Loading…
Affective Disruption During Forced Ethanol Abstinence in C57BL/6J and C57BL/6NJ Mice
Background In alcohol‐dependent individuals, acute alcohol withdrawal results in severe physiological disruption, including potentially lethal central nervous system hyperexcitability. Although benzodiazepines successfully mitigate such symptoms, this treatment does not significantly reduce recidivi...
Saved in:
Published in: | Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research clinical and experimental research, 2020-10, Vol.44 (10), p.2019-2030 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4133-4af52dc3e4329f430f31fc33146702b1f6fbc69acb53abcaabdffe88049040c63 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4133-4af52dc3e4329f430f31fc33146702b1f6fbc69acb53abcaabdffe88049040c63 |
container_end_page | 2030 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 2019 |
container_title | Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Hartmann, Matthew C. Haney, Megan M. Smith, Caitlin G. Kumar, Vivek Rosenwasser, Alan M. |
description | Background
In alcohol‐dependent individuals, acute alcohol withdrawal results in severe physiological disruption, including potentially lethal central nervous system hyperexcitability. Although benzodiazepines successfully mitigate such symptoms, this treatment does not significantly reduce recidivism rates in postdependent individuals. Instead, persistent affective disturbances that often emerge weeks to months after initial detoxification appear to play a significant role in relapse risk; however, it remains unclear whether genetic predispositions contribute to their emergence, severity, and/or duration. Interestingly, significant genotypic and phenotypic differences have been observed among distinct C57BL/6 (B6) substrains, and, in particular, C57BL/6J (B6J) mice have been found to reliably exhibit higher voluntary ethanol (EtOH) intake and EtOH preference compared to several C57BL/6N (B6N)‐derived substrains. To date, however, B6 substrains have not been directly compared on measures of acute withdrawal severity or affective–behavioral disruption during extended abstinence.
Methods
Male and female B6J and B6NJ mice were exposed to either a 7‐day chronic intermittent EtOH vapor (CIE) protocol or to ordinary room air in inhalation chambers. Subsequently, blood EtOH concentrations and handling‐induced convulsions were evaluated during acute withdrawal, and mice were then tested weekly for affective behavior on the sucrose preference test, light–dark box test, and forced swim test throughout 4 weeks of (forced) abstinence.
Results
Despite documented differences in voluntary EtOH intake between these substrains, we found little evidence for substrain differences in either acute withdrawal or long‐term abstinence between B6J and B6NJ mice.
Conclusions
In B6J and B6NJ mice, both the acute and long‐term sequelae of EtOH withdrawal are dependent on largely nonoverlapping gene networks relative to those underlying voluntary EtOH drinking.
C57BL/6NJ (B6NJ) mice display more persistent behavioral depression in the forced swim test following chronic‐intermittent ethanol (EtOH) vapor exposure compared to C57BL/6J (B6J) mice. However, this trend was not observed in the sucrose preference test, suggesting that substrain differences in abstinence‐induced behavioral depression are assay specific. Overall, these data support previous findings that the emergence of affective disturbances in postdependent mice follows distinct temporal trajectories which depend on several |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/acer.14443 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11060412</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2451148627</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4133-4af52dc3e4329f430f31fc33146702b1f6fbc69acb53abcaabdffe88049040c63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kdFqFDEUhoModq3e-AAS8EaEac9JMpmZK1m3W7WsClKvQyaTtCmzyZrMVPr2pm5b1AtzE0I-Pv5zfkJeIhxhOcfa2HSEQgj-iCyw5lABa5rHZAEo6koCtAfkWc5XACBaKZ-SA85ayYRgC3K-dM6ayV9beuJzmneTj4GezMmHC3oak7EDXU-XOsSRLvs8-WCDsdQHuqqb95tjeUZ1GO4fX87oZ2_sc_LE6THbF3f3Ifl-uj5ffaw2Xz98Wi03lRHIeSW0q9lguBWcdU5wcByd4RyFbID16KTrjey06Wuue6N1P5SwbQuiAwFG8kPybu_dzf3WDsaGKelR7ZLf6nSjovbq75_gL9VFvFaIIEEgK4Y3d4YUf8w2T2rrs7HjqIONc1ZM8Lbryk6xoK__Qa_inEKZr1A1Ylktawr1dk-ZFHNO1j2kQVC3banbttTvtgr86s_8D-h9PQXAPfDTj_bmPyq1XK2_7aW_ALkNnRY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2451148627</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Affective Disruption During Forced Ethanol Abstinence in C57BL/6J and C57BL/6NJ Mice</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Hartmann, Matthew C. ; Haney, Megan M. ; Smith, Caitlin G. ; Kumar, Vivek ; Rosenwasser, Alan M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hartmann, Matthew C. ; Haney, Megan M. ; Smith, Caitlin G. ; Kumar, Vivek ; Rosenwasser, Alan M.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
In alcohol‐dependent individuals, acute alcohol withdrawal results in severe physiological disruption, including potentially lethal central nervous system hyperexcitability. Although benzodiazepines successfully mitigate such symptoms, this treatment does not significantly reduce recidivism rates in postdependent individuals. Instead, persistent affective disturbances that often emerge weeks to months after initial detoxification appear to play a significant role in relapse risk; however, it remains unclear whether genetic predispositions contribute to their emergence, severity, and/or duration. Interestingly, significant genotypic and phenotypic differences have been observed among distinct C57BL/6 (B6) substrains, and, in particular, C57BL/6J (B6J) mice have been found to reliably exhibit higher voluntary ethanol (EtOH) intake and EtOH preference compared to several C57BL/6N (B6N)‐derived substrains. To date, however, B6 substrains have not been directly compared on measures of acute withdrawal severity or affective–behavioral disruption during extended abstinence.
