Loading…
Incidental Durotomy Repair in Lumbar Spine Surgery: Institutional Experience and Review of Literature
Study Design : Retrospective Chart Review. Objectives Incidental durotomies (IDs) are common spine surgery complications. In this study, we present a review on the most commonly utilized management strategies, report our institutional experience with case examples, and describe a stepwise management...
Saved in:
Published in: | Global spine journal 2024-05, Vol.14 (4), p.1316-1327 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-7dcf9def4b8abcf22115a4344d8323ddecea8a28912370d89ae1a33f30d181e83 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-7dcf9def4b8abcf22115a4344d8323ddecea8a28912370d89ae1a33f30d181e83 |
container_end_page | 1327 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1316 |
container_title | Global spine journal |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Albayar, Ahmed Spadola, Michael Blue, Rachel Saylany, Anissa Dagli, Mert Marcel Santangelo, Gabrielle Wathen, Connor Ghenbot, Yohannes Macaluso, Dominick Ali, Zarina S. Ozturk, Ali K. Welch, William C. |
description | Study Design
: Retrospective Chart Review.
Objectives
Incidental durotomies (IDs) are common spine surgery complications. In this study, we present a review on the most commonly utilized management strategies, report our institutional experience with case examples, and describe a stepwise management algorithm.
Methods
A retrospective review was performed of the electronic medical records of all patients who underwent a thoracolumbar or lumbar spine surgery between March 2017 and September 2019. Additionally, a literature review of the current management approaches to treat IDs and persistent postoperative CSF leaks following lumbar spine surgeries was performed.
Results
We looked at 1133 patients that underwent posterior thoracolumbar spine surgery. There was intraoperative evidence of ID in 116 cases. Based on our cohort and the current literature, we developed a progressive treatment algorithm for IDs that begins with a primary repair, which can be bolstered by dural sealants or a muscle patch. If this fails, the primary repair can be followed by a paraspinal muscle flap, as well as a lumbar drain. If the patient cannot be weaned from temporary CSF diversion, the final step in controlling postoperative leak is longterm CSF diversion via a lumboperitoneal shunt. In our experience, these shunts can be weaned once the patient has no further clinical or radiographic signs of CSF leak.
Conclusions
There is no standardized management approach of IDs and CSF leaks in the literature. This article intends to provide a progressive treatment algorithm and contribute to the development process of a treatment consensus. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/21925682221141368 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11289568</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_21925682221141368</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2740511663</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-7dcf9def4b8abcf22115a4344d8323ddecea8a28912370d89ae1a33f30d181e83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV9vFCEUxYnRtE3tB-iLIfHFl61cmGEYX4ypVTfZpInVZ8IOd1aaGRiBad1vL5ut67-UFwj8zrmcewk5B3YB0DSvObS8lopzDlCBkOoJOdndLWrZsqeHs-LH5CylW1aW5I0AfkSOhay4bNr2hODSd86iz2ag7-cYchi39DNOxkXqPF3N49pEejM5j_RmjhuM2zd06VN2ec4u-CK7-jFhdOg7pMbbIr5zeE9DT1cuYzR5jvicPOvNkPDsYT8lXz9cfbn8tFhdf1xevlstuko2edHYrm8t9tVamXXX75LVphJVZZXgwlrs0CjDVQtcNMyq1iAYIXrBLChAJU7J273vNK9HtF3JFc2gp-hGE7c6GKf_fvHum96EOw1QXEuzisOrB4cYvs-Ysh5d6nAYjMcwJ82bitUAUoqCvvwHvQ1zLB1JWrCaAWtkxQoFe6qLIaWI_eE3wPRukPq_QRbNiz9jHBS_xlaAiz2QzAZ_l33c8SftkabH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3050107640</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Incidental Durotomy Repair in Lumbar Spine Surgery: Institutional Experience and Review of Literature</title><source>SAGE Open Access</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed</source><creator>Albayar, Ahmed ; Spadola, Michael ; Blue, Rachel ; Saylany, Anissa ; Dagli, Mert Marcel ; Santangelo, Gabrielle ; Wathen, Connor ; Ghenbot, Yohannes ; Macaluso, Dominick ; Ali, Zarina S. ; Ozturk, Ali K. ; Welch, William C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Albayar, Ahmed ; Spadola, Michael ; Blue, Rachel ; Saylany, Anissa ; Dagli, Mert Marcel ; Santangelo, Gabrielle ; Wathen, Connor ; Ghenbot, Yohannes ; Macaluso, Dominick ; Ali, Zarina S. ; Ozturk, Ali K. ; Welch, William C.</creatorcontrib><description>Study Design
: Retrospective Chart Review.
Objectives
Incidental durotomies (IDs) are common spine surgery complications. In this study, we present a review on the most commonly utilized management strategies, report our institutional experience with case examples, and describe a stepwise management algorithm.
