Loading…
Comparative Efficacy of Subcutaneous and Intravenous Infliximab and Vedolizumab for Maintenance Treatment of TNF-naive Adult Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis
Background Infliximab and vedolizumab are widely used to treat Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Aims This systematic review and network meta-analysis evaluated comparative efficacy of various regimens for intravenous or subcutaneous infliximab and vedolizumab during maintenance trea...
Saved in:
Published in: | Digestive diseases and sciences 2024-05, Vol.69 (5), p.1808-1825 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-d0bcb85f72d2bd390193cadb9126c1c110096cc92da16aedf0ce96a1713400643 |
container_end_page | 1825 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1808 |
container_title | Digestive diseases and sciences |
container_volume | 69 |
creator | Peyrin-Biroulet, L. Bossuyt, P. Bettenworth, D. Loftus, E. V. Anjie, S. I. D’Haens, G. Saruta, M. Arkkila, P. Park, H. Choi, D. Kim, D- H. Reinisch, W. |
description | Background
Infliximab and vedolizumab are widely used to treat Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC).
Aims
This systematic review and network meta-analysis evaluated comparative efficacy of various regimens for intravenous or subcutaneous infliximab and vedolizumab during maintenance treatment in CD and UC.
Methods
Parallel-group randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified by a systematic literature review (CRD42022383401) and included if they evaluated therapeutics of interest for maintenance treatment of adults with moderate-to-severe luminal CD or UC and assessed clinical remission between Weeks 30 and 60. Clinical remission rates in CD or UC and mucosal healing rates in UC were analyzed in a Bayesian network meta-analysis model. Endoscopic outcomes in CD were synthesized by proportional meta-analysis.
Results
Overall, 13 RCTs were included in the analyses. All vedolizumab studies randomized induction responders to maintenance treatment; infliximab studies used a treat-through design. Subcutaneous infliximab 120 mg every 2 weeks had the highest odds ratio (OR) [95% credible interval] versus placebo for clinical remission during the maintenance phase (CD: 5.90 [1.90–18.2]; UC: 5.45 [1.94–15.3]), with surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values of 0.91 and 0.82, respectively. For mucosal healing in UC, subcutaneous infliximab 120 mg every 2 weeks showed the highest OR (4.90 [1.63–14.1]), with SUCRA value of 0.73, followed by intravenous vedolizumab 300 mg every 4 weeks (SUCRA value, 0.70). Endoscopic outcomes in CD were better with subcutaneous infliximab 120 mg every 2 weeks than intravenous infliximab 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks.
Conclusions
Subcutaneous infliximab showed a favorable efficacy profile for achieving clinical remission and endoscopic outcomes during maintenance treatment in CD or UC.
Graphical Abstract |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10620-023-08252-1 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11098872</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3055651680</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-d0bcb85f72d2bd390193cadb9126c1c110096cc92da16aedf0ce96a1713400643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk2P0zAQjRCILQt_gAOyxIVLwHYaJ-GCStmFSt0FsYWrNXEmu14Su9hOS_mz_BWcdlk-Dpw8o_fmzYdfkjxm9DmjtHjhGRWcppRnKS15zlN2J5mwvMhSnovybjKhTMSYMXGUPPD-mlJaFUzcT46yclpVRSYmyY-57dfgIOgNkpO21QrUjtiWXAy1GgIYtIMnYBqyMMHBBs2YL0zb6W-6h3oPfcbGdvr7MOatdeQMtAlowCgkK4cQejRhFF2dn6YGxlazZugC-RD7RsiTrQ5Xe1XoewjW7chru8WOvNEeweNLMiMXOx8wglqRpQ4YRx4cko-40bjdT3GOYWvdF3KGAVIw0O289g-Tey10Hh_dvMfJp9OT1fxdunz_djGfLVM15SKkDa1VXeZtwRteN1lFWZUpaOqKcaGYYvHelVCq4g0wAdi0VGElgBUsm1Iqptlx8uqgux7qHhuF47U6uXbxSG4nLWj5N2L0lby0Gxmlq7IseFR4dqPg7NcBfZC99gq77vAHkleirDibFkWkPv2Hem0HFzf2MqN5LnImShpZ_MBSznrvsL2dhlE5GkgeDCSjgeTeQJLFoid_7nFb8ssxkZAdCD5C5hLd797_kf0JDEnW7Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3055651680</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Efficacy of Subcutaneous and Intravenous Infliximab and Vedolizumab for Maintenance Treatment of TNF-naive Adult Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Peyrin-Biroulet, L. ; Bossuyt, P. ; Bettenworth, D. ; Loftus, E. V. ; Anjie, S. I. ; D’Haens, G. ; Saruta, M. ; Arkkila, P. ; Park, H. ; Choi, D. ; Kim, D- H. ; Reinisch, W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Peyrin-Biroulet, L. ; Bossuyt, P. ; Bettenworth, D. ; Loftus, E. V. ; Anjie, S. I. ; D’Haens, G. ; Saruta, M. ; Arkkila, P. ; Park, H. ; Choi, D. ; Kim, D- H. ; Reinisch, W.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Infliximab and vedolizumab are widely used to treat Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC).
