Loading…
Epidemiology of distal radius fractures in Germany - incidence rates and trends based on inpatient and outpatient data
Summary We examined incidence rates (IR) for all distal radius fracture (DRF) events based on inpatient and outpatient data from a large statutory health insurance in Germany. Of all DRF, 56% were treated as inpatients, and thus, 44% treated as outpatients. IR were higher in women than in men. Purpo...
Saved in:
Published in: | Osteoporosis international 2024-02, Vol.35 (2), p.317-326 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-a2edba0e51378c280704fdbc0ce4485c6156fe7c0b3fc3a76c8b8ece4ac5cc203 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-a2edba0e51378c280704fdbc0ce4485c6156fe7c0b3fc3a76c8b8ece4ac5cc203 |
container_end_page | 326 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 317 |
container_title | Osteoporosis international |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Reiland, Kevin Haastert, Burkhard Arend, Werner Klüppelholz, Birgit Windolf, Joachim Icks, Andrea Thelen, Simon Andrich, Silke |
description | Summary
We examined incidence rates (IR) for all distal radius fracture (DRF) events based on inpatient and outpatient data from a large statutory health insurance in Germany. Of all DRF, 56% were treated as inpatients, and thus, 44% treated as outpatients. IR were higher in women than in men.
Purpose
Although a distal radius fracture (DRF) is one of the most common fractures in the elderly population, epidemiological data are limited. Many studies examine only hospitalized patients, do not analyze time trends, or include only small populations. In this retrospective population-based observational study, routine data on inpatient and outpatient care of persons aged ≥ 60 years insured by a large statutory health insurance in Germany were analyzed from 2014 to 2018.
Methods
DRF were identified by ICD-10 codes. All DRF events of an individual were considered with a corresponding individual washout period. Incidence rates (IR) and time trends were estimated assuming a Poisson distribution per 100,000 person-years, with 95% confidence intervals [95% CI] and age-sex standardization to the German population in 2018. Associations of calendar year, age, sex, and comorbidity with IR were examined using Poisson regression estimating incidence rate ratios (IRR) with CI.
Results
The study population consists of 974,332 insured individuals, with 16,557 experiencing one or more DRF events during the observation period. A total of 17,705 DRF events occurred, of which 9961 (56.3%) were hospitalized. Standardized IR were 439 [424–453] (inpatient: 240 [230–251], outpatient: 199 [189–209]) in 2014 and 438 [423–452] (inpatient: 238 [227–249], outpatient: 200 [190–210]) in 2018. Female sex, older age, and comorbidity were associated with higher IR and adjusted Poisson regression showed no significant time trend (IRR overall 0.994 [0.983–1.006]).
Conclusion
A relevant proportion of DRF were treated in outpatient settings, so both inpatient and outpatient data are necessary for a valid estimate. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00198-023-06904-6 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10837268</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2876635710</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-a2edba0e51378c280704fdbc0ce4485c6156fe7c0b3fc3a76c8b8ece4ac5cc203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhS0EopfCC7BAkdiwCYztxI5XCFWlIFViAxI7y7EnF1eJfbEdxH2bPkufDLe3LT8LVpZ1vnNmRoeQ5xReUwD5JgNQNbTAeAtCQdeKB2RDO85bpkT_kGxAcdmqjn49Ik9yvoBqUko-JkdcDlR1QDfk5-nOO1x8nON238SpcT4XMzfJOL_mZkrGljVhbnxozjAtJuyvLturSx9s9QWLlSxVNsE1JWFwuRlNRtfEUC07UzyGcqPGtdx9nSnmKXk0mTnjs9v3mHx5f_r55EN7_uns48m789Z2si-tYehGA9jTurNlA0joJjdasNh1Q28F7cWE0sLIJ8uNFHYYB6yisb21DPgxeXvI3a3jgs7W-cnMepf8YtJeR-P130rw3_Q2_tAUBi6ZGGrCq9uEFL-vmItefLY4zyZgXLNmgxSC95JeD3v5D3oR1xTqfZopRpmSvOsrxQ6UTTHnhNP9NhT0dbP60KyuzeqbZrWophd_3nFvuauyAvwA5CqFLabfs_8T-wtgnrOE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2921297345</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Epidemiology of distal radius fractures in Germany - incidence rates and trends based on inpatient and outpatient data</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Reiland, Kevin ; Haastert, Burkhard ; Arend, Werner ; Klüppelholz, Birgit ; Windolf, Joachim ; Icks, Andrea ; Thelen, Simon ; Andrich, Silke</creator><creatorcontrib>Reiland, Kevin ; Haastert, Burkhard ; Arend, Werner ; Klüppelholz, Birgit ; Windolf, Joachim ; Icks, Andrea ; Thelen, Simon ; Andrich, Silke</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
We examined incidence rates (IR) for all distal radius fracture (DRF) events based on inpatient and outpatient data from a large statutory health insurance in Germany. Of all DRF, 56% were treated as inpatients, and thus, 44% treated as outpatients. IR were higher in women than in men.
