Loading…

A diverse portfolio of marine protected areas can better advance global conservation and equity

Marine protected areas (MPAs) are widely used for ocean conservation, yet the relative impacts of various types of MPAs are poorly understood. We estimated impacts on fish biomass from no-take and multiple-use (fished) MPAs, employing a rigorous matched counterfactual design with a global dataset of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS 2024-03, Vol.121 (10), p.e2313205121
Main Authors: Gill, David A, Lester, Sarah E, Free, Christopher M, Pfaff, Alexander, Iversen, Edwin, Reich, Brian J, Yang, Shu, Ahmadia, Gabby, Andradi-Brown, Dominic A, Darling, Emily S, Edgar, Graham J, Fox, Helen E, Geldmann, Jonas, Trung Le, Duong, Mascia, Michael B, Mesa-Gutiérrez, Roosevelt, Mumby, Peter J, Veverka, Laura, Warmuth, Laura M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-61e51c28c5ee3d44cd127b39ae6220fdfcf9c1ba5a46fc86042e4f9f7294abba3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-61e51c28c5ee3d44cd127b39ae6220fdfcf9c1ba5a46fc86042e4f9f7294abba3
container_end_page
container_issue 10
container_start_page e2313205121
container_title Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS
container_volume 121
creator Gill, David A
Lester, Sarah E
Free, Christopher M
Pfaff, Alexander
Iversen, Edwin
Reich, Brian J
Yang, Shu
Ahmadia, Gabby
Andradi-Brown, Dominic A
Darling, Emily S
Edgar, Graham J
Fox, Helen E
Geldmann, Jonas
Trung Le, Duong
Mascia, Michael B
Mesa-Gutiérrez, Roosevelt
Mumby, Peter J
Veverka, Laura
Warmuth, Laura M
description Marine protected areas (MPAs) are widely used for ocean conservation, yet the relative impacts of various types of MPAs are poorly understood. We estimated impacts on fish biomass from no-take and multiple-use (fished) MPAs, employing a rigorous matched counterfactual design with a global dataset of >14,000 surveys in and around 216 MPAs. Both no-take and multiple-use MPAs generated positive conservation outcomes relative to no protection (58.2% and 12.6% fish biomass increases, respectively), with smaller estimated differences between the two MPA types when controlling for additional confounding factors (8.3% increase). Relative performance depended on context and management: no-take MPAs performed better in areas of high human pressure but similar to multiple-use in remote locations. Multiple-use MPA performance was low in high-pressure areas but improved significantly with better management, producing similar outcomes to no-take MPAs when adequately staffed and appropriate use regulations were applied. For priority conservation areas where no-take restrictions are not possible or ethical, our findings show that a portfolio of well-designed and well-managed multiple-use MPAs represents a viable and potentially equitable pathway to advance local and global conservation.
doi_str_mv 10.1073/pnas.2313205121
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10927568</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2954293409</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-61e51c28c5ee3d44cd127b39ae6220fdfcf9c1ba5a46fc86042e4f9f7294abba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtrHTEMhU1oaW6Trrsrhm66mcTPmfGqhNC0hUA3zdpoPHLiMNe-sT0X8u_jkEcfK4H06aCjQ8hHzk44G-TpLkI5EZJLwTQX_IBsODO865Vhb8iGMTF0oxLqkLwv5ZYxZvTI3pFDOSo2Cqk3xJ7ROewxF6S7lKtPS0g0ebqFHGLr5VTRVZwpZIRCHUQ6Ya2YKcx7iA7p9ZImWKhLsWDeQw0pUogzxbs11Ptj8tbDUvDDcz0iVxfffp__6C5_ff95fnbZOSVE7XqOmjsxOo0oZ6XczMUwSQPYC8H87J03jk-gQfXejT1TApU3fhBGwTSBPCJfn3R367TF2WGsGRa7y6E5ubcJgv13EsONvU572_4lBt2PTeHLs0JOdyuWarehOFwWiJjWYoWRQkk9aNHQz_-ht2nNsflrlFaNVMw06vSJcjmVktG_XsOZfUzPPqZn_6TXNj79beKVf4lLPgD8UphB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2954293409</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A diverse portfolio of marine protected areas can better advance global conservation and equity</title><source>PubMed Central (Open Access)</source><creator>Gill, David A ; Lester, Sarah E ; Free, Christopher M ; Pfaff, Alexander ; Iversen, Edwin ; Reich, Brian J ; Yang, Shu ; Ahmadia, Gabby ; Andradi-Brown, Dominic A ; Darling, Emily S ; Edgar, Graham J ; Fox, Helen E ; Geldmann, Jonas ; Trung Le, Duong ; Mascia, Michael B ; Mesa-Gutiérrez, Roosevelt ; Mumby, Peter J ; Veverka, Laura ; Warmuth, Laura M</creator><creatorcontrib>Gill, David A ; Lester, Sarah E ; Free, Christopher M ; Pfaff, Alexander ; Iversen, Edwin ; Reich, Brian J ; Yang, Shu ; Ahmadia, Gabby ; Andradi-Brown, Dominic A ; Darling, Emily S ; Edgar, Graham J ; Fox, Helen E ; Geldmann, Jonas ; Trung Le, Duong ; Mascia, Michael B ; Mesa-Gutiérrez, Roosevelt ; Mumby, Peter J ; Veverka, Laura ; Warmuth, Laura M</creatorcontrib><description>Marine protected areas (MPAs) are widely used for ocean conservation, yet the relative impacts of various types of MPAs are poorly understood. We estimated impacts on