Loading…

Functionally graded 3D printed plates for rib fracture fixation

Design freedom offered by additive manufacturing allows for the implementation of functional gradients - where mechanical stiffness is decreased along the length of the implant. It is unclear if such changes will influence failure mechanisms in the context of rib fracture repair. We hypothesized tha...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical biomechanics (Bristol) 2024-01, Vol.111, p.106151-106151, Article 106151
Main Authors: Gupta, Richa, Judkins, Lauren, Friday, Chet S, Ulsh, Joseph B, Kovach, 3rd, Stephen J, Mehta, Samir, Tomonto, Charles, Manogharan, Guha, Hast, Michael W
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-d04a1cc920509881d0c2c582319425f7669baa72347a960f9a7dd6539aa1d91a3
container_end_page 106151
container_issue
container_start_page 106151
container_title Clinical biomechanics (Bristol)
container_volume 111
creator Gupta, Richa
Judkins, Lauren
Friday, Chet S
Ulsh, Joseph B
Kovach, 3rd, Stephen J
Mehta, Samir
Tomonto, Charles
Manogharan, Guha
Hast, Michael W
description Design freedom offered by additive manufacturing allows for the implementation of functional gradients - where mechanical stiffness is decreased along the length of the implant. It is unclear if such changes will influence failure mechanisms in the context of rib fracture repair. We hypothesized that our novel functionally graded rib implants would be less stiff than controls and decrease occurrence of secondary fracture at implant ends. Five novel additively manufactured rib implants were tested along with a clinically used Control implant. Fracture reconstructions were modeled with custom synthetic rib bones with a transverse B1 fracture. Ribs were compressed in a cyclic two-point bend test for 360,000 cycles followed by a ramp to failure test. Differences in cyclic stiffness, 3D interfragmentary motions, ramp-to-failure stiffness, maximum load, and work to failure were determined. The Control group had lower construct stiffness (0.76 ± 0.28 N/mm), compared to all novel implant designs (means: 1.35-1.61 N/mm, p 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2023.106151
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10842059</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2892661179</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-d04a1cc920509881d0c2c582319425f7669baa72347a960f9a7dd6539aa1d91a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUclOwzAQtRAIyvILKNy4pMzYjZcTQmWVkLjA2Zo6TusqTYqdIPh7UpYKTjOambdoHmNnCGMElBfLsatDMwvtyrvFmAMXw1xigTtshFqZHLnCXTYCLnUOIMQBO0xpCQATXqh9diCU0QakGLHL275xXWgbquuPbB6p9GUmrrN1DE03tOuaOp-yqo1ZDLOsiuS6PvqsCu-0gR2zvYrq5E9-6hF7ub15nt7nj093D9Orx9wJqbu8hAmhc4ZDAUZrLMFxV2gu0AyWKiWlmREpLiaKjITKkCpLWQhDhKVBEkeD0y_edT9b-dL5potU28HmiuKHbSnY_5smLOy8fbMIejKomoHh_Ichtq-9T51dheR8XVPj2z5Zrg2XElFtTs33qYttStFXWx0Eu0nALu2fBOwmAfudwIA9_Wt0i_x9ufgEhwiGRQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2892661179</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Functionally graded 3D printed plates for rib fracture fixation</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Gupta, Richa ; Judkins, Lauren ; Friday, Chet S ; Ulsh, Joseph B ; Kovach, 3rd, Stephen J ; Mehta, Samir ; Tomonto, Charles ; Manogharan, Guha ; Hast, Michael W</creator><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Richa ; Judkins, Lauren ; Friday, Chet S ; Ulsh, Joseph B ; Kovach, 3rd, Stephen J ; Mehta, Samir ; Tomonto, Charles ; Manogharan, Guha ; Hast, Michael W</creatorcontrib><description>Design freedom offered by additive manufacturing allows for the implementation of functional gradients - where mechanical stiffness is decreased along the length of the implant. It is unclear if such changes will influence failure mechanisms in the context of rib fracture repair. We hypothesized that our novel functionally graded rib implants would be less stiff than controls and decrease occurrence of secondary fracture at implant ends. Five novel additively manufactured rib implants were tested along with a clinically used Control implant. Fracture reconstructions were modeled with custom synthetic rib bones with a transverse B1 fracture. Ribs were compressed in a cyclic two-point bend test for 360,000 cycles followed by a ramp to failure test. Differences in cyclic stiffness, 3D interfragmentary motions, ramp-to-failure stiffness, maximum load, and work to failure were determined. The Control group had lower construct stiffness (0.76 ± 0.28 N/mm), compared to all novel implant designs (means: 1.35-1.61 N/mm, p &lt; 0.05) and rotated significantly more about the bending axis (2.7° ± 1.3°) than the additively manufactured groups (means between 1.2° - 1.6°, p &lt; 0.05). All constructs failed via bone fracture at the most posterior screw hole. Experimental implants were stiffer than Controls, and there were few significant differences between functional gradient groups. Additively