Methods
Male and female B6J and B6NJ mice were exposed to either a 7‐day chronic intermittent EtOH vapor (CIE) protocol or to ordinary room air in inhalation chambers. Subsequently, blood EtOH concentrations and handling‐induced convulsions were evaluated during acute withdrawal, and mice were then tested weekly for affective behavior on the sucrose preference test, light–dark box test, and forced swim test throughout 4 weeks of (forced) abstinence.
Results
Despite documented differences in voluntary EtOH intake between these substrains, we found little evidence for substrain differences in either acute withdrawal or long‐term abstinence between B6J and B6NJ mice.
Conclusions
In B6J and B6NJ mice, both the acute and long‐term sequelae of EtOH withdrawal are dependent on largely nonoverlapping gene networks relative to those underlying voluntary EtOH drinking.
C57BL/6NJ (B6NJ) mice display more persistent behavioral depression in the forced swim test following chronic‐intermittent ethanol (EtOH) vapor exposure compared to C57BL/6J (B6J) mice. However, this trend was not observed in the sucrose preference test, suggesting that substrain differences in abstinence‐induced behavioral depression are assay specific. Overall, these data support previous findings that the emergence of affective disturbances in postdependent mice follows distinct temporal trajectories which depend on several factors, including both genotype and the behavioral assays utilized.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0145-6008</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-0277</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/acer.14443</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32862442</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Abstinence ; Addictive behaviors ; Affect - drug effects ; Affective Behavior ; Alcohol Abstinence ; Alcohol Abstinence - psychology ; Alcohol use ; Alcohol withdrawal ; Animals ; B6J ; B6NJ ; Benzodiazepines ; Central nervous system ; CIE ; Complications ; Convulsions ; Depression - etiology ; Depression - genetics ; Depression - psychology ; Detoxification ; Drinking behavior ; Emotional behavior ; Ethanol ; Female ; Inhalation ; Male ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred C57BL ; Rodents ; Substance Withdrawal Syndrome - genetics ; Substance Withdrawal Syndrome - psychology ; Sucrose</subject><ispartof>Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2020-10, Vol.44 (10), p.2019-2030</ispartof><rights>2020 by the Research Society on Alcoholism</rights><rights>2020 by the Research Society on Alcoholism.</rights><rights>2020 Research Society on Alcoholism</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4133-4af52dc3e4329f430f31fc33146702b1f6fbc69acb53abcaabdffe88049040c63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4133-4af52dc3e4329f430f31fc33146702b1f6fbc69acb53abcaabdffe88049040c63</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9676-5195</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32862442$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hartmann, Matthew C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haney, Megan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Caitlin G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Vivek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenwasser, Alan M.</creatorcontrib><title>Affective Disruption During Forced Ethanol Abstinence in C57BL/6J and C57BL/6NJ Mice</title><title>Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research</title><addtitle>Alcohol Clin Exp Res</addtitle><description>Background
In alcohol‐dependent individuals, acute alcohol withdrawal results in severe physiological disruption, including potentially lethal central nervous system hyperexcitability. Although benzodiazepines successfully mitigate such symptoms, this treatment does not significantly reduce recidivism rates in postdependent individuals. Instead, persistent affective disturbances that often emerge weeks to months after initial detoxification appear to play a significant role in relapse risk; however, it remains unclear whether genetic predispositions contribute to their emergence, severity, and/or duration. Interestingly, significant genotypic and phenotypic differences have been observed among distinct C57BL/6 (B6) substrains, and, in particular, C57BL/6J (B6J) mice have been found to reliably exhibit higher voluntary ethanol (EtOH) intake and EtOH preference compared to several C57BL/6N (B6N)‐derived substrains. To date, however, B6 substrains have not been directly compared on measures of acute withdrawal severity or affective–behavioral disruption during extended abstinence.
