Loading…
Comparison of Informant Reports and Neuropsychological Assessment in Mild Cognitive Impairment
The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the accuracy of informant reports on cognitive status in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) by comparing the subjective evaluation made by patients’ relatives with the objective results of neuropsychological assessment. We enrolled 119 MCI outpatie...
Saved in:
Published in: | American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias 2011-11, Vol.26 (7), p.528-534 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Request full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-affda68eed80b7fce74e4fea6b7c65383167ad60d5f3ca3f260d4dfef228b88e3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-affda68eed80b7fce74e4fea6b7c65383167ad60d5f3ca3f260d4dfef228b88e3 |
container_end_page | 534 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 528 |
container_title | American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Abbate, Carlo Trimarchi, Pietro D. Nicolini, Paola Bergamaschini, Luigi Vergani, Carlo Mari, Daniela |
description | The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the accuracy of informant reports on cognitive status in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) by comparing the subjective evaluation made by patients’ relatives with the objective results of neuropsychological assessment. We enrolled 119 MCI outpatients and their relatives. Cognitive impairment was assessed by a battery of standardized neuropsychological tests. Informant reports on cognitive functioning were obtained by means of a structured interview. Subjective and objective evaluations of cognitive status were rated according to the same scoring system in order to enable comparison. All but one relative reported cognitive dysfunctions at the interview, but the kind of cognitive profile emerging from their reports was quite different from the one highlighted by neuropsychological assessment. A subjective evaluation of cognitive status based on informant reports could therefore be useful to identify patients with MCI but is unable to define MCI subtypes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1533317511429323 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10845647</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1533317511429323</sage_id><sourcerecordid>913317500</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-affda68eed80b7fce74e4fea6b7c65383167ad60d5f3ca3f260d4dfef228b88e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFvFCEUxonR2Hb17slw08sob4CBPZlmo3aTqonRq4RlHluaGRhhpkn_e1m3NmqiJ17y_d4HfB8hz4C9AlDqNUjOOSgJINo1b_kDcgprrptWcXhY5yo3B_2EnJVyzZiQWrPH5KRtQUq9Fqfk2yaNk82hpEiTp9voUx5tnOlnnFKeC7Wxpx9xyWkqt-4qDWkfnB3oeSlYyoiVDJF-CENPN2kfwxxukG6rZcgH8Ql55O1Q8OnduSJf3739srloLj-9327OLxsnOjU31vvedhqx12ynvEMlUHi03U65TnLNoVO271gvPXeW-7aOovfo21bvtEa-Im-OvtOyG7F39epsBzPlMNp8a5IN5k8lhiuzTzcGmBayE6o6vLhzyOn7gmU2YygOh8FGTEsxa_iZNGOVfPlfEmq6ICTURlaEHVGXUykZ_f2LgJlDg-bvBuvK899_cr_wq7IKNEeg2D2a67TkWJP9t-EPuKSmPw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1221145129</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Informant Reports and Neuropsychological Assessment in Mild Cognitive Impairment</title><source>SAGE Open Access</source><creator>Abbate, Carlo ; Trimarchi, Pietro D. ; Nicolini, Paola ; Bergamaschini, Luigi ; Vergani, Carlo ; Mari, Daniela</creator><creatorcontrib>Abbate, Carlo ; Trimarchi, Pietro D. ; Nicolini, Paola ; Bergamaschini, Luigi ; Vergani, Carlo ; Mari, Daniela</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the accuracy of informant reports on cognitive status in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) by comparing the subjective evaluation made by patients’ relatives with the objective results of neuropsychological assessment. We enrolled 119 MCI outpatients and their relatives. Cognitive impairment was assessed by a battery of standardized neuropsychological tests. Informant reports on cognitive functioning were obtained by means of a structured interview. Subjective and objective evaluations of cognitive status were rated according to the same scoring system in order to enable comparison. All but one relative reported cognitive dysfunctions at the interview, but the kind of cognitive profile emerging from their reports was quite different from the one highlighted by neuropsychological assessment. A subjective evaluation of cognitive status based on informant reports could therefore be useful to identify patients with MCI but is unable to define MCI subtypes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1533-3175</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-2731</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1533317511429323</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22155894</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Caregivers - psychology ; Cognition ; Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnosis ; Current Topics in Research ; Female ; Humans ; Interviews as Topic ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neuropsychological Tests - standards ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias, 2011-11, Vol.26 (7), p.528-534</ispartof><rights>SAGE Publications 2011</rights><rights>SAGE Publications 2011 2011 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-affda68eed80b7fce74e4fea6b7c65383167ad60d5f3ca3f260d4dfef228b88e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-affda68eed80b7fce74e4fea6b7c65383167ad60d5f3ca3f260d4dfef228b88e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10845647/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10845647/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,21966,27853,27924,27925,44945,45333,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1533317511429323?utm_source=summon&utm_medium=discovery-provider$$EView_record_in_SAGE_Publications$$FView_record_in_$$GSAGE_Publications</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22155894$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abbate, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trimarchi, Pietro D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicolini, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergamaschini, Luigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vergani, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mari, Daniela</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Informant Reports and Neuropsychological Assessment in Mild Cognitive Impairment</title><title>American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias</title><addtitle>Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen</addtitle><description>The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the