Loading…

Comparison of Informant Reports and Neuropsychological Assessment in Mild Cognitive Impairment

The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the accuracy of informant reports on cognitive status in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) by comparing the subjective evaluation made by patients’ relatives with the objective results of neuropsychological assessment. We enrolled 119 MCI outpatie...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias 2011-11, Vol.26 (7), p.528-534
Main Authors: Abbate, Carlo, Trimarchi, Pietro D., Nicolini, Paola, Bergamaschini, Luigi, Vergani, Carlo, Mari, Daniela
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-affda68eed80b7fce74e4fea6b7c65383167ad60d5f3ca3f260d4dfef228b88e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-affda68eed80b7fce74e4fea6b7c65383167ad60d5f3ca3f260d4dfef228b88e3
container_end_page 534
container_issue 7
container_start_page 528
container_title American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias
container_volume 26
creator Abbate, Carlo
Trimarchi, Pietro D.
Nicolini, Paola
Bergamaschini, Luigi
Vergani, Carlo
Mari, Daniela
description The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the accuracy of informant reports on cognitive status in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) by comparing the subjective evaluation made by patients’ relatives with the objective results of neuropsychological assessment. We enrolled 119 MCI outpatients and their relatives. Cognitive impairment was assessed by a battery of standardized neuropsychological tests. Informant reports on cognitive functioning were obtained by means of a structured interview. Subjective and objective evaluations of cognitive status were rated according to the same scoring system in order to enable comparison. All but one relative reported cognitive dysfunctions at the interview, but the kind of cognitive profile emerging from their reports was quite different from the one highlighted by neuropsychological assessment. A subjective evaluation of cognitive status based on informant reports could therefore be useful to identify patients with MCI but is unable to define MCI subtypes.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1533317511429323
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10845647</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1533317511429323</sage_id><sourcerecordid>913317500</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-affda68eed80b7fce74e4fea6b7c65383167ad60d5f3ca3f260d4dfef228b88e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFvFCEUxonR2Hb17slw08sob4CBPZlmo3aTqonRq4RlHluaGRhhpkn_e1m3NmqiJ17y_d4HfB8hz4C9AlDqNUjOOSgJINo1b_kDcgprrptWcXhY5yo3B_2EnJVyzZiQWrPH5KRtQUq9Fqfk2yaNk82hpEiTp9voUx5tnOlnnFKeC7Wxpx9xyWkqt-4qDWkfnB3oeSlYyoiVDJF-CENPN2kfwxxukG6rZcgH8Ql55O1Q8OnduSJf3739srloLj-9327OLxsnOjU31vvedhqx12ynvEMlUHi03U65TnLNoVO271gvPXeW-7aOovfo21bvtEa-Im-OvtOyG7F39epsBzPlMNp8a5IN5k8lhiuzTzcGmBayE6o6vLhzyOn7gmU2YygOh8FGTEsxa_iZNGOVfPlfEmq6ICTURlaEHVGXUykZ_f2LgJlDg-bvBuvK899_cr_wq7IKNEeg2D2a67TkWJP9t-EPuKSmPw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1221145129</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Informant Reports and Neuropsychological Assessment in Mild Cognitive Impairment</title><source>SAGE Open Access</source><creator>Abbate, Carlo ; Trimarchi, Pietro D. ; Nicolini, Paola ; Bergamaschini, Luigi ; Vergani, Carlo ; Mari, Daniela</creator><creatorcontrib>Abbate, Carlo ; Trimarchi, Pietro D. ; Nicolini, Paola ; Bergamaschini, Luigi ; Vergani, Carlo ; Mari, Daniela</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the accuracy of informant reports on cognitive status in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) by comparing the subjective evaluation made by patients’ relatives with the objective results of neuropsychological assessment. We enrolled 119 MCI outpatients and their relatives. Cognitive impairment was assessed by a battery of standardized neuropsychological tests. Informant reports on cognitive functioning were obtained by means of a structured interview. Subjective and objective evaluations of cognitive status were rated according to the same scoring system in order to enable comparison. All but one relative reported cognitive dysfunctions at the interview, but the kind of cognitive profile emerging from their reports was quite different from the one highlighted by neuropsychological assessment. A subjective evaluation of cognitive status based on informant reports could therefore be useful to identify patients with MCI but is unable to define MCI subtypes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1533-3175</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-2731</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1533317511429323</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22155894</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Caregivers - psychology ; Cognition ; Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnosis ; Current Topics in Research ; Female ; Humans ; Interviews as Topic ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neuropsychological Tests - standards ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias, 2011-11, Vol.26 (7), p.528-534</ispartof><rights>SAGE Publications 2011</rights><rights>SAGE Publications 2011 2011 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-affda68eed80b7fce74e4fea6b7c65383167ad60d5f3ca3f260d4dfef228b88e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-affda68eed80b7fce74e4fea6b7c65383167ad60d5f3ca3f260d4dfef228b88e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10845647/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10845647/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,21966,27853,27924,27925,44945,45333,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1533317511429323?utm_source=summon&amp;utm_medium=discovery-provider$$EView_record_in_SAGE_Publications$$FView_record_in_$$GSAGE_Publications</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22155894$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abbate, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trimarchi, Pietro D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicolini, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergamaschini, Luigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vergani, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mari, Daniela</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Informant Reports and Neuropsychological Assessment in Mild Cognitive