Neal, Karter ; Shackelford, Tom ; Lappin, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this study was to use polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays to determine the prevalence of
Ehrlichia species,
Anaplasma phagocytophilum,
Mycoplasma haemofelis, ‘
Candidatus Mycoplasma haemominutum’ and
Bartonella species from feral and relinquished cats in Phoenix and Nogales, Arizona. DNA from one or more of the organisms was amplified from 31 of 112 blood samples (27.7%). DNA consistent with
Bartonella clarridgeiae 15 (13.4%),
Bartonella henselae 14 (12.5%), ‘
Candidatus M haemominutum’ 9 (8.0%), and
M haemofelis 5 (4.5%) were detected. DNA of
Ehrlichia species,
Neorickettsia risticii, or
A phagocytophilum was not amplified. Failure to amplify DNA of
A phagocytophilum may relate to the absence of appropriate tick vectors. Failure to amplify
Ehrlichia species DNA suggests that cats were not exposed, exposed but not infected, or infected but the DNA was not detected by the PCR assay used in this study. The
Bartonella species and hemoplasma results suggest flea control should be maintained.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1098-612X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2750</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jfms.2005.12.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16443383</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Anaplasma phagocytophilum ; Anaplasma phagocytophilum - isolation & purification ; Anaplasmataceae Infections - veterinary ; Animals ; Arizona - epidemiology ; Bartonella ; Bartonella - isolation & purification ; Bartonella Infections - veterinary ; Cat Diseases - epidemiology ; Cat Diseases - microbiology ; Cat Diseases - parasitology ; Cats ; disease prevalence ; DNA, Bacterial - analysis ; Ehrlichia ; Ehrlichia - isolation & purification ; Female ; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - epidemiology ; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - transmission ; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - veterinary ; Insect Vectors - microbiology ; Male ; Mycoplasma - isolation & purification ; Mycoplasma Infections - veterinary ; Neorickettsia risticii - isolation & purification ; polymerase chain reaction ; Polymerase Chain Reaction - veterinary ; Prevalence ; Siphonaptera - microbiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2006-06, Vol.8 (3), p.164-168</ispartof><rights>2005 ESFM and AAFP</rights><rights>2006 International Society of Feline Medicine and American Association of Feline Practitioners</rights><rights>2006 International Society of Feline Medicine and American Association of Feline Practitioners 2006 International Society of Feline Medicine and American Association of Feline Practitioners</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-9e862af5109534333fa18ae64ad8e41872409ef059b1ca62e52793a6e82813a13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-9e862af5109534333fa18ae64ad8e41872409ef059b1ca62e52793a6e82813a13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10832851/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10832851/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,21966,27853,27924,27925,44945,45333,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1016/j.jfms.2005.12.002?utm_source=summon&utm_medium=discovery-provider$$EView_record_in_SAGE_Publications$$FView_record_in_$$GSAGE_Publications</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16443383$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eberhardt, Jason M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neal, Karter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shackelford, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lappin, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><title>Prevalence of selected infectious disease agents in cats from Arizona</title><title>Journal of feline medicine and surgery</title><addtitle>J Feline Med Surg</addtitle><description>The objective of this study was to use polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays to determine the prevalence of
Ehrlichia species,
Anaplasma phagocytophilum,
Mycoplasma haemofelis, ‘
Candidatus Mycoplasma haemominutum’ and
Bartonella species from feral and relinquished cats in Phoenix and Nogales, Arizona. DNA from one or more of the organisms was amplified from 31 of 112 blood samples (27.7%). DNA consistent with
Bartonella clarridgeiae 15 (13.4%),
Bartonella henselae 14 (12.5%), ‘
Candidatus M haemominutum’ 9 (8.0%), and
M haemofelis 5 (4.5%) were detected. DNA of
Ehrlichia species,
Neorickettsia risticii, or
A phagocytophilum was not amplified. Failure to amplify DNA of
A phagocytophilum may relate to the absence of appropriate tick vectors. Failure to amplify
Ehrlichia species DNA suggests that cats were not exposed, exposed but not infected, or infected but the DNA was not detected by the PCR assay used in this study. The
Bartonella species and hemoplasma results suggest flea control should be maintained.</description><subject>Anaplasma phagocytophilum</subject><subject>Anaplasma phagocytophilum - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Anaplasmataceae Infections - veterinary</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Arizona - epidemiology</subject><subject>Bartonella</subject><subject>Bartonella - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Bartonella Infections - veterinary</subject><subject>Cat Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cat Diseases - microbiology</subject><subject>Cat Diseases - parasitology</subject><subject>Cats</subject><subject>disease prevalence</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial - analysis</subject><subject>Ehrlichia</subject><subject>Ehrlichia - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - transmission</subject><subject>Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - veterinary</subject><subject>Insect Vectors - microbiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mycoplasma - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Mycoplasma Infections - veterinary</subject><subject>Neorickettsia risticii - isolation & purification</subject><subject>polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction - veterinary</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Siphonaptera - microbiology</subject><issn>1098-612X</issn><issn>1532-2750</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kVFrFTEQhYMotlb_gA-6T33b7STZ7GZBkFKqFgotaMG3MM1Orll2NzW594L-erPsRetLn2YgZ86cfMPYWw4VB96cDdXgplQJAFVxUQGIZ-yYKylK0Sp4nnvodNlw8f2IvUppAIBOduIlO-JNXUup5TG7vI20x5FmS0VwRaKR7Jb6ws8uNz7sUtH7RJiowA3N25RfCou5uhim4jz632HG1-yFwzHRm0M9YXefLr9dfCmvbz5fXZxfl1ZxvS070o1Ap3IuJXMA6ZBrpKbGXlPNdStq6MiB6u65xUaQEm0nsSEtNJfI5Qn7uPo-7O4n6m0OFHE0D9FPGH-ZgN78_zL7H2YT9oaDlkKrxeH04BDDzx2lrZl8sjSOOFP-rGnaHE0pyEKxCm0MKUVyf7dwMAt-M5gFv1nwGy5Mxp-H3j3O92_kwDsLzlZByjTNEHZxzryetny_TjgMBjfRJ3P3VQCXwKFtheyy4sOqoEx-7ymaZP1y0N7HfEPTB__Ugj9DzK7p</recordid><startdate>20060601</startdate><enddate>20060601</enddate><creator>Eberhardt, Jason M.