Loading…
Functionally graded 3D printed plates for rib fracture fixation
Design freedom offered by additive manufacturing allows for the implementation of functional gradients - where mechanical stiffness is decreased along the length of the implant. It is unclear if such changes will influence failure mechanisms in the context of rib fracture repair. We hypothesized tha...
Saved in:
Published in: | Clinical biomechanics (Bristol) 2024-01, Vol.111, p.106151-106151, Article 106151 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-d04a1cc920509881d0c2c582319425f7669baa72347a960f9a7dd6539aa1d91a3 |
container_end_page | 106151 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 106151 |
container_title | Clinical biomechanics (Bristol) |
container_volume | 111 |
creator | Gupta, Richa Judkins, Lauren Friday, Chet S Ulsh, Joseph B Kovach, 3rd, Stephen J Mehta, Samir Tomonto, Charles Manogharan, Guha Hast, Michael W |
description | Design freedom offered by additive manufacturing allows for the implementation of functional gradients - where mechanical stiffness is decreased along the length of the implant. It is unclear if such changes will influence failure mechanisms in the context of rib fracture repair. We hypothesized that our novel functionally graded rib implants would be less stiff than controls and decrease occurrence of secondary fracture at implant ends.
Five novel additively manufactured rib implants were tested along with a clinically used Control implant. Fracture reconstructions were modeled with custom synthetic rib bones with a transverse B1 fracture. Ribs were compressed in a cyclic two-point bend test for 360,000 cycles followed by a ramp to failure test. Differences in cyclic stiffness, 3D interfragmentary motions, ramp-to-failure stiffness, maximum load, and work to failure were determined.
The Control group had lower construct stiffness (0.76 ± 0.28 N/mm), compared to all novel implant designs (means: 1.35-1.61 N/mm, p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2023.106151 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10842059</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2892661179</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-d04a1cc920509881d0c2c582319425f7669baa72347a960f9a7dd6539aa1d91a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUclOwzAQtRAIyvILKNy4pMzYjZcTQmWVkLjA2Zo6TusqTYqdIPh7UpYKTjOambdoHmNnCGMElBfLsatDMwvtyrvFmAMXw1xigTtshFqZHLnCXTYCLnUOIMQBO0xpCQATXqh9diCU0QakGLHL275xXWgbquuPbB6p9GUmrrN1DE03tOuaOp-yqo1ZDLOsiuS6PvqsCu-0gR2zvYrq5E9-6hF7ub15nt7nj093D9Orx9wJqbu8hAmhc4ZDAUZrLMFxV2gu0AyWKiWlmREpLiaKjITKkCpLWQhDhKVBEkeD0y_edT9b-dL5potU28HmiuKHbSnY_5smLOy8fbMIejKomoHh_Ichtq-9T51dheR8XVPj2z5Zrg2XElFtTs33qYttStFXWx0Eu0nALu2fBOwmAfudwIA9_Wt0i_x9ufgEhwiGRQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2892661179</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Functionally graded 3D printed plates for rib fracture fixation</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Gupta, Richa ; Judkins, Lauren ; Friday, Chet S ; Ulsh, Joseph B ; Kovach, 3rd, Stephen J ; Mehta, Samir ; Tomonto, Charles ; Manogharan, Guha ; Hast, Michael W</creator><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Richa ; Judkins, Lauren ; Friday, Chet S ; Ulsh, Joseph B ; Kovach, 3rd, Stephen J ; Mehta, Samir ; Tomonto, Charles ; Manogharan, Guha ; Hast, Michael W</creatorcontrib><description>Design freedom offered by additive manufacturing allows for the implementation of functional gradients - where mechanical stiffness is decreased along the length of the implant. It is unclear if such changes will influence failure mechanisms in the context of rib fracture repair. We hypothesized that our novel functionally graded rib implants would be less stiff than controls and decrease occurrence of secondary fracture at implant ends.
Five novel additively manufactured rib implants were tested along with a clinically used Control implant. Fracture reconstructions were modeled with custom synthetic rib bones with a transverse B1 fracture. Ribs were compressed in a cyclic two-point bend test for 360,000 cycles followed by a ramp to failure test. Differences in cyclic stiffness, 3D interfragmentary motions, ramp-to-failure stiffness, maximum load, and work to failure were determined.
