Loading…

Incidental Durotomy Repair in Lumbar Spine Surgery: Institutional Experience and Review of Literature

Study Design : Retrospective Chart Review. Objectives Incidental durotomies (IDs) are common spine surgery complications. In this study, we present a review on the most commonly utilized management strategies, report our institutional experience with case examples, and describe a stepwise management...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Global spine journal 2024-05, Vol.14 (4), p.1316-1327
Main Authors: Albayar, Ahmed, Spadola, Michael, Blue, Rachel, Saylany, Anissa, Dagli, Mert Marcel, Santangelo, Gabrielle, Wathen, Connor, Ghenbot, Yohannes, Macaluso, Dominick, Ali, Zarina S., Ozturk, Ali K., Welch, William C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-7dcf9def4b8abcf22115a4344d8323ddecea8a28912370d89ae1a33f30d181e83
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-7dcf9def4b8abcf22115a4344d8323ddecea8a28912370d89ae1a33f30d181e83
container_end_page 1327
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1316
container_title Global spine journal
container_volume 14
creator Albayar, Ahmed
Spadola, Michael
Blue, Rachel
Saylany, Anissa
Dagli, Mert Marcel
Santangelo, Gabrielle
Wathen, Connor
Ghenbot, Yohannes
Macaluso, Dominick
Ali, Zarina S.
Ozturk, Ali K.
Welch, William C.
description Study Design : Retrospective Chart Review. Objectives Incidental durotomies (IDs) are common spine surgery complications. In this study, we present a review on the most commonly utilized management strategies, report our institutional experience with case examples, and describe a stepwise management algorithm. Methods A retrospective review was performed of the electronic medical records of all patients who underwent a thoracolumbar or lumbar spine surgery between March 2017 and September 2019. Additionally, a literature review of the current management approaches to treat IDs and persistent postoperative CSF leaks following lumbar spine surgeries was performed. Results We looked at 1133 patients that underwent posterior thoracolumbar spine surgery. There was intraoperative evidence of ID in 116 cases. Based on our cohort and the current literature, we developed a progressive treatment algorithm for IDs that begins with a primary repair, which can be bolstered by dural sealants or a muscle patch. If this fails, the primary repair can be followed by a paraspinal muscle flap, as well as a lumbar drain. If the patient cannot be weaned from temporary CSF diversion, the final step in controlling postoperative leak is longterm CSF diversion via a lumboperitoneal shunt. In our experience, these shunts can be weaned once the patient has no further clinical or radiographic signs of CSF leak. Conclusions There is no standardized management approach of IDs and CSF leaks in the literature. This article intends to provide a progressive treatment algorithm and contribute to the development process of a treatment consensus.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/21925682221141368
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11289568</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_21925682221141368</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2740511663</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-7dcf9def4b8abcf22115a4344d8323ddecea8a28912370d89ae1a33f30d181e83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV9vFCEUxYnRtE3tB-iLIfHFl61cmGEYX4ypVTfZpInVZ8IOd1aaGRiBad1vL5ut67-UFwj8zrmcewk5B3YB0DSvObS8lopzDlCBkOoJOdndLWrZsqeHs-LH5CylW1aW5I0AfkSOhay4bNr2hODSd86iz2ag7-cYchi39DNOxkXqPF3N49pEejM5j_RmjhuM2zd06VN2ec4u-CK7-jFhdOg7pMbbIr5zeE9DT1cuYzR5jvicPOvNkPDsYT8lXz9cfbn8tFhdf1xevlstuko2edHYrm8t9tVamXXX75LVphJVZZXgwlrs0CjDVQtcNMyq1iAYIXrBLChAJU7J273vNK9HtF3JFc2gp-hGE7c6GKf_fvHum96EOw1QXEuzisOrB4cYvs-Ysh5d6nAYjMcwJ82bitUAUoqCvvwHvQ1zLB1JWrCaAWtkxQoFe6qLIaWI_eE3wPRukPq_QRbNiz9jHBS_xlaAiz2QzAZ_l33c8SftkabH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3050107640</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Incidental Durotomy Repair in Lumbar Spine Surgery: Institutional Experience and Review of Literature</title><source>SAGE Open Access</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed</source><creator>Albayar, Ahmed ; Spadola, Michael ; Blue, Rachel ; Saylany, Anissa ; Dagli, Mert Marcel ; Santangelo, Gabrielle ; Wathen, Connor ; Ghenbot, Yohannes ; Macaluso, Dominick ; Ali, Zarina S. ; Ozturk, Ali K. ; Welch, William C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Albayar, Ahmed ; Spadola, Michael ; Blue, Rachel ; Saylany, Anissa ; Dagli, Mert Marcel ; Santangelo, Gabrielle ; Wathen, Connor ; Ghenbot, Yohannes ; Macaluso, Dominick ; Ali, Zarina S. ; Ozturk, Ali K. ; Welch, William C.</creatorcontrib><description>Study Design : Retrospective Chart Review. Objectives Incidental durotomies (IDs) are common spine surgery complications. In this study, we present a review on the most commonly utilized management strategies, report our institutional experience with case examples, and describe a stepwise management algorithm. Methods A retrospective review was performed of the electronic medical records of all patients who underwent a thoracolumbar or lumbar spine surgery between March 2017 and September 2019. Additionally, a literature review of the current management approaches to treat IDs and persistent postoperative CSF leaks following lumbar spine surgeries was performed. Results We looked at 1133 patients that underwent posterior thoracolumbar spine surgery. There was intraoperative evidence of ID in 116 cases. Based on our cohort and the current literature, we developed a progressive treatment algorithm for IDs that begins with a primary repair, which can be bolstered by dural sealants or a muscle patch. If this fails, the primary repair can be followed by a paraspinal muscle flap, as well as a lumbar drain. If the patient cannot be weaned from temporary CSF diversion, the final step in controlling postoperative leak is longterm CSF diversion via a lumboperitoneal shunt. In our experience, these shunts can be weaned once the patient has no further clinical or radiographic signs of CSF leak. Conclusions There is no standardized management approach of IDs and CSF leaks in the literature. This article intends to provide a progressive treatment algorithm and contribute to the development process of a treatment consensus.