Loading…

Magnetosheath Jets Over Solar Cycle 24: An Empirical Model

Time History of Events and Macroscale Interactions during Substorms (THEMIS) spacecraft have been sampling the subsolar magnetosheath since the first dayside science phase in 2008, and we finally have observations over a solar cycle. However, we show that the solar wind coverage during these magneto...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of geophysical research. Space physics 2023-08, Vol.128 (8), p.e2023JA031493-n/a
Main Authors: Vuorinen, Laura, LaMoury, Adrian T., Hietala, Heli, Koller, Florian
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4574-15bc4f39141c0a81d82bfa506a231594e818f78a4e6a5b5e4a9249f80ab82dae3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4574-15bc4f39141c0a81d82bfa506a231594e818f78a4e6a5b5e4a9249f80ab82dae3
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 8
container_start_page e2023JA031493
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Space physics
container_volume 128
creator Vuorinen, Laura
LaMoury, Adrian T.
Hietala, Heli
Koller, Florian
description Time History of Events and Macroscale Interactions during Substorms (THEMIS) spacecraft have been sampling the subsolar magnetosheath since the first dayside science phase in 2008, and we finally have observations over a solar cycle. However, we show that the solar wind coverage during these magnetosheath intervals is not always consistent with the solar wind conditions throughout the same year. This has implications for studying phenomena whose occurrence depends strongly on solar wind parameters. We demonstrate this with magnetosheath jets—flows of enhanced earthward dynamic pressure in the magnetosheath. Jets emerge from the bow shock, and some of them can go on and collide into the magnetopause. Their occurrence is highly linked to solar wind conditions, particularly the orientation of the interplanetary magnetic field, as jets are mostly observed downstream of the quasi‐parallel shock. We study the yearly occurrence rates of jets recorded by THEMIS over solar cycle 24 (2008–2019) and find that they are biased due to differences in spacecraft orbits and uneven sampling of solar wind conditions during the different years. Thus, we instead use the THEMIS observations and their corresponding solar wind conditions to develop a model of how jet occurrence varies as a function of solar wind conditions. We then use OMNI data of the whole solar cycle to estimate the unbiased yearly jet occurrence rates. For comparison, we also estimate jet occurrence rates during solar cycle 23 (1996–2008). Our results suggest that there is no strong solar cycle dependency in jet formation. Key Points Observed jet occurrence rates can be biased due to spacecraft orbits and uneven solar wind sampling We created a statistical model of jet occurrence using interplanetary magnetic field cone angle, magnitude, solar wind speed, and density There is no strong solar cycle dependency in jet occurrence, but there may be a ∼10%–20% decrease around solar maximum
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2023JA031493
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10909464</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2937704272</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4574-15bc4f39141c0a81d82bfa506a231594e818f78a4e6a5b5e4a9249f80ab82dae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1LI0EQxZtlZSOam-dlYC97MNof1TPdXpYQXDUoAT_OTc2kxox0prPdE5f89ztLoqgH61JF1Y9HPR5jR4KfCC7tqeRSTcdcCbDqC9uXIrcjC1x-fZmV4QM2TOmJ92X6ldDf2EAZAK4s32dnN_jYUhfSgrBbZFPqUjZ7ppjdBY8xm2wqT5mEs2zcZufLVRObCn12E-bkD9lejT7RcNcP2MPv8_vJ5eh6dnE1GV-PKtAFjIQuK6iVFSAqjkbMjSxr1DxHqYS2QEaYujAIlKMuNQFaCbY2HEsj50jqgP3a6q7W5ZLmFbVdRO9WsVli3LiAjXt_aZuFewzPTnDLLeTQK_zcKcTwZ02pc8smVeQ9thTWyUmrioKDLGSP_viAPoV1bHt_ThpdmFxBLnrqeEtVMaQUqX79RnD3Pxj3Npge__7WwSv8EkMPqC3wt_G0-VTMTS9ux7qwGtQ_7JCUOw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2857863461</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Magnetosheath Jets Over Solar Cycle 24: An Empirical Model</title><source>Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list)</source><creator>Vuorinen, Laura ; LaMoury, Adrian T. ; Hietala, Heli ; Koller, Florian</creator><creatorcontrib>Vuorinen, Laura ; LaMoury, Adrian T. ; Hietala, Heli ; Koller, Florian</creatorcontrib><description>Time History of Events and Macroscale Interactions during Substorms (THEMIS) spacecraft have been sampling the subsolar magnetosheath since the first dayside science phase in 2008, and we finally have observations over a solar cycle. However, we show that the solar wind coverage during these magnetosheath intervals is not always consistent with the solar wind conditions throughout the same year. This has implications for studying phenomena whose occurrence depends strongly on solar wind parameters. We demonstrate this with magnetosheath jets—flows of enhanced earthward dynamic pressure in the magnetosheath. Jets emerge from the bow shock, and some of them