Loading…
The impact of Disability Insurance reassessment on healthcare use
Several Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development countries have constrained Disability Income Insurance (DI) eligibility and reassessed those on DI to encourage workforce participation. But these policies can also have unintended consequences. While receiving less income can directly w...
Saved in:
Published in: | Health economics 2023-07, Vol.32 (7), p.1581-1602 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4900-431eb73b26054fe3608187d9a02ea0f0018c094a3c0a3c8983fd18f8f2ae2e8f3 |
container_end_page | 1602 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1581 |
container_title | Health economics |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Badji, Samia Kavanagh, Anne Petrie, Dennis |
description | Several Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development countries have constrained Disability Income Insurance (DI) eligibility and reassessed those on DI to encourage workforce participation. But these policies can also have unintended consequences. While receiving less income can directly worsen physical and mental health, the stress related to reassessment and the possibility of losing DI may also adversely affect mental health. This paper uses Australian population‐wide administrative data to explore how a 2014 policy ‐ where DI recipients under 35 were reassessed under stricter criteria ‐ affected healthcare use. We exploit this age targeting using a difference‐in‐difference regression design and find that the policy increased nervous system drug prescriptions (which includes antidepressants). Our findings suggest that the reassessment of DI recipients, even without income loss, may have had a significant negative impact on their mental health. DI reassessment policies may have the unintended consequence of worsening mental health and this needs be considered when deciding if reassessment is worthwhile. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/hec.4680 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10947330</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2821749894</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4900-431eb73b26054fe3608187d9a02ea0f0018c094a3c0a3c8983fd18f8f2ae2e8f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctKAzEUhoMo1hv4BDLgxs3oSTKdSVYitVpBcFPXIU1PnJS51GRG6dubWu_gIiRwvnz8yU_IMYVzCsAuSjTnWS5gi-xRkDKlMITt9XlYpJJxGJD9EBYAcQb5LhnwIt4SnO-Rq2mJiauX2nRJa5NrF_TMVa5bJXdN6L1uDCYedQgYQo1NhJqkRF11pdEekz7gIdmxugp49LEfkMeb8XQ0Se8fbu9GV_epySRAmnGKs4LPWA7DzCLPQVBRzKUGhhosABUGZKa5gbiEFNzOqbDCMo0MheUH5HLjXfazGucmhvG6Ukvvau1XqtVO_Z40rlRP7YuKP5IVnEM0nH0YfPvcY-hU7YLBqtINtn1QrJBcimHkI3r6B120vW_i-xQTjBaZFDL7FhrfhuDRfqWhoNbFqFiMWhcT0ZOf6b_AzyYikG6AV1fh6l-RmoxH78I3c_KWQg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2821749894</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impact of Disability Insurance reassessment on healthcare use</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley</source><source>EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text</source><creator>Badji, Samia ; Kavanagh, Anne ; Petrie, Dennis</creator><creatorcontrib>Badji, Samia ; Kavanagh, Anne ; Petrie, Dennis</creatorcontrib><description>Several Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development countries have constrained Disability Income Insurance (DI) eligibility and reassessed those on DI to encourage workforce participation. But these policies can also have unintended consequences. While receiving less income can directly worsen physical and mental health, the stress related to reassessment and the possibility of losing DI may also adversely affect mental health. This paper uses Australian population‐wide administrative data to explore how a 2014 policy ‐ where DI recipients under 35 were reassessed under stricter criteria ‐ affected healthcare use. We exploit this age targeting using a difference‐in‐difference regression design and find that the policy increased nervous system drug prescriptions (which includes antidepressants). Our findings suggest that the reassessment of DI recipients, even without income loss, may have had a significant negative impact on their mental health. DI reassessment policies may have the unintended consequence of worsening mental health and this needs be considered when deciding if reassessment is worthwhile.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1057-9230</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hec.4680</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37002833</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Periodicals Inc</publisher><subject>Age differences ; Antidepressants ; Australia ; Central nervous system ; Delivery of Health Care ; Disability ; Disability insurance ; Disabled Persons ; Health economics ; Health insurance ; Health status ; healthcare use ; Humans ; Income ; Insurance, Disability ; Mental health ; Nervous system ; Prescription drugs ; reassessment ; welfare benefits ; Workforce</subject><ispartof>Health economics, 2023-07, Vol.32 (7), p.1581-1602</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. Health Economics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4900-431eb73b26054fe3608187d9a02ea0f0018c094a3c0a3c8983fd18f8f2ae2e8f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7352-0232</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,30999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37002833$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Badji, Samia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kavanagh, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrie, Dennis</creatorcontrib><title>The impact of Disability Insurance reassessment on healthcare use</title><title>Health economics</title><addtitle>Health Econ</addtitle><description>Several Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development countries have constrained Disability Income Insurance (DI) eligibility and reassessed those on DI to encourage workforce participation. But these policies can also have unintended consequences. While receiving less income can directly worsen physical and mental health, the stress related to reassessment and the possibility of losing DI may also adversely affect mental health. This paper uses Australian population‐wide administrative data to explore how a 2014 policy ‐ where DI recipients under 35 were reassessed under stricter criteria ‐ affected healthcare use. We exploit this age targeting using a difference‐in‐difference regression design and find that the policy increased nervous system drug prescriptions (which includes antidepressants). Our findings suggest that the reassessment of DI recipients, even without income loss, may have had a significant negative impact on their mental health. DI reassessment policies may have the unintended consequence of worsening mental health and this needs be considered when deciding if reassessment is worthwhile.