Loading…

Comparative efficacy of difloxacin and nano-emulsion difloxacin as antibacterial agents against Salmonella enterica Serovar enteritidis in chickenss

Avian salmonellosis is a group of diseases caused by bacteria from the genus Salmonella with a negative impact on poultry, particularly chickens. In addition, salmonellosis is a global food-borne infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of nano-emulsion difloxacin (NED) and commer...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Open veterinary journal (Tripoli, Libya) Libya), 2024-01, Vol.14 (1), p.449-458
Main Authors: Ashosh, Mohammed I, El-Abasy, Moshira A, El-Borady, Ola M, Elkhaiat, Ibrahim, Ismail, Mahmoud M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 458
container_issue 1
container_start_page 449
container_title Open veterinary journal (Tripoli, Libya)
container_volume 14
creator Ashosh, Mohammed I
El-Abasy, Moshira A
El-Borady, Ola M
Elkhaiat, Ibrahim
Ismail, Mahmoud M
description Avian salmonellosis is a group of diseases caused by bacteria from the genus Salmonella with a negative impact on poultry, particularly chickens. In addition, salmonellosis is a global food-borne infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of nano-emulsion difloxacin (NED) and commercial difloxacin (CD) water supplement on broiler's growth, feed intake, and body weight, weight gain, growth rate, feed conversion ratio (FCR), and mortality rate (MR). The antibiotic sensitivity was determined both and for NED against in chickens. 1500 one-day of age chicks were grouped into five groups as follows: group 1 (G1) control negative group, G2 control positive group (infected and not treated), G3 (infected and treated with CD, and G4 and G5 (infected and treated with NED at different doses). Samples, including the intestine, liver, and spleen were collected. Agar well diffusion test and minimum inhibitory concentrations were adopted. Histopathological lesions on different tissues were studied. During 35 days of the experiment, the feed intake, growth rate, growth gain, FCR, and MR were recorded daily. In addition, a variety of analytical techniques including transmission electron microscopic analysis, dynamic light scattering, UV-visible spectroscopy, and zeta-potential analysis were applied to characterize NED. The agar well diffusion test indicated that NED was effective against isolates than CD. The minimum inhibitory concentration was recorded as NED inhibited bacterial growth till well 8 at a concentration of 0.78 µg/ml; on the other hand, the CD inhibited bacterial growth till well 6 at a concentration of 0.62 µg/ml. Growth performance and MRs in the groups treated with NED are significantly reduced. Treatment of broiler's drinking water with NED at doses of 0.5 and 1 ml instead of pure CD was able to enforce a new perspective, antibacterial efficacy, enhancing the productive performance, and reducing the MRs of broilers.
doi_str_mv 10.5455/OVJ.2024.v14.i1.41
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11018397</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3041234481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p267t-239a23d432ab548f780707a58e33a053fa1829956dabe1f4fc5cec23079efa253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUctOwzAQtBAIqtIf4IB85JLgZx4nhCqeQuqhwDXaOnZrSOwSpxX9Dz4YVxRE97KrmdHMrhahM0pSKaS8nLw-powwka6pSC1NBT1AA8ZokWREksPtzLJEiEKeoFEIbyRWTjkr6TE64UXGORXZAH2NfbuEDnq71lgbYxWoDfYG19Y0_hOUdRhcjR04n-h21QTr3R4ZIt_bGahedxYaDHPt-gjOwbrQ4yk0rXe6aQBHPEoU4Knu_Bq6HdDb2gYcrdTCqnftQjhFRwaaoEe7PkQvtzfP4_vkaXL3ML5-SpYsy_uE8RIYrwVnMJOiMHlBcpKDLDTnQCQ3QAtWljKrYaapEUZJpRXjJC-1ASb5EF39-C5Xs1bXKu7TQVMtO9tCt6k82GqfcXZRzf26opTQgpd5dLjYOXT-Y6VDX7U2qO21TvtVqDgRlPH4BRql5__D_lJ-f8G_AdWpkhk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3041234481</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative efficacy of difloxacin and nano-emulsion difloxacin as antibacterial agents against Salmonella enterica Serovar enteritidis in chickenss</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><creator>Ashosh, Mohammed I ; El-Abasy, Moshira A ; El-Borady, Ola M ; Elkhaiat, Ibrahim ; Ismail, Mahmoud M</creator><creatorcontrib>Ashosh, Mohammed I ; El-Abasy, Moshira A ; El-Borady, Ola M ; Elkhaiat, Ibrahim ; Ismail, Mahmoud M</creatorcontrib><description>Avian salmonellosis is a group of diseases caused by bacteria from the genus Salmonella with a negative impact on poultry, particularly chickens. In addition, salmonellosis is a global food-borne infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of nano-emulsion difloxacin (NED) and commercial difloxacin (CD) water supplement on broiler's growth, feed intake, and body weight, weight gain, growth rate, feed conversion ratio (FCR), and mortality rate (MR). The antibiotic sensitivity was determined both and for NED against in chickens. 