can go on and collide into the magnetopause. Their occurrence is highly linked to solar wind conditions, particularly the orientation of the interplanetary magnetic field, as jets are mostly observed downstream of the quasi‐parallel shock. We study the yearly occurrence rates of jets recorded by THEMIS over solar cycle 24 (2008–2019) and find that they are biased due to differences in spacecraft orbits and uneven sampling of solar wind conditions during the different years. Thus, we instead use the THEMIS observations and their corresponding solar wind conditions to develop a model of how jet occurrence varies as a function of solar wind conditions. We then use OMNI data of the whole solar cycle to estimate the unbiased yearly jet occurrence rates. For comparison, we also estimate jet occurrence rates during solar cycle 23 (1996–2008). Our results suggest that there is no strong solar cycle dependency in jet formation. Key Points Observed jet occurrence rates can be biased due to spacecraft orbits and uneven solar wind sampling We created a statistical model of jet occurrence using interplanetary magnetic field cone angle, magnitude, solar wind speed, and density There is no strong solar cycle dependency in jet occurrence, but there may be a ∼10%–20% decrease around solar maximum</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9380</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9402</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2023JA031493</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38440390</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Computational Geophysics ; Dynamic pressure ; Electromagnetics ; Empirical models ; Fifteen Years of THEMIS Mission ; Fourier Analysis ; Informatics ; Interplanetary magnetic field ; Ionosphere ; Ionospheric Propagation ; Jets ; Magnetic fields ; Magnetopause ; Magnetosheath ; Magnetospheric Physics ; Mathematical Geophysics ; Natural Hazards ; Nonlinear Geophysics ; Nonlinear Waves, Shock Waves, Solitons ; Oceanography: General ; Radio Science ; Remote Sensing and Electromagnetic Processes ; Sampling ; Saturn ; Shock Waves ; Solar cycle ; Solar cycle-solar wind relationships ; Solar wind ; Solar wind parameters ; Solar Wind/Magnetosphere Interactions ; Solitons and Solitary Waves ; Space Plasma Physics ; Spacecraft ; Spacecraft orbits ; Spatial Analysis ; Spatial Analysis and Representation ; Spatial Modeling ; Spectral Analysis ; Wave Propagation ; Wavelet Transform</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics, 2023-08, Vol.128 (8), p.e2023JA031493-n/a</ispartof><rights>2023. The Authors.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4574-15bc4f39141c0a81d82bfa506a231594e818f78a4e6a5b5e4a9249f80ab82dae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4574-15bc4f39141c0a81d82bfa506a231594e818f78a4e6a5b5e4a9249f80ab82dae3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3039-1255 ; 0000-0003-1551-5325 ; 0000-0002-8164-0004 ; 0000-0002-2238-109X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38440390$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vuorinen, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaMoury, Adrian T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hietala, Heli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koller, Florian</creatorcontrib><title>Magnetosheath Jets Over Solar Cycle 24: An Empirical Model</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</title><addtitle>J Geophys Res Space Phys</addtitle><description>Time History of Events and Macroscale Interactions during Substorms (THEMIS) spacecraft have been sampling the subsolar magnetosheath since the first dayside science phase in 2008, and we finally have observations over a solar cycle. However, we show that the solar wind coverage during these magnetosheath intervals is not always consistent with the solar wind conditions throughout the same year. This has implications for studying phenomena whose occurrence depends strongly on solar wind parameters. We demonstrate this with magnetosheath jets—flows of enhanced earthward dynamic pressure in the magnetosheath. Jets emerge from the bow shock, and some of them can go on and collide into the magnetopause. Their occurrence is highly linked to solar wind conditions, particularly the orientation of the interplanetary magnetic field, as jets are mostly observed downstream of the quasi‐parallel shock. We study the yearly occurrence rates of jets recorded by THEMIS over solar cycle 24 (2008–2019) and find that they are biased due to differences in spacecraft orbits and uneven sampling of solar wind conditions during the different years. Thus, we instead use the THEMIS observations and their corresponding solar wind conditions to develop a model of how jet occurrence varies as a function of solar wind conditions. We then use OMNI data of the whole solar cycle to estimate the unbiased yearly jet occurrence rates. For comparison, we also estimate jet occurrence rates during solar cycle 23 (1996–2008). Our results suggest that there is no strong solar cycle dependency in jet formation. Key Points Observed jet occurrence rates can be biased due to spacecraft orbits and uneven solar wind sampling We created a statistical model of jet occurrence using interplanetary magnetic field cone angle, magnitude, solar wind speed, and density There is no strong solar cycle dependency in jet occurrence, but there may be a ∼10%–20% decrease around solar maximum</description><subject>Computational Geophysics</subject><subject>Dynamic pressure</subject><subject>Electromagnetics</subject><subject>Empirical models</subject><subject>Fifteen Years of THEMIS Mission</subject><subject>Fourier Analysis</subject><subject>Informatics</subject><subject>Interplanetary magnetic field</subject><subject>Ionosphere</subject><subject>Ionospheric Propagation</subject><subject>Jets</subject><subject>Magnetic fields</subject><subject>Magnetopause</subject><subject>Magnetosheath</subject><subject>Magnetospheric Physics</subject><subject>Mathematical Geophysics</subject><subject>Natural Hazards</subject><subject>Nonlinear Geophysics</subject><subject>Nonlinear Waves, Shock Waves, Solitons</subject><subject>Oceanography: General</subject><subject>Radio Science</subject><subject>Remote Sensing and Electromagnetic Processes</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Saturn</subject><subject>Shock Waves</subject><subject>Solar cycle</subject><subject>Solar cycle-solar wind relationships</subject><subject>Solar wind</subject><subject>Solar wind parameters</subject><subject>Solar Wind/Magnetosphere Interactions</subject><subject>Solitons and Solitary Waves</subject><subject>Space Plasma Physics</subject><subject>Spacecraft</subject><subject>Spacecraft orbits</subject><subject>Spatial Analysis</subject><subject>Spatial Analysis and Representation</subject><subject>Spatial Modeling</subject><subject>Spectral Analysis</subject><subject>Wave Propagation</subject><subject>Wavelet Transform</subject><issn>2169-9380</issn><issn>2169-9402</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1LI0EQxZtlZSOam-dlYC97MNof1TPdXpYQXDUoAT_OTc2kxox0prPdE5f89ztLoqgH61JF1Y9HPR5jR4KfCC7tqeRSTcdcCbDqC9uXIrcjC1x-fZmV4QM2TOmJ92X6ldDf2EAZAK4s32dnN_jYUhfSgrBbZFPqUjZ7ppjdBY8xm2wqT5mEs2zcZufLVRObCn12E-bkD9lejT7RcNcP2MPv8_vJ5eh6dnE1GV-PKtAFjIQuK6iVFSAqjkbMjSxr1DxHqYS2QEaYujAIlKMuNQFaCbY2HEsj50jqgP3a6q7W5ZLmFbVdRO9WsVli3LiAjXt_aZuFewzPTnDLLeTQK_zcKcTwZ02pc8smVeQ9thTWyUmrioKDLGSP_viAPoV1bHt_ThpdmFxBLnrqeEtVMaQUqX79RnD3Pxj3Npge__7WwSv8EkMPqC3wt_G0-VTMTS9ux7qwGtQ_7JCUOw</recordid><startdate>202308</startdate><enddate>202308</enddate><creator>Vuorinen, Laura</creator><creator>LaMoury, Adrian T.</creator><creator>Hietala, Heli</creator><creator>Koller, Florian</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3039-1255</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1551-5325</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8164-0004</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2238-109X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202308</creationdate><title>Magnetosheath Jets Over Solar Cycle 24: An Empirical Model</title><author>Vuorinen, Laura ; LaMoury, Adrian T. ; Hietala, Heli ; Koller, Florian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4574-15bc4f39141c0a81d82bfa506a231594e818f78a4e6a5b5e4a9249f80ab82dae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Computational Geophysics</topic><topic>Dynamic pressure</topic><topic>Electromagnetics</topic><topic>Empirical models</topic><topic>Fifteen Years of THEMIS Mission</topic><topic>Fourier Analysis</topic><topic>Informatics</topic><topic>Interplanetary magnetic field</topic><topic>Ionosphere</topic><topic>Ionospheric Propagation</topic><topic>Jets</topic><topic>Magnetic fields</topic><topic>Magnetopause</topic><topic>Magnetosheath</topic><topic>Magnetospheric Physics</topic><topic>Mathematical Geophysics</topic><topic>Natural Hazards</topic><topic>Nonlinear Geophysics</topic><topic>Nonlinear Waves, Shock Waves, Solitons</topic><topic>Oceanography: General</topic><topic>Radio Science</topic><topic>Remote Sensing and Electromagnetic Processes</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Saturn</topic><topic>Shock Waves</topic><topic>Solar cycle</topic><topic>Solar cycle-solar wind relationships</topic><topic>Solar wind</topic><topic>Solar wind parameters</topic><topic>Solar Wind/Magnetosphere Interactions</topic><topic>Solitons and Solitary Waves</topic><topic>Space Plasma Physics</topic><topic>Spacecraft</topic><topic>Spacecraft orbits</topic><topic>Spatial Analysis</topic><topic>Spatial Analysis and Representation</topic><topic>Spatial Modeling</topic><topic>Spectral Analysis</topic><topic>Wave Propagation</topic><topic>Wavelet Transform</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vuorinen, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaMoury, Adrian T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hietala, Heli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koller, Florian</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vuorinen, Laura</au><au>LaMoury, Adrian T.