Loading…

Recurrent Pelvic Organ Prolapse after Sacrocolpopexy-A Surgical Challenge

: Repeat sacrocolpopexy (reSCP) for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a rare and complex condition with little understanding of how to manage. Most authors recommend complete reSCP regardless of the underlying cause of the failure. This retrospective cohort study presents our management workf...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical medicine 2024-03, Vol.13 (6), p.1613
Main Authors: Studer, Andreas Martin, Faehnle-Schiegg, Ivo, Frey, Janine, Aichner, Simone, Brambs, Christine, Christmann-Schmid, Corina
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-636040de0fe98c792e6fac0962df41eeaacc3f69351a2dda6617fef19a527d993
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1613
container_title Journal of clinical medicine
container_volume 13
creator Studer, Andreas Martin
Faehnle-Schiegg, Ivo
Frey, Janine
Aichner, Simone
Brambs, Christine
Christmann-Schmid, Corina
description : Repeat sacrocolpopexy (reSCP) for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a rare and complex condition with little understanding of how to manage. Most authors recommend complete reSCP regardless of the underlying cause of the failure. This retrospective cohort study presents our management workflow and how to systematically approach this challenging situation. : From 2017 to 2021, we analyzed all women undergoing surgery for recurrent POP after sacrocolpopexy at our tertiary referral hospital at the department of urogynecology. Preoperatively, all women underwent a structured work-up consisting of answering the validated German female pelvic floor questionnaires, a clinical examination utilizing the POP-Q staging system according to the International Continence Society (ICS), and a pelvic floor ultrasound. The surgical management was based on the preoperative findings and was adapted individually during surgery if indicated according to the estimated underlying problem for recurrence. : In total, 377 women underwent a primary laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. However, ten women presented with a symptomatic recurrent prolapse requiring further surgical intervention. A reSCP was performed in eight women, including two with additional laparoscopic paravaginal repair to correct the displaced mesh placement at initial surgery. A vaginal correction was indicated in two women with an isolated posterior compartment prolapse. The analysis demonstrates that reSCP has a low intraoperative complication rate and high subjective and objective success rates. : We could demonstrate that individualized reSCP after initial SCP is a challenging yet feasible and safe treatment option, but there may be suitable alternatives. If women undergo pre- and intraoperative standardized problem-oriented examinations, we can often identify the cause of the recurrent prolapse. Tailored surgery must be subsequently performed.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/jcm13061613
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10970834</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A788248825</galeid><sourcerecordid>A788248825</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-636040de0fe98c792e6fac0962df41eeaacc3f69351a2dda6617fef19a527d993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkd9rFDEQx4MottQ--S4LvgiyNdnZzY8nOQ5tC4UWq88hZifbHNnNmtyW9r83R2u9iglhQvKZbzLzJeQtoycAin7a2JEB5YwzeEEOGypETUHCy739ATnOeUPLkLJtmHhNDkB2LZOgDsn5N7RLSjhtqysMt95Wl2kwU3WVYjBzxsq4Labq2tgUbQxznPHuvl5V10savDWhWt-YEHAa8A155UzIePwYj8iPr1--r8_qi8vT8_XqorYtdNuaA6ct7ZE6VNIK1SB3xlLFm961DNEYa8FxBR0zTd8bzplw6JgyXSN6peCIfH7QnZefI_a2fD2ZoOfkR5PudTReP7-Z_I0e4q1mVAkqoS0KHx4VUvy1YN7q0WeLIZgJ45I1UNZSqkDs0Pf_oJu4pKnUVyjaKMaA87_UYAJqP7lYHrY7Ub0SUjZtWV2hTv5Dldnj6G2c0Ply_izh40NC6X3OCd1TkYzqnft6z_1Cv9vvyxP7x2v4DdlwqRs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3002911366</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Recurrent Pelvic Organ Prolapse after Sacrocolpopexy-A Surgical Challenge</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Studer, Andreas Martin ; Faehnle-Schiegg, Ivo ; Frey, Janine ; Aichner, Simone ; Brambs, Christine ; Christmann-Schmid, Corina</creator><creatorcontrib>Studer, Andreas Martin ; Faehnle-Schiegg, Ivo ; Frey, Janine ; Aichner, Simone ; Brambs, Christine ; Christmann-Schmid, Corina</creatorcontrib><description>: Repeat sacrocolpopexy (reSCP) for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a rare and complex condition with little understanding of how to manage. Most authors recommend complete reSCP regardless of the underlying cause of the failure. This retrospective cohort study presents our management workflow and how to systematically approach this challenging situation. : From 2017 to 2021, we analyzed all women undergoing surgery for recurrent POP after sacrocolpopexy at our tertiary referral hospital at the department of urogynecology. Preoperatively, all women underwent a structured work-up consisting of answering the validated German female pelvic floor questionnaires, a clinical examination utilizing the POP-Q staging system according to the International Continence Society (ICS), and a pelvic floor ultrasound. The surgical management was based on the preoperative findings and was adapted individually during surgery if indicated according to the estimated underlying problem for recurrence. : In total, 377 women underwent a primary laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. However, ten women presented with a symptomatic recurrent prolapse requiring further surgical