Loading…
A diverse portfolio of marine protected areas can better advance global conservation and equity
Marine protected areas (MPAs) are widely used for ocean conservation, yet the relative impacts of various types of MPAs are poorly understood. We estimated impacts on fish biomass from no-take and multiple-use (fished) MPAs, employing a rigorous matched counterfactual design with a global dataset of...
Saved in:
Published in: | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS 2024-03, Vol.121 (10), p.e2313205121 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-61e51c28c5ee3d44cd127b39ae6220fdfcf9c1ba5a46fc86042e4f9f7294abba3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-61e51c28c5ee3d44cd127b39ae6220fdfcf9c1ba5a46fc86042e4f9f7294abba3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | e2313205121 |
container_title | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS |
container_volume | 121 |
creator | Gill, David A Lester, Sarah E Free, Christopher M Pfaff, Alexander Iversen, Edwin Reich, Brian J Yang, Shu Ahmadia, Gabby Andradi-Brown, Dominic A Darling, Emily S Edgar, Graham J Fox, Helen E Geldmann, Jonas Trung Le, Duong Mascia, Michael B Mesa-Gutiérrez, Roosevelt Mumby, Peter J Veverka, Laura Warmuth, Laura M |
description | Marine protected areas (MPAs) are widely used for ocean conservation, yet the relative impacts of various types of MPAs are poorly understood. We estimated impacts on fish biomass from no-take and multiple-use (fished) MPAs, employing a rigorous matched counterfactual design with a global dataset of >14,000 surveys in and around 216 MPAs. Both no-take and multiple-use MPAs generated positive conservation outcomes relative to no protection (58.2% and 12.6% fish biomass increases, respectively), with smaller estimated differences between the two MPA types when controlling for additional confounding factors (8.3% increase). Relative performance depended on context and management: no-take MPAs performed better in areas of high human pressure but similar to multiple-use in remote locations. Multiple-use MPA performance was low in high-pressure areas but improved significantly with better management, producing similar outcomes to no-take MPAs when adequately staffed and appropriate use regulations were applied. For priority conservation areas where no-take restrictions are not possible or ethical, our findings show that a portfolio of well-designed and well-managed multiple-use MPAs represents a viable and potentially equitable pathway to advance local and global conservation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1073/pnas.2313205121 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10927568</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2954293409</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-61e51c28c5ee3d44cd127b39ae6220fdfcf9c1ba5a46fc86042e4f9f7294abba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtrHTEMhU1oaW6Trrsrhm66mcTPmfGqhNC0hUA3zdpoPHLiMNe-sT0X8u_jkEcfK4H06aCjQ8hHzk44G-TpLkI5EZJLwTQX_IBsODO865Vhb8iGMTF0oxLqkLwv5ZYxZvTI3pFDOSo2Cqk3xJ7ROewxF6S7lKtPS0g0ebqFHGLr5VTRVZwpZIRCHUQ6Ya2YKcx7iA7p9ZImWKhLsWDeQw0pUogzxbs11Ptj8tbDUvDDcz0iVxfffp__6C5_ff95fnbZOSVE7XqOmjsxOo0oZ6XczMUwSQPYC8H87J03jk-gQfXejT1TApU3fhBGwTSBPCJfn3R367TF2WGsGRa7y6E5ubcJgv13EsONvU572_4lBt2PTeHLs0JOdyuWarehOFwWiJjWYoWRQkk9aNHQz_-ht2nNsflrlFaNVMw06vSJcjmVktG_XsOZfUzPPqZn_6TXNj79beKVf4lLPgD8UphB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2954293409</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A diverse portfolio of marine protected areas can better advance global conservation and equity</title><source>PubMed Central (Open Access)</source><creator>Gill, David A ; Lester, Sarah E ; Free, Christopher M ; Pfaff, Alexander ; Iversen, Edwin ; Reich, Brian J ; Yang, Shu ; Ahmadia, Gabby ; Andradi-Brown, Dominic A ; Darling, Emily S ; Edgar, Graham J ; Fox, Helen E ; Geldmann, Jonas ; Trung Le, Duong ; Mascia, Michael B ; Mesa-Gutiérrez, Roosevelt ; Mumby, Peter J ; Veverka, Laura ; Warmuth, Laura M</creator><creatorcontrib>Gill, David A ; Lester, Sarah E ; Free, Christopher M ; Pfaff, Alexander ; Iversen, Edwin ; Reich, Brian J ; Yang, Shu ; Ahmadia, Gabby ; Andradi-Brown, Dominic A ; Darling, Emily S ; Edgar, Graham J ; Fox, Helen E ; Geldmann, Jonas ; Trung Le, Duong ; Mascia, Michael B ; Mesa-Gutiérrez, Roosevelt ; Mumby, Peter J ; Veverka, Laura ; Warmuth, Laura M</creatorcontrib><description>Marine protected areas (MPAs) are widely used for ocean conservation, yet the relative impacts of various types of MPAs are poorly understood. We estimated impacts on fish biomass from no-take and multiple-use (fished) MPAs, employing a rigorous matched counterfactual design with a global dataset of >14,000 surveys in and around 216 MPAs. Both no-take and multiple-use MPAs