manufactured, functionally graded designs have the potential to change the form and function of trauma implants. Here, the impact of functional gradients was limited because implants had small cross-sectional areas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-0033</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1879-1271</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1271</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2023.106151</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37989063</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena ; Bone Plates ; Bone Screws ; Fracture Fixation ; Fracture Fixation, Internal ; Humans ; Printing, Three-Dimensional ; Rib Fractures - surgery ; Ribs</subject><ispartof>Clinical biomechanics (Bristol), 2024-01, Vol.111, p.106151-106151, Article 106151</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-d04a1cc920509881d0c2c582319425f7669baa72347a960f9a7dd6539aa1d91a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27900,27901</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37989063$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Richa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Judkins, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friday, Chet S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulsh, Joseph B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovach, 3rd, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Samir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomonto, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manogharan, Guha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hast, Michael W</creatorcontrib><title>Functionally graded 3D printed plates for rib fracture fixation</title><title>Clinical biomechanics (Bristol)</title><addtitle>Clin Biomech (Bristol)</addtitle><description>Design freedom offered by additive manufacturing allows for the implementation of functional gradients - where mechanical stiffness is decreased along the length of the implant. It is unclear if such changes will influence failure mechanisms in the context of rib fracture repair. We hypothesized that our novel functionally graded rib implants would be less stiff than controls and decrease occurrence of secondary fracture at implant ends. Five novel additively manufactured rib implants were tested along with a clinically used Control implant. Fracture reconstructions were modeled with custom synthetic rib bones with a transverse B1 fracture. Ribs were compressed in a cyclic two-point bend test for 360,000 cycles followed by a ramp to failure test. Differences in cyclic stiffness, 3D interfragmentary motions, ramp-to-failure stiffness, maximum load, and work to failure were determined. The Control group had lower construct stiffness (0.76 ± 0.28 N/mm), compared to all novel implant designs (means: 1.35-1.61 N/mm, p &lt; 0.05) and rotated significantly more about the bending axis (2.7° ± 1.3°) than the additively manufactured groups (means between 1.2° - 1.6°, p &lt; 0.05). All constructs failed via bone fracture at the most posterior screw hole. Experimental implants were stiffer than Controls, and there were few significant differences between functional gradient groups. Additively manufactured, functionally graded designs have the potential to change the form and function of trauma implants. Here, the impact of functional gradients was limited because implants had small cross-sectional areas.</description><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Bone Plates</subject><subject>Bone Screws</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Internal</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Printing, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>Rib Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Ribs</subject><issn>0268-0033</issn><issn>1879-1271</issn><issn>1879-1271</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUclOwzAQtRAIyvILKNy4pMzYjZcTQmWVkLjA2Zo6TusqTYqdIPh7UpYKTjOambdoHmNnCGMElBfLsatDMwvtyrvFmAMXw1xigTtshFqZHLnCXTYCLnUOIMQBO0xpCQATXqh9diCU0QakGLHL275xXWgbquuPbB6p9GUmrrN1DE03tOuaOp-yqo1ZDLOsiuS6PvqsCu-0gR2zvYrq5E9-6hF7ub15nt7nj093D9Orx9wJqbu8hAmhc4ZDAUZrLMFxV2gu0AyWKiWlmREpLiaKjITKkCpLWQhDhKVBEkeD0y_edT9b-dL5potU28HmiuKHbSnY_5smLOy8fbMIejKomoHh_Ichtq-9T51dheR8XVPj2z5Zrg2XElFtTs33qYttStFXWx0Eu0nALu2fBOwmAfudwIA9_Wt0i_x9ufgEhwiGRQ</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Gupta, Richa</creator><creator>Judkins, Lauren</creator><creator>Friday, Chet S</creator><creator>Ulsh, Joseph B</creator><creator>Kovach, 3rd, Stephen J</creator><creator>Mehta, Samir</creator><creator>Tomonto, Charles</creator><creator>Manogharan, Guha</creator><creator>Hast, Michael W</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>Functionally graded 3D printed plates for rib fracture fixation</title><author>Gupta, Richa ; Judkins, Lauren ; Friday, Chet S ; Ulsh, Joseph B ; Kovach, 3rd, Stephen J ; Mehta, Samir ; Tomonto, Charles ; Manogharan, Guha ; Hast, Michael W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-d04a1cc920509881d0c2c582319425f7669baa72347a960f9a7dd6539aa1d91a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Bone Plates</topic><topic>Bone Screws</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Internal</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Printing, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>Rib Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Ribs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Richa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Judkins, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friday, Chet S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulsh, Joseph B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovach, 3rd, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Samir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomonto, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manogharan, Guha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hast, Michael W</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical biomechanics (Bristol)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gupta, Richa</au><au>Judkins, Lauren</au><au>Friday, Chet S</au><au>Ulsh, Joseph B</au><au>Kovach, 3rd, Stephen J</au><au>Mehta, Samir</au><au>Tomonto, Charles</au><au>Manogharan, Guha</au><au>Hast, Michael W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Functionally graded 3D printed plates for rib fracture fixation</atitle><jtitle>Clinical biomechanics (Bristol)</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Biomech (Bristol)</addtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>111</volume><spage>106151</spage><epage>106151</epage><pages>106151-106151</pages><artnum>106151</artnum><issn>0268-0033</issn><issn>1879-1271</issn><eissn>1879-1271</eissn><abstract>Design freedom offered by additive manufacturing allows for the implementation of functional gradients - where mechanical stiffness is decreased along the length of the implant. It is unclear if such changes will influence failure mechanisms in the context of rib fracture repair. We hypothesized that our novel functionally graded rib implants would be less stiff than controls and decrease occurrence of secondary fracture at implant ends. Five novel additively manufactured rib implants were tested along with a clinically used Control implant. Fracture reconstructions were modeled with custom synthetic rib bones with a transverse B1 fracture. Ribs were compressed in a cyclic two-point bend test for 360,000 cycles followed by a ramp to failure test. Differences in cyclic stiffness, 3D interfragmentary motions, ramp-to-failure stiffness, maximum load, and work to failure were determined. The Control group had lower construct stiffness (0.76 ± 0.28 N/mm), compared to all novel implant designs (means: 1.35-1.61 N/mm, p &lt; 0.05) and rotated significantly more about the bending axis (2.7° ± 1.3°) than the additively manufactured groups (means between 1.2° - 1.6°, p &lt; 0.05). All constructs failed via bone fracture at the most posterior screw hole. Experimental implants were stiffer than Controls, and there were few significant differences between functional gradient groups. Additively manufactured, functionally graded designs have the potential to change the form and function of trauma implants. Here, the impact of functional gradients was limited because implants had small cross-sectional areas.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>37989063</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2023.106151</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0268-0033
ispartof Clinical biomechanics (Bristol), 2024-01, Vol.111, p.106151-106151, Article 106151
issn 0268-0033
1879-1271
1879-1271
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10842059
source Elsevier
subjects Biomechanical Phenomena
Bone Plates
Bone Screws
Fracture Fixation
Fracture Fixation, Internal
Humans
Printing, Three-Dimensional
Rib Fractures - surgery
Ribs
title Functionally graded 3D printed plates for rib fracture fixation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-24T17%3A33%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Functionally%20graded%203D%20printed%20plates%20for%20rib%20fracture%20fixation&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20biomechanics%20(Bristol)&rft.au=Gupta,%20Richa&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=111&rft.spage=106151&rft.epage=106151&rft.pages=106151-106151&rft.artnum=106151&rft.issn=0268-0033&rft.eissn=1879-1271&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2023.106151&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2892661179%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-d04a1cc920509881d0c2c582319425f7669baa72347a960f9a7dd6539aa1d91a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2892661179&rft_id=info:pmid/37989063&rfr_iscdi=true