The Control group had lower construct stiffness (0.76 ± 0.28 N/mm), compared to all novel implant designs (means: 1.35-1.61 N/mm, p < 0.05) and rotated significantly more about the bending axis (2.7° ± 1.3°) than the additively manufactured groups (means between 1.2° - 1.6°, p < 0.05). All constructs failed via bone fracture at the most posterior screw hole. Experimental implants were stiffer than Controls, and there were few significant differences between functional gradient groups.
Additively manufactured, functionally graded designs have the potential to change the form and function of trauma implants. Here, the impact of functional gradients was limited because implants had small cross-sectional areas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-0033</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1879-1271</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1271</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2023.106151</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37989063</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena ; Bone Plates ; Bone Screws ; Fracture Fixation ; Fracture Fixation, Internal ; Humans ; Printing, Three-Dimensional ; Rib Fractures - surgery ; Ribs</subject><ispartof>Clinical biomechanics (Bristol), 2024-01, Vol.111, p.106151-106151, Article 106151</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-d04a1cc920509881d0c2c582319425f7669baa72347a960f9a7dd6539aa1d91a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27900,27901</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37989063$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Richa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Judkins, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friday, Chet S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulsh, Joseph B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovach, 3rd, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Samir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomonto, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manogharan, Guha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hast, Michael W</creatorcontrib><title>Functionally graded 3D printed plates for rib fracture fixation</title><title>Clinical biomechanics (Bristol)</title><addtitle>Clin Biomech (Bristol)</addtitle><description>Design freedom offered by additive manufacturing allows for the implementation of functional gradients - where mechanical stiffness is decreased along the length of the implant. It is unclear if such changes will influence failure mechanisms in the context of rib fracture repair. We hypothesized that our novel functionally graded rib implants would be less stiff than controls and decrease occurrence of secondary fracture at implant ends.
Five novel additively manufactured rib implants were tested along with a clinically used Control implant. Fracture reconstructions were modeled with custom synthetic rib bones with a transverse B1 fracture. Ribs were compressed in a cyclic two-point bend test for 360,000 cycles followed by a ramp to failure test. Differences in cyclic stiffness, 3D interfragmentary motions, ramp-to-failure stiffness, maximum load, and work to failure were determined.
The Control group had lower construct stiffness (0.76 ± 0.28 N/mm), compared to all novel implant designs (means: 1.35-1.61 N/mm, p < 0.05) and rotated significantly more about the bending axis (2.7° ± 1.3°) than the additively manufactured groups (means between 1.2° - 1.6°, p < 0.05). All constructs failed via bone fracture at the most posterior screw hole. Experimental implants were stiffer than Controls, and there were few significant differences between functional gradient groups.
Additively manufactured, functionally graded designs have the potential to change the form and function of trauma implants. Here, the impact of functional gradients was limited because implants had small cross-sectional areas.</description><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Bone Plates</subject><subject>Bone Screws</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Internal</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Printing, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>Rib Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Ribs</subject><issn>0268-0033</issn><issn>1879-1271</issn><issn>1879-1271</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUclOwzAQtRAIyvILKNy4pMzYjZcTQmWVkLjA2Zo6TusqTYqdIPh7UpYKTjOambdoHmNnCGMElBfLsatDMwvtyrvFmAMXw1xigTtshFqZHLnCXTYCLnUOIMQBO0xpCQATXqh9diCU0QakGLHL275xXWgbquuPbB6p9GUmrrN1DE03tOuaOp-yqo1ZDLOsiuS6PvqsCu-0gR2zvYrq5E9-6hF7ub15nt7nj093D9Orx9wJqbu8hAmhc4ZDAUZrLMFxV2gu0AyWKiWlmREpLiaKjITKkCpLWQhDhKVBEkeD0y_edT9b-dL5potU28HmiuKHbSnY_5smLOy8fbMIejKomoHh_Ichtq-9T51dheR8XVPj2z5Zrg2XElFtTs33qYttStFXWx0Eu0nALu2fBOwmAfudwIA9_Wt0i_x9ufgEhwiGRQ</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Gupta, Richa</creator><creator>Judkins, Lauren</creator><creator>Friday, Chet S</creator><creator>Ulsh, Joseph B</creator><creator>Kovach, 3rd, Stephen J</creator><creator>Mehta, Samir</creator><creator>Tomonto, Charles</creator><creator>Manogharan, Guha</creator><creator>Hast, Michael