Loading…
Tensile strength of conventional glass ionomer cement and silver reinforced glass ionomer cement
A comparative analysis and assessment of the compressive strength (CS) and diametral tensile strength (DTS) between conventional glass ionomer cement (C-GIC) and a silver-reinforced GIC (S-GIC) variant is of interest. Ten specimens of both C-GIC (GC Fuji II, Japan) and S-GIC (Riva Silver, SDI, Austr...
Saved in:
Published in: | Bioinformation 2024-04, Vol.20 (4), p.391-393 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 393 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 391 |
container_title | Bioinformation |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Sharma, Suman Bagchi, Anandamoy Mullick, Shruti Deepyanti, Dubey Sai Kiran, Katta Datta Kumar, Amit Surana, Pratik |
description | A comparative analysis and assessment of the compressive strength (CS) and diametral tensile strength (DTS) between conventional glass ionomer cement (C-GIC) and a silver-reinforced GIC (S-GIC) variant is of interest. Ten specimens of both C-GIC (GC Fuji II, Japan) and S-GIC (Riva Silver, SDI, Australia) were fabricated for the evaluation of compressive strength, and an identical number of samples were created for the examination of tensile strength. These specimens were then tested using a universal testing apparatus. The results exhibited that both the compressive and diametral tensile strengths were significantly greater for the S-GIC cement in comparison to the C-GIC, with a notable p-value of 0.001. The findings suggest that S-GIC may be considered a viable alternative to conventional GIC. |
doi_str_mv | 10.6026/973206300200391 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11161885</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3055533898</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2211-47a6edd93bffda87dae9e37575e71d18fc4eb6488b02479033cc44162463b58f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkc1LAzEQxYMotlbP3mTBi5fVZPO5J5HiFxS86Dlms7Ptlt2kJtuC_70pVVHxlOHNb16SeQidEnwpcCGuSkkLLCjGBca0JHtojJOUb7X9H_UIHcW4xJgRKfkhGlGlOJNCjdHrM7jYdpDFIYCbD4vMN5n1bgNuaL0zXTbvTIxZqn0PIbPQp05mXJ2lsU1SArSu8cFC_S96jA4a00U4-Twn6OXu9nn6kM-e7h-nN7PcFgUhOZNGQF2XtGqa2ihZGyiBSi45SFIT1VgGlWBKVbhgssSUWssYEQUTtOKqoRN0vfNdraseapuuDqbTq9D2Jrxrb1r9u-PahZ77jSaECJL2kRwuPh2Cf1tDHHTfRgtdZxz4ddQUC0EpZ7xM6PkfdOnXIW1rS3HOKVWlStTVjrLBxxig-X4NwXobn_4TX5o4-_mJb_4rL_oB60uWYg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3055533898</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tensile strength of conventional glass ionomer cement and silver reinforced glass ionomer cement</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><creator>Sharma, Suman ; Bagchi, Anandamoy ; Mullick, Shruti ; Deepyanti, Dubey ; Sai Kiran, Katta Datta ; Kumar, Amit ; Surana, Pratik</creator><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Suman ; Bagchi, Anandamoy ; Mullick, Shruti ; Deepyanti, Dubey ; Sai Kiran, Katta Datta ; Kumar, Amit ; Surana, Pratik ; Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Pihu Dental Hospital, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India ; Department of Pedodontics & Preventive Dentistry, Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences, KIIT Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, India ; Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, G. Pulla Reddy Dental College and Hospital, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India ; Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Maitri College of Dentistry and Research Centre, Durg, Chhattisgarh, India ; Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Dr D.Y Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr D.Y Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India ; Department of Prosthodontics Crown Bridge & Implantology, Sardar Patel Postgraduate institute of Dental and Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India ; Department of Dentistry, Lord Buddha Koshi Medical College and Hospital, Baijnathpur, Saharsa, Bihar-852221, India</creatorcontrib><description>A comparative analysis and assessment of the compressive strength (CS) and diametral tensile strength (DTS) between conventional glass ionomer cement (C-GIC) and a silver-reinforced GIC (S-GIC) variant is of interest. Ten specimens of both C-GIC (GC Fuji II, Japan) and S-GIC (Riva Silver, SDI, Australia) were fabricated for the evaluation of compressive strength, and an identical number of samples were created for the examination of tensile strength. These specimens were then tested using a universal testing apparatus. The results exhibited that both the compressive and diametral tensile strengths were significantly greater for the S-GIC cement in comparison to the C-GIC, with a notable p-value of 0.001. The findings suggest that S-GIC may be considered a viable alternative to conventional GIC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0973-2063</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0973-8894</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0973-2063</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.6026/973206300200391</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38854768</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: Biomedical Informatics</publisher><subject>Cement ; Comparative analysis ; Compressive strength ; Concrete ; Glass ; Glass ionomer cements ; Silver ; Tensile strength ; Test equipment</subject><ispartof>Bioinformation, 2024-04, Vol.20 (4), p.391-393</ispartof><rights>2024 Biomedical Informatics.