Loading…

Texture analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps: can it identify nonresponse to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for additional radiation therapy in rectal cancer patients?

Abstract Background Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) alone can achieve comparable treatment outcomes to chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients. This study aimed to investigate the value of texture analysis (TA) in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps for identifying n...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Gastroenterology report 2024, Vol.12, p.goae035-goae035
Main Authors: Wu, Qianyu, Yi, Yongju, Lai, Bingjia, Li, Jiao, Lian, Yanbang, Chen, Junhong, Wu, Yue, Wang, Xinhua, Cao, Wuteng
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) alone can achieve comparable treatment outcomes to chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients. This study aimed to investigate the value of texture analysis (TA) in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps for identifying non-responders to NCT. Methods This retrospective study included patients with LARC after NCT, and they were categorized into nonresponse group (pTRG 3) and response group (pTRG 0–2) based on pathological tumor regression grade (pTRG). Predictive texture features were extracted from pre- and post-treatment ADC maps to construct a TA model using RandomForest. The ADC model was developed by manually measuring pre- and post-treatment ADC values and calculating their changes. Simultaneously, subjective evaluations based on magnetic resonance imaging assessment of TRG were performed by two experienced radiologists. Model performance was compared using the area under the curve (AUC) and DeLong test. Results A total of 299 patients from two centers were divided into three cohorts: the primary cohort (center A; n = 194, with 36 non-responders and 158 responders), the internal validation cohort (center A; n = 49, with 9 non-responders) and external validation cohort (center B; n = 56, with 33 non-responders). The TA model was constructed by post_mean, mean_change, post_skewness, post_entropy, and entropy_change, which outperformed both the ADC model and subjective evaluations with an impressive AUC of 0.997 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.975–1.000) in the primary cohort. Robust performances were observed in internal and external validation cohorts, with AUCs of 0.919 (95% CI, 0.805–0.978) and 0.938 (95% CI, 0.840–0.985), respectively. Conclusions The TA model has the potential to serve as an imaging biomarker for identifying nonresponse to NCT in LARC patients, providing a valuable reference for these patients considering additional radiation therapy.
ISSN:2052-0034
2052-0034
DOI:10.1093/gastro/goae035