generated positive conservation outcomes relative to no protection (58.2% and 12.6% fish biomass increases, respectively), with smaller estimated differences between the two MPA types when controlling for additional confounding factors (8.3% increase). Relative performance depended on context and management: no-take MPAs performed better in areas of high human pressure but similar to multiple-use in remote locations. Multiple-use MPA performance was low in high-pressure areas but improved significantly with better management, producing similar outcomes to no-take MPAs when adequately staffed and appropriate use regulations were applied. For priority conservation areas where no-take restrictions are not possible or ethical, our findings show that a portfolio of well-designed and well-managed multiple-use MPAs represents a viable and potentially equitable pathway to advance local and global conservation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0027-8424</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1091-6490</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1091-6490</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2313205121</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38408235</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Academy of Sciences</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological Sciences ; Biomass ; Conservation ; Conservation areas ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Ecosystem ; Fish ; Fisheries ; Fishes ; Humans ; Marine protected areas ; Protected areas ; Social Sciences</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2024-03, Vol.121 (10), p.e2313205121</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Academy of Sciences Mar 5, 2024</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-61e51c28c5ee3d44cd127b39ae6220fdfcf9c1ba5a46fc86042e4f9f7294abba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-61e51c28c5ee3d44cd127b39ae6220fdfcf9c1ba5a46fc86042e4f9f7294abba3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1456-3843 ; 0000-0002-9874-9778 ; 0000-0001-7703-707X ; 0000-0002-0541-7484 ; 0000-0002-5448-4552 ; 0000-0002-6297-9053 ; 0000-0002-2557-8920 ; 0000-0003-4198-5216 ; 0000-0002-1191-7610 ; 0000-0002-7550-1761</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10927568/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10927568/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38408235$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gill, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lester, Sarah E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Free, Christopher M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfaff, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iversen, Edwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reich, Brian J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Shu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmadia, Gabby</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andradi-Brown, Dominic A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darling, Emily S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edgar, Graham J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Helen E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geldmann, Jonas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trung Le, Duong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mascia, Michael B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mesa-Gutiérrez, Roosevelt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mumby, Peter J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veverka, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warmuth, Laura M</creatorcontrib><title>A diverse portfolio of marine protected areas can better advance global conservation and equity</title><title>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</title><addtitle>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</addtitle><description>Marine protected areas (MPAs) are widely used for ocean conservation, yet the relative impacts of various types of MPAs are poorly understood. We estimated impacts on fish biomass from no-take and multiple-use (fished) MPAs, employing a rigorous matched counterfactual design with a global dataset of >14,000 surveys in and around 216 MPAs. Both no-take and multiple-use MPAs generated positive conservation outcomes relative to no protection (58.2% and 12.6% fish biomass increases, respectively), with smaller estimated differences between the two MPA types when controlling for additional confounding factors (8.3% increase). Relative performance depended on context and management: no-take MPAs performed better in areas of high human pressure but similar to multiple-use in remote locations. Multiple-use MPA performance was low in high-pressure areas but improved significantly with better management, producing similar outcomes to no-take MPAs when adequately staffed and appropriate use regulations were applied. For priority conservation areas where no-take restrictions are not possible or ethical, our findings show that a portfolio of well-designed and well-managed multiple-use MPAs represents a viable and potentially equitable pathway to advance local and global conservation.