Purpose
Although a distal radius fracture (DRF) is one of the most common fractures in the elderly population, epidemiological data are limited. Many studies examine only hospitalized patients, do not analyze time trends, or include only small populations. In this retrospective population-based observational study, routine data on inpatient and outpatient care of persons aged ≥ 60 years insured by a large statutory health insurance in Germany were analyzed from 2014 to 2018.
Methods
DRF were identified by ICD-10 codes. All DRF events of an individual were considered with a corresponding individual washout period. Incidence rates (IR) and time trends were estimated assuming a Poisson distribution per 100,000 person-years, with 95% confidence intervals [95% CI] and age-sex standardization to the German population in 2018. Associations of calendar year, age, sex, and comorbidity with IR were examined using Poisson regression estimating incidence rate ratios (IRR) with CI.
Results
The study population consists of 974,332 insured individuals, with 16,557 experiencing one or more DRF events during the observation period. A total of 17,705 DRF events occurred, of which 9961 (56.3%) were hospitalized. Standardized IR were 439 [424–453] (inpatient: 240 [230–251], outpatient: 199 [189–209]) in 2014 and 438 [423–452] (inpatient: 238 [227–249], outpatient: 200 [190–210]) in 2018. Female sex, older age, and comorbidity were associated with higher IR and adjusted Poisson regression showed no significant time trend (IRR overall 0.994 [0.983–1.006]).
Conclusion
A relevant proportion of DRF were treated in outpatient settings, so both inpatient and outpatient data are necessary for a valid estimate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0937-941X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-2965</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00198-023-06904-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37819401</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer London</publisher><subject>Comorbidity ; Endocrinology ; Epidemiology ; Fractures ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Older people ; Original ; Original Article ; Orthopedics ; Population studies ; Rheumatology ; Standardization ; Trends ; Wrist</subject><ispartof>Osteoporosis international, 2024-02, Vol.35 (2), p.317-326</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-a2edba0e51378c280704fdbc0ce4485c6156fe7c0b3fc3a76c8b8ece4ac5cc203</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-a2edba0e51378c280704fdbc0ce4485c6156fe7c0b3fc3a76c8b8ece4ac5cc203</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8884-7465</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37819401$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reiland, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haastert, Burkhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arend, Werner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klüppelholz, Birgit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windolf, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Icks, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thelen, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrich, Silke</creatorcontrib><title>Epidemiology of distal radius fractures in Germany - incidence rates and trends based on inpatient and outpatient data</title><title>Osteoporosis international</title><addtitle>Osteoporos Int</addtitle><addtitle>Osteoporos Int</addtitle><description>Summary
We examined incidence rates (IR) for all distal radius fracture (DRF) events based on inpatient and outpatient data from a large statutory health insurance in Germany. Of all DRF, 56% were treated as inpatients, and thus, 44% treated as outpatients. IR were higher in women than in men.
