Emerging multi-port soft tissue robotic systems: a systematic review of clinical outcomes

• Published in: Journal of robotic surgery 2024-03, Vol.18 (1), p.145, Article 145
• Main Authors: Leang, Yit J., Kong, Joseph C. H., Mosharaf, Zahin, Hensman, Chrys S., Burton, Paul R., Brown, Wendy A.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Blood Loss, Surgical - statistics & numerical data; Cholecystectomy; Clinical outcomes; Colorectal cancer; Humans; Laparoscopy; Laparoscopy - instrumentation; Laparoscopy - methods; Length of Stay; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Minimally Invasive Surgery; Operative Time; Patients; Review; Robotic surgery; Robotic Surgical Procedures - instrumentation; Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods; Search engines; Soft tissues; Surgery; Systematic review; Treatment Outcome; Urology
• ISSN: 1863-2491; 1863-2483; 1863-2491
• DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01887-w

Multiple novel multi-port robotic surgical systems have been introduced into clinical practice. This systematic review aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of these novel robotic systems to conventional laparoscopic technique and established da Vinci robotic surgical platforms. A literature search of Embase, Medline, Pubmed, Cochrane library, and Google Scholar was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines from 2012 to May 2023. Studies comparing clinical outcomes of novel multi-port robotic surgical systems with laparoscopic or the da Vinci platforms were included. Case series with no comparison groups were excluded. Descriptive statistics were used to report patient and outcome data. A systematic narrative review was provided for each outcome. Twelve studies comprised of 1142 patients were included. A total of 6 novel multi-port robotic systems: Micro Hand S, Senhance, Revo-i MSR-5000, KangDuo, Versius, and Hugo ™ RAS were compared against the laparoscopic or the da Vinci robotic platforms. Clinical outcomes of these novel robotic platforms were comparable to the established da Vinci platforms. When compared against conventional laparoscopic approaches, the robotic platforms demonstrated lower volume of blood loss, shorter length of stay but longer operative time. This systematic review highlighted the safe implementation and efficacy of 6 new robotic systems. The clinical outcomes achieved by these new robotic systems are comparable to the established da Vinci robotic system in simple to moderate case complexities. There is emerging evidence that these new robotic systems provide a viable alternative to currently available robotic platforms.