accuracy of informant reports on cognitive status in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) by comparing the subjective evaluation made by patients’ relatives with the objective results of neuropsychological assessment. We enrolled 119 MCI outpatients and their relatives. Cognitive impairment was assessed by a battery of standardized neuropsychological tests. Informant reports on cognitive functioning were obtained by means of a structured interview. Subjective and objective evaluations of cognitive status were rated according to the same scoring system in order to enable comparison. All but one relative reported cognitive dysfunctions at the interview, but the kind of cognitive profile emerging from their reports was quite different from the one highlighted by neuropsychological assessment. A subjective evaluation of cognitive status based on informant reports could therefore be useful to identify patients with MCI but is unable to define MCI subtypes.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Caregivers - psychology</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnosis</subject><subject>Current Topics in Research</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests - standards</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>1533-3175</issn><issn>1938-2731</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kcFvFCEUxonR2Hb17slw08sob4CBPZlmo3aTqonRq4RlHluaGRhhpkn_e1m3NmqiJ17y_d4HfB8hz4C9AlDqNUjOOSgJINo1b_kDcgprrptWcXhY5yo3B_2EnJVyzZiQWrPH5KRtQUq9Fqfk2yaNk82hpEiTp9voUx5tnOlnnFKeC7Wxpx9xyWkqt-4qDWkfnB3oeSlYyoiVDJF-CENPN2kfwxxukG6rZcgH8Ql55O1Q8OnduSJf3739srloLj-9327OLxsnOjU31vvedhqx12ynvEMlUHi03U65TnLNoVO271gvPXeW-7aOovfo21bvtEa-Im-OvtOyG7F39epsBzPlMNp8a5IN5k8lhiuzTzcGmBayE6o6vLhzyOn7gmU2YygOh8FGTEsxa_iZNGOVfPlfEmq6ICTURlaEHVGXUykZ_f2LgJlDg-bvBuvK899_cr_wq7IKNEeg2D2a67TkWJP9t-EPuKSmPw</recordid><startdate>20111101</startdate><enddate>20111101</enddate><creator>Abbate, Carlo</creator><creator>Trimarchi, Pietro D.</creator><creator>Nicolini, Paola</creator><creator>Bergamaschini, Luigi</creator><creator>Vergani, Carlo</creator><creator>Mari, Daniela</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111101</creationdate><title>Comparison of Informant Reports and Neuropsychological Assessment in Mild Cognitive Impairment</title><author>Abbate, Carlo ; Trimarchi, Pietro D. ; Nicolini, Paola ; Bergamaschini, Luigi ; Vergani, Carlo ; Mari, Daniela</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-affda68eed80b7fce74e4fea6b7c65383167ad60d5f3ca3f260d4dfef228b88e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Caregivers - psychology</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnosis</topic><topic>Current Topics in Research</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests - standards</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abbate, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trimarchi, Pietro D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicolini, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergamaschini, Luigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vergani, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mari, Daniela</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abbate, Carlo</au><au>Trimarchi, Pietro D.</au><au>Nicolini, Paola</au><au>Bergamaschini, Luigi</au><au>Vergani, Carlo</au><au>Mari, Daniela</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Informant Reports and Neuropsychological Assessment in Mild Cognitive Impairment</atitle><jtitle>American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen</addtitle><date>2011-11-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>528</spage><epage>534</epage><pages>528-534</pages><issn>1533-3175</issn><eissn>1938-2731</eissn><abstract>The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the accuracy of informant reports on cognitive status in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) by comparing the subjective evaluation made by patients’ relatives with the objective results of neuropsychological assessment. We enrolled 119 MCI outpatients and their relatives. Cognitive impairment was assessed by a battery of standardized neuropsychological tests. Informant reports on cognitive functioning were obtained by means of a structured interview. Subjective and objective evaluations of cognitive status were rated according to the same scoring system in order to enable comparison. All but one relative reported cognitive dysfunctions at the interview, but the kind of cognitive profile emerging from their reports was quite different from the one highlighted by neuropsychological assessment. A subjective evaluation of cognitive status based on informant reports could therefore be useful to identify patients with MCI but is unable to define MCI subtypes.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>22155894</pmid><doi>10.1177/1533317511429323</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1533-3175 |
ispartof | American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias, 2011-11, Vol.26 (7), p.528-534 |
issn | 1533-3175 1938-2731 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10845647 |
source | SAGE Open Access |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Caregivers - psychology Cognition Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnosis Current Topics in Research Female Humans Interviews as Topic Male Middle Aged Neuropsychological Tests - standards Retrospective Studies |
title | Comparison of Informant Reports and Neuropsychological Assessment in Mild Cognitive Impairment |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T09%3A03%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_AFRWT&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Informant%20Reports%20and%20Neuropsychological%20Assessment%20in%20Mild%20Cognitive%20Impairment&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20Alzheimer's%20disease%20and%20other%20dementias&rft.au=Abbate,%20Carlo&rft.date=2011-11-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=528&rft.epage=534&rft.pages=528-534&rft.issn=1533-3175&rft.eissn=1938-2731&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1533317511429323&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_AFRWT%3E913317500%3C/proquest_AFRWT%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-affda68eed80b7fce74e4fea6b7c65383167ad60d5f3ca3f260d4dfef228b88e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1221145129&rft_id=info:pmid/22155894&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1533317511429323&rfr_iscdi=true |