Loading…

The impact of Disability Insurance reassessment on healthcare use

Several Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development countries have constrained Disability Income Insurance (DI) eligibility and reassessed those on DI to encourage workforce participation. But these policies can also have unintended consequences. While receiving less income can directly w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Health economics 2023-07, Vol.32 (7), p.1581-1602
Main Authors: Badji, Samia, Kavanagh, Anne, Petrie, Dennis
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4900-431eb73b26054fe3608187d9a02ea0f0018c094a3c0a3c8983fd18f8f2ae2e8f3
container_end_page 1602
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1581
container_title Health economics
container_volume 32
creator Badji, Samia
Kavanagh, Anne
Petrie, Dennis
description Several Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development countries have constrained Disability Income Insurance (DI) eligibility and reassessed those on DI to encourage workforce participation. But these policies can also have unintended consequences. While receiving less income can directly worsen physical and mental health, the stress related to reassessment and the possibility of losing DI may also adversely affect mental health. This paper uses Australian population‐wide administrative data to explore how a 2014 policy ‐ where DI recipients under 35 were reassessed under stricter criteria ‐ affected healthcare use. We exploit this age targeting using a difference‐in‐difference regression design and find that the policy increased nervous system drug prescriptions (which includes antidepressants). Our findings suggest that the reassessment of DI recipients, even without income loss, may have had a significant negative impact on their mental health. DI reassessment policies may have the unintended consequence of worsening mental health and this needs be considered when deciding if reassessment is worthwhile.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/hec.4680
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10947330</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2821749894</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4900-431eb73b26054fe3608187d9a02ea0f0018c094a3c0a3c8983fd18f8f2ae2e8f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctKAzEUhoMo1hv4BDLgxs3oSTKdSVYitVpBcFPXIU1PnJS51GRG6dubWu_gIiRwvnz8yU_IMYVzCsAuSjTnWS5gi-xRkDKlMITt9XlYpJJxGJD9EBYAcQb5LhnwIt4SnO-Rq2mJiauX2nRJa5NrF_TMVa5bJXdN6L1uDCYedQgYQo1NhJqkRF11pdEekz7gIdmxugp49LEfkMeb8XQ0Se8fbu9GV_epySRAmnGKs4LPWA7DzCLPQVBRzKUGhhosABUGZKa5gbiEFNzOqbDCMo0MheUH5HLjXfazGucmhvG6Ukvvau1XqtVO_Z40rlRP7YuKP5IVnEM0nH0YfPvcY-hU7YLBqtINtn1QrJBcimHkI3r6B120vW_i-xQTjBaZFDL7FhrfhuDRfqWhoNbFqFiMWhcT0ZOf6b_AzyYikG6AV1fh6l-RmoxH78I3c_KWQg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2821749894</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impact of Disability Insurance reassessment on healthcare use</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley</source><source>EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text</source><creator>Badji, Samia ; Kavanagh, Anne ; Petrie, Dennis</creator><creatorcontrib>Badji, Samia ; Kavanagh, Anne ; Petrie, Dennis</creatorcontrib><description>Several Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development countries have constrained Disability Income Insurance (DI) eligibility and reassessed those on DI to encourage workforce participation. But these policies can also have unintended consequences. While receiving less income can directly worsen physical and mental health, the stress related to reassessment and the possibility of losing DI may also adversely affect mental health. This paper uses Australian population‐wide administrative data to explore how a 2014 policy ‐ where DI recipients under 35 were reassessed under stricter criteria ‐ affected healthcare use. We exploit this age targeting using a difference‐in‐difference regression design and find that the policy increased nervous system drug prescriptions (which includes antidepressants). Our findings suggest that the reassessment of DI recipients, even without income loss, may have had a significant negative impact on their mental health. DI reassessment policies may have the unintended consequence of worsening mental health and this needs be considered when deciding if reassessment is worthwhile.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1057-9230</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hec.4680</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37002833</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Periodicals Inc</publisher><subject>Age differences ; Antidepressants ; Australia ; Central nervous system ; Delivery of Health Care ; Disability ; Disability insurance ; Disabled Persons ; Health economics ; Health insurance ; Health status ; healthcare use ; Humans ; Income ; Insurance, Disability ; Mental health ; Nervous system ; Prescription drugs ; reassessment ; welfare benefits ; Workforce</subject><ispartof>Health economics, 2023-07, Vol.32 (7), p.1581-1602</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. Health Economics published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4900-431eb73b26054fe3608187d9a02ea0f0018c094a3c0a3c8983fd18f8f2ae2e8f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7352-0232</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,30999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37002833$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Badji, Samia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kavanagh, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrie, Dennis</creatorcontrib><title>The impact of Disability Insurance reassessment on healthcare use</title><title>Health economics</title><addtitle>Health Econ</addtitle><description>Several Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development countries have constrained Disability Income Insurance (DI) eligibility and reassessed those on DI to encourage workforce participation. But these policies can also have unintended consequences. While receiving less income can directly worsen physical and mental health, the stress related to reassessment and the possibility of losing DI may also adversely affect mental health. This paper uses Australian population‐wide administrative data to explore how a 2014 policy ‐ where DI recipients under 35 were reassessed under stricter criteria ‐ affected healthcare use. We exploit this age targeting using a difference‐in‐difference regression design and find that the policy increased nervous system drug prescriptions (which includes antidepressants). Our findings suggest that the reassessment of DI recipients, even without income loss, may have had a significant negative impact on their mental health. DI reassessment policies may have the unintended consequence of worsening mental health and this needs be considered when deciding if reassessment is worthwhile.