Loading…

Epidemiology of distal radius fractures in Germany - incidence rates and trends based on inpatient and outpatient data

Summary We examined incidence rates (IR) for all distal radius fracture (DRF) events based on inpatient and outpatient data from a large statutory health insurance in Germany. Of all DRF, 56% were treated as inpatients, and thus, 44% treated as outpatients. IR were higher in women than in men. Purpo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Osteoporosis international 2024-02, Vol.35 (2), p.317-326
Main Authors: Reiland, Kevin, Haastert, Burkhard, Arend, Werner, Klüppelholz, Birgit, Windolf, Joachim, Icks, Andrea, Thelen, Simon, Andrich, Silke
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-a2edba0e51378c280704fdbc0ce4485c6156fe7c0b3fc3a76c8b8ece4ac5cc203
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-a2edba0e51378c280704fdbc0ce4485c6156fe7c0b3fc3a76c8b8ece4ac5cc203
container_end_page 326
container_issue 2
container_start_page 317
container_title Osteoporosis international
container_volume 35
creator Reiland, Kevin
Haastert, Burkhard
Arend, Werner
Klüppelholz, Birgit
Windolf, Joachim
Icks, Andrea
Thelen, Simon
Andrich, Silke
description Summary We examined incidence rates (IR) for all distal radius fracture (DRF) events based on inpatient and outpatient data from a large statutory health insurance in Germany. Of all DRF, 56% were treated as inpatients, and thus, 44% treated as outpatients. IR were higher in women than in men. Purpose Although a distal radius fracture (DRF) is one of the most common fractures in the elderly population, epidemiological data are limited. Many studies examine only hospitalized patients, do not analyze time trends, or include only small populations. In this retrospective population-based observational study, routine data on inpatient and outpatient care of persons aged ≥ 60 years insured by a large statutory health insurance in Germany were analyzed from 2014 to 2018. Methods DRF were identified by ICD-10 codes. All DRF events of an individual were considered with a corresponding individual washout period. Incidence rates (IR) and time trends were estimated assuming a Poisson distribution per 100,000 person-years, with 95% confidence intervals [95% CI] and age-sex standardization to the German population in 2018. Associations of calendar year, age, sex, and comorbidity with IR were examined using Poisson regression estimating incidence rate ratios (IRR) with CI. Results The study population consists of 974,332 insured individuals, with 16,557 experiencing one or more DRF events during the observation period. A total of 17,705 DRF events occurred, of which 9961 (56.3%) were hospitalized. Standardized IR were 439 [424–453] (inpatient: 240 [230–251], outpatient: 199 [189–209]) in 2014 and 438 [423–452] (inpatient: 238 [227–249], outpatient: 200 [190–210]) in 2018. Female sex, older age, and comorbidity were associated with higher IR and adjusted Poisson regression showed no significant time trend (IRR overall 0.994 [0.983–1.006]). Conclusion A relevant proportion of DRF were treated in outpatient settings, so both inpatient and outpatient data are necessary for a valid estimate.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00198-023-06904-6
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10837268</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2876635710</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-a2edba0e51378c280704fdbc0ce4485c6156fe7c0b3fc3a76c8b8ece4ac5cc203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhS0EopfCC7BAkdiwCYztxI5XCFWlIFViAxI7y7EnF1eJfbEdxH2bPkufDLe3LT8LVpZ1vnNmRoeQ5xReUwD5JgNQNbTAeAtCQdeKB2RDO85bpkT_kGxAcdmqjn49Ik9yvoBqUko-JkdcDlR1QDfk5-nOO1x8nON238SpcT4XMzfJOL_mZkrGljVhbnxozjAtJuyvLturSx9s9QWLlSxVNsE1JWFwuRlNRtfEUC07UzyGcqPGtdx9nSnmKXk0mTnjs9v3mHx5f_r55EN7_uns48m789Z2si-tYehGA9jTurNlA0joJjdasNh1Q28F7cWE0sLIJ8uNFHYYB6yisb21DPgxeXvI3a3jgs7W-cnMepf8YtJeR-P130rw3_Q2_tAUBi6ZGGrCq9uEFL-vmItefLY4zyZgXLNmgxSC95JeD3v5D3oR1xTqfZopRpmSvOsrxQ6UTTHnhNP9NhT0dbP60KyuzeqbZrWophd_3nFvuauyAvwA5CqFLabfs_8T-wtgnrOE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2921297345</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Epidemiology of distal radius fractures in Germany - incidence rates and trends based on inpatient and outpatient data</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Reiland, Kevin ; Haastert, Burkhard ; Arend, Werner ; Klüppelholz, Birgit ; Windolf, Joachim ; Icks, Andrea ; Thelen, Simon ; Andrich, Silke</creator><creatorcontrib>Reiland, Kevin ; Haastert, Burkhard ; Arend, Werner ; Klüppelholz, Birgit ; Windolf, Joachim ; Icks, Andrea ; Thelen, Simon ; Andrich, Silke</creatorcontrib><description>Summary We examined incidence rates (IR) for all distal radius fracture (DRF) events based on inpatient and outpatient data from a large statutory health insurance in Germany. Of all DRF, 56% were treated as inpatients, and thus, 44% treated as outpatients. IR were higher in women than in men. Purpose Although a distal radius fracture (DRF) is one of the most common fractures in the elderly population, epidemiological data are limited. Many studies examine only hospitalized patients, do not analyze time trends, or include only small populations. In this retrospective population-based observational study, routine data on inpatient and outpatient care of persons aged ≥ 60 years insured by a large statutory health insurance in Germany were analyzed from 2014 to 2018. Methods DRF were identified by ICD-10 codes. All DRF events of an individual were considered with a corresponding individual washout period. Incidence rates (IR) and time trends were estimated assuming a Poisson distribution per 100,000 person-years, with 95% confidence intervals [95% CI] and age-sex standardization to the German population in 2018. Associations of calendar year, age, sex, and comorbidity with IR were examined using Poisson regression estimating incidence rate ratios (IRR) with CI. Results The study population consists of 974,332 insured individuals, with 16,557 experiencing one or more DRF events during the observation period. A total of 17,705 DRF events occurred, of which 9961 (56.3%) were hospitalized. Standardized IR were 439 [424–453] (inpatient: 240 [230–251], outpatient: 199 [189–209]) in 2014 and 438 [423–452] (inpatient: 238 [227–249], outpatient: 200 [190–210]) in 2018. Female sex, older age, and comorbidity were associated with higher IR and adjusted Poisson regression showed no significant time trend (IRR overall 0.994 [0.983–1.006]). Conclusion A relevant proportion of DRF were treated in outpatient settings, so both inpatient and outpatient data are necessary for a valid estimate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0937-941X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-2965</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00198-023-06904-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37819401</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer London</publisher><subject>Comorbidity ; Endocrinology ; Epidemiology ; Fractures ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Older people ; Original ; Original Article ; Orthopedics ; Population studies ; Rheumatology ; Standardization ; Trends ; Wrist</subject><ispartof>Osteoporosis international, 2024-02, Vol.35 (2), p.317-326</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-a2edba0e51378c280704fdbc0ce4485c6156fe7c0b3fc3a76c8b8ece4ac5cc203</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-a2edba0e51378c280704fdbc0ce4485c6156fe7c0b3fc3a76c8b8ece4ac5cc203</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8884-7465</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37819401$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reiland, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haastert, Burkhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arend, Werner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klüppelholz, Birgit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windolf, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Icks, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thelen, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrich, Silke</creatorcontrib><title>Epidemiology of distal radius fractures in Germany - incidence rates and trends based on inpatient and outpatient data</title><title>Osteoporosis international</title><addtitle>Osteoporos Int</addtitle><addtitle>Osteoporos Int</addtitle><description>Summary We examined incidence rates (IR) for all distal radius fracture (DRF) events based on inpatient and outpatient data from a large statutory health insurance in Germany. Of all DRF, 56% were treated