Diffusion-weighted imaging for determining response to neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

• Published in: European radiology 2024-05, Vol.34 (5), p.3238-3248
• Main Authors: Bilreiro, Carlos, Andrade, Luísa, Marques, Rui Mateus, Matos, Celso
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Bias; Cancer; Cancer therapies; Data acquisition; Diagnostic Radiology; Diagnostic systems; Diffusion coefficient; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods; Hepatobiliary-Pancreas; Heterogeneity; Histopathology; Humans; Imaging; Internal Medicine; Interventional Radiology; Medical imaging; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Meta-analysis; Neoadjuvant Therapy - methods; Neuroradiology; Pancreatic cancer; Pancreatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging; Pancreatic Neoplasms - therapy; Performance evaluation; Quality assessment; Quality control; Radiology; Sensitivity and Specificity; Therapy; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasound
• ISSN: 1432-1084; 0938-7994; 1432-1084
• DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10381-0

Objectives To determine the role of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for predicting response to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in pancreatic cancer. Materials and methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies evaluating the performance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) to assess response to NAT. Data extracted included ADC pre- and post-NAT, for predicting response as defined by imaging, histopathology, or clinical reference standards. ADC values were compared with standardized mean differences. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Studies (QUADAS-2). Results Of 337 studies, 7 were included in the analysis (161 patients). ADC values reported for the pre- and post-NAT assessments overlapped between responders and non-responders. One study reported inability of ADC increase after NAT for distinguishing responders and non-responders. A correlation with histopathological response was reported for pre- and post-NAT ADC in 4 studies. DWI’s diagnostic performance was reported to be high in three studies, with a 91.6–100% sensitivity and 62.5–94.7% specificity. Finally, heterogeneity and high risk of bias were identified across studies, affecting the domains of patient selection, index test, reference standard, and flow and timing. Conclusion DWI might be useful for determining response to NAT in pancreatic cancer. However, there are still too few studies on this matter, which are also heterogeneous and at high risk for bias. Further studies with standardized procedures for data acquisition and accurate reference standards are needed. Clinical relevance statement Diffusion-weighted MRI might be useful for assessing response to neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer. However, further studies with robust data are needed to provide specific recommendations for clinical practice. Key Points •The role of DWI with ADC measurements for assessing response to neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer is still unclear. •Pre- and post-neoadjuvant therapy ADC values overlap between responders and non-responders. •DWI has a reported high diagnostic performance for determining response when using histopathological or clinical reference standards; however, studies are still few and at high risk for bias.