Loading…
Economic analysis of the robotic approach to inguinal hernia versus laparoscopic: is it sustainable for the healthcare system?
Introduction There has been a rapid proliferation of the robotic approach to inguinal hernia, mainly in the United States, as it has shown similar outcomes to the laparoscopic approach but with a significant increase in associated costs. Our objective is to conduct a cost analysis in our setting (Sp...
Saved in:
Published in: | Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery 2024-08, Vol.28 (4), p.1205-1214 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Introduction
There has been a rapid proliferation of the robotic approach to inguinal hernia, mainly in the United States, as it has shown similar outcomes to the laparoscopic approach but with a significant increase in associated costs. Our objective is to conduct a cost analysis in our setting (Spanish National Health System).
Materials and methods
A retrospective single-center comparative study on inguinal hernia repair using a robotic approach versus laparoscopic approach.
Results
A total of 98 patients who underwent either robotic or laparoscopic TAPP inguinal hernia repair between October 2021 and July 2023 were analyzed. Out of these 98 patients, 20 (20.4%) were treated with the robotic approach, while 78 (79.6%) underwent the laparoscopic approach. When comparing both approaches, no significant differences were found in terms of complications, recurrences, or readmissions. However, the robotic group exhibited a longer surgical time (86 ± 33.07 min vs. 40 ± 14.46 min,
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1248-9204 1265-4906 1248-9204 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10029-024-03006-y |