Exploring Work Absences and Return to Work During Social Transition and Following Gender-Affirming Care, a Mixed-Methods Approach: ‘Bridging Support Actors Through Literacy’

• Published in: Journal of occupational rehabilitation 2024-06, Vol.34 (2), p.425-446
• Main Authors: Van de Cauter, Joy, Van de Velde, Dominique, Motmans, Joz, Clays, Els, Braeckman, Lutgart
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Access to information; Adult; Clinical Psychology; Data analysis; Environmental Health; Female; Gender; Gender-Affirming Care; Health education; Health Literacy; Health promotion; Health Psychology; Humans; Insurance; Literacy; Male; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Middle Aged; Occupational Medicine/Industrial Medicine; Orthopedics; Qualitative analysis; Qualitative Research; Rehabilitation; Return to Work - psychology; Sick Leave - statistics & numerical data; Social Support; Surveys and Questionnaires; Transgender Persons - psychology; Young Adult
• ISSN: 1053-0487; 1573-3688; 1573-3688
• DOI: 10.1007/s10926-023-10139-x

Purpose Research on return to work (RTW) following transition-related gender-affirming care (GAC) is lacking. We aim to study the RTW outcomes and experiences of transgender and gender diverse (TGD) people during social and medical transition to understand their needs better and provide tailored support. Methods In this convergent mixed-methods study, the questionnaires of 125 employed TGD people, who took steps in transition (social and GAC), were analyzed for personal- and work characteristics, medical work absences, RTW, support at work, and health literacy. In-depth interviews were held with twenty TGD people to explore perceived facilitators and barriers to RTW. Results One hundred and nine participants reported an average of 38 sick days after GAC. The majority (90.2%) resumed their job at the same employer. Although TGD workers felt supported, their health literacy (55.1%) was lower compared to the general population. The qualitative data analysis revealed four major themes: (1) the need and access to information; (2) having multidisciplinary TGD allies; (3) the influence of the occupational position; (4) the precarious balance between work, life, and GAC. Especially participants with a low health literacy level experienced RTW barriers by struggling: (1) to find and/or apply information; (2) to navigate (occupational) health and insurance services. Conclusion Our research has shown that RTW for TGD individuals is a multifaceted process, affected by personal factors, work-related elements, and the characteristics of the healthcare and social insurance system. Enhancing support for TGD people at work and their RTW requires a high need for centralized information and promoting health literacy while engaging relevant stakeholders, such as prevention services and employers.