Methods
A retrospective review was performed of the electronic medical records of all patients who underwent a thoracolumbar or lumbar spine surgery between March 2017 and September 2019. Additionally, a literature review of the current management approaches to treat IDs and persistent postoperative CSF leaks following lumbar spine surgeries was performed.
Results
We looked at 1133 patients that underwent posterior thoracolumbar spine surgery. There was intraoperative evidence of ID in 116 cases. Based on our cohort and the current literature, we developed a progressive treatment algorithm for IDs that begins with a primary repair, which can be bolstered by dural sealants or a muscle patch. If this fails, the primary repair can be followed by a paraspinal muscle flap, as well as a lumbar drain. If the patient cannot be weaned from temporary CSF diversion, the final step in controlling postoperative leak is longterm CSF diversion via a lumboperitoneal shunt. In our experience, these shunts can be weaned once the patient has no further clinical or radiographic signs of CSF leak.
Conclusions
There is no standardized management approach of IDs and CSF leaks in the literature. This article intends to provide a progressive treatment algorithm and contribute to the development process of a treatment consensus.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2192-5682</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2192-5690</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/21925682221141368</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36426799</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Back surgery ; Original</subject><ispartof>Global spine journal, 2024-05, Vol.14 (4), p.1316-1327</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – No Derivatives License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022 2022 AO Spine, unless otherwise noted. Manuscript content on this site is licensed under Creative Commons Licenses</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-7dcf9def4b8abcf22115a4344d8323ddecea8a28912370d89ae1a33f30d181e83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-7dcf9def4b8abcf22115a4344d8323ddecea8a28912370d89ae1a33f30d181e83</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4172-8842 ; 0000-0002-5201-6720</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11289568/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3050107640?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,21945,25731,27830,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,44921,45309,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36426799$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Albayar, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spadola, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blue, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saylany, Anissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dagli, Mert Marcel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santangelo, Gabrielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wathen, Connor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghenbot, Yohannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macaluso, Dominick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali, Zarina S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozturk, Ali K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welch, William C.</creatorcontrib><title>Incidental Durotomy Repair in Lumbar Spine Surgery: Institutional Experience and Review of Literature</title><title>Global spine journal</title><addtitle>Global Spine J</addtitle><description>Study Design
: Retrospective Chart Review.
Objectives
Incidental durotomies (IDs) are common spine surgery complications. In this study, we present a review on the most commonly utilized management strategies, report our institutional experience with case examples, and describe a stepwise management algorithm.
Methods
A retrospective review was performed of the electronic medical records of all patients who underwent a thoracolumbar or lumbar spine surgery between March 2017 and September 2019. Additionally, a literature review of the current management approaches to treat IDs and persistent postoperative CSF leaks following lumbar spine surgeries was performed.
Results
We looked at 1133 patients that underwent posterior thoracolumbar spine surgery. There was intraoperative evidence of ID in 116 cases. Based on our cohort and the current literature, we developed a progressive treatment algorithm for IDs that begins with a primary repair, which can be bolstered by dural sealants or a muscle patch. If this fails, the primary repair can be followed by a paraspinal muscle flap, as well as a lumbar drain. If the patient cannot be weaned from temporary CSF diversion, the final step in controlling postoperative leak is longterm CSF diversion via a lumboperitoneal shunt. In our experience, these shunts can be weaned once the patient has no further clinical or radiographic signs of CSF leak.