</description><subject>Age differences</subject><subject>Antidepressants</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Central nervous system</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Disability insurance</subject><subject>Disabled Persons</subject><subject>Health economics</subject><subject>Health insurance</subject><subject>Health status</subject><subject>healthcare use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Insurance, Disability</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Nervous system</subject><subject>Prescription drugs</subject><subject>reassessment</subject><subject>welfare benefits</subject><subject>Workforce</subject><issn>1057-9230</issn><issn>1099-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctKAzEUhoMo1hv4BDLgxs3oSTKdSVYitVpBcFPXIU1PnJS51GRG6dubWu_gIiRwvnz8yU_IMYVzCsAuSjTnWS5gi-xRkDKlMITt9XlYpJJxGJD9EBYAcQb5LhnwIt4SnO-Rq2mJiauX2nRJa5NrF_TMVa5bJXdN6L1uDCYedQgYQo1NhJqkRF11pdEekz7gIdmxugp49LEfkMeb8XQ0Se8fbu9GV_epySRAmnGKs4LPWA7DzCLPQVBRzKUGhhosABUGZKa5gbiEFNzOqbDCMo0MheUH5HLjXfazGucmhvG6Ukvvau1XqtVO_Z40rlRP7YuKP5IVnEM0nH0YfPvcY-hU7YLBqtINtn1QrJBcimHkI3r6B120vW_i-xQTjBaZFDL7FhrfhuDRfqWhoNbFqFiMWhcT0ZOf6b_AzyYikG6AV1fh6l-RmoxH78I3c_KWQg</recordid><startdate>202307</startdate><enddate>202307</enddate><creator>Badji, Samia</creator><creator>Kavanagh, Anne</creator><creator>Petrie, Dennis</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7352-0232</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202307</creationdate><title>The impact of Disability Insurance reassessment on healthcare use</title><author>Badji, Samia ; Kavanagh, Anne ; Petrie, Dennis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4900-431eb73b26054fe3608187d9a02ea0f0018c094a3c0a3c8983fd18f8f2ae2e8f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Age differences</topic><topic>Antidepressants</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Central nervous system</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Disability insurance</topic><topic>Disabled Persons</topic><topic>Health economics</topic><topic>Health insurance</topic><topic>Health status</topic><topic>healthcare use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Insurance, Disability</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Nervous system</topic><topic>Prescription drugs</topic><topic>reassessment</topic><topic>welfare benefits</topic><topic>Workforce</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Badji, Samia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kavanagh, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrie, Dennis</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Health economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Badji, Samia</au><au>Kavanagh, Anne</au><au>Petrie, Dennis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impact of Disability Insurance reassessment on healthcare use</atitle><jtitle>Health economics</jtitle><addtitle>Health Econ</addtitle><date>2023-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1581</spage><epage>1602</epage><pages>1581-1602</pages><issn>1057-9230</issn><eissn>1099-1050</eissn><abstract>Several Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development countries have constrained Disability Income Insurance (DI) eligibility and reassessed those on DI to encourage workforce participation. But these policies can also have unintended consequences. While receiving less income can directly worsen physical and mental health, the stress related to reassessment and the possibility of losing DI may also adversely affect mental health. This paper uses Australian population‐wide administrative data to explore how a 2014 policy ‐ where DI recipients under 35 were reassessed under stricter criteria ‐ affected healthcare use. We exploit this age targeting using a difference‐in‐difference regression design and find that the policy increased nervous system drug prescriptions (which includes antidepressants). Our findings suggest that the reassessment of DI recipients, even without income loss, may have had a significant negative impact on their mental health. DI reassessment policies may have the unintended consequence of worsening mental health and this needs be considered when deciding if reassessment is worthwhile.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals Inc</pub><pmid>37002833</pmid><doi>10.1002/hec.4680</doi><tpages>0</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7352-0232</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1057-9230
ispartof Health economics, 2023-07, Vol.32 (7), p.1581-1602
issn 1057-9230
1099-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10947330
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley; EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text
subjects Age differences
Antidepressants
Australia
Central nervous system
Delivery of Health Care
Disability
Disability insurance
Disabled Persons
Health economics
Health insurance
Health status
healthcare use
Humans
Income
Insurance, Disability
Mental health
Nervous system
Prescription drugs
reassessment
welfare benefits
Workforce
title The impact of Disability Insurance reassessment on healthcare use
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T03%3A00%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impact%20of%20Disability%20Insurance%20reassessment%20on%20healthcare%20use&rft.jtitle=Health%20economics&rft.au=Badji,%20Samia&rft.date=2023-07&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1581&rft.epage=1602&rft.pages=1581-1602&rft.issn=1057-9230&rft.eissn=1099-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hec.4680&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2821749894%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4900-431eb73b26054fe3608187d9a02ea0f0018c094a3c0a3c8983fd18f8f2ae2e8f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2821749894&rft_id=info:pmid/37002833&rfr_iscdi=true