</creator><creator>Neal, Karter</creator><creator>Shackelford, Tom</creator><creator>Lappin, Michael R.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060601</creationdate><title>Prevalence of selected infectious disease agents in cats from Arizona</title><author>Eberhardt, Jason M. ; Neal, Karter ; Shackelford, Tom ; Lappin, Michael R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-9e862af5109534333fa18ae64ad8e41872409ef059b1ca62e52793a6e82813a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Anaplasma phagocytophilum</topic><topic>Anaplasma phagocytophilum - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Anaplasmataceae Infections - veterinary</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Arizona - epidemiology</topic><topic>Bartonella</topic><topic>Bartonella - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Bartonella Infections - veterinary</topic><topic>Cat Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cat Diseases - microbiology</topic><topic>Cat Diseases - parasitology</topic><topic>Cats</topic><topic>disease prevalence</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial - analysis</topic><topic>Ehrlichia</topic><topic>Ehrlichia - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - transmission</topic><topic>Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - veterinary</topic><topic>Insect Vectors - microbiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mycoplasma - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Mycoplasma Infections - veterinary</topic><topic>Neorickettsia risticii - isolation & purification</topic><topic>polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction - veterinary</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Siphonaptera - microbiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eberhardt, Jason M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neal, Karter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shackelford, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lappin, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of feline medicine and surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eberhardt, Jason M.</au><au>Neal, Karter</au><au>Shackelford, Tom</au><au>Lappin, Michael R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prevalence of selected infectious disease agents in cats from Arizona</atitle><jtitle>Journal of feline medicine and surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Feline Med Surg</addtitle><date>2006-06-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>164</spage><epage>168</epage><pages>164-168</pages><issn>1098-612X</issn><eissn>1532-2750</eissn><abstract>The objective of this study was to use polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays to determine the prevalence of
Ehrlichia species,
Anaplasma phagocytophilum,
Mycoplasma haemofelis, ‘
Candidatus Mycoplasma haemominutum’ and
Bartonella species from feral and relinquished cats in Phoenix and Nogales, Arizona. DNA from one or more of the organisms was amplified from 31 of 112 blood samples (27.7%). DNA consistent with
Bartonella clarridgeiae 15 (13.4%),
Bartonella henselae 14 (12.5%), ‘
Candidatus M haemominutum’ 9 (8.0%), and
M haemofelis 5 (4.5%) were detected. DNA of
Ehrlichia species,
Neorickettsia risticii, or
A phagocytophilum was not amplified. Failure to amplify DNA of
A phagocytophilum may relate to the absence of appropriate tick vectors. Failure to amplify
Ehrlichia species DNA suggests that cats were not exposed, exposed but not infected, or infected but the DNA was not detected by the PCR assay used in this study. The
Bartonella species and hemoplasma results suggest flea control should be maintained.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16443383</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jfms.2005.12.002</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | ISSN: 1098-612X |
| ispartof | Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2006-06, Vol.8 (3), p.164-168 |
| issn | 1098-612X 1532-2750 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10832851 |
| source | SAGE Open Access |
| subjects | Anaplasma phagocytophilum Anaplasma phagocytophilum - isolation & purification Anaplasmataceae Infections - veterinary Animals Arizona - epidemiology Bartonella Bartonella - isolation & purification Bartonella Infections - veterinary Cat Diseases - epidemiology Cat Diseases - microbiology Cat Diseases - parasitology Cats disease prevalence DNA, Bacterial - analysis Ehrlichia Ehrlichia - isolation & purification Female Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - epidemiology Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - transmission Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - veterinary Insect Vectors - microbiology Male Mycoplasma - isolation & purification Mycoplasma Infections - veterinary Neorickettsia risticii - isolation & purification polymerase chain reaction Polymerase Chain Reaction - veterinary Prevalence Siphonaptera - microbiology |
| title | Prevalence of selected infectious disease agents in cats from Arizona |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T08%3A11%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_AFRWT&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prevalence%20of%20selected%20infectious%20disease%20agents%20in%20cats%20from%20Arizona&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20feline%20medicine%20and%20surgery&rft.au=Eberhardt,%20Jason%20M.&rft.date=2006-06-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=164&rft.epage=168&rft.pages=164-168&rft.issn=1098-612X&rft.eissn=1532-2750&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jfms.2005.12.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_AFRWT%3E67953550%3C/proquest_AFRWT%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-9e862af5109534333fa18ae64ad8e41872409ef059b1ca62e52793a6e82813a13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67953550&rft_id=info:pmid/16443383&rft_sage_id=10.1016_j.jfms.2005.12.002&rfr_iscdi=true |