Team Cognition in Handoffs: Relating System Factors, Team Cognition Functions and Outcomes in Two Handoff Processes

• Published in: Human factors 2024-01, Vol.66 (1), p.271-293
• Main Authors: Wooldridge, Abigail R., Carayon, Pascale, Hoonakker, Peter, Hose, Bat-Zion, Shaffer, David W., Brazelton, Tom, Eithun, Ben, Rusy, Deborah, Ross, Joshua, Kohler, Jonathan, Kelly, Michelle M., Springman, Scott, Gurses, Ayse P.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anesthesia; Child; Cognition; Cognition & reasoning; Cognitive ability; Communication; Content analysis; Decision making; Humans; Information processing; Intensive Care Units; Medical personnel; Network analysis; Operating Rooms; Patient Handoff; Patients; Pediatrics; Qualitative analysis; Systems design; Team size
• ISSN: 0018-7208; 1547-8181; 1547-8181
• DOI: 10.1177/00187208221086342

Objective This study investigates how team cognition occurs in care transitions from operating room (OR) to intensive care unit (ICU). We then seek to understand how the sociotechnical system and team cognition are related. Background Effective handoffs are critical to ensuring patient safety and have been the subject of many improvement efforts. However, the types of team-level cognitive processing during handoffs have not been explored, nor is it clear how the sociotechnical system shapes team cognition. Method We conducted this study in an academic, Level 1 trauma center in the Midwestern United States. Twenty-eight physicians (surgery, anesthesia, pediatric critical care) and nurses (OR, ICU) participated in semi-structured interviews. We performed qualitative content analysis and epistemic network analysis to understand the relationships between system factors, team cognition in handoffs and outcomes. Results Participants described three team cognition functions in handoffs—(1) information exchange, (2) assessment, and (3) planning and decision making; information exchange was mentioned most. Work system factors influenced team cognition. Inter-professional handoffs facilitated information exchange but included large teams with diverse backgrounds communicating, which can be inefficient. Intra-professional handoffs decreased team size and role diversity, which may simplify communication but increase information loss. Participants in inter-professional handoffs reflected on outcomes significantly more in relation to system factors and team cognition (p < 0.001), while participants in intra-professional handoffs discussed handoffs as a task. Conclusion Handoffs include team cognition, which was influenced by work system design. Opportunities for handoff improvement include a flexibly standardized process and supportive tools/technologies. We recommend incorporating perspectives of the patient and family in future work.