W</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>Functionally graded 3D printed plates for rib fracture fixation</title><author>Gupta, Richa ; Judkins, Lauren ; Friday, Chet S ; Ulsh, Joseph B ; Kovach, 3rd, Stephen J ; Mehta, Samir ; Tomonto, Charles ; Manogharan, Guha ; Hast, Michael W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-d04a1cc920509881d0c2c582319425f7669baa72347a960f9a7dd6539aa1d91a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Bone Plates</topic><topic>Bone Screws</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Internal</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Printing, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>Rib Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Ribs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Richa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Judkins, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friday, Chet S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulsh, Joseph B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovach, 3rd, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Samir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomonto, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manogharan, Guha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hast, Michael W</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical biomechanics (Bristol)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gupta, Richa</au><au>Judkins, Lauren</au><au>Friday, Chet S</au><au>Ulsh, Joseph B</au><au>Kovach, 3rd, Stephen J</au><au>Mehta, Samir</au><au>Tomonto, Charles</au><au>Manogharan, Guha</au><au>Hast, Michael W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Functionally graded 3D printed plates for rib fracture fixation</atitle><jtitle>Clinical biomechanics (Bristol)</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Biomech (Bristol)</addtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>111</volume><spage>106151</spage><epage>106151</epage><pages>106151-106151</pages><artnum>106151</artnum><issn>0268-0033</issn><issn>1879-1271</issn><eissn>1879-1271</eissn><abstract>Design freedom offered by additive manufacturing allows for the implementation of functional gradients - where mechanical stiffness is decreased along the length of the implant. It is unclear if such changes will influence failure mechanisms in the context of rib fracture repair. We hypothesized that our novel functionally graded rib implants would be less stiff than controls and decrease occurrence of secondary fracture at implant ends.
Five novel additively manufactured rib implants were tested along with a clinically used Control implant. Fracture reconstructions were modeled with custom synthetic rib bones with a transverse B1 fracture. Ribs were compressed in a cyclic two-point bend test for 360,000 cycles followed by a ramp to failure test. Differences in cyclic stiffness, 3D interfragmentary motions, ramp-to-failure stiffness, maximum load, and work to failure were determined.
The Control group had lower construct stiffness (0.76 ± 0.28 N/mm), compared to all novel implant designs (means: 1.35-1.61 N/mm, p < 0.05) and rotated significantly more about the bending axis (2.7° ± 1.3°) than the additively manufactured groups (means between 1.2° - 1.6°, p < 0.05). All constructs failed via bone fracture at the most posterior screw hole. Experimental implants were stiffer than Controls, and there were few significant differences between functional gradient groups.
Additively manufactured, functionally graded designs have the potential to change the form and function of trauma implants. Here, the impact of functional gradients was limited because implants had small cross-sectional areas.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>37989063</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2023.106151</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0268-0033 |
ispartof | Clinical biomechanics (Bristol), 2024-01, Vol.111, p.106151-106151, Article 106151 |
issn | 0268-0033 1879-1271 1879-1271 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10842059 |
source | Elsevier |
subjects | Biomechanical Phenomena Bone Plates Bone Screws Fracture Fixation Fracture Fixation, Internal Humans Printing, Three-Dimensional Rib Fractures - surgery Ribs |
title | Functionally graded 3D printed plates for rib fracture fixation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-24T17%3A33%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Functionally%20graded%203D%20printed%20plates%20for%20rib%20fracture%20fixation&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20biomechanics%20(Bristol)&rft.au=Gupta,%20Richa&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=111&rft.spage=106151&rft.epage=106151&rft.pages=106151-106151&rft.artnum=106151&rft.issn=0268-0033&rft.eissn=1879-1271&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2023.106151&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2892661179%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-d04a1cc920509881d0c2c582319425f7669baa72347a960f9a7dd6539aa1d91a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2892661179&rft_id=info:pmid/37989063&rfr_iscdi=true |