Analysis of Treatment Strategies and Outcomes in Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma: Insights From a Multi-Center Study

• Published in: Annals of surgical oncology 2024-09, Vol.31 (9), p.6228-6236
• Main Authors: Yaşar, Serkan, Yılmaz, Feride, Utkan, Güngör, Algın, Efnan, Bayram, Doğan, Tamam, Selim, Öksüzoğlu, Ömür Berna Çakmak, İlhan, Ayşegül, Erdat, Efe Cem, Ünal, Ali Ekrem, Yalçın, Şuayib
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use; Asbestos; Chemotherapy; Combined Modality Therapy; Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy; Life span; Lung Neoplasms - mortality; Lung Neoplasms - pathology; Lung Neoplasms - therapy; Male; Medical prognosis; Medical records; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Mesothelioma; Mesothelioma, Malignant - pathology; Mesothelioma, Malignant - therapy; Metastases; Metastasis; Middle Aged; Morbidity; Oncology; Patients; Peritoneal Neoplasms - mortality; Peritoneal Neoplasms - secondary; Peritoneal Neoplasms - therapy; Peritoneal Surface Malignancy; Peritoneum; Population studies; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies; Surgery; Surgical Oncology; Survival; Survival Rate
• ISSN: 1068-9265; 1534-4681; 1534-4681
• DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15506-3

Background This study aimed to evaluate the demographic,” clinicopathologic, and prognostic characteristics of malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPeM), as well as the treatment options for the rare and heterogeneous MPeM population. Methods A retrospective multi-center observational cohort study was conducted to evaluate patients with MPeM. Due to the heterogeneity of the study population, the study divided them into two main groups in terms of treatments, follow-up periods, and prognostic features. The first group comprised the patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), and the second group included the patients with metastatic disease for whom curative intent surgery was not possible. The patients’ diagnostic procedures and treatments were identified from medical records. Patients older than 18 years old were included in the study regardless of asbestos exposure. Well-differentiated papillary and multicystic mesothelioma histologic types were not included in the study. Results The study evaluated 118 patients from five centers. Survival times, prognosis, and treatment responses were analyzed in both groups. The study showed that CRS-HIPEC was associated with longer overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Perioperative therapy was evaluated in subgroup analyses of this population and shown to provide survival benefits. The patients treated with chemotherapy (metastatic and medically inoperable patients and those for whom complete cytoreduction was not achievable) had a poorer prognosis than the surgery group. The study showed that life expectancy decreased significantly for the patients not suitable to undergo surgery for any reason. Conclusions According to data from experienced centers, CRS-HIPEC is a treatment option recognized as effective, cost-effective, and safe, with better OS and PFS , as well as low morbidity and mortality rates similar to those in the literature. In addition, the platinum-pemetrexed combination continues to be an effective and acceptable treatment option for metastatic patients, those who are medically inoperable, and those for whom complete or near-complete cytoreduction is not achievable.