Purpose
Although a distal radius fracture (DRF) is one of the most common fractures in the elderly population, epidemiological data are limited. Many studies examine only hospitalized patients, do not analyze time trends, or include only small populations. In this retrospective population-based observational study, routine data on inpatient and outpatient care of persons aged ≥ 60 years insured by a large statutory health insurance in Germany were analyzed from 2014 to 2018.
Methods
DRF were identified by ICD-10 codes. All DRF events of an individual were considered with a corresponding individual washout period. Incidence rates (IR) and time trends were estimated assuming a Poisson distribution per 100,000 person-years, with 95% confidence intervals [95% CI] and age-sex standardization to the German population in 2018. Associations of calendar year, age, sex, and comorbidity with IR were examined using Poisson regression estimating incidence rate ratios (IRR) with CI.
Results
The study population consists of 974,332 insured individuals, with 16,557 experiencing one or more DRF events during the observation period. A total of 17,705 DRF events occurred, of which 9961 (56.3%) were hospitalized. Standardized IR were 439 [424–453] (inpatient: 240 [230–251], outpatient: 199 [189–209]) in 2014 and 438 [423–452] (inpatient: 238 [227–249], outpatient: 200 [190–210]) in 2018. Female sex, older age, and comorbidity were associated with higher IR and adjusted Poisson regression showed no significant time trend (IRR overall 0.994 [0.983–1.006]).
Conclusion
A relevant proportion of DRF were treated in outpatient settings, so both inpatient and outpatient data are necessary for a valid estimate.</description><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Endocrinology</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Rheumatology</subject><subject>Standardization</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Wrist</subject><issn>0937-941X</issn><issn>1433-2965</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhS0EopfCC7BAkdiwCYztxI5XCFWlIFViAxI7y7EnF1eJfbEdxH2bPkufDLe3LT8LVpZ1vnNmRoeQ5xReUwD5JgNQNbTAeAtCQdeKB2RDO85bpkT_kGxAcdmqjn49Ik9yvoBqUko-JkdcDlR1QDfk5-nOO1x8nON238SpcT4XMzfJOL_mZkrGljVhbnxozjAtJuyvLturSx9s9QWLlSxVNsE1JWFwuRlNRtfEUC07UzyGcqPGtdx9nSnmKXk0mTnjs9v3mHx5f_r55EN7_uns48m789Z2si-tYehGA9jTurNlA0joJjdasNh1Q28F7cWE0sLIJ8uNFHYYB6yisb21DPgxeXvI3a3jgs7W-cnMepf8YtJeR-P130rw3_Q2_tAUBi6ZGGrCq9uEFL-vmItefLY4zyZgXLNmgxSC95JeD3v5D3oR1xTqfZopRpmSvOsrxQ6UTTHnhNP9NhT0dbP60KyuzeqbZrWophd_3nFvuauyAvwA5CqFLabfs_8T-wtgnrOE</recordid><startdate>20240201</startdate><enddate>20240201</enddate><creator>Reiland, Kevin</creator><creator>Haastert, Burkhard</creator><creator>Arend, Werner</creator><creator>Klüppelholz, Birgit</creator><creator>Windolf, Joachim</creator><creator>Icks, Andrea</creator><creator>Thelen, Simon</creator><creator>Andrich, Silke</creator><general>Springer London</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8884-7465</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240201</creationdate><title>Epidemiology of distal radius fractures in Germany - incidence rates and trends based on inpatient and outpatient data</title><author>Reiland, Kevin ; Haastert, Burkhard ; Arend, Werner ; Klüppelholz, Birgit ; Windolf, Joachim ; Icks, Andrea ; Thelen, Simon ; Andrich, Silke</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-a2edba0e51378c280704fdbc0ce4485c6156fe7c0b3fc3a76c8b8ece4ac5cc203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Endocrinology</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Rheumatology</topic><topic>Standardization</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Wrist</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reiland, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haastert, Burkhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arend, Werner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klüppelholz, Birgit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windolf, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Icks, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thelen, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrich, Silke</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Osteoporosis international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reiland, Kevin</au><au>Haastert, Burkhard</au><au>Arend, Werner</au><au>Klüppelholz, Birgit</au><au>Windolf, Joachim</au><au>Icks, Andrea</au><au>Thelen, Simon</au><au>Andrich, Silke</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Epidemiology of distal radius fractures in Germany - incidence rates and trends based on inpatient and outpatient data</atitle><jtitle>Osteoporosis international</jtitle><stitle>Osteoporos Int</stitle><addtitle>Osteoporos Int</addtitle><date>2024-02-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>317</spage><epage>326</epage><pages>317-326</pages><issn>0937-941X</issn><eissn>1433-2965</eissn><abstract>Summary
We examined incidence rates (IR) for all distal radius fracture (DRF) events based on inpatient and outpatient data from a large statutory health insurance in Germany. Of all DRF, 56% were treated as inpatients, and thus, 44% treated as outpatients. IR were higher in women than in men.