fish biomass from no-take and multiple-use (fished) MPAs, employing a rigorous matched counterfactual design with a global dataset of &gt;14,000 surveys in and around 216 MPAs. Both no-take and multiple-use MPAs generated positive conservation outcomes relative to no protection (58.2% and 12.6% fish biomass increases, respectively), with smaller estimated differences between the two MPA types when controlling for additional confounding factors (8.3% increase). Relative performance depended on context and management: no-take MPAs performed better in areas of high human pressure but similar to multiple-use in remote locations. Multiple-use MPA performance was low in high-pressure areas but improved significantly with better management, producing similar outcomes to no-take MPAs when adequately staffed and appropriate use regulations were applied. For priority conservation areas where no-take restrictions are not possible or ethical, our findings show that a portfolio of well-designed and well-managed multiple-use MPAs represents a viable and potentially equitable pathway to advance local and global conservation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0027-8424</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1091-6490</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1091-6490</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2313205121</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38408235</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Academy of Sciences</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological Sciences ; Biomass ; Conservation ; Conservation areas ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Ecosystem ; Fish ; Fisheries ; Fishes ; Humans ; Marine protected areas ; Protected areas ; Social Sciences</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2024-03, Vol.121 (10), p.e2313205121</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Academy of Sciences Mar 5, 2024</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-61e51c28c5ee3d44cd127b39ae6220fdfcf9c1ba5a46fc86042e4f9f7294abba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-61e51c28c5ee3d44cd127b39ae6220fdfcf9c1ba5a46fc86042e4f9f7294abba3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1456-3843 ; 0000-0002-9874-9778 ; 0000-0001-7703-707X ; 0000-0002-0541-7484 ; 0000-0002-5448-4552 ; 0000-0002-6297-9053 ; 0000-0002-2557-8920 ; 0000-0003-4198-5216 ; 0000-0002-1191-7610 ; 0000-0002-7550-1761</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10927568/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10927568/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38408235$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gill, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lester, Sarah E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Free, Christopher M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfaff, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iversen, Edwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reich, Brian J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Shu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmadia, Gabby</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andradi-Brown, Dominic A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darling, Emily S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edgar, Graham J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Helen E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geldmann, Jonas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trung Le, Duong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mascia, Michael B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mesa-Gutiérrez, Roosevelt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mumby, Peter J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veverka, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warmuth, Laura M</creatorcontrib><title>A diverse portfolio of marine protected areas can better advance global conservation and equity</title><title>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</title><addtitle>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</addtitle><description>Marine protected areas (MPAs) are widely used for ocean conservation, yet the relative impacts of various types of MPAs are poorly understood. We estimated impacts on fish biomass from no-take and multiple-use (fished) MPAs, employing a rigorous matched counterfactual design with a global dataset of &gt;14,000 surveys in and around 216 MPAs. Both no-take and multiple-use MPAs generated positive conservation outcomes relative to no protection (58.2% and 12.6% fish biomass increases, respectively), with smaller estimated differences between the two MPA types when controlling for additional confounding factors (8.3% increase). Relative performance depended on context and management: no-take MPAs performed better in areas of high human pressure but similar to multiple-use in remote locations. Multiple-use MPA performance was low in high-pressure areas but improved significantly with better management, producing similar outcomes to no-take MPAs when adequately staffed and appropriate use regulations were applied. For priority conservation areas where no-take restrictions are not possible or ethical, our findings show that a portfolio of well-designed and well-managed multiple-use MPAs represents a viable and potentially equitable pathway to advance local and global conservation.