</description><subject>Age differences</subject><subject>Antidepressants</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Central nervous system</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Disability insurance</subject><subject>Disabled Persons</subject><subject>Health economics</subject><subject>Health insurance</subject><subject>Health status</subject><subject>healthcare use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Insurance, Disability</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Nervous system</subject><subject>Prescription drugs</subject><subject>reassessment</subject><subject>welfare benefits</subject><subject>Workforce</subject><issn>1057-9230</issn><issn>1099-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctKAzEUhoMo1hv4BDLgxs3oSTKdSVYitVpBcFPXIU1PnJS51GRG6dubWu_gIiRwvnz8yU_IMYVzCsAuSjTnWS5gi-xRkDKlMITt9XlYpJJxGJD9EBYAcQb5LhnwIt4SnO-Rq2mJiauX2nRJa5NrF_TMVa5bJXdN6L1uDCYedQgYQo1NhJqkRF11pdEekz7gIdmxugp49LEfkMeb8XQ0Se8fbu9GV_epySRAmnGKs4LPWA7DzCLPQVBRzKUGhhosABUGZKa5gbiEFNzOqbDCMo0MheUH5HLjXfazGucmhvG6Ukvvau1XqtVO_Z40rlRP7YuKP5IVnEM0nH0YfPvcY-hU7YLBqtINtn1QrJBcimHkI3r6B120vW_i-xQTjBaZFDL7FhrfhuDRfqWhoNbFqFiMWhcT0ZOf6b_AzyYikG6AV1fh6l-RmoxH78I3c_KWQg</recordid><startdate>202307</startdate><enddate>202307</enddate><creator>Badji, Samia</creator><creator>Kavanagh, Anne</creator><creator>Petrie, Dennis</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7352-0232</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202307</creationdate><title>The impact of Disability Insurance reassessment on healthcare use</title><author>Badji, Samia ; Kavanagh, Anne ; Petrie, Dennis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4900-431eb73b26054fe3608187d9a02ea0f0018c094a3c0a3c8983fd18f8f2ae2e8f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Age differences</topic><topic>Antidepressants</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Central nervous system</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Disability insurance</topic><topic>Disabled Persons</topic><topic>Health economics</topic><topic>Health insurance</topic><topic>Health status</topic><topic>healthcare use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Insurance, Disability</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Nervous system</topic><topic>Prescription drugs</topic><topic>reassessment</topic><topic>welfare benefits</topic><topic>Workforce</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Badji, Samia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kavanagh, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrie, Dennis</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Health economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Badji, Samia</au><au>Kavanagh, Anne</au><au>Petrie, Dennis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impact of Disability Insurance reassessment on healthcare use</atitle><jtitle>Health economics</jtitle><addtitle>Health Econ</addtitle><date>2023-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1581</spage><epage>1602</epage><pages>1581-1602</pages><issn>1057-9230</issn><eissn>1099-1050</eissn><abstract>Several Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development countries have constrained Disability Income Insurance (DI) eligibility and reassessed those on DI to encourage workforce participation. But these policies can also have unintended consequences. While receiving less income can directly worsen physical and mental health, the stress related to reassessment and the possibility of losing DI may also adversely affect mental health. This paper uses Australian population‐wide administrative data to explore how a 2014 policy ‐ where DI recipients under 35 were reassessed under stricter criteria ‐ affected healthcare use. We exploit this age targeting using a difference‐in‐difference regression design and find that the policy increased nervous system drug prescriptions (which includes antidepressants). Our findings suggest that the reassessment of DI recipients, even without income loss, may have had a significant negative impact on their mental health. DI reassessment policies may have the unintended consequence of worsening mental health and this needs be considered when deciding if reassessment is worthwhile.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals Inc</pub><pmid>37002833</pmid><doi>10.1002/hec.4680</doi><tpages>0</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7352-0232</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1057-9230 |
ispartof | Health economics, 2023-07, Vol.32 (7), p.1581-1602 |
issn | 1057-9230 1099-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10947330 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley; EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text |
subjects | Age differences Antidepressants Australia Central nervous system Delivery of Health Care Disability Disability insurance Disabled Persons Health economics Health insurance Health status healthcare use Humans Income Insurance, Disability Mental health Nervous system Prescription drugs reassessment welfare benefits Workforce |
title | The impact of Disability Insurance reassessment on healthcare use |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T03%3A00%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impact%20of%20Disability%20Insurance%20reassessment%20on%20healthcare%20use&rft.jtitle=Health%20economics&rft.au=Badji,%20Samia&rft.date=2023-07&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1581&rft.epage=1602&rft.pages=1581-1602&rft.issn=1057-9230&rft.eissn=1099-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hec.4680&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2821749894%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4900-431eb73b26054fe3608187d9a02ea0f0018c094a3c0a3c8983fd18f8f2ae2e8f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2821749894&rft_id=info:pmid/37002833&rfr_iscdi=true |