Methods
Male and female B6J and B6NJ mice were exposed to either a 7‐day chronic intermittent EtOH vapor (CIE) protocol or to ordinary room air in inhalation chambers. Subsequently, blood EtOH concentrations and handling‐induced convulsions were evaluated during acute withdrawal, and mice were then tested weekly for affective behavior on the sucrose preference test, light–dark box test, and forced swim test throughout 4 weeks of (forced) abstinence.
Results
Despite documented differences in voluntary EtOH intake between these substrains, we found little evidence for substrain differences in either acute withdrawal or long‐term abstinence between B6J and B6NJ mice.
Conclusions
In B6J and B6NJ mice, both the acute and long‐term sequelae of EtOH withdrawal are dependent on largely nonoverlapping gene networks relative to those underlying voluntary EtOH drinking.
C57BL/6NJ (B6NJ) mice display more persistent behavioral depression in the forced swim test following chronic‐intermittent ethanol (EtOH) vapor exposure compared to C57BL/6J (B6J) mice. However, this trend was not observed in the sucrose preference test, suggesting that substrain differences in abstinence‐induced behavioral depression are assay specific. Overall, these data support previous findings that the emergence of affective disturbances in postdependent mice follows distinct temporal trajectories which depend on several factors, including both genotype and the behavioral assays utilized.</description><subject>Abstinence</subject><subject>Addictive behaviors</subject><subject>Affect - drug effects</subject><subject>Affective Behavior</subject><subject>Alcohol Abstinence</subject><subject>Alcohol Abstinence - psychology</subject><subject>Alcohol use</subject><subject>Alcohol withdrawal</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>B6J</subject><subject>B6NJ</subject><subject>Benzodiazepines</subject><subject>Central nervous system</subject><subject>CIE</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Convulsions</subject><subject>Depression - etiology</subject><subject>Depression - genetics</subject><subject>Depression - psychology</subject><subject>Detoxification</subject><subject>Drinking behavior</subject><subject>Emotional behavior</subject><subject>Ethanol</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Inhalation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mice, Inbred C57BL</subject><subject>Rodents</subject><subject>Substance Withdrawal Syndrome - genetics</subject><subject>Substance Withdrawal Syndrome - psychology</subject><subject>Sucrose</subject><issn>0145-6008</issn><issn>1530-0277</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kdFqFDEUhoModq3e-AAS8EaEac9JMpmZK1m3W7WsClKvQyaTtCmzyZrMVPr2pm5b1AtzE0I-Pv5zfkJeIhxhOcfa2HSEQgj-iCyw5lABa5rHZAEo6koCtAfkWc5XACBaKZ-SA85ayYRgC3K-dM6ayV9beuJzmneTj4GezMmHC3oak7EDXU-XOsSRLvs8-WCDsdQHuqqb95tjeUZ1GO4fX87oZ2_sc_LE6THbF3f3Ifl-uj5ffaw2Xz98Wi03lRHIeSW0q9lguBWcdU5wcByd4RyFbID16KTrjey06Wuue6N1P5SwbQuiAwFG8kPybu_dzf3WDsaGKelR7ZLf6nSjovbq75_gL9VFvFaIIEEgK4Y3d4YUf8w2T2rrs7HjqIONc1ZM8Lbryk6xoK__Qa_inEKZr1A1Ylktawr1dk-ZFHNO1j2kQVC3banbttTvtgr86s_8D-h9PQXAPfDTj_bmPyq1XK2_7aW_ALkNnRY</recordid><startdate>202010</startdate><enddate>202010</enddate><creator>Hartmann, Matthew C.</creator><creator>Haney, Megan M.</creator><creator>Smith, Caitlin G.</creator><creator>Kumar, Vivek</creator><creator>Rosenwasser, Alan M.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9676-5195</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202010</creationdate><title>Affective Disruption During Forced Ethanol Abstinence in C57BL/6J and C57BL/6NJ Mice</title><author>Hartmann, Matthew C. ; Haney, Megan M. ; Smith, Caitlin G. ; Kumar, Vivek ; Rosenwasser, Alan M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4133-4af52dc3e4329f430f31fc33146702b1f6fbc69acb53abcaabdffe88049040c63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abstinence</topic><topic>Addictive behaviors</topic><topic>Affect - drug effects</topic><topic>Affective Behavior</topic><topic>Alcohol Abstinence</topic><topic>Alcohol Abstinence - psychology</topic><topic>Alcohol use</topic><topic>Alcohol withdrawal</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>B6J</topic><topic>B6NJ</topic><topic>Benzodiazepines</topic><topic>Central nervous system</topic><topic>CIE</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Convulsions</topic><topic>Depression - etiology</topic><topic>Depression - genetics</topic><topic>Depression - psychology</topic><topic>Detoxification</topic><topic>Drinking behavior</topic><topic>Emotional behavior</topic><topic>Ethanol</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Inhalation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mice, Inbred C57BL</topic><topic>Rodents</topic><topic>Substance Withdrawal Syndrome - genetics</topic><topic>Substance Withdrawal Syndrome - psychology</topic><topic>Sucrose</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hartmann, Matthew C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haney, Megan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Caitlin G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Vivek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenwasser, Alan M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hartmann, Matthew C.</au><au>Haney, Megan M.</au><au>Smith, Caitlin G.</au><au>Kumar, Vivek</au><au>Rosenwasser, Alan M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Affective Disruption During Forced Ethanol Abstinence in C57BL/6J and C57BL/6NJ Mice</atitle><jtitle>Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research</jtitle><addtitle>Alcohol Clin Exp Res</addtitle><date>2020-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2019</spage><epage>2030</epage><pages>2019-2030</pages><issn>0145-6008</issn><eissn>1530-0277</eissn><abstract>Background