intervention. A reSCP was performed in eight women, including two with additional laparoscopic paravaginal repair to correct the displaced mesh placement at initial surgery. A vaginal correction was indicated in two women with an isolated posterior compartment prolapse. The analysis demonstrates that reSCP has a low intraoperative complication rate and high subjective and objective success rates. : We could demonstrate that individualized reSCP after initial SCP is a challenging yet feasible and safe treatment option, but there may be suitable alternatives. If women undergo pre- and intraoperative standardized problem-oriented examinations, we can often identify the cause of the recurrent prolapse. Tailored surgery must be subsequently performed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jcm13061613</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38541839</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Bladder ; Cohort analysis ; Defects ; Diseases ; Gynecology, Operative ; Laparoscopy ; Methods ; Patient outcomes ; Pelvic organ prolapse ; Pelvis ; Prolapse ; Questionnaires ; Relapse ; Success ; Surgery ; Urinary incontinence ; Uterus ; Vagina</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical medicine, 2024-03, Vol.13 (6), p.1613</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-636040de0fe98c792e6fac0962df41eeaacc3f69351a2dda6617fef19a527d993</cites><orcidid>0009-0006-2034-1453 ; 0000-0003-0130-1422</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3002911366/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3002911366?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25752,27923,27924,37011,37012,44589,53790,53792,74997</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38541839$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Studer, Andreas Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faehnle-Schiegg, Ivo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frey, Janine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aichner, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brambs, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christmann-Schmid, Corina</creatorcontrib><title>Recurrent Pelvic Organ Prolapse after Sacrocolpopexy-A Surgical Challenge</title><title>Journal of clinical medicine</title><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><description>: Repeat sacrocolpopexy (reSCP) for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a rare and complex condition with little understanding of how to manage. Most authors recommend complete reSCP regardless of the underlying cause of the failure. This retrospective cohort study presents our management workflow and how to systematically approach this challenging situation. : From 2017 to 2021, we analyzed all women undergoing surgery for recurrent POP after sacrocolpopexy at our tertiary referral hospital at the department of urogynecology. Preoperatively, all women underwent a structured work-up consisting of answering the validated German female pelvic floor questionnaires, a clinical examination utilizing the POP-Q staging system according to the International Continence Society (ICS), and a pelvic floor ultrasound. The surgical management was based on the preoperative findings and was adapted individually during surgery if indicated according to the estimated underlying problem for recurrence. : In total, 377 women underwent a primary laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. However, ten women presented with a symptomatic recurrent prolapse requiring further surgical intervention. A reSCP was performed in eight women, including two with additional laparoscopic paravaginal repair to correct the displaced mesh placement at initial surgery. A vaginal correction was indicated in two women with an isolated posterior compartment prolapse. The analysis demonstrates that reSCP has a low intraoperative complication rate and high subjective and objective success rates. : We could demonstrate that individualized reSCP after initial SCP is a challenging yet feasible and safe treatment option, but there may be suitable alternatives. If women undergo pre- and intraoperative standardized problem-oriented examinations, we can often identify the cause of the recurrent prolapse. Tailored surgery must be subsequently performed.</description><subject>Bladder</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Defects</subject><subject>Diseases</subject><subject>Gynecology, Operative</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Pelvic organ prolapse</subject><subject>Pelvis</subject><subject>Prolapse</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Relapse</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Urinary incontinence</subject><subject>Uterus</subject><subject>Vagina</subject><issn>2077-0383</issn><issn>2077-0383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNptkd9rFDEQx4MottQ--S4LvgiyNdnZzY8nOQ5tC4UWq88hZifbHNnNmtyW9r83R2u9iglhQvKZbzLzJeQtoycAin7a2JEB5YwzeEEOGypETUHCy739ATnOeUPLkLJtmHhNDkB2LZOgDsn5N7RLSjhtqysMt95Wl2kwU3WVYjBzxsq4Labq2tgUbQxznPHuvl5V10savDWhWt-YEHAa8A155UzIePwYj8iPr1--r8_qi8vT8_XqorYtdNuaA6ct7ZE6VNIK1SB3xlLFm961DNEYa8FxBR0zTd8bzplw6JgyXSN6peCIfH7QnZefI_a2fD2ZoOfkR5PudTReP7-Z_I0e4q1mVAkqoS0KHx4VUvy1YN7q0WeLIZgJ45I1UNZSqkDs0Pf_oJu4pKnUVyjaKMaA87_UYAJqP7lYHrY7Ub0SUjZtWV2hTv5Dldnj6G2c0Ply_izh40NC6X3OCd1TkYzqnft6z_1Cv9vvyxP7x2v4DdlwqRs</recordid><startdate>20240312</startdate><enddate>20240312</enddate><creator>Studer, Andreas