as inpatients, and thus, 44% treated as outpatients. IR were higher in women than in men. Purpose Although a distal radius fracture (DRF) is one of the most common fractures in the elderly population, epidemiological data are limited. Many studies examine only hospitalized patients, do not analyze time trends, or include only small populations. In this retrospective population-based observational study, routine data on inpatient and outpatient care of persons aged ≥ 60 years insured by a large statutory health insurance in Germany were analyzed from 2014 to 2018. Methods DRF were identified by ICD-10 codes. All DRF events of an individual were considered with a corresponding individual washout period. Incidence rates (IR) and time trends were estimated assuming a Poisson distribution per 100,000 person-years, with 95% confidence intervals [95% CI] and age-sex standardization to the German population in 2018. Associations of calendar year, age, sex, and comorbidity with IR were examined using Poisson regression estimating incidence rate ratios (IRR) with CI. Results The study population consists of 974,332 insured individuals, with 16,557 experiencing one or more DRF events during the observation period. A total of 17,705 DRF events occurred, of which 9961 (56.3%) were hospitalized. Standardized IR were 439 [424–453] (inpatient: 240 [230–251], outpatient: 199 [189–209]) in 2014 and 438 [423–452] (inpatient: 238 [227–249], outpatient: 200 [190–210]) in 2018. Female sex, older age, and comorbidity were associated with higher IR and adjusted Poisson regression showed no significant time trend (IRR overall 0.994 [0.983–1.006]). Conclusion A relevant proportion of DRF were treated in outpatient settings, so both inpatient and outpatient data are necessary for a valid estimate.</description><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Endocrinology</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Rheumatology</subject><subject>Standardization</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Wrist</subject><issn>0937-941X</issn><issn>1433-2965</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhS0EopfCC7BAkdiwCYztxI5XCFWlIFViAxI7y7EnF1eJfbEdxH2bPkufDLe3LT8LVpZ1vnNmRoeQ5xReUwD5JgNQNbTAeAtCQdeKB2RDO85bpkT_kGxAcdmqjn49Ik9yvoBqUko-JkdcDlR1QDfk5-nOO1x8nON238SpcT4XMzfJOL_mZkrGljVhbnxozjAtJuyvLturSx9s9QWLlSxVNsE1JWFwuRlNRtfEUC07UzyGcqPGtdx9nSnmKXk0mTnjs9v3mHx5f_r55EN7_uns48m789Z2si-tYehGA9jTurNlA0joJjdasNh1Q28F7cWE0sLIJ8uNFHYYB6yisb21DPgxeXvI3a3jgs7W-cnMepf8YtJeR-P130rw3_Q2_tAUBi6ZGGrCq9uEFL-vmItefLY4zyZgXLNmgxSC95JeD3v5D3oR1xTqfZopRpmSvOsrxQ6UTTHnhNP9NhT0dbP60KyuzeqbZrWophd_3nFvuauyAvwA5CqFLabfs_8T-wtgnrOE</recordid><startdate>20240201</startdate><enddate>20240201</enddate><creator>Reiland, Kevin</creator><creator>Haastert, Burkhard</creator><creator>Arend, Werner</creator><creator>Klüppelholz, Birgit</creator><creator>Windolf, Joachim</creator><creator>Icks, Andrea</creator><creator>Thelen, Simon</creator><creator>Andrich, Silke</creator><general>Springer London</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8884-7465</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240201</creationdate><title>Epidemiology of distal radius fractures in Germany - incidence rates and trends based on inpatient and outpatient data</title><author>Reiland, Kevin ; Haastert, Burkhard ; Arend, Werner ; Klüppelholz, Birgit ; Windolf, Joachim ; Icks, Andrea ; Thelen, Simon ; Andrich, Silke</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-a2edba0e51378c280704fdbc0ce4485c6156fe7c0b3fc3a76c8b8ece4ac5cc203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Endocrinology</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Rheumatology</topic><topic>Standardization</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Wrist</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reiland, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haastert, Burkhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arend, Werner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klüppelholz, Birgit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windolf, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Icks, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thelen, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrich, Silke</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Osteoporosis