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2192-5682</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2192-5690</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/21925682221141368</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36426799</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Back surgery ; Original</subject><ispartof>Global spine journal, 2024-05, Vol.14 (4), p.1316-1327</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – No Derivatives License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022 2022 AO Spine, unless otherwise noted. Manuscript content on this site is licensed under Creative Commons Licenses</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-7dcf9def4b8abcf22115a4344d8323ddecea8a28912370d89ae1a33f30d181e83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-7dcf9def4b8abcf22115a4344d8323ddecea8a28912370d89ae1a33f30d181e83</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4172-8842 ; 0000-0002-5201-6720</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11289568/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3050107640?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,21945,25731,27830,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,44921,45309,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36426799$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Albayar, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spadola, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blue, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saylany, Anissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dagli, Mert Marcel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santangelo, Gabrielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wathen, Connor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghenbot, Yohannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macaluso, Dominick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali, Zarina S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozturk, Ali K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welch, William C.</creatorcontrib><title>Incidental Durotomy Repair in Lumbar Spine Surgery: Institutional Experience and Review of Literature</title><title>Global spine journal</title><addtitle>Global Spine J</addtitle><description>Study Design : Retrospective Chart Review. Objectives Incidental durotomies (IDs) are common spine surgery complications. In this study, we present a review on the most commonly utilized management strategies, report our institutional experience with case examples, and describe a stepwise management algorithm. Methods A retrospective review was performed of the electronic medical records of all patients who underwent a thoracolumbar or lumbar spine surgery between March 2017 and September 2019. Additionally, a literature review of the current management approaches to treat IDs and persistent postoperative CSF leaks following lumbar spine surgeries was performed. Results We looked at 1133 patients that underwent posterior thoracolumbar spine surgery. There was intraoperative evidence of ID in 116 cases. Based on our cohort and the current literature, we developed a progressive treatment algorithm for IDs that begins with a primary repair, which can be bolstered by dural sealants or a muscle patch. If this fails, the primary repair can be followed by a paraspinal muscle flap, as well as a lumbar drain. If the patient cannot be weaned from temporary CSF diversion, the final step in controlling postoperative leak is longterm CSF diversion via a lumboperitoneal shunt. In our experience, these shunts can be weaned once the patient has no further clinical or radiographic signs of CSF leak. Conclusions There is no standardized management approach of IDs and CSF leaks in the literature. This article intends to provide a progressive treatment algorithm and contribute to the development process of a treatment consensus.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Back surgery</subject><subject>Original</subject><issn>2192-5682</issn><issn>2192-5690</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV9vFCEUxYnRtE3tB-iLIfHFl61cmGEYX4ypVTfZpInVZ8IOd1aaGRiBad1vL5ut67-UFwj8zrmcewk5B3YB0DSvObS8lopzDlCBkOoJOdndLWrZsqeHs-LH5CylW1aW5I0AfkSOhay4bNr2hODSd86iz2ag7-cYchi39DNOxkXqPF3N49pEejM5j_RmjhuM2zd06VN2ec4u-CK7-jFhdOg7pMbbIr5zeE9DT1cuYzR5jvicPOvNkPDsYT8lXz9cfbn8tFhdf1xevlstuko2edHYrm8t9tVamXXX75LVphJVZZXgwlrs0CjDVQtcNMyq1iAYIXrBLChAJU7J273vNK9HtF3JFc2gp-hGE7c6GKf_fvHum96EOw1QXEuzisOrB4cYvs-Ysh5d6nAYjMcwJ82bitUAUoqCvvwHvQ1zLB1JWrCaAWtkxQoFe6qLIaWI_eE3wPRukPq_QRbNiz9jHBS_xlaAiz2QzAZ_l33c8SftkabH</recordid><startdate>20240501</startdate><enddate>20240501</enddate><creator>Albayar, Ahmed</creator><creator>Spadola, Michael</creator><creator>Blue, Rachel</creator><creator>Saylany, Anissa</creator><creator>Dagli, Mert Marcel</creator><creator>Santangelo, Gabrielle</creator><creator>Wathen, Connor</creator><creator>Ghenbot, Yohannes</creator><creator>Macaluso, Dominick</creator><creator>Ali, Zarina S.