Aims
This systematic review and network meta-analysis evaluated comparative efficacy of various regimens for intravenous or subcutaneous infliximab and vedolizumab during maintenance treatment in CD and UC.
Methods
Parallel-group randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified by a systematic literature review (CRD42022383401) and included if they evaluated therapeutics of interest for maintenance treatment of adults with moderate-to-severe luminal CD or UC and assessed clinical remission between Weeks 30 and 60. Clinical remission rates in CD or UC and mucosal healing rates in UC were analyzed in a Bayesian network meta-analysis model. Endoscopic outcomes in CD were synthesized by proportional meta-analysis.
Results
Overall, 13 RCTs were included in the analyses. All vedolizumab studies randomized induction responders to maintenance treatment; infliximab studies used a treat-through design. Subcutaneous infliximab 120 mg every 2 weeks had the highest odds ratio (OR) [95% credible interval] versus placebo for clinical remission during the maintenance phase (CD: 5.90 [1.90–18.2]; UC: 5.45 [1.94–15.3]), with surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values of 0.91 and 0.82, respectively. For mucosal healing in UC, subcutaneous infliximab 120 mg every 2 weeks showed the highest OR (4.90 [1.63–14.1]), with SUCRA value of 0.73, followed by intravenous vedolizumab 300 mg every 4 weeks (SUCRA value, 0.70). Endoscopic outcomes in CD were better with subcutaneous infliximab 120 mg every 2 weeks than intravenous infliximab 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks.
Conclusions
Subcutaneous infliximab showed a favorable efficacy profile for achieving clinical remission and endoscopic outcomes during maintenance treatment in CD or UC.
Graphical Abstract</description><identifier>ISSN: 0163-2116</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1573-2568</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2568</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10620-023-08252-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38499736</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Administration, Intravenous ; Adult ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - administration & dosage ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use ; Biochemistry ; Colitis, Ulcerative - drug therapy ; Crohn Disease - drug therapy ; Crohn's disease ; Endoscopy ; Gastroenterology ; Gastrointestinal Agents - administration & dosage ; Gastrointestinal Agents - therapeutic use ; Hepatology ; Humans ; Infliximab - administration & dosage ; Infliximab - therapeutic use ; Injections, Subcutaneous ; Literature reviews ; Maintenance Chemotherapy - methods ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Meta-analysis ; Network Meta-Analysis ; Oncology ; Original ; Original Article ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Remission (Medicine) ; Remission Induction ; Systematic review ; Transplant Surgery ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Digestive diseases and sciences, 2024-05, Vol.69 (5), p.1808-1825</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-d0bcb85f72d2bd390193cadb9126c1c110096cc92da16aedf0ce96a1713400643</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2088-091X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38499736$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peyrin-Biroulet, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bossuyt, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bettenworth, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loftus, E. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anjie, S. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Haens, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saruta, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arkkila, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, D- H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinisch, W.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Efficacy of Subcutaneous and Intravenous Infliximab and Vedolizumab for Maintenance Treatment of TNF-naive Adult Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis</title><title>Digestive diseases and sciences</title><addtitle>Dig Dis Sci</addtitle><addtitle>Dig Dis Sci</addtitle><description>Background
Infliximab and vedolizumab are widely used to treat Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC).
Aims
This systematic review and network meta-analysis evaluated comparative efficacy of various regimens for intravenous or subcutaneous infliximab and vedolizumab during maintenance treatment in CD and UC.
Methods
Parallel-group randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified by a systematic literature review (CRD42022383401) and included if they evaluated therapeutics of interest for maintenance treatment of adults with moderate-to-severe luminal CD or UC and assessed clinical remission between Weeks 30 and 60. Clinical remission rates in CD or UC and mucosal healing rates in UC were analyzed in a Bayesian network meta-analysis model. Endoscopic outcomes in CD were synthesized by proportional meta-analysis.
