Loading…

Comparative Efficacy of Subcutaneous and Intravenous Infliximab and Vedolizumab for Maintenance Treatment of TNF-naive Adult Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis

Background Infliximab and vedolizumab are widely used to treat Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Aims This systematic review and network meta-analysis evaluated comparative efficacy of various regimens for intravenous or subcutaneous infliximab and vedolizumab during maintenance trea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Digestive diseases and sciences 2024-05, Vol.69 (5), p.1808-1825
Main Authors: Peyrin-Biroulet, L., Bossuyt, P., Bettenworth, D., Loftus, E. V., Anjie, S. I., D’Haens, G., Saruta, M., Arkkila, P., Park, H., Choi, D., Kim, D- H., Reinisch, W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-d0bcb85f72d2bd390193cadb9126c1c110096cc92da16aedf0ce96a1713400643
container_end_page 1825
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1808
container_title Digestive diseases and sciences
container_volume 69
creator Peyrin-Biroulet, L.
Bossuyt, P.
Bettenworth, D.
Loftus, E. V.
Anjie, S. I.
D’Haens, G.
Saruta, M.
Arkkila, P.
Park, H.
Choi, D.
Kim, D- H.
Reinisch, W.
description Background Infliximab and vedolizumab are widely used to treat Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Aims This systematic review and network meta-analysis evaluated comparative efficacy of various regimens for intravenous or subcutaneous infliximab and vedolizumab during maintenance treatment in CD and UC. Methods Parallel-group randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified by a systematic literature review (CRD42022383401) and included if they evaluated therapeutics of interest for maintenance treatment of adults with moderate-to-severe luminal CD or UC and assessed clinical remission between Weeks 30 and 60. Clinical remission rates in CD or UC and mucosal healing rates in UC were analyzed in a Bayesian network meta-analysis model. Endoscopic outcomes in CD were synthesized by proportional meta-analysis. Results Overall, 13 RCTs were included in the analyses. All vedolizumab studies randomized induction responders to maintenance treatment; infliximab studies used a treat-through design. Subcutaneous infliximab 120 mg every 2 weeks had the highest odds ratio (OR) [95% credible interval] versus placebo for clinical remission during the maintenance phase (CD: 5.90 [1.90–18.2]; UC: 5.45 [1.94–15.3]), with surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values of 0.91 and 0.82, respectively. For mucosal healing in UC, subcutaneous infliximab 120 mg every 2 weeks showed the highest OR (4.90 [1.63–14.1]), with SUCRA value of 0.73, followed by intravenous vedolizumab 300 mg every 4 weeks (SUCRA value, 0.70). Endoscopic outcomes in CD were better with subcutaneous infliximab 120 mg every 2 weeks than intravenous infliximab 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks. Conclusions Subcutaneous infliximab showed a favorable efficacy profile for achieving clinical remission and endoscopic outcomes during maintenance treatment in CD or UC. Graphical Abstract
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10620-023-08252-1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11098872</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3055651680</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-d0bcb85f72d2bd390193cadb9126c1c110096cc92da16aedf0ce96a1713400643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk2P0zAQjRCILQt_gAOyxIVLwHYaJ-GCStmFSt0FsYWrNXEmu14Su9hOS_mz_BWcdlk-Dpw8o_fmzYdfkjxm9DmjtHjhGRWcppRnKS15zlN2J5mwvMhSnovybjKhTMSYMXGUPPD-mlJaFUzcT46yclpVRSYmyY-57dfgIOgNkpO21QrUjtiWXAy1GgIYtIMnYBqyMMHBBs2YL0zb6W-6h3oPfcbGdvr7MOatdeQMtAlowCgkK4cQejRhFF2dn6YGxlazZugC-RD7RsiTrQ5Xe1XoewjW7chru8WOvNEeweNLMiMXOx8wglqRpQ4YRx4cko-40bjdT3GOYWvdF3KGAVIw0O289g-Tey10Hh_dvMfJp9OT1fxdunz_djGfLVM15SKkDa1VXeZtwRteN1lFWZUpaOqKcaGYYvHelVCq4g0wAdi0VGElgBUsm1Iqptlx8uqgux7qHhuF47U6uXbxSG4nLWj5N2L0lby0Gxmlq7IseFR4dqPg7NcBfZC99gq77vAHkleirDibFkWkPv2Hem0HFzf2MqN5LnImShpZ_MBSznrvsL2dhlE5GkgeDCSjgeTeQJLFoid_7nFb8ssxkZAdCD5C5hLd797_kf0JDEnW7Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3055651680</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Efficacy of Subcutaneous and Intravenous Infliximab and Vedolizumab for Maintenance Treatment of TNF-naive Adult Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Peyrin-Biroulet, L. ; Bossuyt, P. ; Bettenworth, D. ; Loftus, E. V. ; Anjie, S. I. ; D’Haens, G. ; Saruta, M. ; Arkkila, P. ; Park, H. ; Choi, D. ; Kim, D- H. ; Reinisch, W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Peyrin-Biroulet, L. ; Bossuyt, P. ; Bettenworth, D. ; Loftus, E. V. ; Anjie, S. I. ; D’Haens, G. ; Saruta, M. ; Arkkila, P. ; Park, H. ; Choi, D. ; Kim, D- H. ; Reinisch, W.