Loading…

Affective Disruption During Forced Ethanol Abstinence in C57BL/6J and C57BL/6NJ Mice

Background In alcohol‐dependent individuals, acute alcohol withdrawal results in severe physiological disruption, including potentially lethal central nervous system hyperexcitability. Although benzodiazepines successfully mitigate such symptoms, this treatment does not significantly reduce recidivi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research clinical and experimental research, 2020-10, Vol.44 (10), p.2019-2030
Main Authors: Hartmann, Matthew C., Haney, Megan M., Smith, Caitlin G., Kumar, Vivek, Rosenwasser, Alan M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4133-4af52dc3e4329f430f31fc33146702b1f6fbc69acb53abcaabdffe88049040c63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4133-4af52dc3e4329f430f31fc33146702b1f6fbc69acb53abcaabdffe88049040c63
container_end_page 2030
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2019
container_title Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research
container_volume 44
creator Hartmann, Matthew C.
Haney, Megan M.
Smith, Caitlin G.
Kumar, Vivek
Rosenwasser, Alan M.
description Background In alcohol‐dependent individuals, acute alcohol withdrawal results in severe physiological disruption, including potentially lethal central nervous system hyperexcitability. Although benzodiazepines successfully mitigate such symptoms, this treatment does not significantly reduce recidivism rates in postdependent individuals. Instead, persistent affective disturbances that often emerge weeks to months after initial detoxification appear to play a significant role in relapse risk; however, it remains unclear whether genetic predispositions contribute to their emergence, severity, and/or duration. Interestingly, significant genotypic and phenotypic differences have been observed among distinct C57BL/6 (B6) substrains, and, in particular, C57BL/6J (B6J) mice have been found to reliably exhibit higher voluntary ethanol (EtOH) intake and EtOH preference compared to several C57BL/6N (B6N)‐derived substrains. To date, however, B6 substrains have not been directly compared on measures of acute withdrawal severity or affective–behavioral disruption during extended abstinence. Methods Male and female B6J and B6NJ mice were exposed to either a 7‐day chronic intermittent EtOH vapor (CIE) protocol or to ordinary room air in inhalation chambers. Subsequently, blood EtOH concentrations and handling‐induced convulsions were evaluated during acute withdrawal, and mice were then tested weekly for affective behavior on the sucrose preference test, light–dark box test, and forced swim test throughout 4 weeks of (forced) abstinence. Results Despite documented differences in voluntary EtOH intake between these substrains, we found little evidence for substrain differences in either acute withdrawal or long‐term abstinence between B6J and B6NJ mice. Conclusions In B6J and B6NJ mice, both the acute and long‐term sequelae of EtOH withdrawal are dependent on largely nonoverlapping gene networks relative to those underlying voluntary EtOH drinking. C57BL/6NJ (B6NJ) mice display more persistent behavioral depression in the forced swim test following chronic‐intermittent ethanol (EtOH) vapor exposure compared to C57BL/6J (B6J) mice. However, this trend was not observed in the sucrose preference test, suggesting that substrain differences in abstinence‐induced behavioral depression are assay specific. Overall, these data support previous findings that the emergence of affective disturbances in postdependent mice follows distinct temporal trajectories which depend on several
doi_str_mv 10.1111/acer.14443
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11060412</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2451148627</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4133-4af52dc3e4329f430f31fc33146702b1f6fbc69acb53abcaabdffe88049040c63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kdFqFDEUhoModq3e-AAS8EaEac9JMpmZK1m3W7WsClKvQyaTtCmzyZrMVPr2pm5b1AtzE0I-Pv5zfkJeIhxhOcfa2HSEQgj-iCyw5lABa5rHZAEo6koCtAfkWc5XACBaKZ-SA85ayYRgC3K-dM6ayV9beuJzmneTj4GezMmHC3oak7EDXU-XOsSRLvs8-WCDsdQHuqqb95tjeUZ1GO4fX87oZ2_sc_LE6THbF3f3Ifl-uj5ffaw2Xz98Wi03lRHIeSW0q9lguBWcdU5wcByd4RyFbID16KTrjey06Wuue6N1P5SwbQuiAwFG8kPybu_dzf3WDsaGKelR7ZLf6nSjovbq75_gL9VFvFaIIEEgK4Y3d4YUf8w2T2rrs7HjqIONc1ZM8Lbryk6xoK__Qa_inEKZr1A1Ylktawr1dk-ZFHNO1j2kQVC3banbttTvtgr86s_8D-h9PQXAPfDTj_bmPyq1XK2_7aW_ALkNnRY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2451148627</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Affective Disruption During Forced Ethanol Abstinence in C57BL/6J and C57BL/6NJ Mice</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Hartmann, Matthew C. ; Haney, Megan M. ; Smith, Caitlin G. ; Kumar, Vivek ; Rosenwasser, Alan M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hartmann, Matthew C. ; Haney, Megan M. ; Smith, Caitlin G. ; Kumar, Vivek ; Rosenwasser, Alan M.