The impact of cognitive behavioural therapy‐based psychological intervention on emotional improvement in elderly patients with extensive burns

To evaluate the efficacy of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) as a psychological intervention for elderly patients with extensive burns, focusing on its impact on emotional well‐being, self‐efficacy and quality of life. A prospective, randomized study involving 200 elderly burn patients was conduc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International wound journal 2024-02, Vol.21 (2), p.e14594-n/a
Main Authors: Yu, Hong‐Mei, Wang, Ling, Pan, Cui‐Zhen
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Aged
Anxiety
Anxiety - therapy
Behavior modification
Burns
Clinical medicine
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
cognitive behavioural therapy
Consent
elderly burn patients
emotional well‐being
Emotions
Humans
Infections
Injuries
Intervention
Mental health
Original
Pain management
Patients
Prospective Studies
Psychosocial Intervention
Quality of Life
Rehabilitation
Review boards
Self esteem
Self-efficacy
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To evaluate the efficacy of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) as a psychological intervention for elderly patients with extensive burns, focusing on its impact on emotional well‐being, self‐efficacy and quality of life. A prospective, randomized study involving 200 elderly burn patients was conducted from November 2021 to January 2023. The patients were randomly assigned to receive either standard care (control group) or burn care based on cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT‐B) (study group), with 100 patients in each group. Outcome measures included the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain assessment, 36‐item Short Form Survey (SF‐36) for quality of life, General Self‐Efficacy Scale (GSES) and Rosenberg Self‐Esteem Scale (RSES). The study revealed that CBT‐based intervention significantly reduced anxiety and depression scores compared with standard care (p 
ISSN:1742-4801
1742-481X
1742-481X
DOI:10.1111/iwj.14594