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological Sciences</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation areas</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Fishes</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Marine protected areas</subject><subject>Protected areas</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><issn>0027-8424</issn><issn>1091-6490</issn><issn>1091-6490</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkUtrHTEMhU1oaW6Trrsrhm66mcTPmfGqhNC0hUA3zdpoPHLiMNe-sT0X8u_jkEcfK4H06aCjQ8hHzk44G-TpLkI5EZJLwTQX_IBsODO865Vhb8iGMTF0oxLqkLwv5ZYxZvTI3pFDOSo2Cqk3xJ7ROewxF6S7lKtPS0g0ebqFHGLr5VTRVZwpZIRCHUQ6Ya2YKcx7iA7p9ZImWKhLsWDeQw0pUogzxbs11Ptj8tbDUvDDcz0iVxfffp__6C5_ff95fnbZOSVE7XqOmjsxOo0oZ6XczMUwSQPYC8H87J03jk-gQfXejT1TApU3fhBGwTSBPCJfn3R367TF2WGsGRa7y6E5ubcJgv13EsONvU572_4lBt2PTeHLs0JOdyuWarehOFwWiJjWYoWRQkk9aNHQz_-ht2nNsflrlFaNVMw06vSJcjmVktG_XsOZfUzPPqZn_6TXNj79beKVf4lLPgD8UphB</recordid><startdate>20240305</startdate><enddate>20240305</enddate><creator>Gill, David A</creator><creator>Lester, Sarah E</creator><creator>Free, Christopher M</creator><creator>Pfaff, Alexander</creator><creator>Iversen, Edwin</creator><creator>Reich, Brian J</creator><creator>Yang, Shu</creator><creator>Ahmadia, Gabby</creator><creator>Andradi-Brown, Dominic A</creator><creator>Darling, Emily S</creator><creator>Edgar, Graham J</creator><creator>Fox, Helen E</creator><creator>Geldmann, Jonas</creator><creator>Trung Le, Duong</creator><creator>Mascia, Michael B</creator><creator>Mesa-Gutiérrez, Roosevelt</creator><creator>Mumby, Peter J</creator><creator>Veverka, Laura</creator><creator>Warmuth, Laura M</creator><general>National Academy of Sciences</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1456-3843</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9874-9778</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7703-707X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0541-7484</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5448-4552</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6297-9053</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2557-8920</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4198-5216</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1191-7610</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7550-1761</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240305</creationdate><title>A diverse portfolio of marine protected areas can better advance global conservation and equity</title><author>Gill, David A ; Lester, Sarah E ; Free, Christopher M ; Pfaff, Alexander ; Iversen, Edwin ; Reich, Brian J ; Yang, Shu ; Ahmadia, Gabby ; Andradi-Brown, Dominic A ; Darling, Emily S ; Edgar, Graham J ; Fox, Helen E ; Geldmann, Jonas ; Trung Le, Duong ; Mascia, Michael B ; Mesa-Gutiérrez, Roosevelt ; Mumby, Peter J ; Veverka, Laura ; Warmuth, Laura M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-61e51c28c5ee3d44cd127b39ae6220fdfcf9c1ba5a46fc86042e4f9f7294abba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological Sciences</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation areas</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Fishes</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Marine protected areas</topic><topic>Protected areas</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gill, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lester, Sarah E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Free, Christopher M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfaff, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iversen, Edwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reich, Brian J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Shu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmadia, Gabby</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andradi-Brown, Dominic A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darling, Emily S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edgar, Graham J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Helen E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geldmann, Jonas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trung Le, Duong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mascia, Michael