Loading…
Comparative efficacy of difloxacin and nano-emulsion difloxacin as antibacterial agents against Salmonella enterica Serovar enteritidis in chickenss
Avian salmonellosis is a group of diseases caused by bacteria from the genus Salmonella with a negative impact on poultry, particularly chickens. In addition, salmonellosis is a global food-borne infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of nano-emulsion difloxacin (NED) and commer...
Saved in:
Published in: | Open veterinary journal (Tripoli, Libya) Libya), 2024-01, Vol.14 (1), p.449-458 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 458 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 449 |
container_title | Open veterinary journal (Tripoli, Libya) |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Ashosh, Mohammed I El-Abasy, Moshira A El-Borady, Ola M Elkhaiat, Ibrahim Ismail, Mahmoud M |
description | Avian salmonellosis is a group of diseases caused by bacteria from the genus Salmonella with a negative impact on poultry, particularly chickens. In addition, salmonellosis is a global food-borne infection.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of nano-emulsion difloxacin (NED) and commercial difloxacin (CD) water supplement on broiler's growth, feed intake, and body weight, weight gain, growth rate, feed conversion ratio (FCR), and mortality rate (MR). The antibiotic sensitivity was determined both
and
for NED against
in chickens.
1500 one-day of age chicks were grouped into five groups as follows: group 1 (G1) control negative group, G2 control positive group (infected and not treated), G3 (infected and treated with CD, and G4 and G5 (infected and treated with NED at different doses). Samples, including the intestine, liver, and spleen were collected. Agar well diffusion test and minimum inhibitory concentrations were adopted. Histopathological lesions on different tissues were studied. During 35 days of the experiment, the feed intake, growth rate, growth gain, FCR, and MR were recorded daily. In addition, a variety of analytical techniques including transmission electron microscopic analysis, dynamic light scattering, UV-visible spectroscopy, and zeta-potential analysis were applied to characterize NED.
The agar well diffusion test indicated that NED was
effective against
isolates than CD. The minimum inhibitory concentration was recorded as NED inhibited bacterial growth till well 8 at a concentration of 0.78 µg/ml; on the other hand, the CD inhibited bacterial growth till well 6 at a concentration of 0.62 µg/ml. Growth performance and MRs in the groups treated with NED are significantly reduced.
Treatment of broiler's drinking water with NED at doses of 0.5 and 1 ml instead of pure CD was able to enforce a new perspective, antibacterial efficacy, enhancing the productive performance, and reducing the MRs of broilers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5455/OVJ.2024.v14.i1.41 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11018397</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3041234481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p267t-239a23d432ab548f780707a58e33a053fa1829956dabe1f4fc5cec23079efa253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUctOwzAQtBAIqtIf4IB85JLgZx4nhCqeQuqhwDXaOnZrSOwSpxX9Dz4YVxRE97KrmdHMrhahM0pSKaS8nLw-powwka6pSC1NBT1AA8ZokWREksPtzLJEiEKeoFEIbyRWTjkr6TE64UXGORXZAH2NfbuEDnq71lgbYxWoDfYG19Y0_hOUdRhcjR04n-h21QTr3R4ZIt_bGahedxYaDHPt-gjOwbrQ4yk0rXe6aQBHPEoU4Knu_Bq6HdDb2gYcrdTCqnftQjhFRwaaoEe7PkQvtzfP4_vkaXL3ML5-SpYsy_uE8RIYrwVnMJOiMHlBcpKDLDTnQCQ3QAtWljKrYaapEUZJpRXjJC-1ASb5EF39-C5Xs1bXKu7TQVMtO9tCt6k82GqfcXZRzf26opTQgpd5dLjYOXT-Y6VDX7U2qO21TvtVqDgRlPH4BRql5__D_lJ-f8G_AdWpkhk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3041234481</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative efficacy of difloxacin and nano-emulsion difloxacin as antibacterial agents against Salmonella enterica Serovar enteritidis in chickenss</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><creator>Ashosh, Mohammed I ; El-Abasy, Moshira A ; El-Borady, Ola M ; Elkhaiat, Ibrahim ; Ismail, Mahmoud M</creator><creatorcontrib>Ashosh, Mohammed I ; El-Abasy, Moshira A ; El-Borady, Ola M ; Elkhaiat, Ibrahim ; Ismail, Mahmoud M</creatorcontrib><description>Avian salmonellosis is a group of diseases caused by bacteria from the genus Salmonella with a negative impact on poultry, particularly chickens. In addition, salmonellosis is a global food-borne infection.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of nano-emulsion difloxacin (NED) and commercial difloxacin (CD) water supplement on broiler's growth, feed intake, and body weight, weight gain, growth rate, feed conversion ratio (FCR), and mortality rate (MR). The antibiotic sensitivity was determined both
and
for NED against
in chickens.
