ChatGPT for Academic Purposes: Survey Among Undergraduate Healthcare Students in Malaysia

• Published in: Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) CA), 2024-01, Vol.16 (1), p.e53032-e53032
• Main Authors: George Pallivathukal, Renjith, Kyaw Soe, Htoo Htoo, Donald, Preethy Mary, Samson, Renu Sarah, Hj Ismail, Abdul Rashid
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Accuracy; Artificial intelligence; Attitudes; Chatbots; Creativity; Education; Epidemiology/Public Health; Gender; Influence; Knowledge; Medical Education; Population; Questionnaires; Sample size; University students; Validity; Variables
• ISSN: 2168-8184; 2168-8184
• DOI: 10.7759/cureus.53032

The impact of generative artificial intelligence-based Chatbots on medical education, particularly in Southeast Asia, is understudied regarding healthcare students' perceptions of its academic utility. Sociodemographic profiles and educational strategies influence prospective healthcare practitioners' attitudes toward AI tools. This study aimed to assess healthcare university students' knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding ChatGPT for academic purposes. It explored chatbot usage frequency, purposes, satisfaction levels, and associations between age, gender, and ChatGPT variables. Four hundred forty-three undergraduate students at a Malaysian tertiary healthcare institute participated, revealing varying awareness levels of ChatGPT's academic utility. Despite concerns about accuracy, ethics, and dependency, participants generally held positive attitudes toward ChatGPT in academics. Multiple logistic regression highlighted associations between demographics, knowledge, attitude, and academic ChatGPT use. MBBS students were significantly more likely to use ChatGPT for academics than BDS and FIS students. Final-year students exhibited the highest likelihood of academic ChatGPT use. Higher knowledge and positive attitudes correlated with increased academic usage. Most users (45.8%) employed ChatGPT to aid specific assignment sections while completing most work independently. Some did not use it (41.1%), while others heavily relied on it (9.3%). Users also employed it for various purposes, from generating questions to understanding concepts. Thematic analysis of responses showed students' concerns about data accuracy, plagiarism, ethical issues, and dependency on ChatGPT for academic tasks. This study aids in creating guidelines for implementing GAI chatbots in healthcare education, emphasizing benefits, and risks, and informing AI developers and educators about ChatGPT's potential in academia.