</creatorcontrib><description>Background In alcohol‐dependent individuals, acute alcohol withdrawal results in severe physiological disruption, including potentially lethal central nervous system hyperexcitability. Although benzodiazepines successfully mitigate such symptoms, this treatment does not significantly reduce recidivism rates in postdependent individuals. Instead, persistent affective disturbances that often emerge weeks to months after initial detoxification appear to play a significant role in relapse risk; however, it remains unclear whether genetic predispositions contribute to their emergence, severity, and/or duration. Interestingly, significant genotypic and phenotypic differences have been observed among distinct C57BL/6 (B6) substrains, and, in particular, C57BL/6J (B6J) mice have been found to reliably exhibit higher voluntary ethanol (EtOH) intake and EtOH preference compared to several C57BL/6N (B6N)‐derived substrains. To date, however, B6 substrains have not been directly compared on measures of acute withdrawal severity or affective–behavioral disruption during extended abstinence. Methods Male and female B6J and B6NJ mice were exposed to either a 7‐day chronic intermittent EtOH vapor (CIE) protocol or to ordinary room air in inhalation chambers. Subsequently, blood EtOH concentrations and handling‐induced convulsions were evaluated during acute withdrawal, and mice were then tested weekly for affective behavior on the sucrose preference test, light–dark box test, and forced swim test throughout 4 weeks of (forced) abstinence. Results Despite documented differences in voluntary EtOH intake between these substrains, we found little evidence for substrain differences in either acute withdrawal or long‐term abstinence between B6J and B6NJ mice. Conclusions In B6J and B6NJ mice, both the acute and long‐term sequelae of EtOH withdrawal are dependent on largely nonoverlapping gene networks relative to those underlying voluntary EtOH drinking. C57BL/6NJ (B6NJ) mice display more persistent behavioral depression in the forced swim test following chronic‐intermittent ethanol (EtOH) vapor exposure compared to C57BL/6J (B6J) mice. However, this trend was not observed in the sucrose preference test, suggesting that substrain differences in abstinence‐induced behavioral depression are assay specific. Overall, these data support previous findings that the emergence of affective disturbances in postdependent mice follows distinct temporal trajectories which depend on several factors, including both genotype and the behavioral assays utilized.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0145-6008</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-0277</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/acer.14443</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32862442</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Abstinence ; Addictive behaviors ; Affect - drug effects ; Affective Behavior ; Alcohol Abstinence ; Alcohol Abstinence - psychology ; Alcohol use ; Alcohol withdrawal ; Animals ; B6J ; B6NJ ; Benzodiazepines ; Central nervous system ; CIE ; Complications ; Convulsions ; Depression - etiology ; Depression - genetics ; Depression - psychology ; Detoxification ; Drinking behavior ; Emotional behavior ; Ethanol ; Female ; Inhalation ; Male ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred C57BL ; Rodents ; Substance Withdrawal Syndrome - genetics ; Substance Withdrawal Syndrome - psychology ; Sucrose</subject><ispartof>Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2020-10, Vol.44 (10), p.2019-2030</ispartof><rights>2020 by the Research Society on Alcoholism</rights><rights>2020 by the Research Society on Alcoholism.</rights><rights>2020 Research Society on Alcoholism</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4133-4af52dc3e4329f430f31fc33146702b1f6fbc69acb53abcaabdffe88049040c63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4133-4af52dc3e4329f430f31fc33146702b1f6fbc69acb53abcaabdffe88049040c63</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9676-5195</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32862442$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hartmann, Matthew C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haney, Megan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Caitlin G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Vivek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenwasser, Alan M.</creatorcontrib><title>Affective Disruption During Forced Ethanol Abstinence in C57BL/6J and C57BL/6NJ Mice</title><title>Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research</title><addtitle>Alcohol Clin Exp Res</addtitle><description>Background In alcohol‐dependent individuals, acute alcohol withdrawal results in severe physiological disruption, including potentially lethal central nervous system hyperexcitability. Although benzodiazepines successfully mitigate such symptoms, this treatment does not significantly reduce recidivism rates in postdependent individuals. Instead, persistent affective disturbances that often emerge weeks to months after initial detoxification appear to play a significant role in relapse risk; however, it remains unclear whether genetic predispositions contribute to their emergence, severity, and/or duration. Interestingly, significant genotypic and phenotypic differences have been observed among distinct C57BL/6 (B6) substrains, and, in particular, C57BL/6J (B6J) mice have been found to reliably exhibit higher voluntary