international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reiland, Kevin</au><au>Haastert, Burkhard</au><au>Arend, Werner</au><au>Klüppelholz, Birgit</au><au>Windolf, Joachim</au><au>Icks, Andrea</au><au>Thelen, Simon</au><au>Andrich, Silke</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Epidemiology of distal radius fractures in Germany - incidence rates and trends based on inpatient and outpatient data</atitle><jtitle>Osteoporosis international</jtitle><stitle>Osteoporos Int</stitle><addtitle>Osteoporos Int</addtitle><date>2024-02-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>317</spage><epage>326</epage><pages>317-326</pages><issn>0937-941X</issn><eissn>1433-2965</eissn><abstract>Summary We examined incidence rates (IR) for all distal radius fracture (DRF) events based on inpatient and outpatient data from a large statutory health insurance in Germany. Of all DRF, 56% were treated as inpatients, and thus, 44% treated as outpatients. IR were higher in women than in men. Purpose Although a distal radius fracture (DRF) is one of the most common fractures in the elderly population, epidemiological data are limited. Many studies examine only hospitalized patients, do not analyze time trends, or include only small populations. In this retrospective population-based observational study, routine data on inpatient and outpatient care of persons aged ≥ 60 years insured by a large statutory health insurance in Germany were analyzed from 2014 to 2018. Methods DRF were identified by ICD-10 codes. All DRF events of an individual were considered with a corresponding individual washout period. Incidence rates (IR) and time trends were estimated assuming a Poisson distribution per 100,000 person-years, with 95% confidence intervals [95% CI] and age-sex standardization to the German population in 2018. Associations of calendar year, age, sex, and comorbidity with IR were examined using Poisson regression estimating incidence rate ratios (IRR) with CI. Results The study population consists of 974,332 insured individuals, with 16,557 experiencing one or more DRF events during the observation period. A total of 17,705 DRF events occurred, of which 9961 (56.3%) were hospitalized. Standardized IR were 439 [424–453] (inpatient: 240 [230–251], outpatient: 199 [189–209]) in 2014 and 438 [423–452] (inpatient: 238 [227–249], outpatient: 200 [190–210]) in 2018. Female sex, older age, and comorbidity were associated with higher IR and adjusted Poisson regression showed no significant time trend (IRR overall 0.994 [0.983–1.006]). Conclusion A relevant proportion of DRF were treated in outpatient settings, so both inpatient and outpatient data are necessary for a valid estimate.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer London</pub><pmid>37819401</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00198-023-06904-6</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8884-7465</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0937-941X
ispartof Osteoporosis international, 2024-02, Vol.35 (2), p.317-326
issn 0937-941X
1433-2965
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10837268
source Springer Link
subjects Comorbidity
Endocrinology
Epidemiology
Fractures
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Older people
Original
Original Article
Orthopedics
Population studies
Rheumatology
Standardization
Trends
Wrist
title Epidemiology of distal radius fractures in Germany - incidence rates and trends based on inpatient and outpatient data
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T16%3A48%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Epidemiology%20of%20distal%20radius%20fractures%20in%20Germany%C2%A0-%C2%A0incidence%20rates%20and%20trends%20based%20on%20inpatient%20and%20outpatient%20data&rft.jtitle=Osteoporosis%20international&rft.au=Reiland,%20Kevin&rft.date=2024-02-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=317&rft.epage=326&rft.pages=317-326&rft.issn=0937-941X&rft.eissn=1433-2965&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00198-023-06904-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2876635710%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-a2edba0e51378c280704fdbc0ce4485c6156fe7c0b3fc3a76c8b8ece4ac5cc203%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2921297345&rft_id=info:pmid/37819401&rfr_iscdi=true