</au><au>Hietala, Heli</au><au>Koller, Florian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Magnetosheath Jets Over Solar Cycle 24: An Empirical Model</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</jtitle><addtitle>J Geophys Res Space Phys</addtitle><date>2023-08</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>128</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e2023JA031493</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e2023JA031493-n/a</pages><issn>2169-9380</issn><eissn>2169-9402</eissn><abstract>Time History of Events and Macroscale Interactions during Substorms (THEMIS) spacecraft have been sampling the subsolar magnetosheath since the first dayside science phase in 2008, and we finally have observations over a solar cycle. However, we show that the solar wind coverage during these magnetosheath intervals is not always consistent with the solar wind conditions throughout the same year. This has implications for studying phenomena whose occurrence depends strongly on solar wind parameters. We demonstrate this with magnetosheath jets—flows of enhanced earthward dynamic pressure in the magnetosheath. Jets emerge from the bow shock, and some of them can go on and collide into the magnetopause. Their occurrence is highly linked to solar wind conditions, particularly the orientation of the interplanetary magnetic field, as jets are mostly observed downstream of the quasi‐parallel shock. We study the yearly occurrence rates of jets recorded by THEMIS over solar cycle 24 (2008–2019) and find that they are biased due to differences in spacecraft orbits and uneven sampling of solar wind conditions during the different years. Thus, we instead use the THEMIS observations and their corresponding solar wind conditions to develop a model of how jet occurrence varies as a function of solar wind conditions. We then use OMNI data of the whole solar cycle to estimate the unbiased yearly jet occurrence rates. For comparison, we also estimate jet occurrence rates during solar cycle 23 (1996–2008). Our results suggest that there is no strong solar cycle dependency in jet formation. Key Points Observed jet occurrence rates can be biased due to spacecraft orbits and uneven solar wind sampling We created a statistical model of jet occurrence using interplanetary magnetic field cone angle, magnitude, solar wind speed, and density There is no strong solar cycle dependency in jet occurrence, but there may be a ∼10%–20% decrease around solar maximum</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>38440390</pmid><doi>10.1029/2023JA031493</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3039-1255</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1551-5325</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8164-0004</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2238-109X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-9380
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Space physics, 2023-08, Vol.128 (8), p.e2023JA031493-n/a
issn 2169-9380
2169-9402
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10909464
source Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list)
subjects Computational Geophysics
Dynamic pressure
Electromagnetics
Empirical models
Fifteen Years of THEMIS Mission
Fourier Analysis
Informatics
Interplanetary magnetic field
Ionosphere
Ionospheric Propagation
Jets
Magnetic fields
Magnetopause
Magnetosheath
Magnetospheric Physics
Mathematical Geophysics
Natural Hazards
Nonlinear Geophysics
Nonlinear Waves, Shock Waves, Solitons
Oceanography: General
Radio Science
Remote Sensing and Electromagnetic Processes
Sampling
Saturn
Shock Waves
Solar cycle
Solar cycle-solar wind relationships
Solar wind
Solar wind parameters
Solar Wind/Magnetosphere Interactions
Solitons and Solitary Waves
Space Plasma Physics
Spacecraft
Spacecraft orbits
Spatial Analysis
Spatial Analysis and Representation
Spatial Modeling
Spectral Analysis
Wave Propagation
Wavelet Transform
title Magnetosheath Jets Over Solar Cycle 24: An Empirical Model
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T01%3A42%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Magnetosheath%20Jets%20Over%20Solar%20Cycle%2024:%20An%20Empirical%20Model&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Space%20physics&rft.au=Vuorinen,%20Laura&rft.date=2023-08&rft.volume=128&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e2023JA031493&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e2023JA031493-n/a&rft.issn=2169-9380&rft.eissn=2169-9402&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2023JA031493&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2937704272%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4574-15bc4f39141c0a81d82bfa506a231594e818f78a4e6a5b5e4a9249f80ab82dae3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2857863461&rft_id=info:pmid/38440390&rfr_iscdi=true