Loading…

Economic analysis of the robotic approach to inguinal hernia versus laparoscopic: is it sustainable for the healthcare system?

Introduction There has been a rapid proliferation of the robotic approach to inguinal hernia, mainly in the United States, as it has shown similar outcomes to the laparoscopic approach but with a significant increase in associated costs. Our objective is to conduct a cost analysis in our setting (Sp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery 2024-08, Vol.28 (4), p.1205-1214
Main Authors: Hinojosa-Ramirez, F., Tallon-Aguilar, L., Tinoco-Gonzalez, J., Sanchez-Arteaga, A., Aguilar-Del Castillo, F., Alarcon-Del Agua, I., Morales-Conde, S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Introduction There has been a rapid proliferation of the robotic approach to inguinal hernia, mainly in the United States, as it has shown similar outcomes to the laparoscopic approach but with a significant increase in associated costs. Our objective is to conduct a cost analysis in our setting (Spanish National Health System). Materials and methods A retrospective single-center comparative study on inguinal hernia repair using a robotic approach versus laparoscopic approach. Results A total of 98 patients who underwent either robotic or laparoscopic TAPP inguinal hernia repair between October 2021 and July 2023 were analyzed. Out of these 98 patients, 20 (20.4%) were treated with the robotic approach, while 78 (79.6%) underwent the laparoscopic approach. When comparing both approaches, no significant differences were found in terms of complications, recurrences, or readmissions. However, the robotic group exhibited a longer surgical time (86 ± 33.07 min vs. 40 ± 14.46 min, p  
ISSN:1248-9204
1265-4906
1248-9204
DOI:10.1007/s10029-024-03006-y