Comparison of Evolut-R 34 mm Valve and Smaller Evolut-R Valves in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Determination of Mild Paravalvular Leak Predictors

The main purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the in-hospital, 1-month and 1-year post-procedure outcomes of patients treated with Evolut-R 34 mm and Evolut-R 23/26/29 mm devices. Additionally, the study aimed to identify factors that could predict the occurrence of ≥ mild paravalvular...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Anatolian journal of cardiology 2024-02, Vol.28 (2), p.109-117
Main Authors: Kılıç, Raif, Güzel, Tuncay, Aktan, Adem, Demir, Muhammed, Günlü, Serhat, Arslan, Bayram, Ertaş, Faruk
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Original Investigation
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The main purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the in-hospital, 1-month and 1-year post-procedure outcomes of patients treated with Evolut-R 34 mm and Evolut-R 23/26/29 mm devices. Additionally, the study aimed to identify factors that could predict the occurrence of ≥ mild paravalvular leaks (PVL). Between April 2015 and May 2022, 269 consecutive patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with Evolut-R 34 mm (n = 66, 24.5%) and Evolut-R 23/26/29 mm (n = 203, 75.5%) devices in a single center were retrospectively analyzed. Patients in the Evolut-R 34 mm group had a lower female sex ratio (16.7% vs. 66.5%, P
ISSN:2149-2263
2149-2271
2149-2263
DOI:10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2023.3563