A Single-Center Retrospective Evaluation of Decision-Making and Factors Motivating Hand Transplant Candidates

• Published in: Progress in transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.) Calif.), 2023-09, Vol.33 (3), p.216-222
• Main Authors: Boehmer, Kasey R., Kennedy, Cassie C., Hargraves, Ian G., Griffin, Joan M., Garcia-Bautista, Andrea E., Sanchez, Brianna B., Chokkalingam, Avudaiappan, Finnie, Dawn M., Miller, Adam R., Moran, Steven L., Smither, Fantley C., Amer, Hatem, Jowsey-Gregoire, Sheila
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Activities of Daily Living; Hand Transplantation; Humans; Immunosuppression Therapy - adverse effects; Retrospective Studies; Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation
• ISSN: 1526-9248; 2164-6708
• DOI: 10.1177/15269248231189863

Introduction Advancements in vascularized composite allotransplantation have made hand transplants possible for persons living with upper limb loss. Hand transplantation is not a life-saving procedure, but rather a quality-of-life enhancing procedure; hence the risk of morbidity and mortality must be weighed against improvements in function and appearance. This study explored the decision-making process of patients evaluated for hand transplantation. Methods/Approach A qualitative case series study using retrospective chart data of evaluations was conducted between January 1, 2011 and February 28, 2020. Notes were extracted and read by three reviewers. Each case was summarized noting similarities and differences. Findings Nine patients underwent evaluation. Eight were no longer under evaluation and did not receive transplant; one was still undergoing evaluation. Patient motivations for evaluation were dissatisfaction with prostheses or self-image, chronic pain, performing activities of daily living, occupation, burden placed on caregivers, and concerns about overuse of non-affected limbs. Patients chose not to pursue transplantation due to rehabilitation time, immunosuppression, alternative treatments, and social and financial challenges. The clinical team discontinued evaluations due to unmet evaluation requirements, medical contraindications, or treatment alternatives. Different modes of shared decision-making were present depending on the party most heavily featured in the charts as driving decisions. Discussion This was an examination of shared decision-making with hand transplant candidates who did not proceed to transplant. Reasons for choosing alternative strategies for management were multifactorial. Lessons learned regarding patient motivations and shared decision-making can inform future interventions to better support patients.