Unringing the bell: Successful debriefing following a rich false memory study

• Published in: Memory & cognition 2024-07, Vol.52 (5), p.1079-1092
• Main Authors: Greene, Ciara M., Ryan, Katie M., Ballantyne, Lisa, Barrett, Elizabeth, Cowman, Conor S., Dawson, Caroline A., Huston, Charlotte, Maher, Julie, Murphy, Gillian
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Behavioral Science and Psychology; Cognitive Psychology; False information; Families & family life; Female; Humans; Interviews; Male; Memory, Episodic; Mental Recall - physiology; Metacognition; Psychology; Repression, Psychology; Researchers; Young Adult
• ISSN: 0090-502X; 1532-5946; 1532-5946
• DOI: 10.3758/s13421-024-01524-9

In rich false memory studies, familial informants often provide information to support researchers in planting vivid memories of events that never occurred. The goal of the current study was to assess how effectively we can retract these false memories via debriefing – i.e., to what extent can we put participants back the way we found them? We aimed to establish (1) what proportion of participants would retain a false memory or false belief following debriefing, and (2) whether richer, more detailed memories would be more difficult to retract. Participants ( N = 123) completed a false memory implantation protocol as part of a replication of the “Lost in the Mall” study (Loftus & Pickrell, Psychiatric Annals , 25 , 720-725, 1995 ). By the end of the protocol, 14% of participants self-reported a memory for the fabricated event, and a further 52% believed it had happened. Participants were then fully debriefed, and memory and belief for the false event were assessed again. In a follow-up assessment 3 days post-debriefing, the false memory rate had dropped to 6% and false belief rates also fell precipitously to 7%. Moreover, virtually all persistent false memories were found to be nonbelieved memories, where participants no longer accepted that the fabricated event had occurred. Richer, more detailed memories were more resistant to correction, but were still mostly retracted. This study provides evidence that participants can be “dehoaxed”, and even very convincing false memories can be retracted.