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Infliximab and vedolizumab are widely used to treat Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Aims This systematic review and network meta-analysis evaluated comparative efficacy of various regimens for intravenous or subcutaneous infliximab and vedolizumab during maintenance treatment in CD and UC. Methods Parallel-group randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified by a systematic literature review (CRD42022383401) and included if they evaluated therapeutics of interest for maintenance treatment of adults with moderate-to-severe luminal CD or UC and assessed clinical remission between Weeks 30 and 60. Clinical remission rates in CD or UC and mucosal healing rates in UC were analyzed in a Bayesian network meta-analysis model. Endoscopic outcomes in CD were synthesized by proportional meta-analysis. Results Overall, 13 RCTs were included in the analyses. All vedolizumab studies randomized induction responders to maintenance treatment; infliximab studies used a treat-through design. Subcutaneous infliximab 120 mg every 2 weeks had the highest odds ratio (OR) [95% credible interval] versus placebo for clinical remission during the maintenance phase (CD: 5.90 [1.90–18.2]; UC: 5.45 [1.94–15.3]), with surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values of 0.91 and 0.82, respectively. For mucosal healing in UC, subcutaneous infliximab 120 mg every 2 weeks showed the highest OR (4.90 [1.63–14.1]), with SUCRA value of 0.73, followed by intravenous vedolizumab 300 mg every 4 weeks (SUCRA value, 0.70). Endoscopic outcomes in CD were better with subcutaneous infliximab 120 mg every 2 weeks than intravenous infliximab 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks. Conclusions Subcutaneous infliximab showed a favorable efficacy profile for achieving clinical remission and endoscopic outcomes during maintenance treatment in CD or UC. Graphical Abstract</description><identifier>ISSN: 0163-2116</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1573-2568</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2568</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10620-023-08252-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38499736</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Administration, Intravenous ; Adult ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - administration &amp; dosage ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use ; Biochemistry ; Colitis, Ulcerative - drug therapy ; Crohn Disease - drug therapy ; Crohn's disease ; Endoscopy ; Gastroenterology ; Gastrointestinal Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Gastrointestinal Agents - therapeutic use ; Hepatology ; Humans ; Infliximab - administration &amp; dosage ; Infliximab - therapeutic use ; Injections, Subcutaneous ; Literature reviews ; Maintenance Chemotherapy - methods ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Meta-analysis ; Network Meta-Analysis ; Oncology ; Original ; Original Article ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Remission (Medicine) ; Remission Induction ; Systematic review ; Transplant Surgery ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Digestive diseases and sciences, 2024-05, Vol.69 (5), p.1808-1825</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-d0bcb85f72d2bd390193cadb9126c1c110096cc92da16aedf0ce96a1713400643</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2088-091X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38499736$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peyrin-Biroulet, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bossuyt, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bettenworth, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loftus, E. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anjie, S. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Haens, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saruta, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arkkila, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, D- H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinisch, W.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Efficacy of Subcutaneous and Intravenous Infliximab and Vedolizumab for Maintenance Treatment of TNF-naive Adult Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis</title><title>Digestive diseases and sciences</title><addtitle>Dig Dis Sci</addtitle><addtitle>Dig Dis Sci</addtitle><description>Background Infliximab and vedolizumab are widely used to treat Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Aims This systematic review and network meta-analysis evaluated comparative efficacy of various regimens for intravenous or subcutaneous infliximab and vedolizumab during maintenance treatment in CD and UC. Methods Parallel-group randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified by a systematic literature review (CRD42022383401) and included if they evaluated therapeutics of interest for maintenance treatment of adults with moderate-to-severe luminal CD or UC and assessed clinical remission between Weeks 30 and 60. Clinical remission rates in CD or UC and mucosal healing rates in UC were analyzed in a Bayesian network meta-analysis model. Endoscopic outcomes in CD were synthesized by proportional meta-analysis. Results Overall, 13 RCTs were included in the analyses. All