Towards validation in clinical routine: a comparative analysis of visual MTA ratings versus the automated ratio between inferior lateral ventricle and hippocampal volumes in Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis

• Published in: Neuroradiology 2024-04, Vol.66 (4), p.487-506
• Main Authors: Wittens, Mandy M. J., Allemeersch, Gert-Jan, Sima, Diana M., Vanderhasselt, Tim, Raeymaeckers, Steven, Fransen, Erik, Smeets, Dirk, de Mey, Johan, Bjerke, Maria, Engelborghs, Sebastiaan
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Alzheimer Disease - pathology; Alzheimer's disease; Atrophy; Atrophy - pathology; Authorship; Automation; Biomarkers; Brain; Brain research; Cerebrospinal fluid; Classification; Clinical medicine; Cognitive ability; Comparative analysis; Correlation analysis; Dementia; Diagnosis; Diagnostic Neuroradiology; Hippocampus; Hippocampus - pathology; Humans; Imaging; Lateral Ventricles; Magnetic resonance imaging; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods; Medical diagnosis; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Neurodegenerative diseases; Neurology; Neuropsychology; Neuroradiology; Neurosciences; Neurosurgery; Patients; Performance assessment; Radiology; Ratings; Ratings & rankings; Robustness (mathematics); Statistical analysis; Temporal lobe; Temporal Lobe - pathology; Ventricle; Ventricles (cerebral)
• ISSN: 0028-3940; 1432-1920
• DOI: 10.1007/s00234-024-03280-8

Purpose To assess the performance of the inferior lateral ventricle (ILV) to hippocampal (Hip) volume ratio on brain MRI, for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) diagnostics, comparing it to individual automated ILV and hippocampal volumes, and visual medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA) consensus ratings. Methods One-hundred-twelve subjects ( mean age  ±  SD , 66.85 ± 13.64 years) with varying degrees of cognitive decline underwent MRI using a Philips Ingenia 3T. The MTA scale by Scheltens, rated on coronal 3D T1-weighted images, was determined by three experienced radiologists, blinded to diagnosis and sex. Automated volumetry was computed by icobrain dm (v. 5.10) for total, left, right hippocampal, and ILV volumes. The ILV/Hip ratio, defined as the percentage ratio between ILV and hippocampal volumes, was calculated and compared against a normative reference population ( n  = 1903). Inter-rater agreement, association, classification accuracy, and clinical interpretability on patient level were reported. Results Visual MTA scores showed excellent inter-rater agreement. Ordinal logistic regression and correlation analyses demonstrated robust associations between automated brain segmentations and visual MTA ratings, with the ILV/Hip ratio consistently outperforming individual hippocampal and ILV volumes. Pairwise classification accuracy showed good performance without statistically significant differences between the ILV/Hip ratio and visual MTA across disease stages, indicating potential interchangeability. Comparison to the normative population and clinical interpretability assessments showed commensurability in classifying MTA “severity” between visual MTA and ILV/Hip ratio measurements. Conclusion The ILV/Hip ratio shows the highest correlation to visual MTA, in comparison to automated individual ILV and hippocampal volumes, offering standardized measures for diagnostic support in different stages of cognitive decline.