</rights><rights>Copyright Biomedical Informatics Apr 2024</rights><rights>2024 Biomedical Informatics 2024</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11161885/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11161885/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38854768$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Suman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bagchi, Anandamoy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullick, Shruti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deepyanti, Dubey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sai Kiran, Katta Datta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Amit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Surana, Pratik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Pihu Dental Hospital, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Pedodontics & Preventive Dentistry, Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences, KIIT Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, India</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, G. Pulla Reddy Dental College and Hospital, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Maitri College of Dentistry and Research Centre, Durg, Chhattisgarh, India</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Dr D.Y Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr D.Y Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Prosthodontics Crown Bridge & Implantology, Sardar Patel Postgraduate institute of Dental and Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Dentistry, Lord Buddha Koshi Medical College and Hospital, Baijnathpur, Saharsa, Bihar-852221, India</creatorcontrib><title>Tensile strength of conventional glass ionomer cement and silver reinforced glass ionomer cement</title><title>Bioinformation</title><addtitle>Bioinformation</addtitle><description>A comparative analysis and assessment of the compressive strength (CS) and diametral tensile strength (DTS) between conventional glass ionomer cement (C-GIC) and a silver-reinforced GIC (S-GIC) variant is of interest. Ten specimens of both C-GIC (GC Fuji II, Japan) and S-GIC (Riva Silver, SDI, Australia) were fabricated for the evaluation of compressive strength, and an identical number of samples were created for the examination of tensile strength. These specimens were then tested using a universal testing apparatus. The results exhibited that both the compressive and diametral tensile strengths were significantly greater for the S-GIC cement in comparison to the C-GIC, with a notable p-value of 0.001. The findings suggest that S-GIC may be considered a viable alternative to conventional GIC.</description><subject>Cement</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Compressive strength</subject><subject>Concrete</subject><subject>Glass</subject><subject>Glass ionomer cements</subject><subject>Silver</subject><subject>Tensile strength</subject><subject>Test equipment</subject><issn>0973-2063</issn><issn>0973-8894</issn><issn>0973-2063</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkc1LAzEQxYMotlbP3mTBi5fVZPO5J5HiFxS86Dlms7Ptlt2kJtuC_70pVVHxlOHNb16SeQidEnwpcCGuSkkLLCjGBca0JHtojJOUb7X9H_UIHcW4xJgRKfkhGlGlOJNCjdHrM7jYdpDFIYCbD4vMN5n1bgNuaL0zXTbvTIxZqn0PIbPQp05mXJ2lsU1SArSu8cFC_S96jA4a00U4-Twn6OXu9nn6kM-e7h-nN7PcFgUhOZNGQF2XtGqa2ihZGyiBSi45SFIT1VgGlWBKVbhgssSUWssYEQUTtOKqoRN0vfNdraseapuuDqbTq9D2Jrxrb1r9u-PahZ77jSaECJL2kRwuPh2Cf1tDHHTfRgtdZxz4ddQUC0EpZ7xM6PkfdOnXIW1rS3HOKVWlStTVjrLBxxig-X4NwXobn_4TX5o4-_mJb_4rL_oB60uWYg</recordid><startdate>20240430</startdate><enddate>20240430</enddate><creator>Sharma, Suman</creator><creator>Bagchi, Anandamoy</creator><creator>Mullick, Shruti</creator><creator>Deepyanti, Dubey</creator><creator>Sai Kiran, Katta Datta</creator><creator>Kumar, Amit</creator><creator>Surana, Pratik</creator><general>Biomedical Informatics</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240430</creationdate><title>Tensile strength of conventional glass ionomer cement and silver reinforced glass ionomer cement</title><author>Sharma, Suman ; Bagchi, Anandamoy ; Mullick, Shruti ; Deepyanti, Dubey ; Sai Kiran, Katta Datta ; Kumar, Amit ; Surana, Pratik</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2211-47a6edd93bffda87dae9e37575e71d18fc4eb6488b02479033cc44162463b58f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Cement</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Compressive strength</topic><topic>Concrete</topic><topic>Glass</topic><topic>Glass ionomer cements</topic><topic>Silver</topic><topic>Tensile strength</topic><topic>Test equipment</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Suman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bagchi, Anandamoy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullick, Shruti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deepyanti, Dubey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sai