1500 one-day of age chicks were grouped into five groups as follows: group 1 (G1) control negative group, G2 control positive group (infected and not treated), G3 (infected and treated with CD, and G4 and G5 (infected and treated with NED at different doses). Samples, including the intestine, liver, and spleen were collected. Agar well diffusion test and minimum inhibitory concentrations were adopted. Histopathological lesions on different tissues were studied. During 35 days of the experiment, the feed intake, growth rate, growth gain, FCR, and MR were recorded daily. In addition, a variety of analytical techniques including transmission electron microscopic analysis, dynamic light scattering, UV-visible spectroscopy, and zeta-potential analysis were applied to characterize NED.
The agar well diffusion test indicated that NED was
effective against
isolates than CD. The minimum inhibitory concentration was recorded as NED inhibited bacterial growth till well 8 at a concentration of 0.78 µg/ml; on the other hand, the CD inhibited bacterial growth till well 6 at a concentration of 0.62 µg/ml. Growth performance and MRs in the groups treated with NED are significantly reduced.
Treatment of broiler's drinking water with NED at doses of 0.5 and 1 ml instead of pure CD was able to enforce a new perspective, antibacterial efficacy, enhancing the productive performance, and reducing the MRs of broilers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2226-4485</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2218-6050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5455/OVJ.2024.v14.i1.41</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38633146</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Libya: Faculty of Veterinary Medicine</publisher><subject>Original Research</subject><ispartof>Open veterinary journal (Tripoli, Libya), 2024-01, Vol.14 (1), p.449-458</ispartof><rights>2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11018397/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11018397/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38633146$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ashosh, Mohammed I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Abasy, Moshira A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Borady, Ola M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elkhaiat, Ibrahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ismail, Mahmoud M</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative efficacy of difloxacin and nano-emulsion difloxacin as antibacterial agents against Salmonella enterica Serovar enteritidis in chickenss</title><title>Open veterinary journal (Tripoli, Libya)</title><addtitle>Open Vet J</addtitle><description>Avian salmonellosis is a group of diseases caused by bacteria from the genus Salmonella with a negative impact on poultry, particularly chickens. In addition, salmonellosis is a global food-borne infection.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of nano-emulsion difloxacin (NED) and commercial difloxacin (CD) water supplement on broiler's growth, feed intake, and body weight, weight gain, growth rate, feed conversion ratio (FCR), and mortality rate (MR). The antibiotic sensitivity was determined both
and
for NED against
in chickens.
1500 one-day of age chicks were grouped into five groups as follows: group 1 (G1) control negative group, G2 control positive group (infected and not treated), G3 (infected and treated with CD, and G4 and G5 (infected and treated with NED at different doses). Samples, including the intestine, liver, and spleen were collected. Agar well diffusion test and minimum inhibitory concentrations were adopted. Histopathological lesions on different tissues were studied. During 35 days of the experiment, the feed intake, growth rate, growth gain, FCR, and MR were recorded daily. In addition, a variety of analytical techniques including transmission electron microscopic analysis, dynamic light scattering, UV-visible spectroscopy, and zeta-potential analysis were applied to characterize NED.
The agar well diffusion test indicated that NED was
effective against
isolates than CD. The minimum inhibitory concentration was recorded as NED inhibited bacterial growth till well 8 at a concentration of 0.78 µg/ml; on the other hand, the CD inhibited bacterial growth till well 6 at a concentration of 0.62 µg/ml. Growth performance and MRs in the groups treated with NED are significantly reduced.