Results
Overall, 13 RCTs were included in the analyses. All vedolizumab studies randomized induction responders to maintenance treatment; infliximab studies used a treat-through design. Subcutaneous infliximab 120 mg every 2 weeks had the highest odds ratio (OR) [95% credible interval] versus placebo for clinical remission during the maintenance phase (CD: 5.90 [1.90–18.2]; UC: 5.45 [1.94–15.3]), with surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values of 0.91 and 0.82, respectively. For mucosal healing in UC, subcutaneous infliximab 120 mg every 2 weeks showed the highest OR (4.90 [1.63–14.1]), with SUCRA value of 0.73, followed by intravenous vedolizumab 300 mg every 4 weeks (SUCRA value, 0.70). Endoscopic outcomes in CD were better with subcutaneous infliximab 120 mg every 2 weeks than intravenous infliximab 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks.
Conclusions
Subcutaneous infliximab showed a favorable efficacy profile for achieving clinical remission and endoscopic outcomes during maintenance treatment in CD or UC.
Graphical Abstract</description><subject>Administration, Intravenous</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Colitis, Ulcerative - drug therapy</subject><subject>Crohn Disease - drug therapy</subject><subject>Crohn's disease</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Agents - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infliximab - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Infliximab - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Injections, Subcutaneous</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Maintenance Chemotherapy - methods</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Network Meta-Analysis</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Remission (Medicine)</subject><subject>Remission Induction</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Transplant Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0163-2116</issn><issn>1573-2568</issn><issn>1573-2568</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9Uk2P0zAQjRCILQt_gAOyxIVLwHYaJ-GCStmFSt0FsYWrNXEmu14Su9hOS_mz_BWcdlk-Dpw8o_fmzYdfkjxm9DmjtHjhGRWcppRnKS15zlN2J5mwvMhSnovybjKhTMSYMXGUPPD-mlJaFUzcT46yclpVRSYmyY-57dfgIOgNkpO21QrUjtiWXAy1GgIYtIMnYBqyMMHBBs2YL0zb6W-6h3oPfcbGdvr7MOatdeQMtAlowCgkK4cQejRhFF2dn6YGxlazZugC-RD7RsiTrQ5Xe1XoewjW7chru8WOvNEeweNLMiMXOx8wglqRpQ4YRx4cko-40bjdT3GOYWvdF3KGAVIw0O289g-Tey10Hh_dvMfJp9OT1fxdunz_djGfLVM15SKkDa1VXeZtwRteN1lFWZUpaOqKcaGYYvHelVCq4g0wAdi0VGElgBUsm1Iqptlx8uqgux7qHhuF47U6uXbxSG4nLWj5N2L0lby0Gxmlq7IseFR4dqPg7NcBfZC99gq77vAHkleirDibFkWkPv2Hem0HFzf2MqN5LnImShpZ_MBSznrvsL2dhlE5GkgeDCSjgeTeQJLFoid_7nFb8ssxkZAdCD5C5hLd797_kf0JDEnW7Q</recordid><startdate>20240501</startdate><enddate>20240501</enddate><creator>Peyrin-Biroulet, L.</creator><creator>Bossuyt, P.</creator><creator>Bettenworth, D.</creator><creator>Loftus, E. V.</creator><creator>Anjie, S. I.</creator><creator>D’Haens, G.</creator><creator>Saruta, M.</creator><creator>Arkkila, P.</creator><creator>Park, H.</creator><creator>Choi, D.</creator><creator>Kim, D- H.</creator><creator>Reinisch, W.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2088-091X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240501</creationdate><title>Comparative Efficacy of Subcutaneous and Intravenous Infliximab and Vedolizumab for Maintenance Treatment of TNF-naive Adult Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis</title><author>Peyrin-Biroulet, L. ; Bossuyt, P. ; Bettenworth, D. ; Loftus, E. V. ; Anjie, S. I. ; D’Haens, G. ; Saruta, M. ; Arkkila, P. ; Park, H. ; Choi, D. ; Kim, D- H. ; Reinisch, W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-d0bcb85f72d2bd390193cadb9126c1c110096cc92da16aedf0ce96a1713400643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Administration, Intravenous</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Colitis, Ulcerative - drug therapy</topic><topic>Crohn Disease - drug therapy</topic><topic>Crohn's disease</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Agents - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infliximab - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Infliximab - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Injections, Subcutaneous</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Maintenance Chemotherapy - methods</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Network Meta-Analysis</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Remission (Medicine)</topic><topic>Remission Induction</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Transplant Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peyrin-Biroulet, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bossuyt, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bettenworth, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loftus, E. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anjie, S. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Haens, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saruta, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arkkila, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, D- H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinisch, W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Digestive diseases and sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peyrin-Biroulet, L.</au><au>Bossuyt, P.</au><au>Bettenworth, D.</au><au>Loftus, E. V.</au><au>Anjie, S. I.</au><au>D’Haens, G.</au><au>Saruta, M.</au><au>Arkkila, P.</au><au>Park, H.</au><au>Choi, D.</au><au>Kim, D- H.</au><au>Reinisch, W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Efficacy of Subcutaneous and Intravenous Infliximab and Vedolizumab for Maintenance Treatment of TNF-naive Adult Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Digestive diseases and sciences</jtitle><stitle>Dig Dis Sci</stitle><addtitle>Dig Dis Sci</addtitle><date>2024-05-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1808</spage><epage>1825</epage><pages>1808-1825</pages><issn>0163-2116</issn><issn>1573-2568</issn><eissn>1573-2568</eissn><abstract>Background
Infliximab and vedolizumab are widely used to treat Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC).