1500 one-day of age chicks were grouped into five groups as follows: group 1 (G1) control negative group, G2 control positive group (infected and not treated), G3 (infected and treated with CD, and G4 and G5 (infected and treated with NED at different doses). Samples, including the intestine, liver, and spleen were collected. Agar well diffusion test and minimum inhibitory concentrations were adopted. Histopathological lesions on different tissues were studied. During 35 days of the experiment, the feed intake, growth rate, growth gain, FCR, and MR were recorded daily. In addition, a variety of analytical techniques including transmission electron microscopic analysis, dynamic light scattering, UV-visible spectroscopy, and zeta-potential analysis were applied to characterize NED. The agar well diffusion test indicated that NED was effective against isolates than CD. The minimum inhibitory concentration was recorded as NED inhibited bacterial growth till well 8 at a concentration of 0.78 µg/ml; on the other hand, the CD inhibited bacterial growth till well 6 at a concentration of 0.62 µg/ml. Growth performance and MRs in the groups treated with NED are significantly reduced. Treatment of broiler's drinking water with NED at doses of 0.5 and 1 ml instead of pure CD was able to enforce a new perspective, antibacterial efficacy, enhancing the productive performance, and reducing the MRs of broilers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2226-4485</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2218-6050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5455/OVJ.2024.v14.i1.41</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38633146</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Libya: Faculty of Veterinary Medicine</publisher><subject>Original Research</subject><ispartof>Open veterinary journal (Tripoli, Libya), 2024-01, Vol.14 (1), p.449-458</ispartof><rights>2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11018397/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11018397/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38633146$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ashosh, Mohammed I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Abasy, Moshira A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Borady, Ola M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elkhaiat, Ibrahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ismail, Mahmoud M</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative efficacy of difloxacin and nano-emulsion difloxacin as antibacterial agents against Salmonella enterica Serovar enteritidis in chickenss</title><title>Open veterinary journal (Tripoli, Libya)</title><addtitle>Open Vet J</addtitle><description>Avian salmonellosis is a group of diseases caused by bacteria from the genus Salmonella with a negative impact on poultry, particularly chickens. In addition, salmonellosis is a global food-borne infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of nano-emulsion difloxacin (NED) and commercial difloxacin (CD) water supplement on broiler's growth, feed intake, and body weight, weight gain, growth rate, feed conversion ratio (FCR), and mortality rate (MR). The antibiotic sensitivity was determined both and for NED against in chickens. 1500 one-day of age chicks were grouped into five groups as follows: group 1 (G1) control negative group, G2 control positive group (infected and not treated), G3 (infected and treated with CD, and G4 and G5 (infected and treated with NED at different doses). Samples, including the intestine, liver, and spleen were collected. Agar well diffusion test and minimum inhibitory concentrations were adopted. Histopathological lesions on different tissues were studied. During 35 days of the experiment, the feed intake, growth rate, growth gain, FCR, and MR were recorded daily. In addition, a variety of analytical techniques including transmission electron microscopic analysis, dynamic light scattering, UV-visible spectroscopy, and zeta-potential analysis were applied to characterize NED. The agar well diffusion test indicated that NED was effective against isolates than CD. The minimum inhibitory concentration was recorded as NED inhibited bacterial growth till well 8 at a concentration of 0.78 µg/ml; on the other hand, the CD inhibited bacterial growth till well 6 at a concentration of 0.62 µg/ml. Growth performance and MRs in the groups treated with NED are significantly reduced. Treatment of broiler's drinking water with NED at doses of 0.5 and 1 ml instead of pure CD was able to enforce a new perspective, antibacterial efficacy, enhancing the productive performance, and reducing the MRs of broilers.