Treatment of broiler's drinking water with NED at doses of 0.5 and 1 ml instead of pure CD was able to enforce a new perspective, antibacterial efficacy, enhancing the productive performance, and reducing the MRs of broilers.</description><subject>Original Research</subject><issn>2226-4485</issn><issn>2218-6050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUctOwzAQtBAIqtIf4IB85JLgZx4nhCqeQuqhwDXaOnZrSOwSpxX9Dz4YVxRE97KrmdHMrhahM0pSKaS8nLw-powwka6pSC1NBT1AA8ZokWREksPtzLJEiEKeoFEIbyRWTjkr6TE64UXGORXZAH2NfbuEDnq71lgbYxWoDfYG19Y0_hOUdRhcjR04n-h21QTr3R4ZIt_bGahedxYaDHPt-gjOwbrQ4yk0rXe6aQBHPEoU4Knu_Bq6HdDb2gYcrdTCqnftQjhFRwaaoEe7PkQvtzfP4_vkaXL3ML5-SpYsy_uE8RIYrwVnMJOiMHlBcpKDLDTnQCQ3QAtWljKrYaapEUZJpRXjJC-1ASb5EF39-C5Xs1bXKu7TQVMtO9tCt6k82GqfcXZRzf26opTQgpd5dLjYOXT-Y6VDX7U2qO21TvtVqDgRlPH4BRql5__D_lJ-f8G_AdWpkhk</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Ashosh, Mohammed I</creator><creator>El-Abasy, Moshira A</creator><creator>El-Borady, Ola M</creator><creator>Elkhaiat, Ibrahim</creator><creator>Ismail, Mahmoud M</creator><general>Faculty of Veterinary Medicine</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>Comparative efficacy of difloxacin and nano-emulsion difloxacin as antibacterial agents against Salmonella enterica Serovar enteritidis in chickenss</title><author>Ashosh, Mohammed I ; El-Abasy, Moshira A ; El-Borady, Ola M ; Elkhaiat, Ibrahim ; Ismail, Mahmoud M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p267t-239a23d432ab548f780707a58e33a053fa1829956dabe1f4fc5cec23079efa253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Original Research</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ashosh, Mohammed I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Abasy, Moshira A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Borady, Ola M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elkhaiat, Ibrahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ismail, Mahmoud M</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Open veterinary journal (Tripoli, Libya)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ashosh, Mohammed I</au><au>El-Abasy, Moshira A</au><au>El-Borady, Ola M</au><au>Elkhaiat, Ibrahim</au><au>Ismail, Mahmoud M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative efficacy of difloxacin and nano-emulsion difloxacin as antibacterial agents against Salmonella enterica Serovar enteritidis in chickenss</atitle><jtitle>Open veterinary journal (Tripoli, Libya)</jtitle><addtitle>Open Vet J</addtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>449</spage><epage>458</epage><pages>449-458</pages><issn>2226-4485</issn><eissn>2218-6050</eissn><abstract>Avian salmonellosis is a group of diseases caused by bacteria from the genus Salmonella with a negative impact on poultry, particularly chickens. In addition, salmonellosis is a global food-borne infection.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of nano-emulsion difloxacin (NED) and commercial difloxacin (CD) water supplement on broiler's growth, feed intake, and body weight, weight gain, growth rate, feed conversion ratio (FCR), and mortality rate (MR). The antibiotic sensitivity was determined both
and
for NED against
in chickens.
1500 one-day of age chicks were grouped into five groups as follows: group 1 (G1) control negative group, G2 control positive group (infected and not treated), G3 (infected and treated with CD, and G4 and G5 (infected and treated with NED at different doses). Samples, including the intestine, liver, and spleen were collected. Agar well diffusion test and minimum inhibitory concentrations were adopted. Histopathological lesions on different tissues were studied. During 35 days of the experiment, the feed intake, growth rate, growth gain, FCR, and MR were recorded daily. In addition, a variety of analytical techniques including transmission electron microscopic analysis, dynamic light scattering, UV-visible spectroscopy, and zeta-potential analysis were applied to characterize NED.
The agar well diffusion test indicated that NED was
effective against
isolates than CD. The minimum inhibitory concentration was recorded as NED inhibited bacterial growth till well 8 at a concentration of 0.78 µg/ml; on the other hand, the CD inhibited bacterial growth till well 6 at a concentration of 0.62 µg/ml. Growth performance and MRs in the groups treated with NED are significantly reduced.
Treatment of broiler's drinking water with NED at doses of 0.5 and 1 ml instead of pure CD was able to enforce a new perspective, antibacterial efficacy, enhancing the productive performance, and reducing the MRs of broilers.</abstract><cop>Libya</cop><pub>Faculty of Veterinary Medicine</pub><pmid>38633146</pmid><doi>10.5455/OVJ.2024.v14.i1.41</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2226-4485 |
ispartof | Open veterinary journal (Tripoli, Libya), 2024-01, Vol.14 (1), p.449-458 |
issn | 2226-4485 2218-6050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11018397 |
source | Open Access: PubMed Central |
subjects | Original Research |
title | Comparative efficacy of difloxacin and nano-emulsion difloxacin as antibacterial agents against Salmonella enterica Serovar enteritidis in chickenss |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T16%3A12%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20efficacy%20of%20difloxacin%20and%20nano-emulsion%20difloxacin%20as%20antibacterial%20agents%20against%20Salmonella%20enterica%20Serovar%20enteritidis%20in%20chickenss&rft.jtitle=Open%20veterinary%20journal%20(Tripoli,%20Libya)&rft.au=Ashosh,%20Mohammed%20I&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=449&rft.epage=458&rft.pages=449-458&rft.issn=2226-4485&rft.eissn=2218-6050&rft_id=info:doi/10.5455/OVJ.2024.v14.i1.41&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3041234481%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p267t-239a23d432ab548f780707a58e33a053fa1829956dabe1f4fc5cec23079efa253%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3041234481&rft_id=info:pmid/38633146&rfr_iscdi=true |