Conclusions
There is no standardized management approach of IDs and CSF leaks in the literature. This article intends to provide a progressive treatment algorithm and contribute to the development process of a treatment consensus.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Back surgery</subject><subject>Original</subject><issn>2192-5682</issn><issn>2192-5690</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV9vFCEUxYnRtE3tB-iLIfHFl61cmGEYX4ypVTfZpInVZ8IOd1aaGRiBad1vL5ut67-UFwj8zrmcewk5B3YB0DSvObS8lopzDlCBkOoJOdndLWrZsqeHs-LH5CylW1aW5I0AfkSOhay4bNr2hODSd86iz2ag7-cYchi39DNOxkXqPF3N49pEejM5j_RmjhuM2zd06VN2ec4u-CK7-jFhdOg7pMbbIr5zeE9DT1cuYzR5jvicPOvNkPDsYT8lXz9cfbn8tFhdf1xevlstuko2edHYrm8t9tVamXXX75LVphJVZZXgwlrs0CjDVQtcNMyq1iAYIXrBLChAJU7J273vNK9HtF3JFc2gp-hGE7c6GKf_fvHum96EOw1QXEuzisOrB4cYvs-Ysh5d6nAYjMcwJ82bitUAUoqCvvwHvQ1zLB1JWrCaAWtkxQoFe6qLIaWI_eE3wPRukPq_QRbNiz9jHBS_xlaAiz2QzAZ_l33c8SftkabH</recordid><startdate>20240501</startdate><enddate>20240501</enddate><creator>Albayar, Ahmed</creator><creator>Spadola, Michael</creator><creator>Blue, Rachel</creator><creator>Saylany, Anissa</creator><creator>Dagli, Mert Marcel</creator><creator>Santangelo, Gabrielle</creator><creator>Wathen, Connor</creator><creator>Ghenbot, Yohannes</creator><creator>Macaluso, Dominick</creator><creator>Ali, Zarina S.</creator><creator>Ozturk, Ali K.</creator><creator>Welch, William C.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4172-8842</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5201-6720</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240501</creationdate><title>Incidental Durotomy Repair in Lumbar Spine Surgery: Institutional Experience and Review of Literature</title><author>Albayar, Ahmed ; Spadola, Michael ; Blue, Rachel ; Saylany, Anissa ; Dagli, Mert Marcel ; Santangelo, Gabrielle ; Wathen, Connor ; Ghenbot, Yohannes ; Macaluso, Dominick ; Ali, Zarina S. ; Ozturk, Ali K. ; Welch, William C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-7dcf9def4b8abcf22115a4344d8323ddecea8a28912370d89ae1a33f30d181e83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Back surgery</topic><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Albayar, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spadola, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blue, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saylany, Anissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dagli, Mert Marcel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santangelo, Gabrielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wathen, Connor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghenbot, Yohannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macaluso, Dominick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali, Zarina S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozturk, Ali K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welch, William C.</creatorcontrib><collection>SAGE Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Global spine journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Albayar, Ahmed</au><au>Spadola, Michael</au><au>Blue, Rachel</au><au>Saylany, Anissa</au><au>Dagli, Mert Marcel</au><au>Santangelo, Gabrielle</au><au>Wathen, Connor</au><au>Ghenbot, Yohannes</au><au>Macaluso, Dominick</au><au>Ali, Zarina S.</au><au>Ozturk, Ali K.</au><au>Welch, William C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Incidental Durotomy Repair in Lumbar Spine Surgery: Institutional Experience and Review of Literature</atitle><jtitle>Global spine journal</jtitle><addtitle>Global Spine J</addtitle><date>2024-05-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1316</spage><epage>1327</epage><pages>1316-1327</pages><issn>2192-5682</issn><eissn>2192-5690</eissn><abstract>Study Design
: Retrospective Chart Review.
Objectives
Incidental durotomies (IDs) are common spine surgery complications. In this study, we present a review on the most commonly utilized management strategies, report our institutional experience with case examples, and describe a stepwise management algorithm.
Methods
A retrospective review was performed of the electronic medical records of all patients who underwent a thoracolumbar or lumbar spine surgery between March 2017 and September 2019. Additionally, a literature review of the current management approaches to treat IDs and persistent postoperative CSF leaks following lumbar spine surgeries was performed.
Results
We looked at 1133 patients that underwent posterior thoracolumbar spine surgery. There was intraoperative evidence of ID in 116 cases. Based on our cohort and the current literature, we developed a progressive treatment algorithm for IDs that begins with a primary repair, which can be bolstered by dural sealants or a muscle patch. If this fails, the primary repair can be followed by a paraspinal muscle flap, as well as a lumbar drain. If the patient cannot be weaned from temporary CSF diversion, the final step in controlling postoperative leak is longterm CSF diversion via a lumboperitoneal shunt. In our experience, these shunts can be weaned once the patient has no further clinical or radiographic signs of CSF leak.
Conclusions
There is no standardized management approach of IDs and CSF leaks in the literature. This article intends to provide a progressive treatment algorithm and contribute to the development process of a treatment consensus.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>36426799</pmid><doi>10.1177/21925682221141368</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4172-8842</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5201-6720</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2192-5682 |
ispartof | Global spine journal, 2024-05, Vol.14 (4), p.1316-1327 |
issn | 2192-5682 2192-5690 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11289568 |
source | SAGE Open Access; Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed |
subjects | Algorithms Back surgery Original |
title | Incidental Durotomy Repair in Lumbar Spine Surgery: Institutional Experience and Review of Literature |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T01%3A39%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Incidental%20Durotomy%20Repair%20in%20Lumbar%20Spine%20Surgery:%20Institutional%20Experience%20and%20Review%20of%20Literature&rft.jtitle=Global%20spine%20journal&rft.au=Albayar,%20Ahmed&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1316&rft.epage=1327&rft.pages=1316-1327&rft.issn=2192-5682&rft.eissn=2192-5690&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/21925682221141368&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2740511663%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-7dcf9def4b8abcf22115a4344d8323ddecea8a28912370d89ae1a33f30d181e83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3050107640&rft_id=info:pmid/36426799&rft_sage_id=10.1177_21925682221141368&rfr_iscdi=true |