</description><subject>Original Research</subject><issn>2226-4485</issn><issn>2218-6050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUctOwzAQtBAIqtIf4IB85JLgZx4nhCqeQuqhwDXaOnZrSOwSpxX9Dz4YVxRE97KrmdHMrhahM0pSKaS8nLw-powwka6pSC1NBT1AA8ZokWREksPtzLJEiEKeoFEIbyRWTjkr6TE64UXGORXZAH2NfbuEDnq71lgbYxWoDfYG19Y0_hOUdRhcjR04n-h21QTr3R4ZIt_bGahedxYaDHPt-gjOwbrQ4yk0rXe6aQBHPEoU4Knu_Bq6HdDb2gYcrdTCqnftQjhFRwaaoEe7PkQvtzfP4_vkaXL3ML5-SpYsy_uE8RIYrwVnMJOiMHlBcpKDLDTnQCQ3QAtWljKrYaapEUZJpRXjJC-1ASb5EF39-C5Xs1bXKu7TQVMtO9tCt6k82GqfcXZRzf26opTQgpd5dLjYOXT-Y6VDX7U2qO21TvtVqDgRlPH4BRql5__D_lJ-f8G_AdWpkhk</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Ashosh, Mohammed I</creator><creator>El-Abasy, Moshira A</creator><creator>El-Borady, Ola M</creator><creator>Elkhaiat, Ibrahim</creator><creator>Ismail, Mahmoud M</creator><general>Faculty of Veterinary Medicine</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>Comparative efficacy of difloxacin and nano-emulsion difloxacin as antibacterial agents against Salmonella enterica Serovar enteritidis in chickenss</title><author>Ashosh, Mohammed I ; El-Abasy, Moshira A ; El-Borady, Ola M ; Elkhaiat, Ibrahim ; Ismail, Mahmoud M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p267t-239a23d432ab548f780707a58e33a053fa1829956dabe1f4fc5cec23079efa253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Original Research</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ashosh, Mohammed I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Abasy, Moshira A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Borady, Ola M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elkhaiat, Ibrahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ismail, Mahmoud M</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Open veterinary journal (Tripoli, Libya)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ashosh, Mohammed I</au><au>El-Abasy, Moshira A</au><au>El-Borady, Ola M</au><au>Elkhaiat, Ibrahim</au><au>Ismail, Mahmoud M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative efficacy of difloxacin and nano-emulsion difloxacin as antibacterial agents against Salmonella enterica Serovar enteritidis in chickenss</atitle><jtitle>Open veterinary journal (Tripoli, Libya)</jtitle><addtitle>Open Vet J</addtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>449</spage><epage>458</epage><pages>449-458</pages><issn>2226-4485</issn><eissn>2218-6050</eissn><abstract>Avian salmonellosis is a group of diseases caused by bacteria from the genus Salmonella with a negative impact on poultry, particularly chickens. In addition, salmonellosis is a global food-borne infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of nano-emulsion difloxacin (NED) and commercial difloxacin (CD) water supplement on broiler's growth, feed intake, and body weight, weight gain, growth rate, feed conversion ratio (FCR), and mortality rate (MR). The antibiotic sensitivity was determined both and for NED against in chickens. 1500 one-day of age chicks were grouped into five groups as follows: group 1 (G1) control negative group, G2 control positive group (infected and not treated), G3 (infected and treated with CD, and G4 and G5 (infected and treated with NED at different doses). Samples, including the intestine, liver, and spleen were collected. Agar well diffusion test and minimum inhibitory concentrations were adopted. Histopathological lesions on different tissues were studied. During 35 days of the experiment, the feed intake, growth rate, growth gain, FCR, and MR were recorded daily. In addition, a variety of analytical techniques including transmission electron microscopic analysis, dynamic light scattering, UV-visible spectroscopy, and zeta-potential analysis were applied to characterize NED. The agar well diffusion test indicated that NED was effective against isolates than CD. The minimum inhibitory concentration was recorded as NED inhibited bacterial growth till well 8 at a concentration of 0.78 µg/ml; on the other hand, the CD inhibited bacterial growth till well 6 at a concentration of 0.62 µg/ml. Growth performance and MRs in the groups treated with NED are significantly reduced. Treatment of broiler's drinking water with NED at doses of 0.5 and 1 ml instead of pure CD was able to enforce a new perspective, antibacterial efficacy, enhancing the productive performance, and reducing the MRs of broilers.</abstract><cop>Libya</cop><pub>Faculty of Veterinary Medicine</pub><pmid>38633146</pmid><doi>10.5455/OVJ.2024.v14.i1.41</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2226-4485
ispartof Open veterinary journal (Tripoli, Libya), 2024-01, Vol.14 (1), p.449-458
issn 2226-4485
2218-6050
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11018397
source Open Access: PubMed Central
subjects Original Research
title Comparative efficacy of difloxacin and nano-emulsion difloxacin as antibacterial agents against Salmonella enterica Serovar enteritidis in chickenss
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T16%3A12%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20efficacy%20of%20difloxacin%20and%20nano-emulsion%20difloxacin%20as%20antibacterial%20agents%20against%20Salmonella%20enterica%20Serovar%20enteritidis%20in%20chickenss&rft.jtitle=Open%20veterinary%20journal%20(Tripoli,%20Libya)&rft.au=Ashosh,%20Mohammed%20I&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=449&rft.epage=458&rft.pages=449-458&rft.issn=2226-4485&rft.eissn=2218-6050&rft_id=info:doi/10.5455/OVJ.2024.v14.i1.41&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3041234481%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p267t-239a23d432ab548f780707a58e33a053fa1829956dabe1f4fc5cec23079efa253%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3041234481&rft_id=info:pmid/38633146&rfr_iscdi=true