Impact of Meniscus Repair in Conjunction With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction on Functional Outcomes at Six Months

• Published in: Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) CA), 2024-02, Vol.16 (2), p.e54999-e54999
• Main Authors: Soni, Sanjay, Mankad, Saptak P, Sharma, Dhruv, Patel, Krunal, Soni, Hemant, Shroff, Manan R, Sharma, Shivam, Rana, Preya, Sharma, Tanishq S, Majmudar, Hardil P
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Antibiotics; Cross-sectional studies; Demographics; Females; Joint and ligament injuries; Knee; Orthopedics; Patients; Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation; Rheumatology; Sports injuries; Surgeons; Surgery; Sutures; Variance analysis
• ISSN: 2168-8184; 2168-8184
• DOI: 10.7759/cureus.54999

Background and aim Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries often occur along with menisci tears. ACL reconstruction with meniscectomy has long been the preferred technique for such injuries; however, it has been postulated to increase the chances of osteoarthritis (OA). Therefore, recent techniques have involved preserving menisci while reconstructing ACL to prevent OA and improve overall functional outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the functional outcomes of arthroscopic meniscal repair performed concurrently with ACL reconstruction at six months post-surgery. Methodology We conducted a cross-sectional study at a tertiary care center after getting appropriate ethics committee approval. A total of 67 participants who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled in the study after obtaining informed consent. Their demographics were recorded retrospectively from hospital records, while their Lysholm Knee Score (LKS) responses were collected prospectively during their sixth-month follow-up visit to our department. Analysis was done using Microsoft Excel. Appropriate statistical tests including chi-square, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and independent t-tests were applied to keep an alpha of 0.05. Results We found that the mean age of participants was 35 years. The mean LKS of patients who underwent isolated ACL reconstruction (ACLR) was 86.02 ± 9.38. For those who underwent ACLR plus meniscus repair (MR), the mean LKS was marginally higher at 87.4 ± 7.41 during their sixth-month follow-up, with a -value of 0.27. Furthermore, the mean LKS of patients who underwent ACLR plus meniscectomy was 86 ± 10.48. Comparing the means of all three groups revealed no statistical difference among any surgical approach with a -value of 0.69. A total of 33 (49.25%) participants achieved an LKS falling within the  category (84-94). Comparing between three surgical groups and their LKS categories also revealed no statistical difference with a -value of 0.7. Conclusions Short-term functional outcomes in patients undergoing ACLR or ACLR plus MR using patient-reported knee scores like LKS demonstrate favorable outcomes but fail to demonstrate statistical significance. On a longer follow-up period, a reduction in the prevalence of OA is a possibility with the preservation of menisci; however, conflicting evidence in the literature about the approach to ACL injuries with menisci involvement warrants large-scale randomized controlled trials to decide upon the standard