Impairment</title><title>American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias</title><addtitle>Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen</addtitle><description>The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the accuracy of informant reports on cognitive status in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) by comparing the subjective evaluation made by patients’ relatives with the objective results of neuropsychological assessment. We enrolled 119 MCI outpatients and their relatives. Cognitive impairment was assessed by a battery of standardized neuropsychological tests. Informant reports on cognitive functioning were obtained by means of a structured interview. Subjective and objective evaluations of cognitive status were rated according to the same scoring system in order to enable comparison. All but one relative reported cognitive dysfunctions at the interview, but the kind of cognitive profile emerging from their reports was quite different from the one highlighted by neuropsychological assessment. A subjective evaluation of cognitive status based on informant reports could therefore be useful to identify patients with MCI but is unable to define MCI subtypes.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Caregivers - psychology</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnosis</subject><subject>Current Topics in Research</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests - standards</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>1533-3175</issn><issn>1938-2731</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kcFvFCEUxonR2Hb17slw08sob4CBPZlmo3aTqonRq4RlHluaGRhhpkn_e1m3NmqiJ17y_d4HfB8hz4C9AlDqNUjOOSgJINo1b_kDcgprrptWcXhY5yo3B_2EnJVyzZiQWrPH5KRtQUq9Fqfk2yaNk82hpEiTp9voUx5tnOlnnFKeC7Wxpx9xyWkqt-4qDWkfnB3oeSlYyoiVDJF-CENPN2kfwxxukG6rZcgH8Ql55O1Q8OnduSJf3739srloLj-9327OLxsnOjU31vvedhqx12ynvEMlUHi03U65TnLNoVO271gvPXeW-7aOovfo21bvtEa-Im-OvtOyG7F39epsBzPlMNp8a5IN5k8lhiuzTzcGmBayE6o6vLhzyOn7gmU2YygOh8FGTEsxa_iZNGOVfPlfEmq6ICTURlaEHVGXUykZ_f2LgJlDg-bvBuvK899_cr_wq7IKNEeg2D2a67TkWJP9t-EPuKSmPw</recordid><startdate>20111101</startdate><enddate>20111101</enddate><creator>Abbate, Carlo</creator><creator>Trimarchi, Pietro D.</creator><creator>Nicolini, Paola</creator><creator>Bergamaschini, Luigi</creator><creator>Vergani, Carlo</creator><creator>Mari, Daniela</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111101</creationdate><title>Comparison of Informant Reports and Neuropsychological Assessment in Mild Cognitive Impairment</title><author>Abbate, Carlo ; Trimarchi, Pietro D. ; Nicolini, Paola ; Bergamaschini, Luigi ; Vergani, Carlo ; Mari, Daniela</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-affda68eed80b7fce74e4fea6b7c65383167ad60d5f3ca3f260d4dfef228b88e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Caregivers - psychology</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnosis</topic><topic>Current Topics in Research</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests - standards</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abbate, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trimarchi, Pietro D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicolini, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergamaschini, Luigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vergani, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mari, Daniela</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abbate, Carlo</au><au>Trimarchi, Pietro D.</au><au>Nicolini, Paola</au><au>Bergamaschini, Luigi</au><au>Vergani, Carlo</au><au>Mari, Daniela</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Informant Reports and Neuropsychological Assessment in Mild Cognitive Impairment</atitle><jtitle>American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen</addtitle><date>2011-11-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>528</spage><epage>534</epage><pages>528-534</pages><issn>1533-3175</issn><eissn>1938-2731</eissn><abstract>The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the accuracy of informant reports on cognitive status in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) by comparing the subjective evaluation made by patients’ relatives with the objective results of neuropsychological assessment. We enrolled 119 MCI outpatients and their relatives. Cognitive impairment was assessed by a battery of standardized neuropsychological tests. Informant reports on cognitive functioning were obtained by means of a structured interview. Subjective and objective evaluations of cognitive status were rated according to the same scoring system in order to enable comparison. All but one relative reported cognitive dysfunctions at the interview, but the kind of cognitive profile emerging from their reports was quite different from the one highlighted by neuropsychological assessment. A subjective evaluation of cognitive status based on informant reports could therefore be useful to identify patients with MCI but is unable to define MCI subtypes.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>22155894</pmid><doi>10.1177/1533317511429323</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1533-3175
ispartof American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias, 2011-11, Vol.26 (7), p.528-534
issn 1533-3175
1938-2731
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10845647
source SAGE Open Access
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Caregivers - psychology
Cognition
Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnosis
Current Topics in Research
Female
Humans
Interviews as Topic
Male
Middle Aged
Neuropsychological Tests - standards
Retrospective Studies
title Comparison of Informant Reports and Neuropsychological Assessment in Mild Cognitive Impairment
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T09%3A03%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_AFRWT&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Informant%20Reports%20and%20Neuropsychological%20Assessment%20in%20Mild%20Cognitive%20Impairment&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20Alzheimer's%20disease%20and%20other%20dementias&rft.au=Abbate,%20Carlo&rft.date=2011-11-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=528&rft.epage=534&rft.pages=528-534&rft.issn=1533-3175&rft.eissn=1938-2731&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1533317511429323&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_AFRWT%3E913317500%3C/proquest_AFRWT%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-affda68eed80b7fce74e4fea6b7c65383167ad60d5f3ca3f260d4dfef228b88e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1221145129&rft_id=info:pmid/22155894&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1533317511429323&rfr_iscdi=true