vedolizumab studies randomized induction responders to maintenance treatment; infliximab studies used a treat-through design. Subcutaneous infliximab 120 mg every 2 weeks had the highest odds ratio (OR) [95% credible interval] versus placebo for clinical remission during the maintenance phase (CD: 5.90 [1.90–18.2]; UC: 5.45 [1.94–15.3]), with surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values of 0.91 and 0.82, respectively. For mucosal healing in UC, subcutaneous infliximab 120 mg every 2 weeks showed the highest OR (4.90 [1.63–14.1]), with SUCRA value of 0.73, followed by intravenous vedolizumab 300 mg every 4 weeks (SUCRA value, 0.70). Endoscopic outcomes in CD were better with subcutaneous infliximab 120 mg every 2 weeks than intravenous infliximab 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks. Conclusions Subcutaneous infliximab showed a favorable efficacy profile for achieving clinical remission and endoscopic outcomes during maintenance treatment in CD or UC. Graphical Abstract</description><subject>Administration, Intravenous</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Colitis, Ulcerative - drug therapy</subject><subject>Crohn Disease - drug therapy</subject><subject>Crohn's disease</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infliximab - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Infliximab - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Injections, Subcutaneous</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Maintenance Chemotherapy - methods</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Network Meta-Analysis</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Remission (Medicine)</subject><subject>Remission Induction</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Transplant Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0163-2116</issn><issn>1573-2568</issn><issn>1573-2568</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9Uk2P0zAQjRCILQt_gAOyxIVLwHYaJ-GCStmFSt0FsYWrNXEmu14Su9hOS_mz_BWcdlk-Dpw8o_fmzYdfkjxm9DmjtHjhGRWcppRnKS15zlN2J5mwvMhSnovybjKhTMSYMXGUPPD-mlJaFUzcT46yclpVRSYmyY-57dfgIOgNkpO21QrUjtiWXAy1GgIYtIMnYBqyMMHBBs2YL0zb6W-6h3oPfcbGdvr7MOatdeQMtAlowCgkK4cQejRhFF2dn6YGxlazZugC-RD7RsiTrQ5Xe1XoewjW7chru8WOvNEeweNLMiMXOx8wglqRpQ4YRx4cko-40bjdT3GOYWvdF3KGAVIw0O289g-Tey10Hh_dvMfJp9OT1fxdunz_djGfLVM15SKkDa1VXeZtwRteN1lFWZUpaOqKcaGYYvHelVCq4g0wAdi0VGElgBUsm1Iqptlx8uqgux7qHhuF47U6uXbxSG4nLWj5N2L0lby0Gxmlq7IseFR4dqPg7NcBfZC99gq77vAHkleirDibFkWkPv2Hem0HFzf2MqN5LnImShpZ_MBSznrvsL2dhlE5GkgeDCSjgeTeQJLFoid_7nFb8ssxkZAdCD5C5hLd797_kf0JDEnW7Q</recordid><startdate>20240501</startdate><enddate>20240501</enddate><creator>Peyrin-Biroulet, L.</creator><creator>Bossuyt, P.</creator><creator>Bettenworth, D.</creator><creator>Loftus, E. V.</creator><creator>Anjie, S. I.</creator><creator>D’Haens, G.</creator><creator>Saruta, M.</creator><creator>Arkkila, P.</creator><creator>Park, H.</creator><creator>Choi, D.</creator><creator>Kim, D- H.</creator><creator>Reinisch, W.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2088-091X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240501</creationdate><title>Comparative Efficacy of Subcutaneous and Intravenous Infliximab and Vedolizumab for Maintenance Treatment of TNF-naive Adult Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis</title><author>Peyrin-Biroulet, L. ; Bossuyt, P. ; Bettenworth, D. ; Loftus, E. V. ; Anjie, S. I. ; D’Haens, G. ; Saruta, M. ; Arkkila, P. ; Park, H. ; Choi, D. ; Kim, D- H. ; Reinisch, W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-d0bcb85f72d2bd390193cadb9126c1c110096cc92da16aedf0ce96a1713400643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Administration, Intravenous</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Colitis, Ulcerative - drug therapy</topic><topic>Crohn Disease - drug therapy</topic><topic>Crohn's disease</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infliximab - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Infliximab - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Injections, Subcutaneous</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Maintenance Chemotherapy - methods</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Network Meta-Analysis</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Remission (Medicine)</topic><topic>Remission Induction</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Transplant Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peyrin-Biroulet, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bossuyt, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bettenworth, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loftus, E. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anjie, S. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Haens, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saruta, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arkkila, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, D- H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinisch, W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Digestive diseases and sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peyrin-Biroulet, L.