</creator><creator>Ozturk, Ali K.</creator><creator>Welch, William C.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4172-8842</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5201-6720</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240501</creationdate><title>Incidental Durotomy Repair in Lumbar Spine Surgery: Institutional Experience and Review of Literature</title><author>Albayar, Ahmed ; Spadola, Michael ; Blue, Rachel ; Saylany, Anissa ; Dagli, Mert Marcel ; Santangelo, Gabrielle ; Wathen, Connor ; Ghenbot, Yohannes ; Macaluso, Dominick ; Ali, Zarina S. ; Ozturk, Ali K. ; Welch, William C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-7dcf9def4b8abcf22115a4344d8323ddecea8a28912370d89ae1a33f30d181e83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Back surgery</topic><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Albayar, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spadola, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blue, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saylany, Anissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dagli, Mert Marcel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santangelo, Gabrielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wathen, Connor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghenbot, Yohannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macaluso, Dominick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali, Zarina S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozturk, Ali K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welch, William C.</creatorcontrib><collection>SAGE Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Global spine journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Albayar, Ahmed</au><au>Spadola, Michael</au><au>Blue, Rachel</au><au>Saylany, Anissa</au><au>Dagli, Mert Marcel</au><au>Santangelo, Gabrielle</au><au>Wathen, Connor</au><au>Ghenbot, Yohannes</au><au>Macaluso, Dominick</au><au>Ali, Zarina S.</au><au>Ozturk, Ali K.</au><au>Welch, William C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Incidental Durotomy Repair in Lumbar Spine Surgery: Institutional Experience and Review of Literature</atitle><jtitle>Global spine journal</jtitle><addtitle>Global Spine J</addtitle><date>2024-05-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1316</spage><epage>1327</epage><pages>1316-1327</pages><issn>2192-5682</issn><eissn>2192-5690</eissn><abstract>Study Design : Retrospective Chart Review. Objectives Incidental durotomies (IDs) are common spine surgery complications. In this study, we present a review on the most commonly utilized management strategies, report our institutional experience with case examples, and describe a stepwise management algorithm. Methods A retrospective review was performed of the electronic medical records of all patients who underwent a thoracolumbar or lumbar spine surgery between March 2017 and September 2019. Additionally, a literature review of the current management approaches to treat IDs and persistent postoperative CSF leaks following lumbar spine surgeries was performed. Results We looked at 1133 patients that underwent posterior thoracolumbar spine surgery. There was intraoperative evidence of ID in 116 cases. Based on our cohort and the current literature, we developed a progressive treatment algorithm for IDs that begins with a primary repair, which can be bolstered by dural sealants or a muscle patch. If this fails, the primary repair can be followed by a paraspinal muscle flap, as well as a lumbar drain. If the patient cannot be weaned from temporary CSF diversion, the final step in controlling postoperative leak is longterm CSF diversion via a lumboperitoneal shunt. In our experience, these shunts can be weaned once the patient has no further clinical or radiographic signs of CSF leak. Conclusions There is no standardized management approach of IDs and CSF leaks in the literature. This article intends to provide a progressive treatment algorithm and contribute to the development process of a treatment consensus.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>36426799</pmid><doi>10.1177/21925682221141368</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4172-8842</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5201-6720</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2192-5682
ispartof Global spine journal, 2024-05, Vol.14 (4), p.1316-1327
issn 2192-5682
2192-5690
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11289568
source SAGE Open Access; Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed
subjects Algorithms
Back surgery
Original
title Incidental Durotomy Repair in Lumbar Spine Surgery: Institutional Experience and Review of Literature
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T01%3A39%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Incidental%20Durotomy%20Repair%20in%20Lumbar%20Spine%20Surgery:%20Institutional%20Experience%20and%20Review%20of%20Literature&rft.jtitle=Global%20spine%20journal&rft.au=Albayar,%20Ahmed&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1316&rft.epage=1327&rft.pages=1316-1327&rft.issn=2192-5682&rft.eissn=2192-5690&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/21925682221141368&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2740511663%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-7dcf9def4b8abcf22115a4344d8323ddecea8a28912370d89ae1a33f30d181e83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3050107640&rft_id=info:pmid/36426799&rft_sage_id=10.1177_21925682221141368&rfr_iscdi=true