In alcohol‐dependent individuals, acute alcohol withdrawal results in severe physiological disruption, including potentially lethal central nervous system hyperexcitability. Although benzodiazepines successfully mitigate such symptoms, this treatment does not significantly reduce recidivism rates in postdependent individuals. Instead, persistent affective disturbances that often emerge weeks to months after initial detoxification appear to play a significant role in relapse risk; however, it remains unclear whether genetic predispositions contribute to their emergence, severity, and/or duration. Interestingly, significant genotypic and phenotypic differences have been observed among distinct C57BL/6 (B6) substrains, and, in particular, C57BL/6J (B6J) mice have been found to reliably exhibit higher voluntary ethanol (EtOH) intake and EtOH preference compared to several C57BL/6N (B6N)‐derived substrains. To date, however, B6 substrains have not been directly compared on measures of acute withdrawal severity or affective–behavioral disruption during extended abstinence.
Methods
Male and female B6J and B6NJ mice were exposed to either a 7‐day chronic intermittent EtOH vapor (CIE) protocol or to ordinary room air in inhalation chambers. Subsequently, blood EtOH concentrations and handling‐induced convulsions were evaluated during acute withdrawal, and mice were then tested weekly for affective behavior on the sucrose preference test, light–dark box test, and forced swim test throughout 4 weeks of (forced) abstinence.
Results
Despite documented differences in voluntary EtOH intake between these substrains, we found little evidence for substrain differences in either acute withdrawal or long‐term abstinence between B6J and B6NJ mice.
Conclusions
In B6J and B6NJ mice, both the acute and long‐term sequelae of EtOH withdrawal are dependent on largely nonoverlapping gene networks relative to those underlying voluntary EtOH drinking.
C57BL/6NJ (B6NJ) mice display more persistent behavioral depression in the forced swim test following chronic‐intermittent ethanol (EtOH) vapor exposure compared to C57BL/6J (B6J) mice. However, this trend was not observed in the sucrose preference test, suggesting that substrain differences in abstinence‐induced behavioral depression are assay specific. Overall, these data support previous findings that the emergence of affective disturbances in postdependent mice follows distinct temporal trajectories which depend on several factors, including both genotype and the behavioral assays utilized.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>32862442</pmid><doi>10.1111/acer.14443</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9676-5195</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0145-6008 |
ispartof | Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2020-10, Vol.44 (10), p.2019-2030 |
issn | 0145-6008 1530-0277 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11060412 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Abstinence Addictive behaviors Affect - drug effects Affective Behavior Alcohol Abstinence Alcohol Abstinence - psychology Alcohol use Alcohol withdrawal Animals B6J B6NJ Benzodiazepines Central nervous system CIE Complications Convulsions Depression - etiology Depression - genetics Depression - psychology Detoxification Drinking behavior Emotional behavior Ethanol Female Inhalation Male Mice Mice, Inbred C57BL Rodents Substance Withdrawal Syndrome - genetics Substance Withdrawal Syndrome - psychology Sucrose |
title | Affective Disruption During Forced Ethanol Abstinence in C57BL/6J and C57BL/6NJ Mice |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A42%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Affective%20Disruption%20During%20Forced%20Ethanol%20Abstinence%20in%20C57BL/6J%20and%20C57BL/6NJ%20Mice&rft.jtitle=Alcoholism,%20clinical%20and%20experimental%20research&rft.au=Hartmann,%20Matthew%20C.&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2019&rft.epage=2030&rft.pages=2019-2030&rft.issn=0145-6008&rft.eissn=1530-0277&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/acer.14443&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2451148627%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4133-4af52dc3e4329f430f31fc33146702b1f6fbc69acb53abcaabdffe88049040c63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2451148627&rft_id=info:pmid/32862442&rfr_iscdi=true |