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological Sciences</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation areas</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Fishes</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Marine protected areas</subject><subject>Protected areas</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><issn>0027-8424</issn><issn>1091-6490</issn><issn>1091-6490</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkUtrHTEMhU1oaW6Trrsrhm66mcTPmfGqhNC0hUA3zdpoPHLiMNe-sT0X8u_jkEcfK4H06aCjQ8hHzk44G-TpLkI5EZJLwTQX_IBsODO865Vhb8iGMTF0oxLqkLwv5ZYxZvTI3pFDOSo2Cqk3xJ7ROewxF6S7lKtPS0g0ebqFHGLr5VTRVZwpZIRCHUQ6Ya2YKcx7iA7p9ZImWKhLsWDeQw0pUogzxbs11Ptj8tbDUvDDcz0iVxfffp__6C5_ff95fnbZOSVE7XqOmjsxOo0oZ6XczMUwSQPYC8H87J03jk-gQfXejT1TApU3fhBGwTSBPCJfn3R367TF2WGsGRa7y6E5ubcJgv13EsONvU572_4lBt2PTeHLs0JOdyuWarehOFwWiJjWYoWRQkk9aNHQz_-ht2nNsflrlFaNVMw06vSJcjmVktG_XsOZfUzPPqZn_6TXNj79beKVf4lLPgD8UphB</recordid><startdate>20240305</startdate><enddate>20240305</enddate><creator>Gill, David A</creator><creator>Lester, Sarah E</creator><creator>Free, Christopher M</creator><creator>Pfaff, Alexander</creator><creator>Iversen, Edwin</creator><creator>Reich, Brian J</creator><creator>Yang, Shu</creator><creator>Ahmadia, Gabby</creator><creator>Andradi-Brown, Dominic A</creator><creator>Darling, Emily S</creator><creator>Edgar, Graham J</creator><creator>Fox, Helen E</creator><creator>Geldmann, Jonas</creator><creator>Trung Le, Duong</creator><creator>Mascia, Michael B</creator><creator>Mesa-Gutiérrez, Roosevelt</creator><creator>Mumby, Peter J</creator><creator>Veverka, Laura</creator><creator>Warmuth, Laura M</creator><general>National Academy of Sciences</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1456-3843</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9874-9778</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7703-707X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0541-7484</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5448-4552</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6297-9053</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2557-8920</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4198-5216</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1191-7610</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7550-1761</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240305</creationdate><title>A diverse portfolio of marine protected areas can better advance global conservation and equity</title><author>Gill, David A ; Lester, Sarah E ; Free, Christopher M ; Pfaff, Alexander ; Iversen, Edwin ; Reich, Brian J ; Yang, Shu ; Ahmadia, Gabby ; Andradi-Brown, Dominic A ; Darling, Emily S ; Edgar, Graham J ; Fox, Helen E ; Geldmann, Jonas ; Trung Le, Duong ; Mascia, Michael B ; Mesa-Gutiérrez, Roosevelt ; Mumby, Peter J ; Veverka, Laura ; Warmuth, Laura M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-61e51c28c5ee3d44cd127b39ae6220fdfcf9c1ba5a46fc86042e4f9f7294abba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological Sciences</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation areas</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Fishes</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Marine protected areas</topic><topic>Protected areas</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gill, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lester, Sarah E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Free, Christopher M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfaff, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iversen, Edwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reich, Brian J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Shu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmadia, Gabby</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andradi-Brown, Dominic A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darling, Emily S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edgar, Graham J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Helen E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geldmann, Jonas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trung