Kiran, Katta Datta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Amit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Surana, Pratik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Pihu Dental Hospital, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Pedodontics & Preventive Dentistry, Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences, KIIT Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, India</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, G. Pulla Reddy Dental College and Hospital, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Maitri College of Dentistry and Research Centre, Durg, Chhattisgarh, India</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Dr D.Y Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr D.Y Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Prosthodontics Crown Bridge & Implantology, Sardar Patel Postgraduate institute of Dental and Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Dentistry, Lord Buddha Koshi Medical College and Hospital, Baijnathpur, Saharsa, Bihar-852221, India</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Bioinformation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sharma, Suman</au><au>Bagchi, Anandamoy</au><au>Mullick, Shruti</au><au>Deepyanti, Dubey</au><au>Sai Kiran, Katta Datta</au><au>Kumar, Amit</au><au>Surana, Pratik</au><aucorp>Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Pihu Dental Hospital, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India</aucorp><aucorp>Department of Pedodontics & Preventive Dentistry, Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences, KIIT Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, India</aucorp><aucorp>Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, G. Pulla Reddy Dental College and Hospital, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India</aucorp><aucorp>Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Maitri College of Dentistry and Research Centre, Durg, Chhattisgarh, India</aucorp><aucorp>Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Dr D.Y Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr D.Y Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India</aucorp><aucorp>Department of Prosthodontics Crown Bridge & Implantology, Sardar Patel Postgraduate institute of Dental and Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India</aucorp><aucorp>Department of Dentistry, Lord Buddha Koshi Medical College and Hospital, Baijnathpur, Saharsa, Bihar-852221, India</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tensile strength of conventional glass ionomer cement and silver reinforced glass ionomer cement</atitle><jtitle>Bioinformation</jtitle><addtitle>Bioinformation</addtitle><date>2024-04-30</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>391</spage><epage>393</epage><pages>391-393</pages><issn>0973-2063</issn><issn>0973-8894</issn><eissn>0973-2063</eissn><abstract>A comparative analysis and assessment of the compressive strength (CS) and diametral tensile strength (DTS) between conventional glass ionomer cement (C-GIC) and a silver-reinforced GIC (S-GIC) variant is of interest. Ten specimens of both C-GIC (GC Fuji II, Japan) and S-GIC (Riva Silver, SDI, Australia) were fabricated for the evaluation of compressive strength, and an identical number of samples were created for the examination of tensile strength. These specimens were then tested using a universal testing apparatus. The results exhibited that both the compressive and diametral tensile strengths were significantly greater for the S-GIC cement in comparison to the C-GIC, with a notable p-value of 0.001. The findings suggest that S-GIC may be considered a viable alternative to conventional GIC.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>Biomedical Informatics</pub><pmid>38854768</pmid><doi>10.6026/973206300200391</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0973-2063 |
ispartof | Bioinformation, 2024-04, Vol.20 (4), p.391-393 |
issn | 0973-2063 0973-8894 0973-2063 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11161885 |
source | PubMed (Medline) |
subjects | Cement Comparative analysis Compressive strength Concrete Glass Glass ionomer cements Silver Tensile strength Test equipment |
title | Tensile strength of conventional glass ionomer cement and silver reinforced glass ionomer cement |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T04%3A33%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tensile%20strength%20of%20conventional%20glass%20ionomer%20cement%20and%20silver%20reinforced%20glass%20ionomer%20cement&rft.jtitle=Bioinformation&rft.au=Sharma,%20Suman&rft.aucorp=Department%20of%20Pediatric%20Dentistry,%20Pihu%20Dental%20Hospital,%20Noida,%20Uttar%20Pradesh,%20India&rft.date=2024-04-30&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=391&rft.epage=393&rft.pages=391-393&rft.issn=0973-2063&rft.eissn=0973-2063&rft_id=info:doi/10.6026/973206300200391&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3055533898%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2211-47a6edd93bffda87dae9e37575e71d18fc4eb6488b02479033cc44162463b58f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3055533898&rft_id=info:pmid/38854768&rfr_iscdi=true |