ethanol (EtOH) intake and EtOH preference compared to several C57BL/6N (B6N)‐derived substrains. To date, however, B6 substrains have not been directly compared on measures of acute withdrawal severity or affective–behavioral disruption during extended abstinence. Methods Male and female B6J and B6NJ mice were exposed to either a 7‐day chronic intermittent EtOH vapor (CIE) protocol or to ordinary room air in inhalation chambers. Subsequently, blood EtOH concentrations and handling‐induced convulsions were evaluated during acute withdrawal, and mice were then tested weekly for affective behavior on the sucrose preference test, light–dark box test, and forced swim test throughout 4 weeks of (forced) abstinence. Results Despite documented differences in voluntary EtOH intake between these substrains, we found little evidence for substrain differences in either acute withdrawal or long‐term abstinence between B6J and B6NJ mice. Conclusions In B6J and B6NJ mice, both the acute and long‐term sequelae of EtOH withdrawal are dependent on largely nonoverlapping gene networks relative to those underlying voluntary EtOH drinking. C57BL/6NJ (B6NJ) mice display more persistent behavioral depression in the forced swim test following chronic‐intermittent ethanol (EtOH) vapor exposure compared to C57BL/6J (B6J) mice. However, this trend was not observed in the sucrose preference test, suggesting that substrain differences in abstinence‐induced behavioral depression are assay specific. Overall, these data support previous findings that the emergence of affective disturbances in postdependent mice follows distinct temporal trajectories which depend on several factors, including both genotype and the behavioral assays utilized.</description><subject>Abstinence</subject><subject>Addictive behaviors</subject><subject>Affect - drug effects</subject><subject>Affective Behavior</subject><subject>Alcohol Abstinence</subject><subject>Alcohol Abstinence - psychology</subject><subject>Alcohol use</subject><subject>Alcohol withdrawal</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>B6J</subject><subject>B6NJ</subject><subject>Benzodiazepines</subject><subject>Central nervous system</subject><subject>CIE</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Convulsions</subject><subject>Depression - etiology</subject><subject>Depression - genetics</subject><subject>Depression - psychology</subject><subject>Detoxification</subject><subject>Drinking behavior</subject><subject>Emotional behavior</subject><subject>Ethanol</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Inhalation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mice, Inbred C57BL</subject><subject>Rodents</subject><subject>Substance Withdrawal Syndrome - genetics</subject><subject>Substance Withdrawal Syndrome - psychology</subject><subject>Sucrose</subject><issn>0145-6008</issn><issn>1530-0277</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kdFqFDEUhoModq3e-AAS8EaEac9JMpmZK1m3W7WsClKvQyaTtCmzyZrMVPr2pm5b1AtzE0I-Pv5zfkJeIhxhOcfa2HSEQgj-iCyw5lABa5rHZAEo6koCtAfkWc5XACBaKZ-SA85ayYRgC3K-dM6ayV9beuJzmneTj4GezMmHC3oak7EDXU-XOsSRLvs8-WCDsdQHuqqb95tjeUZ1GO4fX87oZ2_sc_LE6THbF3f3Ifl-uj5ffaw2Xz98Wi03lRHIeSW0q9lguBWcdU5wcByd4RyFbID16KTrjey06Wuue6N1P5SwbQuiAwFG8kPybu_dzf3WDsaGKelR7ZLf6nSjovbq75_gL9VFvFaIIEEgK4Y3d4YUf8w2T2rrs7HjqIONc1ZM8Lbryk6xoK__Qa_inEKZr1A1Ylktawr1dk-ZFHNO1j2kQVC3banbttTvtgr86s_8D-h9PQXAPfDTj_bmPyq1XK2_7aW_ALkNnRY</recordid><startdate>202010</startdate><enddate>202010</enddate><creator>Hartmann, Matthew C.</creator><creator>Haney, Megan M.</creator><creator>Smith, Caitlin G.</creator><creator>Kumar, Vivek</creator><creator>Rosenwasser, Alan M.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9676-5195</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202010</creationdate><title>Affective Disruption During Forced Ethanol Abstinence in C57BL/6J and C57BL/6NJ Mice</title><author>Hartmann, Matthew C. ; Haney, Megan M. ; Smith, Caitlin G. ; Kumar, Vivek ; Rosenwasser, Alan M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4133-4af52dc3e4329f430f31fc33146702b1f6fbc69acb53abcaabdffe88049040c63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abstinence</topic><topic>Addictive behaviors</topic><topic>Affect - drug effects</topic><topic>Affective Behavior</topic><topic>Alcohol Abstinence</topic><topic>Alcohol Abstinence - psychology</topic><topic>Alcohol use</topic><topic>Alcohol withdrawal</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>B6J</topic><topic>B6NJ</topic><topic>Benzodiazepines</topic><topic>Central nervous system</topic><topic>CIE</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Convulsions</topic><topic>Depression - etiology</topic><topic>Depression - genetics</topic><topic>Depression - psychology</topic><topic>Detoxification</topic><topic>Drinking behavior</topic><topic>Emotional behavior</topic><topic>Ethanol</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Inhalation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mice, Inbred C57BL</topic><topic>Rodents</topic><topic>Substance Withdrawal Syndrome - genetics</topic><topic>Substance Withdrawal Syndrome - psychology</topic><topic>Sucrose</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hartmann, Matthew C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haney, Megan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Caitlin G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Vivek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenwasser, Alan M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hartmann, Matthew C.