Aims
This systematic review and network meta-analysis evaluated comparative efficacy of various regimens for intravenous or subcutaneous infliximab and vedolizumab during maintenance treatment in CD and UC.
Methods
Parallel-group randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified by a systematic literature review (CRD42022383401) and included if they evaluated therapeutics of interest for maintenance treatment of adults with moderate-to-severe luminal CD or UC and assessed clinical remission between Weeks 30 and 60. Clinical remission rates in CD or UC and mucosal healing rates in UC were analyzed in a Bayesian network meta-analysis model. Endoscopic outcomes in CD were synthesized by proportional meta-analysis.
Results
Overall, 13 RCTs were included in the analyses. All vedolizumab studies randomized induction responders to maintenance treatment; infliximab studies used a treat-through design. Subcutaneous infliximab 120 mg every 2 weeks had the highest odds ratio (OR) [95% credible interval] versus placebo for clinical remission during the maintenance phase (CD: 5.90 [1.90–18.2]; UC: 5.45 [1.94–15.3]), with surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values of 0.91 and 0.82, respectively. For mucosal healing in UC, subcutaneous infliximab 120 mg every 2 weeks showed the highest OR (4.90 [1.63–14.1]), with SUCRA value of 0.73, followed by intravenous vedolizumab 300 mg every 4 weeks (SUCRA value, 0.70). Endoscopic outcomes in CD were better with subcutaneous infliximab 120 mg every 2 weeks than intravenous infliximab 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks.
Conclusions
Subcutaneous infliximab showed a favorable efficacy profile for achieving clinical remission and endoscopic outcomes during maintenance treatment in CD or UC.
Graphical Abstract</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>38499736</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10620-023-08252-1</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2088-091X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0163-2116 |
ispartof | Digestive diseases and sciences, 2024-05, Vol.69 (5), p.1808-1825 |
issn | 0163-2116 1573-2568 1573-2568 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11098872 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Administration, Intravenous Adult Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - administration & dosage Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use Biochemistry Colitis, Ulcerative - drug therapy Crohn Disease - drug therapy Crohn's disease Endoscopy Gastroenterology Gastrointestinal Agents - administration & dosage Gastrointestinal Agents - therapeutic use Hepatology Humans Infliximab - administration & dosage Infliximab - therapeutic use Injections, Subcutaneous Literature reviews Maintenance Chemotherapy - methods Medicine Medicine & Public Health Meta-analysis Network Meta-Analysis Oncology Original Original Article Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Remission (Medicine) Remission Induction Systematic review Transplant Surgery Treatment Outcome |
title | Comparative Efficacy of Subcutaneous and Intravenous Infliximab and Vedolizumab for Maintenance Treatment of TNF-naive Adult Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T10%3A53%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Efficacy%20of%20Subcutaneous%20and%20Intravenous%20Infliximab%20and%20Vedolizumab%20for%20Maintenance%20Treatment%20of%20TNF-naive%20Adult%20Patients%20with%20Inflammatory%20Bowel%20Disease:%20A%20Systematic%20Literature%20Review%20and%20Network%20Meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Digestive%20diseases%20and%20sciences&rft.au=Peyrin-Biroulet,%20L.&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1808&rft.epage=1825&rft.pages=1808-1825&rft.issn=0163-2116&rft.eissn=1573-2568&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10620-023-08252-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3055651680%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-d0bcb85f72d2bd390193cadb9126c1c110096cc92da16aedf0ce96a1713400643%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3055651680&rft_id=info:pmid/38499736&rfr_iscdi=true |