</au><au>Bossuyt, P.</au><au>Bettenworth, D.</au><au>Loftus, E. V.</au><au>Anjie, S. I.</au><au>D’Haens, G.</au><au>Saruta, M.</au><au>Arkkila, P.</au><au>Park, H.</au><au>Choi, D.</au><au>Kim, D- H.</au><au>Reinisch, W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Efficacy of Subcutaneous and Intravenous Infliximab and Vedolizumab for Maintenance Treatment of TNF-naive Adult Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Digestive diseases and sciences</jtitle><stitle>Dig Dis Sci</stitle><addtitle>Dig Dis Sci</addtitle><date>2024-05-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1808</spage><epage>1825</epage><pages>1808-1825</pages><issn>0163-2116</issn><issn>1573-2568</issn><eissn>1573-2568</eissn><abstract>Background Infliximab and vedolizumab are widely used to treat Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Aims This systematic review and network meta-analysis evaluated comparative efficacy of various regimens for intravenous or subcutaneous infliximab and vedolizumab during maintenance treatment in CD and UC. Methods Parallel-group randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified by a systematic literature review (CRD42022383401) and included if they evaluated therapeutics of interest for maintenance treatment of adults with moderate-to-severe luminal CD or UC and assessed clinical remission between Weeks 30 and 60. Clinical remission rates in CD or UC and mucosal healing rates in UC were analyzed in a Bayesian network meta-analysis model. Endoscopic outcomes in CD were synthesized by proportional meta-analysis. Results Overall, 13 RCTs were included in the analyses. All vedolizumab studies randomized induction responders to maintenance treatment; infliximab studies used a treat-through design. Subcutaneous infliximab 120 mg every 2 weeks had the highest odds ratio (OR) [95% credible interval] versus placebo for clinical remission during the maintenance phase (CD: 5.90 [1.90–18.2]; UC: 5.45 [1.94–15.3]), with surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values of 0.91 and 0.82, respectively. For mucosal healing in UC, subcutaneous infliximab 120 mg every 2 weeks showed the highest OR (4.90 [1.63–14.1]), with SUCRA value of 0.73, followed by intravenous vedolizumab 300 mg every 4 weeks (SUCRA value, 0.70). Endoscopic outcomes in CD were better with subcutaneous infliximab 120 mg every 2 weeks than intravenous infliximab 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks. Conclusions Subcutaneous infliximab showed a favorable efficacy profile for achieving clinical remission and endoscopic outcomes during maintenance treatment in CD or UC. Graphical Abstract</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>38499736</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10620-023-08252-1</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2088-091X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0163-2116
ispartof Digestive diseases and sciences, 2024-05, Vol.69 (5), p.1808-1825
issn 0163-2116
1573-2568
1573-2568
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11098872
source Springer Nature
subjects Administration, Intravenous
Adult
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - administration & dosage
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use
Biochemistry
Colitis, Ulcerative - drug therapy
Crohn Disease - drug therapy
Crohn's disease
Endoscopy
Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal Agents - administration & dosage
Gastrointestinal Agents - therapeutic use
Hepatology
Humans
Infliximab - administration & dosage
Infliximab - therapeutic use
Injections, Subcutaneous
Literature reviews
Maintenance Chemotherapy - methods
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Meta-analysis
Network Meta-Analysis
Oncology
Original
Original Article
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Remission (Medicine)
Remission Induction
Systematic review
Transplant Surgery
Treatment Outcome
title Comparative Efficacy of Subcutaneous and Intravenous Infliximab and Vedolizumab for Maintenance Treatment of TNF-naive Adult Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T10%3A53%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Efficacy%20of%20Subcutaneous%20and%20Intravenous%20Infliximab%20and%20Vedolizumab%20for%20Maintenance%20Treatment%20of%20TNF-naive%20Adult%20Patients%20with%20Inflammatory%20Bowel%20Disease:%20A%20Systematic%20Literature%20Review%20and%20Network%20Meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Digestive%20diseases%20and%20sciences&rft.au=Peyrin-Biroulet,%20L.&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1808&rft.epage=1825&rft.pages=1808-1825&rft.issn=0163-2116&rft.eissn=1573-2568&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10620-023-08252-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3055651680%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-d0bcb85f72d2bd390193cadb9126c1c110096cc92da16aedf0ce96a1713400643%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3055651680&rft_id=info:pmid/38499736&rfr_iscdi=true