B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mesa-Gutiérrez, Roosevelt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mumby, Peter J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veverka, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warmuth, Laura M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gill, David A</au><au>Lester, Sarah E</au><au>Free, Christopher M</au><au>Pfaff, Alexander</au><au>Iversen, Edwin</au><au>Reich, Brian J</au><au>Yang, Shu</au><au>Ahmadia, Gabby</au><au>Andradi-Brown, Dominic A</au><au>Darling, Emily S</au><au>Edgar, Graham J</au><au>Fox, Helen E</au><au>Geldmann, Jonas</au><au>Trung Le, Duong</au><au>Mascia, Michael B</au><au>Mesa-Gutiérrez, Roosevelt</au><au>Mumby, Peter J</au><au>Veverka, Laura</au><au>Warmuth, Laura M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A diverse portfolio of marine protected areas can better advance global conservation and equity</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle><addtitle>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</addtitle><date>2024-03-05</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>121</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e2313205121</spage><pages>e2313205121-</pages><issn>0027-8424</issn><issn>1091-6490</issn><eissn>1091-6490</eissn><abstract>Marine protected areas (MPAs) are widely used for ocean conservation, yet the relative impacts of various types of MPAs are poorly understood. We estimated impacts on fish biomass from no-take and multiple-use (fished) MPAs, employing a rigorous matched counterfactual design with a global dataset of >14,000 surveys in and around 216 MPAs. Both no-take and multiple-use MPAs generated positive conservation outcomes relative to no protection (58.2% and 12.6% fish biomass increases, respectively), with smaller estimated differences between the two MPA types when controlling for additional confounding factors (8.3% increase). Relative performance depended on context and management: no-take MPAs performed better in areas of high human pressure but similar to multiple-use in remote locations. Multiple-use MPA performance was low in high-pressure areas but improved significantly with better management, producing similar outcomes to no-take MPAs when adequately staffed and appropriate use regulations were applied. For priority conservation areas where no-take restrictions are not possible or ethical, our findings show that a portfolio of well-designed and well-managed multiple-use MPAs represents a viable and potentially equitable pathway to advance local and global conservation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Academy of Sciences</pub><pmid>38408235</pmid><doi>10.1073/pnas.2313205121</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1456-3843</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9874-9778</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7703-707X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0541-7484</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5448-4552</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6297-9053</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2557-8920</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4198-5216</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1191-7610</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7550-1761</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0027-8424 |
ispartof | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2024-03, Vol.121 (10), p.e2313205121 |
issn | 0027-8424 1091-6490 1091-6490 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10927568 |
source | PubMed Central (Open Access) |
subjects | Animals Biological Sciences Biomass Conservation Conservation areas Conservation of Natural Resources Ecosystem Fish Fisheries Fishes Humans Marine protected areas Protected areas Social Sciences |
title | A diverse portfolio of marine protected areas can better advance global conservation and equity |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T13%3A52%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20diverse%20portfolio%20of%20marine%20protected%20areas%20can%20better%20advance%20global%20conservation%20and%20equity&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20National%20Academy%20of%20Sciences%20-%20PNAS&rft.au=Gill,%20David%20A&rft.date=2024-03-05&rft.volume=121&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e2313205121&rft.pages=e2313205121-&rft.issn=0027-8424&rft.eissn=1091-6490&rft_id=info:doi/10.1073/pnas.2313205121&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2954293409%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-61e51c28c5ee3d44cd127b39ae6220fdfcf9c1ba5a46fc86042e4f9f7294abba3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2954293409&rft_id=info:pmid/38408235&rfr_iscdi=true |