</au><au>Haney, Megan M.</au><au>Smith, Caitlin G.</au><au>Kumar, Vivek</au><au>Rosenwasser, Alan M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Affective Disruption During Forced Ethanol Abstinence in C57BL/6J and C57BL/6NJ Mice</atitle><jtitle>Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research</jtitle><addtitle>Alcohol Clin Exp Res</addtitle><date>2020-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2019</spage><epage>2030</epage><pages>2019-2030</pages><issn>0145-6008</issn><eissn>1530-0277</eissn><abstract>Background In alcohol‐dependent individuals, acute alcohol withdrawal results in severe physiological disruption, including potentially lethal central nervous system hyperexcitability. Although benzodiazepines successfully mitigate such symptoms, this treatment does not significantly reduce recidivism rates in postdependent individuals. Instead, persistent affective disturbances that often emerge weeks to months after initial detoxification appear to play a significant role in relapse risk; however, it remains unclear whether genetic predispositions contribute to their emergence, severity, and/or duration. Interestingly, significant genotypic and phenotypic differences have been observed among distinct C57BL/6 (B6) substrains, and, in particular, C57BL/6J (B6J) mice have been found to reliably exhibit higher voluntary ethanol (EtOH) intake and EtOH preference compared to several C57BL/6N (B6N)‐derived substrains. To date, however, B6 substrains have not been directly compared on measures of acute withdrawal severity or affective–behavioral disruption during extended abstinence. Methods Male and female B6J and B6NJ mice were exposed to either a 7‐day chronic intermittent EtOH vapor (CIE) protocol or to ordinary room air in inhalation chambers. Subsequently, blood EtOH concentrations and handling‐induced convulsions were evaluated during acute withdrawal, and mice were then tested weekly for affective behavior on the sucrose preference test, light–dark box test, and forced swim test throughout 4 weeks of (forced) abstinence. Results Despite documented differences in voluntary EtOH intake between these substrains, we found little evidence for substrain differences in either acute withdrawal or long‐term abstinence between B6J and B6NJ mice. Conclusions In B6J and B6NJ mice, both the acute and long‐term sequelae of EtOH withdrawal are dependent on largely nonoverlapping gene networks relative to those underlying voluntary EtOH drinking. C57BL/6NJ (B6NJ) mice display more persistent behavioral depression in the forced swim test following chronic‐intermittent ethanol (EtOH) vapor exposure compared to C57BL/6J (B6J) mice. However, this trend was not observed in the sucrose preference test, suggesting that substrain differences in abstinence‐induced behavioral depression are assay specific. Overall, these data support previous findings that the emergence of affective disturbances in postdependent mice follows distinct temporal trajectories which depend on several factors, including both genotype and the behavioral assays utilized.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>32862442</pmid><doi>10.1111/acer.14443</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9676-5195</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0145-6008
ispartof Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2020-10, Vol.44 (10), p.2019-2030
issn 0145-6008
1530-0277
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11060412
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Abstinence
Addictive behaviors
Affect - drug effects
Affective Behavior
Alcohol Abstinence
Alcohol Abstinence - psychology
Alcohol use
Alcohol withdrawal
Animals
B6J
B6NJ
Benzodiazepines
Central nervous system
CIE
Complications
Convulsions
Depression - etiology
Depression - genetics
Depression - psychology
Detoxification
Drinking behavior
Emotional behavior
Ethanol
Female
Inhalation
Male
Mice
Mice, Inbred C57BL
Rodents
Substance Withdrawal Syndrome - genetics
Substance Withdrawal Syndrome - psychology
Sucrose
title Affective Disruption During Forced Ethanol Abstinence in C57BL/6J and C57BL/6NJ Mice
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A42%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Affective%20Disruption%20During%20Forced%20Ethanol%20Abstinence%20in%20C57BL/6J%20and%20C57BL/6NJ%20Mice&rft.jtitle=Alcoholism,%20clinical%20and%20experimental%20research&rft.au=Hartmann,%20Matthew%20C.&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2019&rft.epage=2030&rft.pages=2019-2030&rft.issn=0145-6008&rft.eissn=1530-0277&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/acer.14443&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2451148627%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4133-4af52dc3e4329f430f31fc33146702b1f6fbc69acb53abcaabdffe88049040c63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2451148627&rft_id=info:pmid/32862442&rfr_iscdi=true