Martin</creator><creator>Faehnle-Schiegg, Ivo</creator><creator>Frey, Janine</creator><creator>Aichner, Simone</creator><creator>Brambs, Christine</creator><creator>Christmann-Schmid, Corina</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2034-1453</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0130-1422</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240312</creationdate><title>Recurrent Pelvic Organ Prolapse after Sacrocolpopexy-A Surgical Challenge</title><author>Studer, Andreas Martin ; Faehnle-Schiegg, Ivo ; Frey, Janine ; Aichner, Simone ; Brambs, Christine ; Christmann-Schmid, Corina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-636040de0fe98c792e6fac0962df41eeaacc3f69351a2dda6617fef19a527d993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Bladder</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Defects</topic><topic>Diseases</topic><topic>Gynecology, Operative</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Pelvic organ prolapse</topic><topic>Pelvis</topic><topic>Prolapse</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Relapse</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Urinary incontinence</topic><topic>Uterus</topic><topic>Vagina</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Studer, Andreas Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faehnle-Schiegg, Ivo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frey, Janine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aichner, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brambs, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christmann-Schmid, Corina</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Studer, Andreas Martin</au><au>Faehnle-Schiegg, Ivo</au><au>Frey, Janine</au><au>Aichner, Simone</au><au>Brambs, Christine</au><au>Christmann-Schmid, Corina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Recurrent Pelvic Organ Prolapse after Sacrocolpopexy-A Surgical Challenge</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><date>2024-03-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1613</spage><pages>1613-</pages><issn>2077-0383</issn><eissn>2077-0383</eissn><abstract>: Repeat sacrocolpopexy (reSCP) for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a rare and complex condition with little understanding of how to manage. Most authors recommend complete reSCP regardless of the underlying cause of the failure. This retrospective cohort study presents our management workflow and how to systematically approach this challenging situation. : From 2017 to 2021, we analyzed all women undergoing surgery for recurrent POP after sacrocolpopexy at our tertiary referral hospital at the department of urogynecology. Preoperatively, all women underwent a structured work-up consisting of answering the validated German female pelvic floor questionnaires, a clinical examination utilizing the POP-Q staging system according to the International Continence Society (ICS), and a pelvic floor ultrasound. The surgical management was based on the preoperative findings and was adapted individually during surgery if indicated according to the estimated underlying problem for recurrence. : In total, 377 women underwent a primary laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. However, ten women presented with a symptomatic recurrent prolapse requiring further surgical intervention. A reSCP was performed in eight women, including two with additional laparoscopic paravaginal repair to correct the displaced mesh placement at initial surgery. A vaginal correction was indicated in two women with an isolated posterior compartment prolapse. The analysis demonstrates that reSCP has a low intraoperative complication rate and high subjective and objective success rates. : We could demonstrate that individualized reSCP after initial SCP is a challenging yet feasible and safe treatment option, but there may be suitable alternatives. If women undergo pre- and intraoperative standardized problem-oriented examinations, we can often identify the cause of the recurrent prolapse. Tailored surgery must be subsequently performed.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>38541839</pmid><doi>10.3390/jcm13061613</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2034-1453</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0130-1422</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2077-0383
ispartof Journal of clinical medicine, 2024-03, Vol.13 (6), p.1613
issn 2077-0383
2077-0383
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10970834
source Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); PubMed Central
subjects Bladder
Cohort analysis
Defects
Diseases
Gynecology, Operative
Laparoscopy
Methods
Patient outcomes
Pelvic organ prolapse
Pelvis
Prolapse
Questionnaires
Relapse
Success
Surgery
Urinary incontinence
Uterus
Vagina
title Recurrent Pelvic Organ Prolapse after Sacrocolpopexy-A Surgical Challenge
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T07%3A43%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Recurrent%20Pelvic%20Organ%20Prolapse%20after%20Sacrocolpopexy-A%20Surgical%20Challenge&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20medicine&rft.au=Studer,%20Andreas%20Martin&rft.date=2024-03-12&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1613&rft.pages=1613-&rft.issn=2077-0383&rft.eissn=2077-0383&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jcm13061613&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA788248825%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-636040de0fe98c792e6fac0962df41eeaacc3f69351a2dda6617fef19a527d993%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3002911366&rft_id=info:pmid/38541839&rft_galeid=A788248825&rfr_iscdi=true