Le, Duong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mascia, Michael B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mesa-Gutiérrez, Roosevelt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mumby, Peter J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veverka, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warmuth, Laura M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gill, David A</au><au>Lester, Sarah E</au><au>Free, Christopher M</au><au>Pfaff, Alexander</au><au>Iversen, Edwin</au><au>Reich, Brian J</au><au>Yang, Shu</au><au>Ahmadia, Gabby</au><au>Andradi-Brown, Dominic A</au><au>Darling, Emily S</au><au>Edgar, Graham J</au><au>Fox, Helen E</au><au>Geldmann, Jonas</au><au>Trung Le, Duong</au><au>Mascia, Michael B</au><au>Mesa-Gutiérrez, Roosevelt</au><au>Mumby, Peter J</au><au>Veverka, Laura</au><au>Warmuth, Laura M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A diverse portfolio of marine protected areas can better advance global conservation and equity</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle><addtitle>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</addtitle><date>2024-03-05</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>121</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e2313205121</spage><pages>e2313205121-</pages><issn>0027-8424</issn><issn>1091-6490</issn><eissn>1091-6490</eissn><abstract>Marine protected areas (MPAs) are widely used for ocean conservation, yet the relative impacts of various types of MPAs are poorly understood. We estimated impacts on fish biomass from no-take and multiple-use (fished) MPAs, employing a rigorous matched counterfactual design with a global dataset of &gt;14,000 surveys in and around 216 MPAs. Both no-take and multiple-use MPAs generated positive conservation outcomes relative to no protection (58.2% and 12.6% fish biomass increases, respectively), with smaller estimated differences between the two MPA types when controlling for additional confounding factors (8.3% increase). Relative performance depended on context and management: no-take MPAs performed better in areas of high human pressure but similar to multiple-use in remote locations. Multiple-use MPA performance was low in high-pressure areas but improved significantly with better management, producing similar outcomes to no-take MPAs when adequately staffed and appropriate use regulations were applied. For priority conservation areas where no-take restrictions are not possible or ethical, our findings show that a portfolio of well-designed and well-managed multiple-use MPAs represents a viable and potentially equitable pathway to advance local and global conservation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Academy of Sciences</pub><pmid>38408235</pmid><doi>10.1073/pnas.2313205121</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1456-3843</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9874-9778</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7703-707X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0541-7484</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5448-4552</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6297-9053</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2557-8920</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4198-5216</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1191-7610</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7550-1761</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0027-8424
ispartof Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2024-03, Vol.121 (10), p.e2313205121
issn 0027-8424
1091-6490
1091-6490
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10927568
source PubMed Central (Open Access)
subjects Animals
Biological Sciences
Biomass
Conservation
Conservation areas
Conservation of Natural Resources
Ecosystem
Fish
Fisheries
Fishes
Humans
Marine protected areas
Protected areas
Social Sciences
title A diverse portfolio of marine protected areas can better advance global conservation and equity
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T13%3A52%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20diverse%20portfolio%20of%20marine%20protected%20areas%20can%20better%20advance%20global%20conservation%20and%20equity&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20National%20Academy%20of%20Sciences%20-%20PNAS&rft.au=Gill,%20David%20A&rft.date=2024-03-05&rft.volume=121&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e2313205121&rft.pages=e2313205121-&rft.issn=0027-8424&rft.eissn=1091-6490&rft_id=info:doi/10.1073/pnas.2313205121&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2954293409%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-61e51c28c5ee3d44cd127b39ae6220fdfcf9c1ba5a46fc86042e4f9f7294abba3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2954293409&rft_id=info:pmid/38408235&rfr_iscdi=true