Purpose
Although a distal radius fracture (DRF) is one of the most common fractures in the elderly population, epidemiological data are limited. Many studies examine only hospitalized patients, do not analyze time trends, or include only small populations. In this retrospective population-based observational study, routine data on inpatient and outpatient care of persons aged ≥ 60 years insured by a large statutory health insurance in Germany were analyzed from 2014 to 2018.
Methods
DRF were identified by ICD-10 codes. All DRF events of an individual were considered with a corresponding individual washout period. Incidence rates (IR) and time trends were estimated assuming a Poisson distribution per 100,000 person-years, with 95% confidence intervals [95% CI] and age-sex standardization to the German population in 2018. Associations of calendar year, age, sex, and comorbidity with IR were examined using Poisson regression estimating incidence rate ratios (IRR) with CI.
Results
The study population consists of 974,332 insured individuals, with 16,557 experiencing one or more DRF events during the observation period. A total of 17,705 DRF events occurred, of which 9961 (56.3%) were hospitalized. Standardized IR were 439 [424–453] (inpatient: 240 [230–251], outpatient: 199 [189–209]) in 2014 and 438 [423–452] (inpatient: 238 [227–249], outpatient: 200 [190–210]) in 2018. Female sex, older age, and comorbidity were associated with higher IR and adjusted Poisson regression showed no significant time trend (IRR overall 0.994 [0.983–1.006]).
Conclusion
A relevant proportion of DRF were treated in outpatient settings, so both inpatient and outpatient data are necessary for a valid estimate.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer London</pub><pmid>37819401</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00198-023-06904-6</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8884-7465</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0937-941X |
ispartof | Osteoporosis international, 2024-02, Vol.35 (2), p.317-326 |
issn | 0937-941X 1433-2965 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10837268 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Comorbidity Endocrinology Epidemiology Fractures Medicine Medicine & Public Health Older people Original Original Article Orthopedics Population studies Rheumatology Standardization Trends Wrist |
title | Epidemiology of distal radius fractures in Germany - incidence rates and trends based on inpatient and outpatient data |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T16%3A48%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Epidemiology%20of%20distal%20radius%20fractures%20in%20Germany%C2%A0-%C2%A0incidence%20rates%20and%20trends%20based%20on%20inpatient%20and%20outpatient%20data&rft.jtitle=Osteoporosis%20international&rft.au=Reiland,%20Kevin&rft.date=2024-02-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=317&rft.epage=326&rft.pages=317-326&rft.issn=0937-941X&rft.eissn=1433-2965&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00198-023-06904-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2876635710%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-a2edba0e51378c280704fdbc0ce4485c6156fe7c0b3fc3a76c8b8ece4ac5cc203%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2921297345&rft_id=info:pmid/37819401&rfr_iscdi=true |